How do resource smoothing and resource leveling differ from each other?
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
The accompanying diagram, sourced from the APM Body of Knowledge, provides a comparison between the two approaches.
Resource levelling and smoothing options (APM, 2019, p. 179)
ยฉ Association for Project Management (APM) (2019) APM Body of Knowledge (7th edn), Princes Risborough: APM.
At a more significant level of impact, certain projects undergo more than just rescheduling or resource allocation adjustments. They may undergo a reevaluation of their project scope by the project sponsor. This involves a broader analysis of the entire project and requires reconsideration of how time, cost, and quality interact within the project.
A prime example is the review of large-scale infrastructure projects like railways. Such projects often undergo rescaling due to increased costs, resulting in significant deviations from the original plans. The consequences of these revisions can affect the client and a wider range of stakeholders and may even result in the loss of subsequent work opportunities (Kerzner, 2009, p. 529).
Now, let’s consider MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event that you have been following in the course videos thus far. When examining the provided figure, do you think it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario?
Share your thoughts and join the discussion below.
ยฉ The Open University
Considering MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, resource levelling feasible and beneficial. This is directly proportional to how flexible the project timeline is. Through proper planning, cost can be well controlled and at the same time, extension of time in project execution can sometimes be easily accommodated that cost increase. Hence, resource smoothing and resource levelling approaches is key.
With the given scenario that happened with Glasgow, one of MTD’s clients, I would say that the best approach to remedy the situation would be to reschedule deadlines, which is Resource Leveling approach.
It will be easier to request & renegotiate for more time from your client than ask for more resources because that will be inconveniencing for them as an organisation. Financial expenditures come with planning & budgeting.
However, both resource leveling & resource smoothing approaches would have been proffered as available options, so that the client can also weigh their choices, & decide which one they prefer
I am of the opinion that the MTD project will work more effectively if the project manager and the team will leverage on the reality of resource levelling. By this, all non-critical activities within their available float will be delayed while non-critical activity durations within the available float will be extended.
Improved Organizational Performance
Optimized Resource Utilization: By ensuring that resources are utilized efficiently, organizations can maximize their return on investment.
Enhanced Organizational Agility: A flexible and adaptable workforce is better equipped to respond to changing business needs and market demands.
Improved Employee Morale and Retention: By reducing stress and burnout, organizations can improve employee satisfaction and retention.
Implementing resource smoothing will be a more approachable method for MTDโs temporary water installations at a major event like Glasgow, but it would depend on the flexibility of both the event schedule and resource availability
Events require strict timing and fixed deadlines and as such,I think Resource Smoothing would work best for MTD and Glasgow event though it can attract extra cost because they may likely extend the work hours or add more personnel to finish up.
Resource levelling could be applied to certain non-critical (time-fixed) tasks in the Glasgow event project, particularly during the early phases. However, it requires a careful balance to avoid delays impacting the overall timeline. MTD should conduct a thorough resource allocation review, identify tasks with flexible scheduling, ensure levelling does not affect the critical path or disrupt event-day operations.
This approach could optimize resource use while maintaining the event’s success.
Resource leveling does not change the capacity of the project and may not impact costs much. IN the water project being managed by MTD, i believe it is very feasible with proper information and feedback to and from relevant stakeholders.
I think implementing resource levelling approach in the MTD senario would be feasible because it does not change the current capacity of the project
For MTD, resources smoothing will be more effective in this case so as to meet project schedule, timeline and delivery on time.
MDT should adopt resource smoothing to meet project timelines, despite potential cost increases and timeline extensions. Customer satisfaction and quality service delivery will yield lasting benefits.”
– “To deliver projects on time, MDT should implement resource smoothing. While this may increase costs and timelines, customer satisfaction will drive long-term value.”
Considering MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, I believe that resource levelling could be feasible and can provide notable benefits, but the success may depend on how flexible the project timeline is. But, I believe that success could be achieved with proper planning.
For MTD Glass gow events,Resource levelling will be effective to retain current capacity ,deadline and there might be a slight increase in cost.
There is actually more that the MTD project can do with the issue of resource overload. This can be settled with resource smoothing. It can be through the addition of new resource such as new members or material or addition of overtime for the staff but adequate remuneration can be provided for team members involved in this overtime as a means of cushioning the effect on them. The cost of this smoothing should also be put into serious consideration.
I think resource smoothing will be more effective when it comes to MTD and the glasglow event because of the fixed deadlines that should be met
In this case, resource levelling is the best approach, the project costs may be slightly increased but the deadline will be preserved.
For MTDโs Glasgow event, a resource leveling approach could help manage constraints by balancing resource demands, preventing overload, and avoiding extra costs. By redistributing tasks, MTD can maintain quality and reduce the need for additional staff or overtime.
However, if the client has strict deadlines or little flexibility, resource leveling alone may not be enough, and a broader scope revision might be required.
I think resource smoothing will be a more appropriate approach because MTD is a water installation events company which means they provide temporary water sources during events and the dates of these events are not determined by them so it is almost impossible for them to extend the project end date which makes resource leveling not a viable option for them.
Applying resource leveling to MTDโs temporary water installations at a major event like Glasgow could be effective, but it would depend on the flexibility of both the event schedule and resource availability. Resource leveling, which balances resources to avoid overloading and inefficiency, could potentially smooth out peaks and ensure steady availability of equipment and staff.
The deadlines for a high-profile event are strict, so the challenge would be to align resource adjustments without impacting the event timeline. Resource leveling might help MTD avoid last-minute rushes and resource bottlenecks, leading to smoother operations and cost savings.
However, because these projects often involve unexpected variables (weather, site conditions), a contingency buffer might be necessary to handle sudden demands that leveling alone cannot address. The key would be to use resource leveling strategically, without sacrificing the quality or timeliness critical for a successful event setup
Resource levelling option is not applicable in the case of MTD and the Glasgow event because event dates are fixed. Rather, resource smoothing option is the best in this case so as to meet deadlines.
In this scenario, Resource Levelling will not be feasible, because it will delay Project deadline. So, Resource Smoothing will be feasible to use, because it focuses on preserving planned deadline.
Yes, I believe resource levelling can be applied here.
There was a conflict of information which would have caused some miscalculations. There would have been a delay but they were able to get everything right and done. This on the other hand would have led to increase in costs.
Resource levelling was best done
Resource levelling can be applied to any project that lacks enough resources. This occurs when there are many projects competing for the available resources, and when there is scarcity.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
believe that resource leveling can be applied to any project where resources are limited and there is a need to optimize their utilization. It is particularly useful when:
* There are multiple projects competing for the same resources.
* Resources are expensive or scarce.
* There are constraints on resource availability.
When you evaluate your project resources, then you can apply what is best for the situatioon.
I believe that resource leveling can be applied to any project where resources are limited and there is a need to optimize their utilization. It is particularly useful when:
* There are multiple projects competing for the same resources.
* Resources are expensive or scarce.
* There are constraints on resource availability.
When you evaluate your project resources, then you can apply what is best for the situatioon.
From the lesson, I learnt that the following strategies were used by Mr. Wootten in managing quality, resources and conflict.
At Glasgow, MTD struggled with the amount of venue and stakeholders involved. The size of the connection required at the venue was a particular source of conflict and any disruption that was going to be caused while the event was going on.
To address this conflict, communication was established with the technical department at the venue, the organizers and Scottish water to enable the company to have the size of connection they needed for the capacity of water that was going to be used during the event. R3egular meetings locally within the venues with all the stakeholders: power, water, venue and organizer. Of course, this meant that extra resources were needed.
With good communication and stakeholder management, a solution was reached, and the conflicts were resolved.
Conflicts and its potential sources
In many cases that I am aware of, conflict usually arise within the project team itself, as many people are brought together from different background and with different experiences to execute a project.
It is the responsibility of the Project Manager to adopt the right strategies in dealing with these conflicts when, not if, they occur.
No. Moving the water installations completion date would have a wider negative impact on the organizer Glasgow event.
Resource levelling option is not applicable in the case of MTD and the Glasgow event because event dates are fixed. Rather, resource smoothing option is the best in this case so as to meet deadlines.
USing resource leveling will not work for the MTD project because it has a deadline to meet, rather resources will need to be added which will make the budget to be adjusted in order to meet deadline
Resource levelling may not be feasible for MTD project in their events in cases of Coordination Complexity: In water installation, many tasks depend on the availability of both specialized equipment and skilled labor. With fixed dependencies, resources must be precisely aligned to complete interdependent tasks. Resource leveling might necessitate juggling the availability of critical resources in a narrow timeframe, increasing complexity and risk of misalignment.
Resource levelling will not be feasible for MTD project because their events are fixed and resource levelling will involve reschedule of date.
It will be difficult to apply resource levelling method to the MTD and Glasgow projects, seeing that most of their events are fixed and the idea of moving the scheduled end date will be seemingly impossible.
For MTD company, I believe that resource levelling in projects is a technique that involves resolving overallocation or scheduling conflicts to ensure a project can be completed with the available resources. Resources include the time, materials, or tools needed to complete a project.
Although the manager in some of the videos I watched explained some of their challenges as one that can lead to contingencies not budgeted in the overall cost & resources for the project. This at times, may lead to their client to release extra funds for purchase of new resources needed as an emergency to accomplish the project goals and objectives.
Implementing resource leveling for MTDโs water installation at the Glasgow event isnโt feasible, as it would require shifting the project deadlineโwhich is already set by the event schedule. Instead, a resource smoothing approach would be more suitable. By adding resources, we can stay on track to meet the fixed deadline, even if it means adjusting the budget slightly. This way, we keep the project on schedule without impacting the overall timeline.
Resource levelling ยทdoes not change the current capacity but focuses on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
considering the MTD water installation events company and Glasgow event it will not be feasible to implement resources levelling approach because it will delay the project deadline
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource leveling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
Considering the above information, it will not be feasible to implement on the MTD and Gaslow projects as both projects are time-based, and using resource leveling will increase the cost on the project due to rescheduling.
It will be difficult to apply resource levelling method to the MTD and Glasgow projects, seeing that most of their events are fixed and the idea of moving the scheduled end date will be seemingly impossible.
In MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, it would not be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario. This is because the deadline isn’t just for MTD but also for Glasgow event, therefore it can’t be changed. Instead, resource smoothing can be applied in this scenario whereby there would be increase in cost and change of budget to hasten the project in order to still meet up with the deadline and end project successfully.
Events that require urgency like in the case of the MTD company and Glasgow can not implement the resource levelling or resource limited scheduling as they are time conscious and extending the time could incur loss of money.
Urgent events cannot utilize the resource leveling system, as exemplified by the MTD. However, implementing resource smoothing would be beneficial in such cases.
Iโll recommend resource smoothing for the following reasons:
1. Strict Time Constraints:
In urgent events like the MTD water company, and Glasgow company, meeting deadlines is the top priority. Resource leveling, which postpones tasks to balance resource allocation, can lead to delays, making it impractical for time-critical situations.
2. Need for Continuity:
Resource smoothing fine-tunes task schedules within available float without extending the projectโs overall duration, ensuring steady progress. This method is better suited for urgent events as it optimizes resource usage while adhering to strict deadlines.
Urgent events cannot utilize the resource leveling system, as exemplified by the MTD. However, implementing resource smoothing would be beneficial in such cases.
I’ll recommend resource smoothing for the following reasons:
1. Strict Time Constraints:
In urgent events like the MTD (Minimum Time Duration), meeting deadlines is the top priority. Resource leveling, which postpones tasks to balance resource allocation, can lead to delays, making it impractical for time-critical situations.
2. Need for Continuity:
Resource smoothing fine-tunes task schedules within available float without extending the projectโs overall duration, ensuring steady progress. This method is better suited for urgent events as it optimizes resource usage while adhering to strict deadlines.
I don’t think resource levelling will be the best option for MTD water company and Glasgow company. because it has to do with time frame. The projects are time frame and any further extension in the deadline of the project might affect the output of the delivery. Which might leads to lost of money and resources
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
From the two explanations above and considering MTD’s need at this time, implementing a resources levelling approach may not be feasible. Resources smoothing would be the best approach, though with an increase or additional cost to the project, the results would be achievable. MTD already have the capacity to deliver, all it takes is an holistic review of the resources to achieve and deliver without altering the deadlines.
Yes
Events that require urgency cannot adopt the resource leveling system.
MTD as a case study would require resources smoothing not resources leveling. Considering fixed deadlines with an immediately follow-up event. To avoid chaos allocation of more resources to enable a significant push to meet with the stakeholders initial time scheduled.
from the last video, where he spoke about one of their challenges being, that they are the first to arrive and last to leave, they don’t have enough time to consider resource levelling, resource smoothing will come in handy and he mentioned it when he said in Glasgow they had to bring another resource which increased their cost, but they just had to deliver.
Events that require urgency cannot adopt the resource leveling system and the MTD is an example of such cases. Resource smoothing on the other hand will be advantageous if implemented.
Resource smoothing would be the best approach for MDT to keep up with deadline and schedules on delivery of their project services.However ,this comes with increase cost ,and some times extension of time on the project.It is important that customers are happy and received quality service,the resultant chain reaction from customer ‘s satisfaction over time may compensate for additional costs incurred.
Resource levelling wouldn’t have been a good option for MTD Water company and Glasgow because it has to do with time frame. The event would have been greatly affected, and a whole lot of money and resources would have gone down with it. It couldn’t have in anyway be postponed or shifted.
As far I am concerned it is not feasible to implement the leveling approach in the context of MTD and the Glasgow event scenarios. That is simply because time is not a flexible constraint in these projects, a,d applying this approach would impact the duration of the procts completion and deadline. The smoothing approach however would be appropriate for these two projects to maintain the balance among the project constraints.
For me, I don’t think resource levelling will be the best approach at MTD and Glasgow company because of the nature of the project. These are projects that are time bound and any further extension in the deadline of the project might affect the output of the delivery.
Considering the MTD water installation event company and Gaslow event the resource levelling implementation would not be feasible in this scenario because it will affect the deadline of the project. This project is limited. The resource levelling focuses on reschuduling and any reschuduling done will automatically affect the project deadline which in turn affect the planned quality of what they are supposed to deliver.
Resource smoothing should be a better option because it focuses on preserving planned deadlines but it will increase the project cost which could be discussed with the client
No. Embarking on resource levelling would be a bad idea for MTD company. This is because, the planned project (event) can not be postponed or shifted simply because an invite had been sent to the people already, it would be disappointing or difficult to tell them not to come again.
Resource leveling is impossible because the event already has a fixed start date. Thus, resource smoothing, even with the effect of an increase in project cost, will be a preferable option.
Resource levelling will unlikely be feasible because it will have a great impact on the deadline of the project; ideally, resource smoothing will be effective when compared to resource levelling as it enables the a PM to still maintain the plan towards the project deadline.
Applying a resource leveling for MTD could lead to effective management of resources, improved efficiency, reduced cots, and enhance overall project quality. The key would be to analyze the specific resource requirements for each event and craft a flexible, yet structured approach that accommodates varying demands.
Sholanke Olamide
Cohort 19,team 9
David Akintade Cohort 19 Team 3
In evaluating whether MTD can implement resource levelling for the Glasgow event, several key considerations must be addressed:
1. Resource Availability: The first step is to assess current resource levels. If MTD has an excess of personnel or equipment in certain areas, these can be reallocated to critical tasks that are lagging. This approach ensures the workload is balanced without unnecessarily extending the project timeline.
2. Project Timeline: The effectiveness of resource levelling hinges on the project’s schedule flexibility. If deadlines are inflexible, redistributing resources may cause delays. However, if there is some flexibility, adjusting tasks based on resource availability could enhance overall efficiency.
3. Stakeholder Impact: Changes in resource allocation and timelines should be communicated transparently with all stakeholders. Involving clients and team members in the decision-making process can minimize any negative effects and encourage collective problem-solving.
4. Risk Management: Resource levelling introduces potential risks, such as delays in interconnected tasks. Identifying these risks early and developing contingency plans is crucial to ensure the project stays on track.
In conclusion, adopting a resource levelling approach for MTD is viable, provided the project timeline allows for some flexibility and a strong communication plan is in place. This method can optimize resources utilization while maintaining project quality.
Resource smoothing would be a bad idea for MTD, as it will tamper with planned deadlines.
while
Resource smoothing certainly is the best approach for MTD, as it helps them maintain a planned deadline even though its at an increased cost.
Njoku, Chidinma
Cohort 19 team 7
The best approach for MTD and Glasgow event is the Resource Smoothing, simply because it focuses on preserving planned deadline, work overtime, and increase the overall project cost.
Resource smoothing is the best suitable approach for MTD, as it helps them maintain a planned deadline even though its at an increased cost
Ogoke Nwachukwu Felicia O Cohort 18Team7
Resource smoothing is the best approach, being that the event has been fixed so the deadline has to be maintained
Resource leveling is wrong. Resource smoothing is better.
Levelling resources for MTDs Glassgow event may be a viable strategy if the project allows deadline to be flexible. choices to consider, includes resources available, implications for time, cost , quality, and resources available to avoid it being the wrong approach
Looking critically at the two scenario a resource leveling approach wonโt be suitable for MTD and the Glasgow event because it focuses more on rescheduling, while these events have fixed dates. The best approach for this organization is resource smoothing
A resource levelling approach in this case is not feasible because, resource levelling allows for rescheduling which may affect project deadlines.
Resource smoothing on the other hand will cost more resources and work over time and increase overall project cost, but projects will be completed within deadlines.
Since the events have specific dates they’re holding, projects also needs to be accomplished within deadlines. So the best approach for MTD and Glasgow event is the resource smoothing.
Resource levelling will be beneficial in the MTD water project because time required will help in better managing the resources
The best approach for both companies due to their specialty won’t be the best method in order to have a smooth delivery and a better customer’s satisfaction resource smooth approach is the best to apply.
A resource leveling approach won’t be suitable for MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event because it focuses more on rescheduling, while these events have fixed dates. The best approach for this organization is resource smoothing
Christopher Nkanta Cohort 18 Team 3
With MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event no is not possible to apply the resource levelling approach considering Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
The resource leveling approach will be the wrong approach when it comes to the MTD due to deadline and resources available.
Due to the possible impact on project deadline resource leveling integrates, adopting it to the MTD water installation in Glasgow is definitely a wrong turn.
Resource leveling may be a viable strategy for MTD’s Glasgow event, provided that the project allows for flexible deadlines. This approach aids in optimizing resource utilization and mitigating the risk of over-allocation. Nevertheless, given the time-sensitive nature of the event, any delays resulting from leveling could adversely affect the overall schedule. Therefore, the choice to implement this method must take into account resource availability, the critical path, and the potential implications for time, cost, and quality.
I think it would be challenging to apply a resource levelling approach to the MTD water installation event in Glasgow due to the fixed deadline and limited resources
In the case of MTD, I think rescheduling will be a better strategy as it will create room for adequate preparation and further enhance goal accomplishment.
The water installation events company and the Glasgow event are larger projects in which costs can increase, events can be rescheduled and the deadlines can change. So, sponsors have to reconsider the matter of time, cost and quality of the project.
I think that it would be possible to apply levelling approach because these are bigger projects in which things may appear differently from the original plans.
Making use of resource levelling approach on the MTD project can still play a great role because as a top organization additional time will allow them to do the project effectively and also make a reputation for quality even though it can still cost them an additional cost.
In the case of MTD, resource levelling would be counterproductive as it would disrupt the predetermined time expected to complete the project and would bring disappointment to on the side of the sponsor of the project.
however, resource smoothing approach would be more beneficial as it would help in delivering the project at the predetermined time by working overtime and also sourcing for external or alternative water supply to maintain the steadiness of the service while trying to fix the issue, the only factor it would affect is the cost that would definitely be increased.
Peter Benedict
Using the case study of MTD and Glasglow using the resource levelling
Will be beneficial because an additional time need to be added in order to achieve the goal and resources will be made available.
I think resource levelling will be beneficial in the MTD water project because the additional time required will aid in better managing the resources and ensure better delivery.
Using MTD and Glasglow event as case study, implementing resource leveling method would disrupt project deadline, thereby failing short of client’s expectations – it would be detrimental to the project and the management team. This is a predetermined output.
However, using resource smoothing method, would ensure that deadline is met by increasing cost through overtime, sourcing for external/alternative water supply while working to restore contaminated water line.
ALISON UMELO
cohort 17, team 2
In the instance of MTD and the Glasgow event, a resource levelling approach will be ineffective because the event date is predetermined and cannot be changed.
Rather, the resource smoothing technique such as using overtime will be relevant because it focusses on maintaining the project’s anticipated duration and deadline.
It will not be feasible to implement resource levelling in the Glasgow event because resource levelling involves shifting the scheduling of project activities within the available float (recall that FLOAT is a term used to describe how flexible a deadline is and what extent an activity can be rescheduled). Using overtime as one of the strategies in Resource smoothing can be encouraged to keep the project aligned with its schedule.
I also agree with you on this matter. Resource smoothing will be effective when compared to resource levelling as it enables one to still maintain the prescribed deadline
Based on the Glasgow event, and considering how important water is, to the end users, I think the application of smoothing approach will be the best, as it does not affect the planned end date of the project.
Considering the MTD water installation events company and the Glasgow event, I think applying a resource leveling approach could be challenging. Resource leveling involves rescheduling tasks to utilize existing resources more efficiently, without adding new resources or changing the project scope.
In the Glasgow event scenario, the tight deadline and fixed resources (e.g., venue, equipment, and staff) make it difficult to reschedule tasks without impacting the project timeline or quality. Additionally, the event’s complex logistics and interdependent tasks (setup, registration and installation) limit the flexibility for rescheduling.
However, if MTD identifies specific tasks or resources that can be adjusted without compromising the event’s overall quality or timeline, resource leveling might be applied to a limited extent. For instance, optimizing staff shifts or reallocating tasks among existing team members might be possible.
Applying a resource levelling approach to MTD’s water installation event with reference to the Glasgow event could be beneficial. Since resource leveling does not change the current capacity but focuses on rescheduling, there will be the consistency in resource utilization, resource allocation can be predicted enabling MTD to plan and allocate resources effectively thereby reducing any form of waste.
PAMELA OGECHI ANIBUKO. Cohort 17, team 2
I believe water is a very important in any household, community,workplace e.t.c. It is so important that people can pay and will be willing to pay twice the amount they used to pay just to get it. In my opinion,I believe resource leveling can be applied in MTD but will not be the best approach. I believe resource smoothing will be more beneficial to the company as time is a very important commodity as pertains to water availability.
LYDIA EHEBHO
Applying a resource leveling approach to MTDโs water installation events, particularly the Glasgow event, could indeed be beneficial. Resource leveling is a technique used to address resource over-allocation by adjusting the project schedule to ensure that resources are used efficiently and not overburdened.
Key Considerations for Resource Leveling
Identify Resource Constraints:
Personnel: Ensure that the team members are not over-allocated and have sufficient time to complete their tasks without burnout.
Equipment: Make sure that the necessary equipment for water installations is available when needed and not double-booked.
Adjust Project Schedule:
Flexible Deadlines: If possible, adjust deadlines to accommodate resource availability. This might mean extending the project timeline slightly to ensure quality work.
Task Rescheduling: Move tasks around to ensure that no single resource is over-allocated at any given time.
Prioritize Critical Tasks:
Critical Path Method (CPM): Use CPM to identify which tasks are critical and cannot be delayed without affecting the project completion date. Focus on leveling resources for these tasks first.
Monitor and Adjust:
Continuous Monitoring: Regularly check resource allocation and make adjustments as needed to address any new constraints or issues that arise.
Feedback Loop: Encourage team members to provide feedback on their workload and any potential issues with resource allocation.
Practical Steps for MTDโs Glasgow Event
Resource Allocation Plan: Create a detailed plan that outlines the allocation of personnel and equipment for each task.
Gantt Chart: Use a Gantt chart to visualize the project schedule and identify any potential resource conflicts.
Buffer Time: Include buffer time in the schedule to account for any unforeseen delays or issues.
By applying resource leveling, MTD can ensure that the Glasgow event runs smoothly, with all resources used efficiently and effectively. This approach can help prevent overwork, reduce stress, and ultimately lead to a higher quality outcome for the event
LYDIA EHEBHO
pilot
Sent by Copilot:
Applying a resource leveling approach to MTDโs water installation events, particularly the Glasgow event, could indeed be beneficial. Resource leveling is a technique used to address resource over-allocation by adjusting the project schedule to ensure that resources are used efficiently and not overburdened.
Key Considerations for Resource Leveling
Identify Resource Constraints:
Personnel: Ensure that the team members are not over-allocated and have sufficient time to complete their tasks without burnout.
Equipment: Make sure that the necessary equipment for water installations is available when needed and not double-booked.
Adjust Project Schedule:
Flexible Deadlines: If possible, adjust deadlines to accommodate resource availability. This might mean extending the project timeline slightly to ensure quality work.
Task Rescheduling: Move tasks around to ensure that no single resource is over-allocated at any given time.
Prioritize Critical Tasks:
Critical Path Method (CPM): Use CPM to identify which tasks are critical and cannot be delayed without affecting the project completion date. Focus on leveling resources for these tasks first.
Monitor and Adjust:
Continuous Monitoring: Regularly check resource allocation and make adjustments as needed to address any new constraints or issues that arise.
Feedback Loop: Encourage team members to provide feedback on their workload and any potential issues with resource allocation.
Practical Steps for MTDโs Glasgow Event
Resource Allocation Plan: Create a detailed plan that outlines the allocation of personnel and equipment for each task.
Gantt Chart: Use a Gantt chart to visualize the project schedule and identify any potential resource conflicts.
Buffer Time: Include buffer time in the schedule to account for any unforeseen delays or issues.
By applying resource leveling, MTD can ensure that the Glasgow event runs smoothly, with all resources used efficiently and effectively. This approach can help prevent overwork, reduce stress, and ultimately lead to a higher quality outcome for the event
In this case, MTD would be unable to resort to Resource Levelling, rather, Resource Smoothing would most likely be preferable, because the said event had already been scheduled by the organizers. All MTD does here is to manage the event.
Resource leveling is the practice of adjusting a project’s start and end dates to accommodate for limited resources. Resource smoothing, meanwhile, entails adjusting the project’s activities to ensure work is completed according to existing timelines
For MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, Resource smoothing is the strategy they could adopt because it focuses on preserving deadlines. Managing project for a large scale event requires that the project deadline be met irrespective of the risks or challenges faced in the process of executing it. Cost, floats and other budgeted resources might increase but it should not affect the project deadline as it could affect the sponsors event.
Based on the past experience, complexity of the project, the project scope and unpredicted environment, rescheduling resources within their available capacity will be a better option for MTD project.
This approach leverage on stable workload in order to avoid the risk of stress.
Resource leveling focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact/ extension on the project deadline. This would not be feasible to implement by MTD during the Glasgow event because, the deadline of the event cannot be changed or shifted.
Applying resource smoothing would be more advisable even if it meant increased additional project costs, as this would preserve the planned end date.
Resource leveling might be challenging to fully implement for MTDโs Glasgow event due to its fixed date. Unlike projects with flexible deadlines, rescheduling activities to match resource availability could be impractical.
However, resource smoothing could be beneficial. By adjusting start and finish dates within the eventโs timeframe, MTD can aim to balance the workload and prevent resource overloads. For example, if setup tasks can be slightly delayed without impacting the eventโs success, it could alleviate pressure on the team.
Ultimately, a combination of both approaches, tailored to the eventโs specific constraints, might be most effective.
Oku Blessing
Cohort 17
Team 8
Resource levelling involves a realignment/ balancing of the workload on resources with an extension of the deadline of the project. With this in mind, this is ill advised for the Glasgow event as they would want to adhere to the timelines they have. Resource smoothing would be a better option with preserving the planned duration, with additional cost implications. Should the costs be above budget, then this should be communicated to the client to see if the scope can be reviewed to meet the cost demands.
However, should they need to rely on resources levelling, MTD can split an activity into non- sequential pieces to free up the overload and also delay the non-critical activities as long as there’s room within the available floats. Throughout the adjustment process, they should be communicating and transparent with the client to ensure that they are on the same page.
If you want to get quality work done, it won’t be cheap and it will take time but if you want it fast, you won’t get quality.
Rowena Avoh
Cohort 17 Team 9
Resource Leveling and Smoothing for MTD.
Resource leveling might be challenging to apply fully to MTD’s Glasgow event. Unlike projects with flexible deadlines, the event has a fixed date. Rescheduling activities to match resource availability could be impractical.
However, resource smoothing could be beneficial. By adjusting start and finish dates within the event’s timeframe, MTD can aim to balance workload and prevent resource overloads. For instance, if setup tasks can be slightly delayed without impacting the event’s success, it could alleviate pressure on the team.
Finally, a combination of both approaches, considering the event’s specific constraints, might be most effective.
Resource Leveling and Smoothing for MTD
Resource leveling might be challenging to apply fully to MTD’s Glasgow event. Unlike projects with flexible deadlines, the event has a fixed date. Rescheduling activities to match resource availability could be impractical.
However, resource smoothing could be beneficial. By adjusting start and finish dates within the event’s timeframe, MTD can aim to balance workload and prevent resource overloads. For instance, if setup tasks can be slightly delayed without impacting the event’s success, it could alleviate pressure on the team.
Finally, a combination of both approaches, considering the event’s specific constraints, might be most effective.
I think it would not be feasible to apply a resource levelling approach as it will have an impact on the deadline of the project so much likely extra resources will likely be incorporated into the project so as to meet up with the client’s expectations (at extra costs).
NDIDI IFEDIBA NWOKEDI
COHORT 17, TEAM 5
Resource smoothing focuses on sustaining projected deadlines while raising project expenses, whereas resource levelling does not modify present capacity but instead focuses on rescheduling, which may affect project deadlines.
NDIDI IFEDIBA NWOKEDI, COHORT 17, TEAM 5
Quality should be focused on the customerโs needs.
– AGREE. The quality of a product should be customer-focused because if the customer is satisfied with it, it then means that high quality has been achieved.
Quality is focused internally.
– DISAGREE. When a product has quality, it should be evident both internally and externally, and not just internally.
Quality should be considered from the beginning of the project.
– AGREE. Yes, I completely agree. If a product is intended to have quality, it should be considered and implemented from the onset of the production to the end of the production.
The execution phase of a project is the most critical to achieve quality targets.
– DISAGREE. Quality targets should be achieved from the onset of the project to the end.
Quality issues should be discussed openly to find corrective actions.
– AGREE. Yes, quality issues should be openly discussed by the Project Manager and the stakeholders to attend to any area that needs correction or fixing.
Quality problems should be hidden from customers and possibly also managers.
– DISAGREE. Quality problems should not be hidden from managers. It should in fact be brought to the notice of managers and promptly addressed.
Also, if there is a quality problem and if the product has entered the market, it should be promptly recalled and corrected. That way, trust would be built between the project team and the customers.
People are keen on producing quality outputs.
-DISAGREE. Often, people just want the easy way out becaise it is faster. Creating quality takes more meticulous efforts and people don’t like stress.
Team members do not produce quality outputs without close supervision.
– AGREE. For quality to be achieved, there needs to be proper supervision during the project.
Resource levelling Versus Resource Smoothing
In the case of MTD water company, I believe resource smoothing is a more feasible approach, this is because MTD is working with a tight and fast approaching project deadline as observed in the scenario painted in the video.
Hence MTD event company, needs to look into an approach that doesn’t extend the project deadline but instead increase the cost either by increasing the resource capacity.
Ejiro Ogbon
Team 4, Cohort 17
Personally I think, for both MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, resource smoothing will be the better approach mainly because of the fixed dates of the projects
Let’s analyze the situation:
MTD, the water installation events company, is managing the Glasgow event. Considering the figure and descriptions, I think applying a resource levelling approach might be challenging for this project. Here’s why:
1. *Tight deadlines*: The event has fixed dates, and rescheduling might not be feasible.
2. *Limited resources*: MTD might have already allocated resources optimally, leaving little room for levelling.
3. *Complexity*: The event involves multiple stakeholders, and changes could impact the client and wider stakeholders.
However, if MTD identifies specific resource constraints or bottlenecks, they could attempt resource levelling by:
1. *Reallocating resources*: Shifting resources from non-critical tasks to critical ones.
2. *Rescheduling non-critical tasks*: Adjusting timelines for less important tasks to free up resources.
3. *Negotiating with stakeholders*: Collaborating with suppliers, contractors, or clients to adjust expectations or timelines.
But, if significant changes are required, a more comprehensive revision of the project scope, as mentioned in the text, might be necessary. This could involve:
1. *Reassessing priorities*: Evaluating what’s essential for the event’s success.
2. *Adjusting resources*: Adding or removing resources to meet revised priorities.
3. *Communicating changes*: Transparently sharing updates with stakeholders to manage expectations
So I think they should consider resource smoothing for the glassgow event.
Obongha, Bassey Ofem
Cohort 17
Team 7
Resources Levelling approach would be challenging for MTD Water Installation Company and Glasgow.
For me I will suggest Resources Smoothening is suitable for MTD Water Installation are temporary.
Resources Smoothening will allow the Project Manager to speed up the execution of the project to meet up with the required project completion time by adding new resources or working overtime.
For the Glasgow event, resource leveling is impractical due to its short duration and fixed timeline; instead, resource smoothing, which involves adding new resources or working overtime to meet deadlines, is the recommended approach.
CONFLICT AND ITS POTENTIAL SOURCES
I remembered witnessing a conflict that occurred during the implementation of Security Communication Upgrade Project in one the states in Nigeria.
Base on collaboration between the State Government and the security Agency to improve security, the State Government supported the agency to revamp the poor state of the agency’s communication system and in order to ensure effective project implementation and delivery, the contract was awarded to an independent security company instead of the agency’s communicatiin department handling the multi-million project for fear of failure and waste of government fund.
In the course of implementation, a conflict ensued between Engineers from the Contractor’s firm started by the technicians who are staff of security agency.
These technicians felt that they should have been the one to have handled the bulk of the installations at the various sites stating that since the bulk of the maintenance job would be undertaken by them as end users.
The rifts became hotter to the extent that the technicians began to withdraw their presence and support from the vendors.
This conflict arise as a result of differences in expectations and views between the agency’s engineers and the technicians of the security agency. This created an initial impediment to the progress of the project.
But since it was a high-level project implementation which was beyond the capacity and control of the agency’s specialized department, the project continued and was fully implemented with less input from the technicians.
The case would have taken a different direction if the technicians had sought for a mutual understanding and have negotiated with the contractor. That would not only speed up the timing for completion, a win-win scenario would have occurred because that collaboration would have led to more learning and modern skills acquisition on the part of the technicians.
Emmanuel Olusegun Omotere
Team 4
Cohort 17
I think it would be appropriate for MTD to use resource smoothing considering the water installation project is temporary and since it focuses on on preserving planned project durations and it deadlines unlike Glasgow that involved a long term resource levelling would be suitable.
In my opinion, applying the resource leveling approach to MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event is not a good choice at all. The date and time for the event has already been fixed and the right thing to do is to try to meet up the demands of the event no matter what! The best option now is to apply the resource smoothening approach. This method will allow the project manager to speed up the execution of the project to meet up with the required project completion time by adding new resources or even working over-time. Also, the Project manager has to be careful so that mistakes are not made during the period of working over-time by his team.
Okiemute Iko-ojo Ojogbane
Cohort 17, Team 8
Resource smoothing is more suitable for the MTD project as events have fixed dates and it’s water installations are temporary unlike Glasgow. In the case of Glasgow, resource levelling will be appropriate for quality work which will last longer despite tampering with project timeline
Based on this scenario, implementing a resource leveling approach might be challenging for MTD the water installation company and the Glasgow event. Resource leveling aims to smooth out resource usage over time, avoiding overallocation and underallocation.
I think in this case, the event’s short duration and fixed timeline make it difficult to level resources effectively. The resources required for each task might be specific and cannot be easily substituted or even reallocated.
I also think that if MTD were to manage multiple events simultaneously or even plan a longer-term project, resource leveling could be beneficial in optimizing resource utilization and reducing conflicts.
Genevieve Osondu
Cohort 17 Team 5
Looking at the MTD and the Glasgow event, I think resource smoothing is most appropriate because the date of the event is fixed and cannot be tampered with . So, resource levelling is not an option in this case .
Considering the MTD and the Glasgow event, I don’t think resource levelling will be appropriate because the date of the event is fixed and cannot be moved. So I do not think resource levelling would help in that situation.
The possibility of applying resources leveling approach on the MTD water project is almost zero, because the date of the event have been fixed and status of achievement by MTD with respect to the deadline was not good enough. The only way out was application of the resources smooth approach, by adding more sources to get the work done on or before the deadline.
Moving the events deadline is near impossible as the project does not have any float time, so resource smoothing would be the best option for the MTD team to utilize in this project. This allows them to utilize all needed resources so as to meet the project deadline.
Resource levelling would not be the best choice to use since the project deadline cannot be moved, hence resource smoothing will be a better choice to meet the deadline although it will incur more cost.
Aishat Aiteseme Abdulrazaaq
Cohort 17
Team 1
A Comprehensive View on Resource Overload
Applying a resource levelling approach to resolve a resource shortfall issue noticed prior to the start of an event may not provide the best and suitableย solution especially in a situation constrained by limited time.
A better option in tackling the issue would be the application of resource smoothing. This method allows the project manager to speedup execution to meet up with the required project completion time by either adding new resources (through request for immediate delivery of items to site by one of MTD’s suppliers in the case of equipment deficit) or demanding for overtime to increase the availability of the resources for client’s use as originally planned.
Emmanuel Olusegun Omotere
Team 4
Cohort 17
For a case like MTD’s event in Glasgow, resource levelling could be applied. Resource levelling would involve the rescheduling of activities, but only in a way which does not exceed the current capacity of resources. Since the tasks involved in the event are typically too rigid to be moved around in terms of deadlines, resource levelling will be more useful here than it might otherwise be in workload management, without moving the final deadline. It may involve having to make some compromises over the scope or quality of some activities to guarantee the key event goals are delivered on time.
Applying a resource leveling approach to the project involving MTD, the water installation events, and the Glasgow event is possible and beneficial. Resource leveling aims to smooth resource utilization, reduce resource allocation peaks and valleys, and ensure consistent resource usage throughout the project. In the project, resource leveling can help manage the varying demands of water installation events and the Glasgow event, balance resource allocation between events and tasks, minimize resource conflicts and overallocations and optimize resource utilization, reducing waste and improving efficiency.
Using a resource smoothing approach is more feasible for MTD the water installation events company, even though additional cost may be incurred but the project gets to meet its scheduled deadline.
While for Glasgow,a resource leveling approach can be used to get the job done.
MTD can successfully adopt the resource leveling approach as they can leverage on the use of past data and event experience to Inform resource allocation decisions with insights from such past events. They can also collaborate with stakeholders, work closely with teams, vendors, and clients to understand their needs and constraints.
Since resource scheduling does not change the current capacity but focuses on rescheduling, I donโt think it would be suitable to apply it to the Glasgow event because of the tight deadline.
However, resource smoothing would be the most suitable resource strategy to apply because of time constraints, resource optimization, and avoidance of peaks and troughs.
Given the deadline they have and that the event cannot be moved to a new date.
MTD has to deliver before the sports event commences.
Resource smoothing is the best option for the MTD project.
Odinfe David Chika
Cohort16
Team7
Based on the past experience, complexity of the project, the project scope and unpredicted environment, rescheduling resources within their available capacity will be a better option for MTD project.
This approach leverage on stable workload in order to avoid the risk of stress.
Applying a resource levelling approach to MTD’s Glasgow event might be challenging, considering the project’s scope and complexity. Resource levelling aims to balance resource allocation to minimize delays and bottlenecks. However, in a project like the Glasgow event, which involves multiple stakeholders, vendors, and logistical considerations, revising the project scope might be more appropriate.
Given the potential for unforeseen issues and changes in stakeholder requirements, a more flexible approach like agile project management might be better suited for MTD’s event planning. This would allow for iterative planning, continuous improvement, and adaptability to changing circumstances.
If a resource levelling approach were to be applied, it would likely require significant adjustments to the project timeline, budget, and resource allocation. This could lead to trade-offs between time, cost, and quality, potentially impacting the event’s overall success and stakeholder satisfaction.
In cases like large infrastructure projects or complex events like MTD’s Glasgow event, a comprehensive project scope revision, as mentioned in the text, might be a more effective approach to address changes and challenges, ensuring the project meets its objectives and delivers the desired outcomes.
Certainly, the implementation of resource leveling is deemed essential in this scenario.
Considering MTD’s role as a water installation events company involved in the Glasgow event, the application of resource leveling could significantly enhance resource Allocation strategies and ultimately lead to the success of the event.
In conclusion, the adoption of a resource leveling approach holds strong feasibility for MTD due to their capacity to leverage past data effectively, engage stakeholders collaboratively, and remain adaptable to changing event dynamics.
.
Stephen Izuchukwu Emeasoba.
Cohort 16, Team 9.
In resource smoothing, project deadlines is maintained while project costs is increased. And for resource leveling project costs is maintained while project deadlines is extended.
From one of the course videos (Identifying the cost of quality in a project) the MTD representative stated that they build in a certain amount of redundancy into the system to for see problems or challenges like additional spec or extra resource that is required on the job. And in another course video (planning for quality) where they had contamination from the main source which happen 3 days before the venue go life. Rather than extending the deadlines they brought in water tanker and kept to the deadline.
From the course videos above, it would be feasible for MTD to implement a resource smoothing approach in this scenario because itโs already built into their system.
In resource smoothing, project deadlines is maintained while project costs is increased. And for resource leveling project costs is maintained while project deadlines is extended.
From one of the course videos (Identifying the cost of quality in a project) the MTD representative stated that they build in a certain amount of redundancy into the system to for see problems or challenges like additional spec or extra resource that is required on the job. And in another course video (planning for quality) where they had contamination from the main source which happen 3 days before the venue go life. Rather than extending the deadlines they brought in water tanker and kept to the deadline.
From the course videos above, it would be feasible for MTD to implement a resource smoothing approach in this scenario because it’s already built into their system.
Yes, applying resource levelling will be necessary. MTD and Glasgow have similar activities situations of multiple tasks. Resource levelling will aid in allocating resources evenly to avoid overallocation or underallocation during the project. It could also reduce potential delays on the project ensuring balanced work load. It can also help in uptimizing resources allocation and uptimization
Reflecting on MTD, the water installation events company, and their involvement in the Glasgow event, resource leveling could significantly optimize resource allocation and contribute to a successful event. By leveraging historical data and event experience, MTD can make informed resource allocation decisions based on insights from past events. Close collaboration with stakeholdersโincluding teams, vendors, and clientsโto understand their needs and constraints is crucial. This ensures all parties are aligned and resources are allocated where they are most needed.
Implementing a flexible resource allocation strategy allows MTD to adjust allocations as event requirements evolve. Continuous monitoring and real-time adjustments are essential for maintaining optimal resource leveling, ensuring resources are used efficiently throughout the event.
Overall, adopting a resource leveling approach appears highly feasible for MTD, given their ability to utilize past data, collaborate with stakeholders, and remain adaptable to changing event requirements.
Afolabi Isaac
Cohort 16 Team1
A convenient approach for MTD would be the resource smoothing. How that, based on the fixed event date it would be unprofessional to reschedule date, however, increasing cost and maintaining the planned deadline will be a more possible option to achieve the goal.
While for Glasgow, resource levelling will be an effective approach to get the project done.
Using a resource smoothing approach is more feasible for MTD even though additional cost may be incurred but the project gets to meet the agreed deadline. While for Glasgow,a resource leveling approach can be used
Thoughts on โA comprehensive view on resource overload considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event( PM Course discussion)โ
In the context of MTD, the water installation events company managing the Glasgow event, let’s clarify the concepts of resource smoothing and resource leveling first:
1.Resource Smoothing: This involves adjusting the amount of resource usage over a period to accommodate fluctuations in demand or resource availability, while still meeting project deadlines. The focus is on managing resource utilization to avoid peaks and valleys, thus smoothing out the resource usage curve.
2.Resource Leveling: This refers to adjusting the project schedule to ensure that the demand for resources does not exceed certain predefined limits. The goal is to avoid resource over-allocation by shifting activities within their slack allowances or by adjusting the project schedule.
Given this understanding, let’s consider whether implementing a resource leveling approach would be feasible for MTD in managing the Glasgow event:
– Nature of Events: Events like the one managed by MTD often have specific deadlines and fixed durations. This makes resource leveling a relevant consideration because it ensures that resources are neither over-allocated nor underutilized during critical stages of the project.
– Resource Constraints: MTD might face constraints such as availability of water installation equipment, skilled labor, and possibly even venue restrictions (such as access times). Resource leveling helps in optimizing the use of these resources throughout the project duration, ensuring that all requirements are met without unnecessary strain or underutilization.
– Feasibility Assessment: To determine if resource leveling is feasible for MTD, it would be essential to analyze the resource requirements and constraints for the Glasgow event. This involves identifying critical resources, understanding their availability over time, and then adjusting the project schedule accordingly to smooth out resource utilization peaks.
– Implementation Challenges: Implementing resource leveling requires careful planning and coordination. MTD would need to have detailed schedules, clear communication channels, and possibly use project management tools to track resource allocations and adjust schedules as needed.
Conclusion: Considering the nature of MTD’s work in managing water installation for events like the Glasgow event, implementing a resource leveling approach appears feasible and beneficial. It would help in optimizing resource usage, ensuring that critical resources are efficiently allocated throughout the project timeline, thereby enhancing overall project management effectiveness and meeting client expectations.
For MTD, resource smoothing works as it helps them meet their deadlines, it allows MTD to maintain original project deadlines even though project costs will increase, with these stakeholders and investor will not be lost.
MTD can successfully adopt the resource leveling approach as they can leverage on the use of past data and event experience to Inform resource allocation decisions with insights from such past events. They can also collaborate with stakeholders, work closely with teams, vendors, and clients to understand their needs and constraints.
For MTD, resource smoothing works as it helps them meet their deadlines, it allows MTD to maintain original project deadlines even though project costs will increase, with these stakeholders and investor will not be lost.
WHILE Resource leveling is better methodology to apply for Gaslow project as it cost effective.
Blessing Olusakin Team 3 Cohort 16.
Considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, resource leveling could be a valuable approach to optimize resource allocation and ensure a successful event.
I think MTD can successfully adopt the resource leveling approach as they can leverage on the use of past data and event experience to Inform resource allocation decisions with insights from such past events. They can also collaborate with stakeholders, work closely with teams, vendors, and clients to understand their needs and constraints. They can choose flexible resource allocation and prepared to adjust resource allocation as event requirements change and they can monitor and make adjustments continuously and at the same time monitor resource usage and adjust allocation as needed to ensure optimal resource leveling.
Team 7,cohort 16.
It would not be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach at the Glasgow event because of the following reasons:
1: Time management – resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
2: Bad reputation – apply resource leveling which in turn emphasizes rescheduling will give a bad reputation to the Glasgow event which is internationally recognized.
3: Negative Impact – resource leveling at such a big and scheduled event will have a negative impact on both the client and the stakeholders.
Moreover it can only be feasible if the Glasgow event schedule is flexible(float), thereby having a very high satisfiable quality project because of rescheduling.
Esther Ezinne Uwoghiren
Resource Smoothing: This is used when time constraints are the biggest factor blocking production. The idea is to finish a project on time while avoiding peaks and dips in resource demand.
1. Objective: The primary goal of resource smoothing is to adjust the activities within their float or slack without affecting the project’s critical path.
2. Focus: It focuses on resolving resource over-allocations during specific periods by redistributing the workload.
3. Method: Resources are adjusted within the available float or slack, meaning activities can be scheduled earlier or later within their allowable time frames without impacting the project’s overall duration.
4. Result: The project schedule remains unchanged in terms of critical path activities but ensures that resource utilization is spread evenly over time.
while
Resource Leveling: This is used when scheduling the production of available resources is limited and needs to be used optimally.
1. Objective: Resource leveling aims to resolve resource over-allocations that affect the project’s critical path.
2. Focus: It addresses situations where resource constraints directly impact the project’s schedule by delaying critical activities.
3. Method: Activities are rescheduled within their total float or slack to eliminate over-allocations that affect critical path activities. This may involve delaying non-critical activities to resolve resource conflicts on critical path tasks.
4. Result: The project schedule may be adjusted in terms of start and finish dates to ensure that critical path activities are not delayed due to resource constraints.
Cohort 16
Team 4
UWOGHIREN OSAGIE WILLIAMS
WHATโS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RESOURCE SMOOTHING AND RESOURCE LEVELLING?
Resource smoothing is used when the time constraint takes priority. The objective is to complete the work by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand. Resource levelling is used when limits on the availability of resources are paramount.
FOR RESOURCE SMOOTHING
1. Time limited scheduling technique: importance is given to duration of the project
2. Removes as much resource conflicts as possible; but, may not remove all resource conflicts
3. May require additional resources to address left over resource conflicts
4. Activities are shifted only to the extent of the float available
5. The project duration remains the same
6. No change the critical path
FOR RESOURCE LEVELLING
1. Resource limited scheduling technique: importance is given to limited resource
2. Remove all resource conflicts
3. May require additional resources
4. Activities may be shifted beyond the float available while rescheduling the activities
5. Generally the project duration gets extended
6. May change the critical path
COHORT 16
TEAM 10
Okeke Uchenna Ifeyinwa Team 7
For MTD water installation, a resource levelling approach is feasible because MTD aims at producing a good quality and adequate water supply therefore rescheduling to prevent any negative occurrence like bad water supply, insufficient water supply to appropriate channels is important to ensure safe and good quality of product even though it may have impact on the project deadline.
A combination of the two will be perfect. You apply each method when it’s needed
A combination of the two will be perfect. You apply each method when it’s needed
Yes, application of a resource levelling approach is very possible and sometimes can be the only optimal option in mitigating the damage, unplanned problems and issues can cause in the execution of a water installation to any sort of event.
Scenarios like
1. Bad water supply, lack of sufficient information by the sponsor e.g. water volume, space, no of people, toilets to supply.
2. Insufficient water tankers to supply water
3. Insufficient knowledge of the layout of the event.
4. Insufficient time to inspect the project layout, functionality of machines or valves.
5. Insufficient equipment or machines to cater for the entire project.
6. Delay in sponsors trying to get the standard equipments to be used for installation.
All these can affect the successful execution of a project, thats why resource levelling to serve as a backchannel to the project to correct flaws and errors keeping in mind the impact on the project deadline. Better to be safe than sorry.
Resource levelling could work for the Glasgow event project. By rescheduling activities, we can balance resource workload without adding new resources. This might require some schedule adjustments, but it could prevent resource overload and ensure a smoother delivery.
For MTD, resource smoothing works as it helps them meet their deadlines, it allows MTD to maintain original project deadlines even though project costs will increase, with these stakeholders and investor will not be lost.
JESUDIMU OPEYEMI
COHORT 16
TEAM 5
In this situation, resource leveling is the best option to address MTD because the project’s cost is being impacted by the deadline. When dealing with the Glasgow event, which has a specific start and end date, it is best to use resource smoothing to ensure the deadline is met.
from my own perspective, adopting resource smoothing is better inorder to meet up with the deadline
For MTD resource levelling is not advisable but resource smoothing can work
Resource levelling its not advisable as an option to use by MTD in the case of Glasgow event which its an event that has a set time for starting. Resource levelling seeks to use same available resource by not altering the resource capacity rather emphasizes on rescheduling which will result in extending the project completion time. Rather resources smoothing its better for MTD for the Glasgow event.
For MTD, resource levelling would not be ideal since it would ve to utter its deadline
Resources leveling would not be the best option for MTD, judging by the fact that the deadline will be impacted and the Glasgow event had a start date set. Resources leveling would not give enough room for the project to be delivered or completed.
Wale Oyegunle
Team 8 Cohort 16
Aminah YUSUFF
Team 2 Cohort 16
Resource leveling is considered safer than resource smoothing for several reasons:
1. Preserves project integrity: Resource leveling maintains the original project scope, timeline, and resources, ensuring that the project’s integrity is preserved.
2. No shortcuts: Unlike resource smoothing, leveling doesn’t involve taking shortcuts or compromising on quality to meet deadlines, reducing the risk of errors and omissions.
3. Even workload distribution: Leveling distributes workload evenly, avoiding overloading and understaffing, which can lead to burnout, mistakes, and accidents.
4. Reduced stress: By avoiding last-minute rushes and crunch times, resource leveling reduces stress on workers, minimizing the likelihood of mistakes and accidents.
5. Improved safety: By maintaining a steady and controlled workflow, leveling prioritizes safety and reduces the risk of accidents and incidents on site.
6. Better planning: Resource leveling encourages thorough planning, identifying potential resource constraints and mitigating risks proactively.
7. Less scope for errors: By avoiding hasty decisions and shortcuts, leveling minimizes the scope for errors, ensuring a higher quality output. While resource smoothing prioritizes meeting deadlines, resource leveling prioritizes project integrity, safety, and quality, making it a safer approach.
While resource smoothing is a viable option in this case, it also has its drawbacks. By prioritizing timely completion, it may lead to shortcuts that compromise the project’s quality and integrity. This approach can put undue pressure on workers, resulting in hasty workmanship, and potentially sacrifice health and safety standards, increasing the risk of accidents and incidents on site. This could ultimately jeopardize the project’s deadline and overall success.”
With the event looming, MTD and Glasgow face a time crunch that renders resource leveling impractical. The deadline is either too close or has already passed, making it challenging to allocate resources effectively. Furthermore, attempting to make do with inadequate resources may compromise the project’s quality.
On a short note, I will say NO. Resource levelling will not be possible or will not be the best option to bank on in those projects. My reason is that the events of the water corporation or the Glasgow events are time bounds, they are projects that have a specific and demand quick delivery. The Glasgow event for example, in a situation where we need to incorporate one of the strategies, Resource levelling would be a bad choice because it would likely affect the deadlines which would render the project useless since it would not be used on the day of the event. Resource smoothing would certainly be the best option here, of course, it will affect the costs of the project but it maintains the due date.
Resource smoothing is better as MTD needs to meet up with deadlines and also use solid quality.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may impact project deadlines.
For MTD, resource leveling is not feasible due to a tight deadline. The date for the sporting event is fixed and difficult to change. Altering the date or deadline may incur additional costs for the client, as significant planning has already been completed. Moreover, changing the date could negatively impact the clientโs reputation and result in hidden costs, such as cancellations from customers and health agencies who have scheduled appointments for the fixed date.
Resource smoothing is a feasible option; however, it has its downsides. It may compromise the project’s integrity, as shortcuts may be taken to ensure the project is completed as planned. This approach could increase pressure and stress on the workers, leading to rushed work. Additionally, it might compromise the health and safety or construction phase plan, potentially leading to accidents and incidents on site, which could adversely affect the project’s deadline.
JESUDIMU OPEYEMI
COHORT 16
TEAM 5
Resource Leveling involves adjusting start and finish dates based on resource availability to balance resource demand with supply. It is done when key resources are
1. only available at certain times, in limited quantities, or are over-allocated.
2. It is also used to keep resource usage constant and reduce fluctuations in demand for key resources.
Resource Smoothing adjusts the activities of a schedule model to ensure that the project’s resource requirements do not exceed specific predefined limits.
As MTD and Glasgow prepare for an event, resource leveling won’t be effective due to the tight deadline, which may be too close or even past the event date. Additionally, utilizing available resources that are insufficient for the project can lead to compromising its quality.
As MTD and Glasgow prepare for an event, resource leveling won’t be effective due to the tight deadline, which may be too close or even past the event date. Additionally, utilizing available resources that are insufficient for the project can lead to compromising its quality.
Considering that the MTD water project for instance has a direct impact on lives, resource smoothing will be a better approach. Deadlines can be extended on any other project such as road constructions, housing etc. Their impact might be minimal due to the availability of alternatives
A project such as the MTD water project in all it’s aspects has a direct bearing with dire consequences when the deadline is tampered.
Also, the MTD project involves water laboratory analysis. Any alteration or delay in the deadline can adversely affect water quality.
Ijeoma Egbu
COHORT 16
MTD works better with resource smoothing since they have to meet up with deadlines and cannot compromise quality
MTD major goal is to meet deadlines with solid quality , so in this case Resource smoothing is a better option for MTD, while Resource leveling will not work for MTD.
Example Scenario
Current Situation: You have a project with a fixed deadline, but resources are over-allocated in the middle of the project.
Approach: Identify non-critical tasks that can be postponed. Use project management software to adjust the schedule automatically, ensuring that no resources are overburdened at any given time.
Outcome: The project might take longer to complete, but resource over-allocation is avoided, reducing the risk of burnout and ensuring quality work.
If you provide more details about your specific scenario, I can offer a more tailored approach to implementing resource leveling.
MTD is a company that is concerned with meeting deadlines. Applying resource levelling will affect the deadline causing a delay in meeting deadline which is not good for them. I think resource smoothing will work best for MTD even though it is time limited. It would only cause them to work overtime.
Glasgow event can go with resource levelling since they can easily change the deadline. It would enable them to get a new date and deliver.
Seeing as MTD and Glasgow work towards an event Resource levelling would not work because the new deadline might be too close to the event or past the event. Also working what they have (using available resources) when its too low for the project can lead to compromising quality.
I don’t think it would be feasible to implement a Resource levelling approach for MTD as their aims to maintain original project deadlines. So I believe Resource smoothing is a suitable option for MTD.
Thinking about the MTD water project and Glasgow event requires separate approach
The MTD water project requires timing and good planning techniques. Applying resource leveling approach will not be a good idea as the project end date will not be feasible, rather resource smoothing will help to achieve the goal and timing faster.
For Glasgow event it’s major problem was resources (water limitation) during the ongoing event, resource leveling can be applied, the project manager is in charge of optimizing the provided limited resources. The schedule isn’t fixed and so the resource leveling helps to figure out the end date of the project with the available resources.
Resource levelling will not work for MTD as their major goal is to meet deadlines with solid quality. In this case Resource smoothing is a better option for MTD.
MTD aims at achieving project deadlines and quality
From Joseph Ikechukwu Onyeocha:
Applying a resource leveling approach to MTD, the water installation events company, and their Glasgow event involves smoothing out resource demand over time to avoid peaks and troughs, thus optimizing resource utilization and potentially reducing costs. This approach typically balances the workload of resources like labor, equipment, and materials to match the available capacity.
In the context of the Glasgow event, which involves complex water installations, resource leveling could be challenging yet beneficial. Hereโs how it might apply:
1. Resource Utilization: MTD could analyze the resource requirements for each phase of the event (e.g., planning, setup, execution) and spread out resource usage evenly. This prevents overloading certain resources at specific times, reducing stress and potential burnout among employees.
2. Cost Management: Smoothing out resource demand can lead to cost savings. For instance, by avoiding last-minute rushes or idle periods, MTD can optimize the use of equipment and minimize overtime costs.
3. Project Schedule: Resource leveling helps in creating a more predictable project schedule. This is crucial for MTD to meet deadlines and deliver installations on time, especially for high-profile events like the one in Glasgow.
4. Constraints and Challenges: However, applying resource leveling in event management isn’t always straightforward. Factors like client demands, weather conditions, and unforeseen events can disrupt planned schedules. MTD would need flexibility and contingency plans to adapt to these changes without compromising the overall project.
5. Technology and Tools: Utilizing project management software and tools that support resource leveling can enhance MTD’s ability to manage resources efficiently. These tools can provide real-time visibility into resource allocation and help in making informed decisions.
In conclusion, while resource leveling offers clear benefits in terms of resource optimization and cost management for MTD’s event in Glasgow, it requires careful planning, flexibility, and the right tools to navigate potential challenges effectively. It’s a strategic approach that can contribute to the success of complex water installation events by ensuring resources are used efficiently throughout the project lifecycle.
PAUL NWEKE
COHORT 16
TEAM 9.
Considering the MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow and the provided figure, Resource Smoothing. This aims to maintain original project deadlines even though project costs will increase.
The Resource Leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines, it is better not to use or apply here. This will lead to customer dissatisfaction and loosing of stakeholders and projects as well.
Using resource leveling for the MTD project won’t be feasible as it’s operating within a fixed deadline, instead resource smoothing is best advised
Based on the figure above, Resource leveling, which prioritizes rescheduling, may lead to client dissatisfaction and potentially jeopardize the success of planned outcomes. Additionally, this could result in missed opportunities for future collaborations with the company.
Resource smoothing is best in this Glasgow and MTD events. There is a fixed date and using resource levelling won’t be right
Nnadi Stella Chidinma
Team 7
In the MTD and Glasgow event, thereโs a date for the program and resource levelling will not be the best at it could affect project deadline and in turn affect client and customer relationship.
Resource smoothing is better as it meets the planned deadline but only increasing project costs.
This should be discussed with the clients to know which fits the client.
My name is Charles Ntanta. Yes i will prefer to apply Resource Levelling to maintain the time line for the projects. Issues like non critical activity can be delayed and extended too in so far, it will not increase the cost of the project and . If i try to smoothing, not only will it increase cost, it will equally affect getting subsequent projects in future.
Their contract was signed for an event scheduled for a specific date. This date cannot be postponed.
Which means that, as far as I’m concerned, it’s only the resource smoothing that will be applied here. The cost could go up, but the priority is really to do everything possible to meet the deadline without any loss of quality in the service to be provided.
MTD specializes in water installation events, and the Glasgow event is likely a complex, time-sensitive project with specific milestones. Such events often require various skilled resources, including:
โข Planners and coordinators.
โข Installation technicians.
โข Support staff for logistics and customer service.
Feasibility of Resource Leveling
1. Resource Availability and Demand:
โข Availability: If MTD has a limited pool of technicians or equipment, leveling could help distribute their work more evenly.
โข Demand: Events like the one in Glasgow might have peak times (e.g., setup days, main event days) where resource demands are high. Leveling could help mitigate this by redistributing tasks.
2. Task Flexibility:
โข Certain tasks might be flexible in their timing (e.g., preliminary site surveys, initial setups), allowing for leveling.
โข Critical tasks with fixed deadlines (e.g., final installations, live event support) are less flexible, posing a challenge to leveling.
3. Project Timeline:
โข If the project timeline has some buffer, leveling could be more easily implemented. However, if the event is tightly scheduled, leveling could delay critical tasks.
โข Incorporating buffer periods in non-critical times could provide opportunities for leveling.
4. Resource Skills and Dependencies:
โข If resources are highly specialized, reassigning tasks could be difficult. Cross-training staff might be a strategy to increase flexibility.
โข Dependencies between tasks need to be carefully managed to avoid creating bottlenecks.
Practical Application for MTD
Given the above considerations, applying a resource leveling approach to MTD and the Glasgow event could be feasible under the following conditions:
โข Pre-Event Planning: Identify tasks that can be moved or adjusted without impacting critical paths. Early planning is crucial to find these opportunities.
โข Flexible Workforce: Cross-training employees or hiring temporary staff during peak times could help balance the workload.
โข Advanced Scheduling Tools: Use project management software to visualize resource allocation and identify leveling opportunities.
โข Communication: Ensure clear communication with all stakeholders about the potential adjustments to timelines and tasks.
Conclusion
While there are challenges, resource leveling could be beneficial for MTD to optimize resource use and prevent overloading staff during peak periods of the Glasgow event. Careful planning, flexibility in task scheduling, and effective use of project management tools will be key to successfully implementing this approach.
MTD project in Glasgow is for an event that already has a deadline,and for any event to be successful it is expected that all things be in place before the start date of the event . If the project must undergo any adjustments or reevaluation it should be done using the Resource smoothing this will maintain the project deadline despite the increase in cost, but at least the event will begin as the staplated time while maintaining the quality.
MTD And Glasgow project it will be feasible to implement an approach Resource leveling approach my answer is a Yes. Resource leveling may require changing task sequences or extending project deadline. Though it might increase cost due to extension of the project and enable the PM to complete project at deadline
For MTD, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
For the MTD and Glasgow project, it is not really applicable to use the resource leveling approach as it involves rescheduling tasks and can be more disruptive to the project schedule. Resource leveling may require changing task sequences or extending project deadline.
It is note worthy to say that resource smoothing is preferable as when external constraints or urgent situations arise, while resource leveling is more suitable when there is flexibility in project deadlines and resource adjustments can be made through rescheduling.
For this MTD scenario, the event has a deadline there, resource smoothing is more suitable,
In the case of MTD and Glasgow, since it is unlikely to reschedule the events, the preferred strategy will be resource smoothing though it will mean increasing project cost.
As regards MTD and the Glasgow event, since they are time based events, I’ll recommend the resource smoothing technique. Even though this may put a strain on the project budget as additional resources may be required, it’ll ensure the provision of quality output within stipulated timelines.
Resource smoothing will enable the project manager to keep track with his time schedule for project completion
Resource smoothing will be a better idea because it will ensure the project is done within the timeline
I will recommend resource smoothing as it help them increase the capacity needed to complete the project on deadline.
I think it would be challenging to apply a resource leveling approach in this context.
Just as we were taught in class that resource leveling is a technique used in project management to smoothen out resource usage over time, and this helps in ensuring that resources are allocated evenly throughout the project. However, in the context of an event like the Glasgow festival, the resources required (such as stages, sound systems, and personnel) are likely to be highly variable and dependent on that specific event and activities that will be taking place each day.
Given the dynamic nature of the schedule of the festival with different events and activities happening at the same time, it might be difficult to apply resource leveling effectively. Instead, MTD might focus on resource smoothing, which involves the allocation of resources to ensure that they are used efficiently, even if it means some of these resources are overallocated or under allocated at certain times.
Considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event as regards which better salvage the situation, either resource leveling or resource smoothing. In my opinion, resource leveling fits the Gasglow event better as it is a program-based event but resource smoothing fits the MTD installation, as chances are that time extension might be the best decision to attain an output quality.
Most importantly, however, looking at a more significant level of impact, certain projects undergo more than just rescheduling or resource allocation adjustments. They may undergo a reevaluation of their project scope by the project sponsor
Mary Ayo
Due to the fact that MTD projects are tied to various events and in turn many varying stakeholders, resource leveling might not be the best approach as, there’s the challenge of maintaining, the project scope with the events date. Resource smoothing, appears to be a better approach, although it will incur extra project costs but the project timeline will be maintained.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs while
Resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines. In the light of this, resource smoothing is recommended because it aims at increasing the cost of projects, adding new resources, and meeting up with the stipulated time, and deadline without having to extend it.
Resource soothing is the most favorable approach, it aims at the original project work because it is good for a time-based project.
I will recommend Resource soothing
Resource levelling will be the most favourable approach for MTD.
Resource smoothing aims to the original project work while resource level doesnโt aim at it , the best method to use is resource smoothing through MTD
For me I would explain what resource smoothing and resource leveling as project management techniques. However I will recommend:
* They conduct an evaluation of their resources, stakeholders willingness to provide additional funding, stakeholders reception of deadline extension viz-a-viz cost implications, cost of additional manpower or the stress of overtime of it’s staff etc
* The outcome of the evaluation will decide which project management technique to adopt.
For company MTD the best approach I would advice is resource smoothing because its good for a time based project like MTD project.
Resource smoothing and resource leveling are distinct project management techniques for handling resource constraints. Resource smoothing aims to adjust activities to maintain constant resource usage without extending project duration, potentially increasing costs. In contrast, resource leveling balances resource demand with availability, often extending project timelines without altering resource capacity.
For MTDโs Glasgow event, implementing resource leveling might be feasible if resource overallocation is a concern and deadlines are flexible. It offers a balanced resource allocation, potentially avoiding overutilization. However, it may lead to delays. If maintaining the original schedule is crucial, resource smoothing, despite higher costs, might be more suitable to ensure timely completion.
Choosing the right approach depends on the project’s specific needs, resource availability, and stakeholder expectations. For MTD, evaluating the importance of deadlines versus resource balance will guide the decision between resource smoothing and resource leveling.
Resource levelling technique aims to optimize resource utilization and ensure a more balanced workload across projects.
Using the resource levelling approach will lead to;
โข Minimized conflicts and delays.
โข Leads to a smoother operation
โข Reduces bottlenecks
โข Reduced risk of project overrun
In some situations however it may not be feasible to level resources if there are specific requirements for the project with regards to specific timelines.
i think Resource smoothing will be more appropriate in the case of MTD, however since it comes with an extra cost, parties must be notified and the reasons for more resource allocation be stated in a proper communication channel.
In the case of MTD and Glasgow projects. Resource smoothing is better here because of events that have been fixed and cannot be altered. The stakeholders needs to come together on how cost can be increased so their clients won’t be disappointed.
While Resource Smoothing appears to be a better option in order to keep to deadlines, it is important to have a round table discussion with all stakeholders regarding the cost implication of this, so that all parties are aligned.
Where the parties concerned are willing to bear costs, the projects proceeds smoothly. Where this is not the case, then, practically a degree of Resource Leveling maybe introduced after critical assessment has be done to determine what aspects of Resource Leveling can be applied.
Regarding the MTD and Glasgow situation, employing the resource leveling method isn’t practical. This approach entails task rescheduling, which could significantly disrupt the project schedule by altering task sequences or prolonging the project duration. It’s worth mentioning that resource smoothing is favored for addressing external constraints or urgent scenarios, whereas resource leveling is more appropriate when project deadlines are flexible, and resource adjustments can be accommodated through rescheduling.
In the case of MTD and Glasgow projects, resource smoothing is better as their clients have fixed dates for the events. Resource smoothing will increase the cost of the project but maintain the end date of the project. This is highly important to the clients. Resource levelling though helps to maintain cost,is not suitable for projects with fixed timelines which cannot be exceeded.
For the MTD and Glasglow scenario, it is not feasible to use the resource leveling approach because it involves rescheduling tasks and can be more disruptive to the project schedule because it may require changing task sequences or extending project duration.
It is important to note that resource smoothing is preferable when external constraints or urgent situations arise, while resource leveling is more suitable when there is flexibility in project deadlines and resource adjustments can be made through rescheduling.
โIf there are no deadlines to meet, The combination of the two approaches is not bad for the MMT project, because aside from resources other factors like weather conditions and logistic accessibility can delay a project. Resources smoothing can be used for constructing tasks, while resources level can be used for tasks that are sensitive to weather changes.
I believe the MTD project would benefit more from project smoothing and not leveling. If a event is fast approaching and with rescheduling, one will not meet up . Although project smoothing might seem expensive, but in the end customers will be satisfied.
I think resource smoothing is best for this kind of project.
I also think it is not feasible to use the resource leveling approach because it involves reassigning tasks and this can be more disruptive to the project assignment because it may require changing task sequences or extending project duration. The event has been planned for a long time with other resources so the delivery date can not be rescheduled
Left to me, I feel resource levelling is not good for the MTD project because the event has been planned for a long time with other resources so the delivery date can not be rescheduled so the best option to go for us the resource smoothing.
it is not also feasible to use the resource leveling approach because it involves reassigning tasks and this can be more disruptive to the project assignment because it may require changing task sequences or extending project duration.
So I think resource smoothing is best for this kind of project.
For the MTD and Glasglow scenario, it is not feasible to use the resource leveling approach because it involves rescheduling tasks and can be more disruptive to the project schedule because it may require changing task sequences or extending project duration.
So i strongly believe that resource smoothing is the best approach for the MTD and Glasglow projects
My little understanding about resource leveling and resource smoothing
Resource leveling adjusts the project schedule to match resource availability, potentially extending the timeline, it is used when there are limited resources and the project timeline can be adjusted,
Resource smoothing works within the existing timeline and redistributes tasks to prevent overloading, it2 is used when the project deadline is fixed and resources need to be optimized within that timeline
for the case of MTD and Glasgow, resource smoothing is advisable. Resource smoothing would be more appropriate in cases where an error was discovered a few days prior to the event. Reducing interruptions and making sure the event goes according to schedule should be the main priorities. Resource levelling at this stage could impede the project and harm the standing of the company. Water is urgently needed for the first group of participants, and a major postponement could negatively affect the event’s outcome. Little changes can be made thanks to resource smoothing without impacting the project’s schedule.
My thoughts on the concepts of resource smoothing and resource levelling in project management.
1. Resource Smoothing:
Resource smoothing is a technique used to adjust resource usage within a project while keeping the project schedule unchanged.
– The primary goal of resource smoothing is to minimize fluctuations in resource utilization, especially when dealing with limited resources.
– In resource smoothing, the focus is on managing resource peaks and valleys to achieve a more consistent resource allocation.
– It allows for small adjustments to resource assignments without affecting project deadlines.
– Resource smoothing is particularly useful when there are external constraints (such as contractual obligations or fixed deadlines) that prevent rescheduling.
– However, it may result in additional costs due to overtime or other resource adjustments.
2. Resource Leveling:
– Resource levelling, on the other hand, involves rescheduling tasks within a project to **balance resource demand.
– The primary goal of resource levelling is to avoid resource overloads by shifting tasks or changing their timing.
– In resource levelling, the focus is on achieving an even distribution of resource usage over time.
– It may involve delaying non-critical tasks or rearranging dependencies to accommodate resource availability.
– Resource levelling can be more disruptive to the project schedule because it may require changing task sequences or extending project duration.
– It is suitable when project deadlines are flexible and when resource constraints can be managed through rescheduling.
3. Application to MTD and Glasgow Cases:
– For the MTD case, where an error was identified a few days before the event, resource smoothing would be more appropriate. The focus should be on minimizing disruptions and ensuring that the event proceeds as planned. Implementing resource levelling at this point could hinder the project and damage the organization’s reputation.
– Similarly, for the Glasgow case, resource smoothing is advisable. The need for water for the first set of participants is urgent, and any significant rescheduling could impact the event’s success. Resource smoothing allows for minor adjustments without affecting the project timeline.
It is important to note that resource smoothing is preferable when external constraints or urgent situations arise, while resource levelling is more suitable when there is flexibility in project deadlines and resource adjustments can be made through rescheduling.
To me, resource levelling isn’t suitable for the MTD project because the event have been planned for a long time with other resources so the delivery date can’t be rescheduled because of maybe 10% of the whole plan so the best option to go for us the resource smoothing.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving deadlines and end dates while increasing projects costs and adding new resources to the project. Resource leveling however, focuses on balancing the workload on resources in order to align the usage of the resources with their available capacity which mostly results to the change or rescheduling of end date.
With what we have learnt so far, I would agree and say it is feasible to implement a resource leveling approach. In this scenario.
Resource leveling will help the project manager enough time to stabilize the work load and reduce the risk of stress on the workers.
The end date can be rescheduled as long as it is communicated effectively with the shareholders and clients and agreed upon so as to still meet client satisfaction and quality requirements.
Resource smoothing prevents rescheduling and helps meet deadlines, although it might incur extra costs. On the other hand, resource leveling promotes rescheduling while maintaining the existing capacity.
Implementing the resource leveling approach for the cases of MTD and Glasgow is not advisable. The resource smoothing approach is more suitable, particularly for MTD. They identified an error a few days before the event, with the first set of participants expected soon and needing water. Using resource leveling at this point would hinder the project and could damage their reputation.
I do not think it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario? The reason being that the approach entails doing the best with the resources available but the project end date slips and you have a new project end date. The Glasgow event is a fixed event scheduled already to take place at a particular days of the month and year. The organizers of the Glasgow event and MTD does not have the luxury of time hence the water infrastructure must be completed within the projected time frame so as to be ready on time for the event.
Already in some of the videos watched, the project manager talked of instances where contingency measures had to be embraced just to make sure MTD delivers within project time frame.
Consequently, resource smoothing which allows for engagement of extra resources even though at an extra cost in order to maintain and keep to the projected timeline of delivery is a better option in this situation.
From I have learnt so far, I think that the MTD project would benefit more from project smoothing and not leveling. It there’s an event that was fast approaching and with rescheduling, deadline will be missed. Though project smoothing would lead to more cost, but in the end there will be customers satisfaction.
In MTDs case resource smoothing is the best i will suggest as thus allow for meeting dead lines and given expected timely at the expense of additional cost with events tend to be time bound.
Resource smoothing prevents rescheduling and also helps meeting deadlines although, this might attracts extra cost while resource leveling promotes rescheduling while all other existing capacity remains the same .
In the case of MTD and Glasgow, I will suggest resource smoothing because the date of the event would have been announced and every effort to meet up with the deadline will be adopted. Yes, it attracts extra cost and I feel this can be discussed between both companies and resolved.
I will like to approach this discussion these points Resource Smoothing is were a new member is added to join the team.
NB:
1) It will definitely increase the over head cost of the project.
2) There will be need for training and time to bring the new member up to speed on current position of the project to be able to meet the dead line of the project..
While for Resource Leveling, the team member might be greatly affected.
1) it also affects cost as over time hours means extra cost on the initial budget.
2) Members will stressed working extra hours
3) This will affect quality as a result of much fatigue.
Finally Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Following the lesson so far, I think resource smoothing is preferable more than resource leveling. Although project cost might/will increase in resource smoothing but a better results will be gotten out of a project instead of rescheduling projects that can have a possible impact on project deadlines and project results too
In my opinion I believe resource leveling approach is not the best option but resource smoothing approach in the case of MTD because time management is key in project management.
For MTD and GLASSGOW companies, I would not advise the resource levelling approach, rather I would advise that resource smoothing (adding new resources to the project) approach should be used without minding the extra costs.
Cohort 15 team 10.
No, resource levelling is not a good option.
Osuji Mirian
May 14,2024 at 11:49 p.m
For me, I will go for project smoothing, because it will foster fast completion of the project.
I dont thing resource leveling can be applied in MTD project
I think it would be feasible to implement the resource levelling approach, especially if the two companies are not willing to change the current capacity and are willing to extend the deadline so that the current capacity would work to deliver what they have been tasked to deliver.
But with rescheduling that comes with the resource levelling approach is something the two companies should be aware of as this might have an impact on the project cost eventually.
Resource smoothing and resource leveling are both project management techniques used to manage resource allocation and avoid resource overloading. However, they differ in their approach and objectives:
Resource Smoothing:
Resource smoothing aims to adjust the resource allocation within the existing project schedule to eliminate peaks and troughs in resource utilization while keeping the project duration constant.
The focus is on minimizing fluctuations in resource usage over time, particularly for resources with limited availability or capacity.
This technique involves shifting non-critical activities within their float or slack time to balance resource demand, ensuring that resource usage remains within predefined limits.
The primary goal is to optimize resource utilization without extending the project’s duration.
Resource Leveling:
Resource leveling involves adjusting the project schedule to allocate resources in a way that ensures a consistent workload over time while maintaining project constraints such as dependencies and deadlines.
The objective is to eliminate resource overloading by rescheduling activities within their slack or float time to avoid conflicts in resource availability.
Resource leveling considers both resource constraints and project constraints to create a feasible and balanced schedule.
Unlike resource smoothing, resource leveling may extend the project duration if necessary to resolve resource conflicts and maintain a sustainable workload.
Time management and quality are crucial in project management, I would not advise using the resource levelling approach as d major issue of the project is a scarcity of resources.
Umeanolue Lilian
For the MTD and Glasgow event, I recommend the smoothing approach as the best option as this would enable both projects to finish at the stipulated time set out for it.
In my opinion, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines but does not increase costs or resource capacity of the project, which may resulting in significant deviations from the original plans.
The right choice between resource leveling and resource smoothing depends on what the project needs, what limits or rules it has to follow, and what the organization thinks is most important for managing resources and planning the project.
But, considering MTD and the Glasgow event.
I believe resource smoothing is better because it will help them make sure resources are used evenly without getting overloaded at certain times, even if it means not spreading them out evenly throughout the whole project.
Suppose MTD suddenly finds out they need more resources or that some plans have to change. Thatโs like trying to finish a puzzle only to find out some pieces donโt fit right! But instead of giving up, they think about how they can rearrange everything so it still looks awesome in the end.
They know that to make things work smoothly, they have to balance their time, costs, and quality of work. Itโs like trying to juggle school, hobbies, and chores without dropping anything!
MTD looks at what they haveโlike equipment, people, and materials. They ask, “Can we move things around a bit to make it all fit together better?”
They also have to follow some rules, like finishing on time and not spending too much money. Itโs a bit like trying to bake cookies perfectly following a recipe, making sure theyโre delicious but not burning them!
MTD talks with everyone involved, from sponsors to team members, to make sure theyโre all on the same page. Itโs like planning a big family trip; everyone needs to agree on where theyโre going and how theyโll get there.
They sit down and figure out exactly what needs to change and how they can manage their resources better. Itโs like making a new game plan for a sports match to make sure they score the winning goal!
They also think about what could go wrong, like delays or unexpected costs, and have plans to handle those surprises. Itโs a bit like having an umbrella ready for a sudden rainstorm!
So, yes, MTD can use a resource leveling approach, but they have to think about everything carefully, work together, and be ready for anything that might pop up along the way. With good planning and teamwork, they can still make the Glasgow event fantastic, even if the puzzle pieces need a bit of rearranging!
For Resource smoothing or Levelling these decision will be subject to the Project Plan.
i will subscribed to Smoothing in a situation where a project as reach completion date.
I am inclined to think that the best approach for the Glasgow and MTD events is smoothing.
Both projects set their deadlines, which were decided and announced. This underscores the purpose of the project.
Resource smoothing and resource leveling are both strategies used in project management to manage resource allocation effectively, but they have different goals and methods. Resource smoothing aims to ensure that resource usage stays within predefined limits over time by adjusting the timing of activities while keeping the total resource demand constant. On the other hand, resource leveling focuses on balancing the demand for resources with their availability by adjusting the start and finish dates of activities to prevent resource overloads or conflicts. In essence, resource smoothing fine-tunes resource utilization over time, while resource leveling ensures a steady balance between resource demand and availability throughout the project duration.
In my opinion, the MTD and Glasgow event should employ the resource smoothing approach since the event date and time may have been decided on and also announced.
For the MTD and Glasgow event I feel the smoothing approach is the best way to Go as this would enable both projects to meet deadline which is the purpose of project management.
Reply
For the MTD and Glasgow event, I recommend the smoothing approach as the best option as this would enable both projects to finish at the stipulated time set out for it.
Most events usually have a set time which can rarely be changed or altered as this will result to a lot of issues, For MTD and Glasgow event I don’t think the resource levelling approach will be feasible as this will result in the project not meeting the set deadline and in turn affect the time of the Event. A better solution to the issue of resource overloading in this case will be resource smoothing, with this the event will be held at the set time but the project cost will increase.
Let consider the decision on MTD,resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs, Resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadlines
There is already an issue of time constraint on the project. Considering the option of resource levelling will delay the start time of the project and will distrupt a lot concerning the event. It is better that MTD spends more and preserve the deadline. Therefore, it is better that MTD considers resource smoothing
Considering the decision of MTD as touching the Glass glow event. I will suggest the resource smoothing idea , reason been that the glass glow event has already been fixed and the time for change seems not be feasible. Hence, the date needs to hold but project cost increases.
For the MTD and Glasgow event. I suggest leveling, it’s does not change the current capacity but instead focuses on rescheduling, with a possible impact on a project deadlines and also, Unlike Smoothing that focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increases more additional cost. But it’s constraint is resources.
For the MTD and Glasgow event I donโt think the leveling approach would be the best way to go, I feel the smoothing approach is the best way to Go as this would enable both projects to finished at the stipulated time
Considering MTD water installation events company and the glasgow event, applying a resource levelling approach might be challenging due to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of events. Resource levelling assumes a stable and predictable resource demand which might not be the case in events with variable crowd sizes, technical issues and last-minute changes.
Resource levelling would require careful planning, monitoring and adjustments to ensure its effectiveness in the dynamic event environment.
Resource smoothing is best for the Glasgow and MTD, as keeping to the stipulated time, is a measure to calculate project success in stakeholders view, and any time further buffering might be considered a fail or no satisfaction.
Each project comes with its difficulties and issues.
In this case, it is good to follow the most sufficient way to deliver on the targeted end date.
By evaluating the type of project before deciding on going with a smoothing or a levelling approach.
The MTD considers negotiating with its customers, so if it demands taking such a step depending on the approach the project falls on.
If the project demands an additional cost to get the necessary things done and deliver at the end date, then it’s fine.
If there’s a need for levelling and still getting the project done before the end date, it’s also fine.
In order to optimize resource utilization, minimize idle time and overallocation, and address resource conflicts and bottlenecks, the resource leveling approach would be beneficial for both the MTD project and the Glasgow event. Implementing this approach would enable project managers to create a more feasible and realistic schedule without incurring additional costs.
I think because the event is time based, the best approach to adopt is resource smoothing, which entails incurring extra costs just to ensure that the event runs smoothly without having to be postponed.
In my opinion resource smoothing would be more preferable for Glasgow and MTD because it’s helps them to retain their schedule even if the cost or price is higher, and it also allow them to keep to time
Given the difficulties of rescheduling the events and the high expense of doing so, resource leveling may not be possible in this situation. This is mostly because advertisements for the event, tickets, and invitations have already been made and sent out. Because resource smoothing makes it possible to finish the task by the deadline or perhaps even ahead of schedule, it becomes a more sensible option.
Resource smoothing won’t work for the Glasgow project and MTD. MTD typically organizes for events that have a set date to complete. They are better off with resource smoothing.
Implementing resource leveling approach in the cases of MTD and Glasgow won’t be the best idea. Resource smoothing approach will be the best approach to use especially in the case of MTD, where they noticed an error few days to the event, and the first set of participants were expected in a couple of days and they would need water. Using resource leveling at this point, will hinder the project and might end up spoiling their reputation.
A resource levelling approach would not be appropriate in the circumstance due to the Glasgow factor (poor wood) as this may adversely impact on the quality of MTD’s work.
For both the MTD project and the Glasgow event, I would consider the resource leveling approach. As it would ensure efficient utilization of resources, reducing idle time and overallocation. It will also help to identify and resolve resource conflicts and bottlenecks and enable the project managers to create a more realistic and achievable project schedule without increasing project costs.
I would suggest resource smoothing because this will help them remain on schedule even though there might be an increase in cost. However this will help the company maintain the level of quality that was proposed at the beginning.
A resource levelling approach in this case would have been detrimental to the project. The sporting event was not postponed and from the video the first set of participants were expected in a couple of days and these would need water. In my opinion resource levelling is not the way to go. MTD found a way to meet the deadline but incurred additional costs in the process which was discussed with sponsors.
I think in future if the sponsors have a similar project, MTD will be their go-to.
I second
Resource smoothing aims to redistribute resources without changing project deadlines, often leading to increased costs to maintain the original schedule.
Resource leveling adjusts project schedules to balance resource demand, potentially impacting deadlines but ensuring resource constraints are respected.
Both techniques are important for managing projects, with smoothing maintaining constraints and leveling prioritizing resource balance.
Resource leveling is the best option for this project given the MTD project cost because it will preserve the initial projects, nevertheless, it will have an impact on the project timeline in contrast to resource smoothing, which can raise the projects’ cost capacity.
Resources smoothing will be best to keep with timeline. I wouldnโt use resources levelling for MDT project. However is we start the planning early, we may consider resources levelling to minimise cost
In my opinion, in executing a water installation project at MTD, I wouldn’t implement the resource levelling approach as this would impact the timeline and the cost of the project being worked upon.
Considering the MTD events company and Glasgow event. It is feasible to implement a resource leveling approach because it helps to define the project scope including all tasks and activities required to complete it. It Identifies all the resources required to complete each task or activity within the project scope. Using resource leveling techniques would optimize resource utilization and avoid overallocation or underutilization of resources. This may involve adjusting task durations, rescheduling tasks, or reallocating resources to different tasks as needed.
Considering the MTD events company and Glasgow event. I think It is feasible to implement a resource leveling approach because it helps to define the project scope including all tasks and activities required to complete it. It Identifies all the resources required to complete each task or activity within the project scope. Using resource leveling techniques would optimize resource utilization and avoid overallocation or underutilization of resources. This may involve adjusting task durations, rescheduling tasks, or reallocating resources to different tasks as needed.
I think Resource Smoothing will be a more acceptable option for me because I always like to keep up with time and would try to avoid anything that will make me fall short of deadline…
Considering MTD, the water installation company, and Glasgow event, resource leveling approach might be feasible because this will help optimize resource utilization, minimize project delays, and improve overall project efficiency by ensuring that resources are allocated in a balanced and efficient manner throughout the project lifecycle. By smoothing out resource peaks and valleys, resource leveling will help to mitigate risks associated with resource constraints and contributes to the successful delivery of their project on time and within budget.
Considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, resource leveling approach could be feasible but would require careful planning.
This approach aims to manage resources available with a consideration of adjusting the project schedule to reduce the impact on project costs.
Resource leveling may not be ideal for the MTD water installation event company scenario, and the Glasgow event as the event is already scheduled, and meeting up with timelines is pivotal to the project’s success as resource leveling may require extending the timeline and other activities that may affect meeting up with deadlines.
In the scenario of MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, resource levelling could potentially be applied to manage resources effectively. Resource levelling involves adjusting the schedule of activities within a project to ensure that resources are allocated evenly and efficiently over time, without exceeding resource constraints. This approach aims to avoid peaks and valleys in resource utilization, leading to a smoother and more balanced workload distribution.
Yes, it’s possible to apply a r. Resource leveling could help in managing resources more efficiently, smoothing out peaks and valleys in resource demand during the event preparations, thus ensuring a more balanced workload and optimized resource utilization.
Considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, resource leveling approach could be feasible but would require careful planning.
This approach aims to manage resources available with a consideration of adjusting the project schedule to reduce the impact on project costs.
However, most event have a fixed deadline for the event to kickoff so carefully planning such rescheduling would be needed to avoid interfering with the event kick off. This could lead to unsatisfied clients and loss of follow up work opportunities.
For the Glasgow event by MTD, a resource leveling approach could be beneficial based on the project’s circumstances.
This involves optimizing resource allocation to avoid overstaffing or understaffing throughout the project. Resource leveling prioritizes rescheduling tasks to stay within resource capacity, potentially impacting the project schedule. Careful planning is crucial for successful implementation.
Using the scenario of MTD and the Glasgow event, it is feasible to apply a resource leveling even though there is the possibility of encountering challenges.
Resource leveling has to do with adjusting the project schedule to ensure that resource usage is distributed evenly over time, which can lead to prevention of resource overloads and delays. In the context of the Glasgow event, where MTD is involved in water installation, this approach could help in managing resources more effectively and ensuring that they are not overextended during peak periods.
However, events could have fixed deadlines and specific requirements, which could make it difficult to adjust schedules without impacting other aspects of the project. Additionally, the availability of certain resources, such as equipment or skilled labor, may be limited and not easily adjustable.
Therefore, while resource leveling could be considered for the Glasgow event, it would require careful planning and coordination to ensure that it does not adversely affect project timelines, quality, or stakeholder satisfaction.
Implementing a resource leveling approach in a water installation events company like MTD can be feasible if there are significant fluctuations in resource demand over time.
Resource leveling aims to balance the allocation of resources such as manpower, equipment, and materials to avoid peaks and valleys in resource utilization, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased costs.
If MTD experiences fluctuations in demand for resources due to varying project schedules or seasonal trends, resource leveling could help optimize resource utilization and improve overall project efficiency.
Considering the MTD events company and Glasgow event. It is feasible to implement a resource leveling approach because it helps to define the project scope including all tasks and activities required to complete it. It Identifies all the resources required to complete each task or activity within the project scope. Using resource leveling techniques would optimize resource utilization and avoid overallocation or underutilization of resources. This may involve adjusting task durations, rescheduling tasks, or reallocating resources to different tasks as needed.
Applying resource levelling approach for a water installation event with MTD would be
because the Resource levelling technique aims to optimize resource utilization and ensure a more balanced workload across projects.
Using the resource levelling approach will lead to;
โข Minimized conflicts and delays.
โข Leads to a smoother operation
โข Reduces bottlenecks
โข Reduced risk of project overrun
In some situations however it may not be feasible to level resources if there are specific requirements for the project with regards to specific timelines.
Considering the scenario of MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, applying a resource leveling approach might be feasible but could encounter challenges.
Resource leveling involves adjusting the project schedule to ensure that resource usage is distributed evenly over time, which can help to prevent resource overloads and delays. In the context of the Glasgow event, where MTD is involved in water installation, this approach could help in managing resources more effectively and ensuring that they are not overextended during peak periods.
However, there are factors unique to event management projects like the Glasgow event that may complicate resource leveling. Events often have fixed deadlines and specific requirements, making it difficult to adjust schedules without impacting other aspects of the project. Additionally, the availability of certain resources, such as equipment or skilled labor, may be limited and not easily adjustable.
Therefore, while resource leveling could be considered for the Glasgow event, it would require careful planning and coordination to ensure that it does not adversely affect project timelines, quality, or stakeholder satisfaction.
Considering the MTD project cost, resource leveling is the most suitable for this project because it will maintain the initial projects; however it will affect the project deadline compared to resource smoothing which can increase the cost capacity of the projects.
Considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, implementing a resource leveling approach could be viable based on the project’s unique circumstances. Resource leveling entails balancing resource utilization across the project timeline to prevent uneven peaks and troughs in allocation.
Contrarily, resource leveling maintains the current resource capacity but prioritizes rescheduling tasks to prevent resource conflicts. Its objective is to ensure resource usage stays within available capacity limits. While effective in averting shortages and bottlenecks, this method could necessitate adjustments to the project schedule, possibly causing delays in project delivery.
Overall, while resource leveling could be feasible for the Glasgow event, it would require careful planning and consideration of various factors to ensure its successful implementation.
MTD wouldnโt be able to use resource levelling as it directly impacts the time taken for quality eater to be delivered at the venue. Being a lobal event of that magnitude, the dates cannot be postponed. So, they can work on resource smoothing or modifying the scope of work to reduce the water quantity/or water points at the venue.
Well , To me i don’t think a resource leveling approach will be a good option for these companies because they are companies that renders services to a event. So trying to postpone might not be a good thing for their profile buh i suggest they add more resources because it will be better
I do not think a resource leveling approach will work because MTD is serving event programmes that are already fixed with set dates and publicity done on event dates. This will make it difficult to move deadline but instead resource smoothing becomes the only way out.
One of the selling point of a PM is meeting deadlines. For a renowned company like MTD, it won’t speak well of such a reputable company to shift or change the delivery date. It could tarnish their reputation. Rather, resource smoothing approach is more appropriate.
In my opinion, resource levelling will work perfectly. Considering there flexibility in the delivery time and rigidity of the project budget.
MTD cannot implement the resource leveling approach because they deal with events and events have dates and timelines, and MTD cannot afford to make their clients uncomfortable or shift their time. So they will have to use resource smoothing approach to deliver within scope and on time.
Certainly resource smoothing is the best for MTD as it was rightly done in the case of infected material, they had to use out of the standby buffer. The deadline must be met without compromise on quality.
Certainly resource smoothing is the best for MTD as it was rightly done in the case of infected material, they had to use out of the standby buffer. The deadline must be met without compromise on quality.
MTD wouldn’t be able to use resource levelling as it directly impacts the time taken for quality eater to be delivered at the venue. Being a lobal event of that magnitude, the dates cannot be postponed. So, they can work on resource smoothing or modifying the scope of work to reduce the water quantity/or water points at the venue.
I think your approach should be based on the clients and stake holders expectations. For example if the clients would agree to a slight change in deadline then you can use the levelling approach? but if they insisted on the same deadline then you can use the resource smoothing approach but you can make them understand the situation involved in this particular approach which offcourse involves an extra cost.. so by so doing you keep the ball in their court to decide.
In the context of MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, resource leveling could potentially be applied to manage resources effectively. Resource leveling involves adjusting the schedule of activities within a project to ensure that resources are allocated evenly and efficiently over time, without exceeding resource constraints. This approach aims to avoid peaks and valleys in resource utilization, leading to a smoother and more balanced workload distribution.
For MTD, which is involved in organizing water installation events, resource leveling could help in optimizing the allocation of resources such as manpower, equipment, and materials throughout the various stages of event planning, preparation, and execution. By identifying resource bottlenecks and adjusting schedules accordingly, MTD can prevent overloading certain resources while others remain underutilized.
However, it’s essential to consider the specific circumstances and constraints of the Glasgow event as well as MTD’s overall project portfolio. Factors such as budget limitations, resource availability, project deadlines, and stakeholder expectations will influence the feasibility and effectiveness of resource-leveling. MTD would need to conduct a thorough analysis of its resources, project timelines, and priorities to determine the best approach for resource management, whether it involves resource leveling, resource smoothing, or a combination of both strategies.
Ultimately, the goal should be to optimize resource utilization, minimize disruptions, and ensure the successful execution of the Glasgow event while maintaining alignment with MTD’s overall business objectives and customer satisfaction.
While resource levelling can be a valuable technique for optimizing resource utilization and balancing workload, its applicability in any project depends on various factors such as resource constraints, project duration, complexity, stakeholder expectations, and organizational practices.
An exemplary illustration lies in the assessment of expansive infrastructure endeavors such as railway systems. These undertakings frequently encounter the need for rescaling owing to escalating costs, leading to substantial deviations from their initial blueprints. The ramifications of these alterations can extend to the client and a diverse array of stakeholders, potentially culminating in missed prospects for future engagements.
MTD deals with events, which by nature, have strict timelines. Unlike construction projects for example where some flexibility might exist, delaying water delivery at an event can significantly disrupt the schedule and negatively impact the experience for organizers and attendees. Resource leveling often involves adjusting project timelines to optimize resource usage, and in MTD’s case, this could mean pushing back water delivery or setup, causing problems.
Certain events, like concerts or conferences, have specific timeframes for water needs. Resource leveling might lead to stretching out these critical periods, impacting things like stage availability or venue access for setting up water infrastructure. This could lead to logistical nightmares and potentially even safety hazards.
Timely water delivery is crucial for the smooth running of an event. Resource leveling could lead to delays in setting up or refilling water stations, creating inconveniences for attendees and potentially impacting sanitation or health aspects of the event.
Apt!
Considering the MTD project cost, resource leveling is the most suitable for this as it will maintain the initial projects but would only affects the the deadline formerly scheduled compared to resource smoothing which can increase the cost capacity of the projects, hence affect the selling and marketing cost.
I think the first thing to look into before taking any consideration is the kind of project, the delicacy project. While resource smoothing may work very fine with some project, Resource levelling may not work on it.
In view of MTD, they had employed the use of Resource smoothing in one of the videos we watched , although the client covered the extra cost and the project had to go on as originally planned. While on the Glasglow incident, Resource smoothing is very much applicable as the situation was that of an emergency and the PM had to use those available to work on the Project.
Considering MTD water company, it may be feasible to consider resource leveling , NOT altering the existing resource capacity but instead rescheduling deadlines within Maximum Floating, which will have impact on project deadlines but delivering quality water and not leading to later cost which may be encountered due to non conformance
for Glasgow event company on the other hand due to the fixed duration and fixed floating time, in my opinion it is only imperative to consider Resource Smoothing maintaining original project deadlines while increasing project costs. because in this case i believe the client will value speed and time conformity.
Considering the reality that MTD may be a water company that handles occasions with settled date, Resource smoothing is appropriate which increments the extend taken a toll (This would be communicated to the extend sponsors)While guaranteeing the occasions hold as anticipated with any dissatisfaction.
Considering the MTD water project, resource leveling is a better option to execute such project as it will not increase project cost but reschedule project time and will still have a perfect result while managing project cost, instead of resource smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
What the customer wants is a perfect project even if it passes deadline.
Considering the MTD water project, resource leveling is a better option to execute such project as it will not increase project cost but reschedule project time and will still have a perfect result while managing project cost, instead of resource smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
I wouldn’t suggest employing the Resource Levelling method for the MTD water installation events and the Glasgow event. These projects have strict deadlines, and rescheduling them could significantly raise project costs. Instead, opting for Resource Smoothing would be prudent. While it may increase the overall project cost, bringing in additional or more skilled team members, or extending working hours through overtime, would help meet the planned deadlines without compromising on quality.
For the MTD water installation events and the Glasgow event, I will not recommend the Resource levelling approach, mainly because these projectsโ deadlines are time sensitive and it would be a greater loss to have deadlines rescheduled but will advise they make use of resource smoothing either by adding new resources to hasten the project.
While resource levelling can be a valuable technique for optimizing resource utilization and balancing workload, its applicability in any project depends on various factors such as resource constraints, project duration, complexity, stakeholder expectations, and organizational practices. While it may not be suitable for every project, resource levelling can be applied effectively in many projects where resources are limited or shared among multiple tasks, and where project timelines allow for adjustments to resource allocation.
Basing on the scenario of MTD water installation, It is possible to apply resources levelling as it workable and effective in many project because the activities a defined at it stage having the deadline in mind.
Unexpected delays and other conflicts are a part of the real world and can crop up anytime without announcing their arrival. It can prevent such problems by adjusting the two most important variables: project deadlines and available resources. The correct strategy can help you optimize resources, extend deadlines, narrow the project scope, and garner more resources.
Employees worldwide believe a healthy work-life balance is the most important attribute of any job. Statistics show resources improve productivity by 21% when they have a good work-life balance.
Not exceeding the regular working hours by providing buffer days to employees, breaking up chunks of large tasks into smaller subtasks, and dividing them among team members will make the workload lighter and the team members more efficient. This process is called resource smoothing. Buffer days are evenly distributed across all days and are advantageous since they provide extra time for solving unexpected problems, effectively reducing stress and overtime.
Resource smoothing coupled with leveling promoted improved work-life balance as the team worked regular working hours with an equal daily workload.
Project managers often turn to resource leveling to ensure that the timelines for any project can be correctly predicted and conflicts arising out of time, scope, or insufficient resources can be tackled early on without snowballing into a huge problem, forcing employees to work overtime. Understanding what leveling resources is, its use, importance, and related information are vital to enhancing productivity and reducing burnout by eliminating over-allocation and minimizing the risk of resource burnout.
For the MTD water installation events and the Glasgow event, successful leveling is often achieved after some experience. Here are some tools you can use to help you expertly execute projects:
1. Use Gantt charts.
2. Leverage Project Management Software
3. Draw network diagrams.
4. Make realistic estimates of resource needs.
For the MTD water installation events and the Glasgow event, I would not recommend using the Resource levelling approach, majorly because these projectsโ deadlines are time sensitive and it would be a greater loss to have deadlines rescheduled-which could likely increase cost of the project also. Rather it would be advisable to implement Resource Smoothing here because though the total cost of the project would increase, the influx of extra or more experienced team members or the extra hours added as overtime for the team members would ensure that the project planned deadlines are adhered to.
Time is power.So in the case of MTD project, I will rather suggest appropriateness of resource smoothing so as not disappoint those that have been eagerly waiting to use the service and project on record time
Due to time constraints, resource smoothing will be a more feasible approach than resource levelling in the MTD events, because thereโs already a fixed timeline which may have been communicated to end users. Rescheduling the time may have a great negative impact to the project than increasing cost, due to the project being a time sensitive one.
Considering both scenarios, resource levelling approach is feasible to implement as this can create balance in the workload on resources in order to align resource usage with their available capacity. Resource levelling will not change the current capacity but focused on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines. This is contrast to resource smoothing, new resources can be added and this affects the project cost.
In resource levelling, the cost advantages relate to a steady distribution of cost over time, because cost of selection, hiring and then lay offs are often high and can be reduced through better scheduling and meet deadlines.
Considering the importance of timing and prompt delivery, I think resource smoothing would be the best solution. This would help to avoid missed deadlines and maximize the use of available resources. This is the ideal option in order to maintain our reputation and credibility.
Considering MTD and Glasglow as a case study, Yes, it will be possible to apply Resource Levelling approach regardless of any form of uncertainty or complexity.
A resource levelling approach can benefit MTD and Glasglow activities by balancing the workload on resources in order to align resource usage with their available capacity. This can be done by shifting schedules of projects within their available floats, which helps in stable workloads, enhance morale, reduce risk of stress and allows steady distribution of resource cost over time.
Resource levelling aims at balancing resourse usage by avoiding Over Allocation or Under Utilization of resources available, which can help to reduce project dey and cost, promotes efficiency in the project and mitigate scheduling conflicts.
The resource leveling approach requires identifying the resource requirements, analyzing resource availability and strategically Delaying and Extending Non-critical activities within available floats and Critical activities as well. All of which aims at adjusting the project schedule to balance the workload on resources. ~Julius
After examining the provided figure Resources, smoothing is the best approach for both MTD and Glasgow, where the planned deadline remains but new resources are being added and the project cost increased.
Resources levelling isnโt advisable for MTD, as this might be a disaster for the sponsor of the event because they might not possibly reschedule the event because of MTD alone which might also affect others. Therefore , adopting resource levelling would mean disappointing the project sponsor.
Adopting smoothing means Satisfying and delivering project in the agreed time with clients and stakeholders without disappointment.
this helps the organisation to earn the trust of the client. Our values is priority.
.
Resources soothing maintains the project deadline but increases cost ,but leveling on the other hand brings in rescheduling,in this case ,resources soothing is advice in this kind of project so resources soothing has to come in but every change has to be communicated with the project sponsors .
MTD is a company involved with water distribution. It has been allocated a specific number of days and time for the project. Resources smoothing aims to deliver original project deadlines while increasing project cost. For a company like MTD this will be the best method for them to assure accuracy and efficiency in delivering their project.Communication should be ensured with the stakeholders to realize a perfect project performance.
For a company like MTD, which is involved in water distribution for mostly an event with a specific date and time. Resource Smoothing is a good option for them just that it will only increase the project cost and all the deliverables will still be achieved within the projected deadline.
Resource leveling might be a disaster for the sponsor of the event because they might not possibly reschedule the event because of MTD alone which might also affect other department(s).
Oluwagbemi Elasoru
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines. And MTD is a water company which works in event projects, I’ll go with resource smoothing. Rescheduling of dates of event may not be favourable to stakeholders or clients as this may affect a lot of things as MTD may not be the only company working on the event project. If the event is rescheduled because of MTD company,other companies working on the project may also be affected and this may bring loss to stakeholders. As there is another option of resource smoothing which will not affect the deadline but only increases project cost, I’ll advise that smoothing be applied after proper discussion with the sponsor of the project.
Resource smoothing is advisable when handling a project like MTD.
Resources soothing ,maintains the project deadline but increases cost ,but leveling on the other hand brings in rescheduling,in this case ,it can’t be rescheduled because this project involves a water company,so resources soothing has to come in but every change has to be communicated with the project sponsors .
Considering the fact that MTD is a water company that handles events with fixed date, Resource smoothing is applicable which increases the project cost (This would be communicated to the project sponsors)While ensuring the events hold as expected with any disappointment.
For MTD company, resource levelling will affect their kind of work since it has to do with deadlines. Though it could help the company come up with better ideas and innovations for enhanced production.
But, resource smoothing is actually preferred since deadlines will be affected, not minding the costs.
Based on MTD/Glasgow event scenario, resource smoothing is more feasible. Though, it increases project cost but it aims at meeting with the project deadlines and deliverables. To get the best of this approach, communication with sponsors is very essential.
While both resource smoothing and resource leveling aim to optimize resource utilization and manage project constraints, they differ in their approach. Resource smoothing focuses on balancing resource demand over time within predefined limits, while resource leveling adjusts project schedules to ensure that resource demand does not exceed availability at any point. Both techniques are valuable tools for project managers to maintain project efficiency, manage risks, and deliver successful outcomes.
In my opinion, resource smoothing would be more favourable for MTD because they work with fixed dates and it will be totally inconvenient to adjust the schedule. Resource smoothing will increase the cost but it will reduce delay, create stability and enhance stakeholder satisfaction. Communication with the event sponsors is essential before implementing this approach.
Resource levelling is all about balancing the workload on resources in a project, after assessing their capacity, to ensure that the available resources are redistributed in a manner that makes the project achievable with the available resources. The Project challenge experienced by MTD, a water installation events company was one related to project quality, as the supply of water was bad for the Glasgow event. Naturally, where the supply is bad and water provided is insufficient for the estimated level of water required for the project, resource levelling would not be ideal.
There is an anticipated number of end users expected at the event (the project), based on historical data. An amount of float has been provided for this in the project plan. Where the supply is bad and the water supplied insufficient, it is likely that the water provided would not serve the anticipated end users. Thus, the project scope (in terms of end users that can be served) would either have to be adjusted, by scaling down drastically, or the event spread over a certain number of days to enable the project cater to the anticipated number of end users. The project might have to be cancelled altogether where the water supply is so bad that the end users to be served would not justify the cost of the project. Resource levelling in this case would materially affect not just the scope of the project but other associated project costs as the availability of other resources and elements of the project including the availability and cost of the venue and the time costs of the sponsor and the other stakeholders in the project.
Consequently, resource smoothing would seem to be a more viable option where the cost of providing an alternative source of water can be incorporated into the adjusted project plan as opposed to making major alterations to the project scope that would affect timelines in a manner that would multiply the cost of the project or make the project a white elephant one.
I would apply resource smoothing because the event has a date already which cannot be changed easily, therefore, I would add resources to meet up and maintain relationship with sponsor and stakeholders. This I would do through effective communication
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines but the project cost is increased in the process. While resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines. So for me, considering the fact that MTD is a water company that handles events with fixed date, Resource smoothing is applicable which increases the project cost which most likely will be communicated to the project sponsors and this ensures that the whole events will hold as expected without any disappointment.
MTD as a company that works with with events might not benefit from
resources leveling ad it will require rescheduling and impact of project deadline . Instead I think project smoothing will be a better option
Yes is visible reason been that time is not altered to meet up with the customer’s demand for water. Since levelling approach still keep to time within the float schedule.
The video about MTD makes it feasible to implement the resource levelling because persistent level of resource usage during the period of the project will not disrupt the already established one not minding putting a hold to the previous project so as not to overload and come out in effectively.
Resource smoothing and resource leveling seek to optimize resource utilization and project schedules, they differ in their focus and approach. Resource smoothing aims to even out resource usage over time by adjusting non-critical activities within their float, while resource leveling prioritizes balancing resource demand and availability throughout the project by adjusting activity schedules within their total float
Considering the fact that MTD is a water company that handles events with fixed date, Resource smoothing is applicable which increases the project cost (This would be communicated to the project sponsors)While ensuring the events hold as expected with any disappointment.
Resource levelling would be feasible to implement in the MTD project because it would not alter the existing resources.
MTD cannot afford to reschedule deadlines.
We have been told in the course of this study that ” they are the first in and the last out”.
Without them, there’s virtually no event.
They would benefit from Resource smoothing as opposed to resource levelling.
They had given an illustration earlier where the client didn’t supply correct information and they found out too late that the water available was bad,so they had to get in water tankers to meet up with the delivery deadline. It cost them extra but they were on time.
MTD aims to maintain a constant level of resource usage throughout the project duration, even if it means delaying certain activities to avoid overloading resources. Resource levelling approach is ideal for them.
Resource leveling and resource smoothing are both project management techniques used to manage resource allocation, but they serve different purposes:
Resource Leveling:
Resource leveling is primarily concerned with adjusting the schedule of activities within a project to ensure that the demand for resources does not exceed their availability during any specific time period.
The main goal of resource leveling is to eliminate peaks and valleys in the resource utilization graph by shifting activities within their total float or slack time. And this affects the deadline of a project
Resource smoothing focuses on adjusting the schedule of activities within a project to ensure that resource usage remains within predetermined limits, typically by varying the start and finish times of activities within their float or slack time. This tend to increase the project cost as it helps to maintain project deadline.
From the video so far about MTD it’s feasible to implement the resource levelling approach since It aims to maintain a consistent level of resource usage throughout the project duration, even if it means delaying certain activities to avoid overloading resources.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines
Considering the high cost of resources smoothing, implementing it is good and should be discussed to the sponsors. As the MTD works resources leveling will not be advised, because water is a very essential need in life. Looking at all that has been written the resources smoothing is to be implemented.
We have been told that MTD which is majorly a water installation company at event centre is usually the last company to move to site after all other facilities have been installed eg the brick work, furniture work and even the plumbing work etc. Its even a hectic fight having to get out 3 to 4 days for them to fit in the water works before the start of the event proper.
With such constrain on time, Resource Leveling that impact deadline but no added cost will not be recommended. However Resources Smoothing which preserves deadline duration with not too significant impact on Resource capacity/ Budget would be most ideal.
Since the event date is fixed and sacrosanct its best to deploy/absorb more cost by employing Resource Smoothing to prevent fluctuatons and shift in deadline / timing so as to preserve the event.
Resource smoothing will be the best approach to get the job done. Although it will bring about extra cost, the project will be delivered as at the agreed time.
With a tight deadline and of course expedited deliverable, i will advise MTD apply resource smoothing, discuss with the sponsors or organization, elucidate on why it is necessary and get the job done
In a stable and advanced community with premium value on the timely comfort of its inhabitants, such a project – handled by MTD Company – will be advised to employ resource smoothing. This will ensure prompt delivery with strict compliance. Except for unforeseen circumstances that may request for employing resource-leveling.
MTD is an installation water company and best approach which can be used is resource smoothing which will make the delivery more costly but more efficient. Except for unforseen circumstances which can lead to reschedule that is resources levelling.
Resource smoothing will be favourable for the event company because events comes with fixed dates and it will be totally disruptive to alter the schedule. Resource Leveling working with the float or increase the schedule will be more suitable for MTD the water company. This will increase the project cost, however the deliverable will meet acceptable criteria.
The terms “resource smoothing” and “resource leveling” are often used interchangeably, but there is a subtle difference between the two. Resource smoothing is a general term that refers to any process of balancing the workload of a team or project over time. This can include spreading tasks out evenly over the course of a project, or ensuring that each team member has a balanced workload. Resource leveling is a specific technique within resource smoothing that focuses on spreading the workload evenly across all resources. So, while resource leveling is a type of resource smoothing, the terms are not exactly the same.
Because of the MTD company, the project’s operational nature is not always certain, so at some point, alternative approaches to presenting the results may be taken into consideration. Given that the initial project cost may have been too high to incur additional costs for project smoothing in order to complete the work by the deadline, project leveling may be essential in this situation. Thus, in order to avoid incurring additional costs, I believe it is best to discuss the project’s nature with clients and all other stakeholders by outlining how the leveling process will be applied in order to produce a high-quality project, albeit with a different deadline.
Some projects does not give room for completion date adjustment which would have fit in into resource leveling. In a project where the delivery date can not be adjusted forward, I prefer using resource smoothing. Although my cost will increase but I will deliver on the due date.
Timing is an important factor and therefore resource smoothing is advantageous over resource levelling.
Opting for resource leveling may not be advisable; instead, a resource smoothing approach is recommended. This entails ensuring that members with the necessary resources from the office are available to address challenges promptly, thereby meeting deadlines and ensuring customer satisfaction. However, it’s important to note that this approach might increase the cost of production.
Here, in regards to timing and prompt delivery, I’ll rather that resource smoothing should be opted for which is the ideal thing to do here as this will help save face and reputation.
The advantages of resource smoothing include.
-It prevents missed deadlines
-It maximizes resource utilization
Thank you!
Considering the timing of the project, Resource Smoothing will be the best approach over Resource Levelling.
Resource levelling will not be the best approach here because of the starting date and finishing date of the project,in that case I will suggest resource Smoothing because of the timing of the project.
Resource leveling will ensure timely delivery and reduce the chance of fluctuation and request for additional time.
โโResource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlinesโ.
As regards MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event. I will suggest the resource smoothing as the solution. This is due to the fact that resource smoothing tends to maintain the original deadline for the project but at a higher cost. The event date has been fixed and altering the date will not make sense. Hence the need to add extra โexpertsโ to meet the deadline.
The advantages of resource smoothing include.
-It prevents missed deadlines
-It maximizes resource utilization
Resource levelling helps to maintain the project deadline but increase the available resources and manpower. It doesnโt alter the project resources as in the case of MTD the water installation event, resource levelling might be possible cause it wonโt affect the project deadline and the scope of the project though just additional resources will be added.
Resource scheduling focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project cost. Did to the peculiarities of the MTD project, I will go for resource scheduling, with my negotiation prowess, I will get the non-confirming cost to execute the project perfectly
In the aspect of the MTD water project, I wouldn’t advise using resouce leveling because of the timeline. The stakeholders may not be willing to spare time but rather open to using more resources as long as its within timeline.
The best practice for MTD Glasgow water project would definitely be resource smoothing that focuses more on preserving planned project duration and its deadline.
Resource leveling is what I will go with because of the deadline it will have effect on delivery
Resource levelling will not my preferred approach because of the fixed dateline, the game is starting in 2/ 3 days. Resource smoothing will be the preferred option to be able to meet the dateline for the start of the games.
Resource leveling approach will have impact on the effect on the deliveries of MTD in the case of timing.
As for MTD, resource levelling approach will impact the completion of the project within stipulated time. To meet up with stated time resource smoothing approach is better.
Considering the time constraint involved in the MTD project as a water installation company
MTD is a water installation company for events and each of their projects has a stipulated timing, hence resource levelling approach might not be suitable if adopted as it involves rescheduling of time frame due to limited resources which will invariably affect the project deadline. My priority as a PM is to ensure resources are allocated adequately and that it should not be overutilized or underutilized. This might result in slight changes to the planned budget and additional costs but customer satisfaction will be met and delivery of services will not exceed the expected time. This is what matters most to MTD clients.
Resource smoothing aims to balance resource utilization over time by adjusting the timing of non-critical activities, potentially resulting in a longer project duration. Resource leveling, on the other hand, focuses on redistributing tasks to eliminate resource overloads while maintaining the original project duration. Both techniques are crucial for effective resource management in project planning and execution.
I would recommend the implementation of resource leveling in this kind of project because certain factors needs to be consider like understanding the economic aspects involved
I will advice
Resource soothing. Although, cost may change but not resource levelling due to time.
with what resource levelling implies, implementing it in the case of the MTD project does not seem feasibe. noting that there are other activities that will commence after your own project makes it impossible for MTD to consider or adopt the resource levelling approach.
with what resource levelling implies, implementing it in the case of the MTD project does not seem feasibe. noting that there are other activities that will commence after your own project makes it impossible for MTD to consider or adopt the resource levelling approach.
As much as project timely delivery is important, more also, project cost controlling is essential.
Resource leveling will ensure timely delivery and reduce the chance of fluctuation and request for additional time.
Mfon Brendan
Cohort 13
Team 9
Implementing resource levelling will not be feasible as these water installing event work with timelines. The customer may not be willing to sacrifice time but may be better willing to use more resources to get the work done without shifting the schedule of the project.
However since timeline is important in these MTD water events, resource smothing may be more suitable, as this will focus on resolving any issue they have with resources without necessarily shifting the project dates. Resource smoothing allows for more flexibility in adjusting activities within their float roo ensure that resources are allocated efficiently without extending the project time
It will not be feasible to implement resource leveling in this kind of project because certain factors needs to be consider like understanding the economic aspects involved in the negotiation and of the mutual value sought through the collaboration.
Secondly the environmental factor and the climate condition needs to be considered.
And lastly the more time wasted, is the more costly the project would become, time management is a skill all project manager must consider in any given projects which makes the project to be defined.
I would not advise using the resource levelling approach as d major issue of the project is a scarcity of resources.
In light of MTD’s critical role in supplying portable drinking water for sports events, my main focus will be on optimizing resource management. As we approach fixed deadlines before the main event, efficient resource allocation is essential to meet these time-sensitive requirements. Prioritizing resource optimization is key to ensuring resources are utilized effectively without any wastage or excess burden. Given the project’s intricate nature, adopting a strategic approach to resource management through optimization facilitates appropriate resource allocation. This systematic approach plays a pivotal role in exceeding customer expectations and providing top-notch services to MTD’s clientele.
Haven observed the MTD project as a deadline project, I would say in the event of resource overload, I will advice a s
Resource soothing. Although, cost may change. But not resource levelling due to time.
The core values of MTD, including passion for what they do, employee drive, support for everyone, and quality infrastructure, positively influence the ethical aspects of their operations. However, a misalignment or breach of these core values and ethical principles may lead to the following consequences:
1. Violation of Rules and Regulations: A deviation from MTD’s core values and ethical principles may result in the violation of rules and regulations, impacting the project’s compliance and potentially leading to environmental disasters.
2. Impact on Moral Principles and Quality Infrastructure: Adhering to moral principles and ethical practices, coupled with the values of passion and drive, is essential for achieving high-quality infrastructure. If these values are compromised, it could result in poor infrastructure quality, posing environmental problems and undermining the overall success of the project.
Resource smoothing is cost_effective in terms of project management
Considering the project, I will prioritize resource smoothing because I believe it is cost-effective.
The MTD project is a deadline project. Projects have to be completed within a timeframe so that events that are scheduled to benefit from the water installations will not be affected and if it does it will impact them greatly.
In a case where issues arises, my best bet in dealing with resource overload is resource smoothing, although there will be a cost cost that will generate a cost variance, but then this is an ideal way to maximise resource efficiency. I don’t think it will be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach because of the timing effect.
Considering MTD’s role, I will prioritize resource leveling. Examining their provision of portable drinking water at sports events, this project must adhere to fixed deadlines preceding the main event. Prioritizing resource leveling is crucial to address the sensitivity of these deadlines, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently without overload or underutilization. Additionally, given the project’s complexity, resource leveling provides a structured approach to resource management, ensuring appropriate allocation. This approach is instrumental in meeting customer expectations and delivering high-quality services to MTD’s clients.
Discussion on comprehensive view on Resource overload. Using MTD water project and Glasgow event as a case study.
Looking at the MTD project and Glasgow event scenario, using Resource leveling as an approach will not work, because there was a fixed date for the Glasgow event and it can’t be shifted, therefore it’s better to go for the Resource smoothing approach, with this I will be able to meet up with the deadline, although will incurred more cost but its preferable to satisfy the Event owner than worry about the cost.
Akinmoye Segun Wilson …Cohort 13, Team 2
Resource levelling might not be applicable in the case of MTD water supply because there is a certain a deadline to be met by the company and take for instance, in a case where the water to be supplied is needed for an occasion, then automatically there is a fixed date for the occasion already and there is no way it can be shifted.
The only applicable means in this case is Resource loading. It might be more easy for the set of people or company MTD wants to supply water to add or foster extra cost in order to meet up with deadline than to be disappointed.
The MTD water installation project is anchored on the Glasgow event which is planned to start on a given date. Any adjustments in date of completion by MTD for the water project will impact on the event itself.
Resource leveling is better methodology to apply for MTD project as it cost effective. You have to manage what you have within the project lifetime despite project deadline change.
The MTD water installation project is anchored on the Glasgow event which is planned to start on a given date. Any adjustments in date of completion by MTD for the water project will impact on the event itself. As such, being a PM at MTD, my focus is to deliver before the start of the event therefore resource leveling might not achieve that as it has high probability of exceeding the dateline of the project delivery. Therefore I’d rather implement the resource smoothing approach, make a little adjustments in the planned budget and incurre some additional cost but stick to my planned date of project delivery. By this, I will not interrupt the main event of the project owner for which reason we are contracted the water project.
Basing on the scenario of Glasgow MTDs event, Resource leveling is not really applicable. It requires some degree of flexibility in time frames while in the scenario MTD Team had to move in some time before to establish unplanned approaches which might have resulted into change in planned costs. Thus, in this case resource smoothing would be the best approach rather.
Not feasible as resource leveling provides flexibility in adjusting project dates, while resource smoothing focuses on meeting time constraints.
Balancing workloads through resource leveling entails smoothing fluctuations in resource demand across the project timeline for MTD. This process involves distributing labor, equipment, and materials to prevent bottlenecks or overloads. By achieving this equilibrium, MTD can maintain a consistent and sustainable pace throughout the project.
Optimizing resource efficiency is a direct outcome of effective resource leveling for MTD. This approach enables the optimal utilization of available resources, including skilled personnel, equipment, and raw materials. By aligning resource deployment with project needs, MTD minimizes idle time and maximizes workforce and asset efficiency.
Furthermore, resource leveling serves as a risk mitigation strategy for MTD. By mitigating peaks in resource demand that could lead to burnout or delays, MTD enhances its ability to manage unforeseen challenges effectively. This proactive approach fosters a more resilient project timeline, reducing vulnerability to disruptions from external factors.
Resource leveling is better methodology to apply for MTD project as it cost effective. You ve to manage what you ve within the project lifetime despite project deadline change.
Resource leveling focuses on rescheduling and extending the project deadline which may be necessary in some cases when some inevitable circumstances occur, however one must be careful in this approach as it may lead to unnecessary extension of the project, abandonment and lack of follow up or supervision till the end
Although they apply different methodologies and emphasize different goals, both techniques aid in the efficient management of project schedules and resource utilization.they can be applied depending on the project sponsor and the delievering time.
Yes,it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario.
Resource leveling involves smoothing out resource usage to prevent peaks and valleys in resource allocation. For an event like the one MTD is organizing in Glasgow, resource leveling could help ensure that resources such as staff, equipment, and materials are allocated efficiently throughout the project timeline. This can help prevent bottlenecks and optimize resource utilization.
Resource leveling seeks to balance resource availability and demand by delaying or splitting tasks to minimize resource overloads and resolve conflicts. Resource smoothing seeks to sustain a steady rate of resource utilization over time by modifying non-critical activities within their float.
Although they apply different methodologies and emphasize different goals, both techniques aid in the efficient management of project schedules and resource utilization.
Cohort 13 Team 6
Due to time constraints, resource smoothing will be a more feasible approach than resource levelling in the MTD events, because thereโs already a fixed timeline which may have been communicated to end users. Rescheduling the time may have a great negative impact to the project than increasing cost, due to the project being a time sensitive one.
Ogheneochuko Ogheneruona
MTD is a water installation company for event and every of their projects has stipulated time line, Hence resource leveling might not be suitable if adopted as it involves rescheduling of time frame due to limited resources which will invariably affect the project deadline.
But if project sponsors are will to increase project cost or resources then resources smoothing would be the best option.
Resource levelling is the best approach using the water installation approach. It definitely will be good to make rescheduling and making appropriate approaches to tackle the project.
Given that MTD must to the deadline of the Glasgow event, which date cannot be shifted, i believe resource levelling will not be most appropriate strategy to use here. Rather, resource smoothing, which will preserve the deadline but increase project cost will be more suitable.
Yeah
I think itโs totally possible to utilise resource levelling for the MDT Project
Since the MTD water installation is for a purpose thatโs stipulated to start at a given time, provided the water must be installed before the commencement of the event, resources leveling is the best option in balancing the work load on the resources. Any other compromises could alter the deliverable time.
In order avoid rises and falls in resource usage, resource levelling entails rescheduling operations within the limitations of current resource capacities. Resource levelingย could be a workable tactic to balance resource demand across the project timeline in the given situation if there are variations in resource availability or if some resources are over-allocated during particular project periods.
Resource leveling would be best used, because it balances work on resources.
One of the best approach should be resource levelling though it seems not easy to adjust the delivery date.
It is very possible to use a resource leveling approach given the flexibility in the project’s deadline.
Depending on when the project begins, it is possible to adopt resource levelling.
From my own point of view resource levelling might work in situations where resources are not enough and sponsors refuses to met up with terms. With adequate communication and negotiation days can be increased.
MTD is a water installation company which cater for water supply for mostly outdoor event, implementing a resource leveling approach might be tricky as they have fixed date for event.
resource leveling approach focuses of reschuduling with possible impact of project deadlines, they will only to use this approach if they have negotiated an ample no of days as they usually do to allow for testing and check to ensure quality service delivery. but if they dont have time for that they might have to settle for resource smoothing.
Implementing a resource levelling might be tricky as MTD have deadlines for events. So they can’t afford to do resource levelling as as deadlines will be affected which in turn can affect business.
MTD is a water installation company which cater for water supply for mostly outdoor event, implementing a resource leveling approach might be tricky as they have fixed date for event.
resource leveling approach focuses of reschuduling with possible impact of project deadlines, they will only to use this approach if they have negotiated an ample no of days as they usually do to allow for testing and check to ensure quality service delivery. but if they dont have time for that they might have to settle for resource smoothing.
Resource levelling approach involves balancing the work load on resources in order to allign resource usage with their avavailable capacity. So it will definitely be feasible to implement a water installation company and the glassglow events.
For MTD, the water installation events company, the most suitable approach would likely be resource leveling. This involves adjusting the schedule of tasks to balance the workload without changing the number of available resources. Since the company may have limitations on their resources, such as equipment and staff, resource leveling would help manage these constraints while still completing the project efficiently. However, it’s important to note that resource leveling may potentially affect deadlines, so MTD would need to carefully consider the trade-offs between resource availability and project timelines.
Resource leveling is all about optimizing the use of resources to make sure that everyone and everything is used efficiently
Yes, it would definitely be feasible for MTD to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario. Here’s why:
In this case, it would help MTD ensure that its resources (water, labor, etc.) are used in the most efficient way possible to serve the needs of the event.
It would also help reduce to costs and ensure that the event is well-prepared and well-executed.
-MTD would need to do some careful planning and analysis to make sure that all of its
Now let’s talk about the specific benefits that MTD could gain from implementing a resource leveling approach:
– Lower costs: By optimizing the use of resources, MTD could reduce the costs associated with the event. This could include saving money on water, labor, equipment, and other expenses.
– Better event execution: With careful planning and monitoring, MTD could ensure that the event runs smoothly and efficiently. This would help create a positive experience for attendees and ensure that the event is a success.
– Increased customer satisfaction: By providing a high-quality event experience, MTD could increase customer satisfaction and loyalty.
So to implement a resource leveling approach, MTD would need to do the following:
– Determine the availability of these resources during the time period of the event.
– Evaluate the demand for these resources during the event.
– Identify any potential bottlenecks or constraints that could impact the availability or demand for resources.
– Come up with a plan to optimize the use of resources based on the above analysis.
As far as MTD is concerned, being a company known for prompt project delivery, resource leveling won’t be the best option as there is a tendency for the delivery date to be extended.
In that wise resource smoothing allows the introduction of more experts and resources.
Module 5 Lesson 17
Balancing Workloads:
Resource leveling involves smoothing out the peaks and troughs in resource demand throughout the project timeline. For MTD, this means distributing labor, equipment, and materials in a way that avoids resource bottlenecks or overloads. By balancing workloads, MTD can ensure a consistent and sustainable pace throughout the project.
Optimizing Resource Efficiency:
Effective resource leveling allows MTD to optimize the utilization of available resources. This includes personnel with specialized skills, equipment, and raw materials. By aligning resource deployment with project requirements, MTD can minimize idle time and maximize the efficiency of its workforce and assets.
Enhancing Risk Management:
Resource leveling serves as a risk mitigation strategy. By avoiding resource peaks that could lead to burnout or delays, MTD can enhance its capacity to manage unexpected challenges. This ensures a more resilient project timeline, reducing the vulnerability to disruptions caused by external factors.
John Mawulolo Amegatse
cohort 13, team 8
Module 5 lesson 17
Leveling of Resources. Discussion.
Workload Balancing:
Resource leveling entails reducing the highs and lows in resource demand over the course of a project. This entails allocating workers, tools, and supplies so as to prevent overloads or bottlenecks in the resources.
MTD can maintain a steady and sustainable pace for the duration of the project by distributing the workload evenly.
Maximizing Resource Efficiency:
MTD is able to maximize the use of resources that are accessible thanks to efficient resource leveling. This covers raw materials, equipment, and employees with specific training. MTD can optimize its personnel and asset efficiency and reduce idle time by coordinating resource deployment with project requirements.
Improving Risk Management:
One way to reduce risk is through resource leveling. By steering clear of resource peaks that might cause burnout or delays, MTD can improve its ability to handle unforeseen difficulties.
By doing this, a more robust project timeline is ensured, making it less susceptible to disruptions from outside sources.
In order to Avoid missing deadline ..recourse smoothing will be a better option to take on MTD
For the MTD,resource smoothing is the better alternative because MTD strict with adherence to project deadlines.
Due to time constraints, resource smoothing will be a more feasible approach than resource levelling in the MTD events, because there’s already a fixed timeline which may have been communicated to end users. Rescheduling the time may have a greater negative impact to the project than increasing cost, due to the project being a time sensitive one.
Module 5 Lesson 17
Balancing Workloads:
Resource leveling involves smoothing out the peaks and troughs in resource demand throughout the project timeline. For MTD, this means distributing labor, equipment, and materials in a way that avoids resource bottlenecks or overloads. By balancing workloads, MTD can ensure a consistent and sustainable pace throughout the project.
Optimizing Resource Efficiency:
Effective resource leveling allows MTD to optimize the utilization of available resources. This includes personnel with specialized skills, equipment, and raw materials. By aligning resource deployment with project requirements, MTD can minimize idle time and maximize the efficiency of its workforce and assets.
Enhancing Risk Management:
Resource leveling serves as a risk mitigation strategy. By avoiding resource peaks that could lead to burnout or delays, MTD can enhance its capacity to manage unexpected challenges. This ensures a more resilient project timeline, reducing the vulnerability to disruptions caused by external factors.
Resource leveling involves rescheduling activities within the constraints of existing resource capacities to avoid peaks and troughs in resource utilization. In the provided scenario, if there are fluctuations in resource availability or if certain resources are over-allocated during specific periods of the project, resource leveling could be a viable strategy to balance resource demand across the project timeline.
I think a resource smoothing would be a better alternative rather than a resource levelling. This is because the event date have already been fixed and a change in end date could have a far more reaching devasting outcome.
My thought is that resource smoothing is a good alternative
For a company like MTD and the nature of events that it holds Versus its reputation over time in delivering quality projects on time, resource levelling would mean adjusting schedules of its clients. In most cases the nature of their business (events) are fixed and time bound. Resource smoothing would be a better alternative incase their under planning of their resource.
OKODI Okodi, Team 10
Reputation is something that is earned with hard work and dedication. For a company like MTD, which has a reputation for delivering quality projects on time, it was not an easy feat to achieve.
When a resource shortfall occurs, there are two difficult options to choose from: either exceed the initial budget or miss the deadline, both of which can damage the company’s reputation.
The best course of action in such situations is to opt for resource smoothing, as it causes the least amount of harm. It involves requesting additional funds to complete the project, but the MTD still has the opportunity to maintain its quality standards and reputation.
For the MTD water installation event, opting for resource smoothing is the preferred approach over resource leveling. This choice is grounded in the recognition of MTDโs adherence to stringent project timelines, dictated by customer orders and the designated event schedule.
An organization like MTD is keen about meeting deadlines.Hence ,when thereโs an issue with resources short fall,I would rather subscribe to resource smoothing that would afford us delivery on planned date as long as quality will not be compromised.
No, I do not think they could have applied a resource leveling approach because the MTD event would most likely have been fixed, and hence a reschedule of the activities would have seriously affected the outcome of the event.
Every project there is a paramount outcome. As a PM on MTD , knowing fully well that deadline most be met. I will subscribe to resource smoothing, as this will be the best approach. Increase in cost might be the price to pay, However, project will be met and delivered to the client before deadline. As long as QUALITY is not compromise in the long run.
However, in a situation where deadline can be adjusted. I will always subscribe to resource leveler, as it helps one to manage resources better, reschedule if need be because I believe above all things, effective management of resources is the core of a PM job.
Resource smoothing, prioritizing the maintenance of original project deadlines while accepting increased costs, is the optimal strategy for MTD’s water project. With fixed deadlines crucial to event-based projects like MTD’s, adjustments to the timeline are limited. Thus, adhering strictly to agreed delivery times is paramount. In contrast, resource leveling, which focuses on rescheduling without altering resource capacity, is less suitable for fixed deadline scenarios like MTD’s, where flexibility is limited.
For me in advising MTD. while both resource smoothing and resource leveling aim to optimize resource utilization in project management, they differ in their primary objectives and approaches. Resource smoothing focuses on maintaining a steady resource demand over time to avoid peaks and valleys, while resource leveling prioritizes resolving resource conflicts and balancing resource demand with resource availability to create a realistic project schedule
For a project like the MTD water project that often revolves around event, events have a fixed time which means much adjustments cannot be made to the timeline.
I think the resources smoothing approach would work best and resource levelling wouldn’t work. Resource levelling would work in situations where deadlines are flexible.
Considering MTD, I think the best approach should be resource levelling though it may not be easy to adjust the project delivery date with collaboration and proper communication to the project sponsors it is achievable.
Considering the cost, man power training and skills required for that that kind of project it wouldn’t be advisable to apply resource smoothing.
Ola Olatonade Cohort 13 Team 1
Using MTD, water installation event company based on the Glasgow event project. To apply a resource leveling approach will not be possible at it would affect the project end date invariably affecting the event, resource smoothing approach is best option in which the planned deadline is intact, increase resources which increases project cost.
Considering MTD water installation during the Glasgow event.
It wonโt be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in the scenario as it would affect the project deadline. MTD is a water installation event company which means they deal with strict deadlines from clients. The stakeholders of the events has already planned and are anticipating the commencement of their event and so it wonโt be feasible to reschedule.
Considering MTD and the Glasgow event, it would not be feasible to implement a resource levelling approach in this scenario, as the MTD water installation project falls under a strict timeline of completion, with events and stakeholders already anticipating the date of completion. Therefore, it would be more feasible to implement a resource smoothing approach, as the timeline for completion would remain the same, even if there would be an increase in thee operating and running costs.
Using the MTD project, the best approach will be Resource Smoothing because it takes into account the fact that the project needs overtime to be able to meet up with schedule. Using the Resource levelling approach will be for when/if the time needed for is extended, which will have an effect on the project cost.
Applying a resource leveling strategy to MTD’s water installation events is definitely feasible, however it would not be as simple as it would be in a manufacturing scenario. In this instance, resources are individuals with various schedules and skill sets rather than tangible components or commodities that can easily moved about and assigned as needed. Nevertheless, there are still methods for allocating resources so that the business can achieve its objectives as effectively as possible.
Having an adequate supply of skilled labor accessible for every event is one technique to implement resource leveling. This can entail assembling a “resource pool” of laborers with diverse skill sets and assigning them to projects.
To illustrate the timeline of each event and identify potential conflicts before they become a problem, it would also be beneficial to think about utilizing a Gantt chart or other comparable tool. In addition, MTD can think about employing cross-training to make sure that several employees possess the abilities required for every event in the event that an employee becomes unavailably absent.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
In this case scenario, resource smoothing is best option for MTD because deadline has been fixed and they need to deliver on the said date. They have to adhere strictly to the agreed time of delivery between them and the client.
With MTD’s project, resource levelling is not an option because this tampers with the project’s deadline which shouldn’t be as the project appears to be an emergency one, hence, resource smoothing is best, though with increased cost, experts are introduced at some point of the project, helping deliver the project within deadline and also delivering within the wanted capacity.
For the MTD project it can be feasible to use resource levelling. The Project is divided into sub projects and phases. As the phases progresses projects that match these resources are brought on board to perfectly execute the whole project on budget.
– Chijioke Obioma, Team 5, Cohort 13
For the MTD water installation event, opting for resource smoothing is the preferred approach over resource leveling. This choice is grounded in the recognition of MTD’s adherence to stringent project timelines, dictated by customer orders and the designated event schedule. Implementing the leveling approach, which involves altering the delivery timeline, carries the risk of adversely affecting the event. MTD’s project commencement and conclusion are intricately tied to the event timeline, making any adjustments to their timeline a potential disruptor to the overall event schedule. Therefore, it is advisable to invest in deploying additional resources, incurring increased costs, rather than compromising the timeline integrity for both MTD’s project and the overarching event timeline.
Olive Chiamaka Sadiq
Team 2
Cohort 13
For the MTD water installation event, opting for resource smoothing is the preferred approach over resource leveling. This choice is grounded in the recognition of MTD’s adherence to stringent project timelines, dictated by customer orders and the designated event schedule. Implementing the leveling approach, which involves altering the delivery timeline, carries the risk of adversely affecting the event. MTD’s project commencement and conclusion are intricately tied to the event timeline, making any adjustments to their timeline a potential disruptor to the overall event schedule. Therefore, it is advisable to invest in deploying additional resources, incurring increased costs, rather than compromising the timeline integrity for both MTD’s project and the overarching event timeline.
The discussion on the possibility of applying a resource leveling approach To the MTD water installation project
According to Usman Ghani (2022), Resource leveling is a project management technique that involves resolving over-allocation or scheduling conflicts to ensure a project can be completed with the available resources. Resources include the time, materials, or tools needed to complete a project. This definition concurred with the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) definition which states that resource leveling is a technique to help you (project managers) better accommodate resource constraints by adjusting the start and finish dates of a project. In doing so, you can make realistic project deadlines without overworking your team and increasing the total cost of the project. Given the above, it is safe to say that resource leveling is not an appropriate approach to the MTD issue. MTD is an organization with a global outlook and the water project is not a stand-alone project. The issue with the MTD project borders on resource augmentation which is the process of increasing the resources available to an organization to improve its performance or capabilities. This can include adding physical resources such as equipment or personnel, increasing access to financial resources, or investing in new technology
The issues with the water installation project are:
โข The need for additional toilets
โข Shortfall in the volume of water supplied
โข The need to put an extra buffer in place
โข The need to use water tankers as a contingency support
โข Having an interface with the local authorities to increase the volume of water, and
โข Adherence to the clientโs timeline
The issues itemized above can be resolved using the resource smoothing approach, also known as time-constrained scheduling, it is a technique used to optimize resources to deliver a project without changing the delivery date. Smoothing will use free/total float and will not change the critical path. The constraints of using resource smoothing are:
โข A possible delay in the completion of certain activities.
โข Likely a demand for a few extra resources.
โข The challenge of the activity dependencies not adequately changed
โข A possible difficulty in adding more tasks or removing strain tasks.
Taking the MTD’s Glasgow project as a context, there cannot be any availability of floating which will therefore make resource levelling a bad strategy here. Hence, resource smoothing could be employed by adding new resources such as water source or personnel to ensure that the deadline is met. Also, overtime may really be considered in order to ensure that all necessary measures are put in place within the agreed time.
Considering MTD, the best method to use is resource smoothing which involves using overtime so as to meet up with the schedule.
Resource levelling approach can only be used if critical activities duration is extended which will definitely affect the project cost.
With respect to the MTD Glasgow event, resource leveling will be a wrong approach because the project deadline cannot be changed. The entire project objective was to supply drinking water to an event and the date of the event was fixed.
Resource smoothing will be the right approach although it will impact the project cost.
Now, letโs consider MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event that you have been following in the course videos thus far. When examining the provided figure, do you think it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario?
Share your thoughts and join the discussion below.
——————————————–
I do not think resource leveling will work because it is solely focused on rescheduling and there is possible impact on project deadlines. A company like MTD can not afford to reschedule because their client event date is fixed.
But the project could be subject to revision, project sponsors are invited to a roundtable to evaluate or revise the scope .
Resource smoothing aims at maintaining original project deadlines while increasing project costs. Whilst Resource leveling focuses on rescheduling with possible impacts on project timelines without altering the project capacity.
Resource levelling approach could be used by extending the critical activities duration. Though that would affect the cost. Crticial activities could be started on time by extending the duration of it so as to spread workload for more extended days.
But I feel the best method would be resource smoothing by using overtime so as to meet up with the schedule.
Resource smoothing will work best in MTD event because there is a limited time frame and they might not necessarily be able to reschedule so increasing the project costs and preserving the planed deadline will be the best option
MTD projects take their origin from global or national programs such as it being announced as Official Sponsor of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Paris 2024. Their projects are not stand-alone. Thus challenges encountered require remediation in the areas of resource increase which ensures project completion within allotted floats. These increases include
1. Additional toilets added
2. Shortfall in the volume of water:
I. An extra buffer put in place
ii. More contingencies such as tanker support
iii. Speaking with local authorities with a view to increase the volume of water.
These decisions had to be made in line with the clientโs timelines adhered to.
The foregoing decisions indicate the nature of the project which is linear with dependencies and non-flexible deadlines. Strictly, resource-smoothing is the right fit.
Resource-leveling would have scored a point had the MTD projects been stand-alone, bearing the undeniable label of Agile or iterative. Such would have gulped in either or all of the intrinsic elements of resource-leveling listed below:
1. Delay non-critical activities within their available floats
2. Extend non-critical activity duration within their available floats
3. Delay critical activities
4. Extend critical activities durations
5. Split an activity into non-sequential activity.
Resource leveling focuses on rescheduling with possible impacts on project timelines, however it does not alter the project capacity. So it is very feasible to implement this approach on many projects types including the MTD and Glasgow event.
Considering that events are planned are held in a pre-adopted and limited period of time, I donโt think it would be possible to apply resource levelling in this scenario, as the deadline cannot be extended.
Blessing Williams
Cohort 13
Resource-leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead underscores rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines. This intrinsic quality of resource-leveling makes it not the right fit for remediation in the MTD Glasgow project.
MTD projects take their origin from global or national programs such as it being announced as Official Sponsor of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Paris 2024. Their projects are not stand-alone. Thus challenges encountered require remediation in the areas of resource increase which ensures project completion within allotted floats. These increases include
1. Additional toilets added
2. Shortfall in the volume of water:
I. An extra buffer put in place
ii. More contingencies such as tanker support
iii. Speaking with local authorities with a view to increase the volume of water.
These decisions had to be made in line with the client’s timelines adhered to.
The foregoing decisions indicate the nature of the project which is linear with dependencies and non-flexible deadlines. Strictly, resource-smoothing is the right fit.
Resource-leveling would have scored a point had the MTD projects been stand-alone, bearing the undeniable label of Agile or iterative. Such would have gulped in either or all of the intrinsic elements of resource-leveling listed below:
1. Delay non-critical activities within their available floats
2. Extend non-critical activity duration within their available floats
3. Delay critical activities
4. Extend critical activities durations
5. Split an activity into non-sequential activity.
Resource leveling by its nature does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
This characteristic of rescheduling, and the impact on project deadlines presents resource leveling as not the likely strategy for handling resource overload in the MTD-Glasgow Project.
MTD projects are heavily dependent on global and national programs from which they derive their relevance such as its being announced as an Official Supporter of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Paris 2024. Their projects are not stand-alone.
The water installation at Glasgow was necessitated by the sports event taking place with a fixed date and venue announced and much publicity prescribed. And thus any remediation would have to be in the areas of procuring additional resources to ensure the timeline and planned end date is strictly adhered to. A reschedule
was not optionable.
Resource-leveling incorporates the following strategies with cognizance of the flexibility of the project to drive its outcomes:
1.Delay non-critical activities within their available floats/timelines
2.
These
Considering that events are planned are held in a pre-adopted and limited period of time, I don’t think it would be possible to apply resource levelling in this scenario, as the deadline cannot be extended.
It is certainly possible to apply a resource levelling approach to MTD’s water installation events, although it may not be as straightforward as it would be for a manufacturing setting. In this case, resources are not physical parts or materials that can be easily moved around and allocated as needed, but rather people with different skills and schedules. That said, there are still ways to level resources so that the company can meet its goals in the most efficient way possible.
One way to apply resource levelling would be to ensure that there are enough workers with the right skills available for each event. This could involve creating a “resource pool” of workers with various skill sets, and then scheduling them to work on events based on their availability and the needs of the event. It may also be helpful to consider using a Gantt chart or similar tool to visualize the timeline of each event, so that potential conflicts can be identified and resolved before they become a problem. Additionally, MTD could also consider using cross-training to ensure that multiple workers have the skills needed for each event, in case one worker is unexpectedly unavailable.
Another approach to resource levelling would be to stagger the start dates of events, so that they don’t all occur at the same time and require the same number of workers. For example, if MTD knows that it has a limited number of plumbers available, it could schedule events so that they don’t all need plumbers at the same time. This would allow the company to use its resources more efficiently, and avoid overloading any one team of workers. Of course, this approach may not always be possible due to the specific needs of the events, but it is worth considering.
Lastly, MTD could also consider using outside contractors to fill any gaps in its workforce. This could be especially helpful for events that require specialized skills that are not available within the company. By bringing in outside help when needed, MTD can ensure that it has the resources it needs to complete its events, without overloading its existing staff. This approach can also provide the added benefit of bringing in fresh ideas and perspectives, which can help to improve the overall quality of the events.
In conclusion, resource levelling is certainly possible in the context of MTD’s water installation events. However, it may require some creative thinking and flexibility to make it work effectively.
Yes, Applying a resource leveling approach could definitely help balance the resources efficiently for the event. It can help ensure that resources are used effectively without overloading any particular aspect of the event. It’s a great way to manage resources smoothly!
Resource leveling involves resolving overallocation or scheduling conflicts to ensure a project can be completed with the available resources. For MTD, a re-evaluation of the project scope by the PM may be required and the estimated timelines will have to be adjusted to ensure quality and optimal product and a maximization of available resources, workload and personnel.
Resource levelling aims at stabilizing workload and maintaining project costs, It is ideally possible to apply resource levelling in the MTD events. Using additional resources and extending durations will help to balance the workload of employees, curbs risk of errors and also improves the quality of deliverables.
Resource leveling is modifying the project’s start and end dates in accordance with the availability of both internal and external resources. Making sure a project can be finished within budget, schedule, and scope restrictions while utilizing the resources at hand is the aim.
Regarding MTD at the Glasgow event (the water installation events); Additional resources might be required if the project deadline is to be kept. The project deadline may be extended if the objective is to complete the work using the resources that are currently available. This is to guarantee the project’s output quality.
Resource leveling will help balance the workload on resources in order to align usage with their avaliable capacity helping them to meet the requried deadline.
Resource leveling will be best for MTD because it will help balance the workload on resources in order to align usage with their avaliable capacity helping them to meet the requried deadline.
Considering MTD’s water installation events in Glasgow, applying a resource leveling approach may be feasible. This method involves redistributing resources without altering project capacity, which could help ensure that resources are utilized efficiently without impacting the current capacity of the team. By adjusting the scheduling of tasks and resources, MTD could potentially manage workload fluctuations and maintain project timelines without significant changes to their current resource capacity.
On the case of MTD and Event Glasgow, resource smoothing methodology can not be compromised on this project. Even though, the time, cost and quality are very important elements to consider, the fact remains that the purpose of this water projects awarded to MTD is for the purpose of the Glasgow Sport events that has already been fixed to commence on a particular date.
Every stakeholders of this events must have been involved, and it’ll be too late to fail in delivering at a stretched time beyond the agreed project delivering date.
Resource smoothing which should be the best approach against Resource Leveling should be the second to non decision. The truth holds that, it’s going to add more to cost because of some overtime workload, add more hands if the need be among others, the implication this may carry may include increase in domestic accidents at the work place, health risks among the workers, increase in the budget allocated.
Despite all these, the truth remains that, nothing can be better than making a project of the kind delivered at the slated time and or date.
Resource leveling may be better since it wonโt alter the project resources capability but gives room for improvement.
So, it’s better adjust the project duration than adding more costs.
MTD did not use the resource-levelling approach which was not possible due to the delivery dateline. Rather they used resource-smoothing by requesting for the additional volume of water from a nearby facility.
Resource leveling may be better since it won’t alter the project resources capability but gives room for adjustments and to me it’s better to affect the project duration than adding more costs.
For a MTD, resource leveling would probably be the better option. Since the company’s goal is likely to complete the installation as quickly as possible, the goal of resource leveling (completing the project quickly) aligns with the company’s overall goal. The main drawback of resource leveling is that it can result in periods of underutilization for resources. However, in the case of a water installation company, it’s likely that the resources (such as construction workers) are specialized and not easily interchangeable, so the risk of underutilization is lower.
Resource leveling will be better for MTD because it will not alter the existing resource capacity but will give room for rescheduling which will not have impact on the project deadlines.
Resource smoothing is used when the time constraint takes priority. The objective is to complete the work by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand.
Resource levelling is used when limits on the availability of resources are paramount.
Resource leveling will be better for MTD because it will not alter the existing resource capacity but will give room for rescheduling which may have impact on the project deadlines.
Resource leveling will be best for MTD because it gives room for because it won’t affect the duration or deadline of the project
Resource levelling maintain the project deadline but increase the resources, manpower and it doesn’t alter the project resources, in the case of MTD the water installation event, resource levelling might be possible cause as it won’t affect the project deadline and the scope of the project just addition resources will be added.
Resource smoothing seems to be the best approach
For the MTD water project applying resource smoothing is the best because it will focus on meeting or allocating more resources to projects to ensure that the preserved planned deadline is kept
If resources leveling is applied the team will experience set backs which will make them not to meet up with the deadline
Resource leveling involves adjusting the start and finish dates of project activities based on the availability of internal and external resources. The goal is to ensure that a project can be completed using the available resources while adhering to time, cost, and scope constraints.
For the MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event If the goal is to keep the current project deadline, more resources may need to be available. If the goal is to run the project with currently available resources, the project deadline may be extended. This is to ensure the quality of the project output.
Applying a resource leveling approach to the MTD water installation events company in Glasgow would involve smoothing out resource allocation to avoid peaks and troughs in resource usage. It could be feasible depending on factors like the availability of skilled labor, equipment, and the project’s timeline. Utilizing the APM Body of Knowledge can provide valuable insights and guidelines for implementing such approaches effectively.
Williamson
Cohort13
Resource-leveling is a project management technique that aims to smooth out the workload of resources (e.g., people, equipment) over time. In a water installation events company (MTD)
, resources like personnel, equipment, and vehicles are typically busy during peak seasons and less busy during off-seasons. Applying resource-leveling techniques could help balance the workload and prevent overloading or underutilizing resources, ensuring a more efficient and sustainable operation.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
On the case of the MTD and Glasgow event, Resource leveling will not help in the case where the deadline of the project must be strongly adhered to. Resource smoothing should be employed here, and where Resource leveling is adopted considering the quality of the contaminated water, proper negotiations with the sponsors and the stakeholders must be taken. However resources and cost must be incurred as the deadline is rescheduled.
In the case of MTD, the issue of contamination, it would be an issue of assessing the effects on cost and time , should any of the approaches be used. If resource smoothing is adopted, then it would mean that maybe getting a new contractor. The deadlines maybe slightly affected, but cost maybe affected considerably.
If resource leveling is to be applied, it would be an issue of reallocating tasks among the engineer or reworking on some processes . This may as well affect deadlines and possibly time trying to evaluate possible strategies to mitigate risk at hand. Either way, the effect must be evaluated to find out what is more suitable given the circumstances.
Looking at the figure provided, resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
However the challenge of MTD with the Glasgow event concerning the water quality and a contaminated source had a deadline to be met.
So, applying a resource levelling approach would mean that, MTD would either delay the activities of Glasgow event in order to make use of its available resources by rescheduling its resources or start the activities on time but would extend its duration over more days.
Whichever of this decisions is made, it will impact on the project deadline and costs. This implies that the scope of the project itself should be reviewed.
Therefore, it would be better if MTD apply resource smoothing approach by substituting current resources with a new one. This way, project deadline is met, quality issues is resolved but cost is affected which will be analysed in the earned value.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
Resources are the key physical tools needed to execute projects. it could be materials or human. these are often planned alongside other elements during project planning. However, there are tendencies that in the course of project execution the PM may fall short of these resources. At this point, the available resources can either be levelled or smoothed to meet up with the project objectives. These are not without implications, though.
While resource levelling majorly impacts the project timeline and cost, resource smoothing may affect the project cost only while the timeline remains undisrupted.
From the MTD videos seen, the Glasgow event seems to have a fixed deadline, and in this case, resource leveling doesn’t look feasible because it has to do with rescheduling. Except the stakeholders involved, from both ends (MTD and Glasgow stakeholders), come to a compromise, which may also place resource smoothing as an option.
Project Resource Management:
Resources are the key physical tools needed to execute projects. it could be materials or human. these are often planned alongside other elements during project planning. However, there are tendencies that in the course of project execution the PM may fall short of these resources. At this point, the available resources can either be levelled or smoothed to meet up with the project objectives. These are not without implications, though.
While resource levelling majorly impacts the project timeline and cost, resource smoothing may affect the project cost only while the timeline remains undisrupted.
With respect to the MTD water project, it must be noted that the project has a definite deadline for which it must be completed so that the event can commence (simultaneous task you may want to call it). To this end, it will be difficult for the PM to apply the resource levelling technique. using this approach will affect the project timeline which will invariable affect the event’s schedule also. The most viable option available to the PM is the resource smoothing technique by hiring additional resources. This must first be discussed with the project sponsors. For as much as the sponsors approved the proposal, and willing to bear the added cost, the PM is good to go.
Regards.
I think it would not be feasible to implement a resource-leveling approach in this scenario. This is because the project was executed under a deadline and every activity was as important as the others, if they implemented resource leveling, the project would have finished overtime which would have affected the event to happen on time and created customer dissatisfaction however I think they would have implemented resource smoothing where they look for an additional resource that will help them to finish the task within scheduled time though it implies cost increase it protect and preserve the reputation and name of the company for future projects
With the Glasgow MTD project, hardly will the delivery date be feasible, because of the gravity of the unforeseen situation that came up. in my opinion, it will not be advisable to implement the levelling approach due to deadline issues, and the ricocheting effects on all layers and actors involved in the project. i will most probably go for the resource smoothing approach, even though costing more, a failure cost was already built into the original budget, this is the advantage of building that cost into the budget. but it will get the job done and on schedule, thereby maintaining integrity and professionalism.
OHAEGBULAM CHIKAODI PRECIOUS
Cohort 13 team 10
Day 16
Resource leveling in MTD water project. Resource Smoothing for me would have been the best since it focuses on preserving planned deadlines even though it increases the project cost when new resource is added to the team without affecting the dealine of the project. E.g when a caterer is given a project to cook for 30 people for an occasion, she will bill you based on the 30 people but maybe along the process you added extra 10 people and you still want her to meet up that day, it will cost you more because the resources available might not reach the 40 people and she will still deliver that day instead of rescheduling the event due to lack of resources which will bring delay nd more cost too.
Noted that if resource levelling is applied, the team will experience huge setbacks and even the clients will be affected by you not meeting up with the deadline and rescheduling of projects due to delays.
Resource smoothing is best for MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event so as to preserve project deadline, though it would invariably increase project cost. But you cannot afford for deadline to be affected as it is for an event.
Resource levelling would impact the deadline of the project which would impact the company’s future rating due to inability to meet a project deadline for an event.
Resource leveling in the MTD Water Project
Resource leveling will have a time impact on the MTD project as it needs some processes to be done at a certain time and in sequence before others.
MTD will deliver the project but if they try to do it with only the resources available per time they will deliver the project late, this is where the vote to apply resource smoothing comes in.
Implementing a resource levelling approach for MTDโs water installation project would have been the option but because in this project some phases are considered before another, it’s a project that one job must be completed before another one comes in. With the knowledge of resource levelling, they do not change the current capacity. Itโs more of rescheduling which obviously canโt work in MTD but when resource smoothing comes in there will be an increase in project cost but the deadline will be fixed and preserved.
Applying resources leveling in MTD project could cause a great set back and make the project slown,thereby not been deliver at expected time
Using the MTD Water project as an example;
Resource Smoothing is the best based on the fact that it tends to focus on preserving planned deadlines though it increases project cost when a new resource is added to the team without affecting the deadline of the project.
On the other hand, If resource levelling is applied, the team will experience huge setbacks and even the clients such as not meeting up with the deadline and rescheduling of projects due to delays.
I agree with you, resource smoothing seems to be the best approach here
Implementing a resource leveling approach for MTD’s water installation events in Glasgow could help optimize resource usage, prevent overallocation, and ensure a smoother execution. Factors such as event complexity, timeline, and resource availability would need to be considered for a comprehensive feasibility assessment.
I will not agree to resource leveling having great impact on MTD water project because in this project some phases are considered before another, its like saying a job must be completed before another one comes in. With the knowledge of resource levelling that they do not change the current capacity. It’s more of rescheduling which obviously can’t work in MTD but when resource smoothing comes in tho there will be increase in project cost but the deadline will be fixed and preserved.
The additional cost will be invested which will yield good outcomes as the deadline for the project phases remain intact.
For Glasglow I believe with all these videos about the firm resource leveling will be good for them.
This is a good defense of the resource smoothing and I like your username.
Resources leveling implementation will be a suitable approach for MTD water project and the Glasgow project, resource optimisation can be applied over time by striking a balance between the available resources and the demand by the project managers.
The best approach for MTD water project and Glasgow project will certainly be Resources leveling implementation, project managers can rely on resource optimisation over time by striking a balance between the resources available and the demand.
Resources leveling implementation is the most suitable approach for MTD water project and the Glasgow project, project managers can leverage on resource optimisation over time by striking a balance between the available resources and the demand. The following most be taken into consideration, the periodic event in the case of MTD limited timing various steps must be taken to meet up. Resources availability and task preorietization
Implementation of resource levelling might just be the best option for the MTD water installation project and the Glasgow project as resources might be far reaching and limited and if a resource smoothing approach is employed, it means having extra overhead expenses that weren’t budgeted for in the scheme of things when the project costs were being outlined. So it will be in the best interest of the MTD water installation Project and Glasgow to not change the existing or current capacity but focus on rescheduling which will definitely impact on intended project deadlines by having to extend the given period of time but on the long run save costs
Though difficult, it might still be possible with good organisation and coordination to implement a resource levelling strategy MTD water installation firm that works within set durations established by athletic events. Through the use of resource levelling, project managers can optimise resource utilisation over time by striking a balance between resource availability and demand.
To apply resource levelling in this case, take into account the following:
Periodic Events: Given that MTD is limited by the periodic schedules of athletic events, the project’s critical path is probably well-defined. In order for the planned events to happen on time, various tasks need to be finished by a given date.
Material Availability: Determine which essential materials are needed for water installations and make sure they are accessible when needed.
Sorting jobs according to priority and effect on the project timeline should be done in a clear and concise manner. By doing this, resources can be better directed towards important tasks that need to be finished on schedule.
While raising the project cost, resource smoothing focuses on maintaining the scheduled deadline. While resource levelling focuses on scheduling changes that may affect the project deadline, it does not alter the current capacity.
Implementing a resource leveling approach MTD water installation company that operates within fixed timeframes determined by sporting events can be challenging but may still be feasible with careful planning and coordination. Resource leveling is a project management technique used to balance resource demand with resource availability, optimizing the use of resources over time.
Here are considerations for implementing resource leveling in this scenario:
Fixed Timeframes: Since MTD is constrained by the fixed timeframes of sporting events, the critical path of the project is likely well-defined. This means that certain activities must be completed within specific deadlines to align with the scheduled events.
Resource Availability: Identify the critical resources required for water installations and ensure that they are available when needed. This may involve coordinating with suppliers, contractors, and other stakeholders to secure necessary resources within the fixed timeframe.
Prioritization of Tasks: Clearly prioritize tasks based on their importance and impact on the overall project schedule. This helps in focusing resources on critical activities that must be completed on time.
I do not agree that resource levelling would be a good approach considering the fact that the project stages by MDT are overlapping. A phase is expected to be completed before another.
Levelling might alter the process of the project.
What can be done is to add more resources or replace resources in other to attain efficiency quality requirements.
Resource leveling would not be appropriate for MTD project because extending the project date holds no benefit to MTD or its client. This is based largely on the fact that MTD projects have a very fixed timeframe which is determined by the dates that the sporting events take place which have been planned sometimes years in advance.
The only plausible approach is resource smoothing, allocating more resources to project to ensure that the end date is kept.
Resource leveling involves adjusting the project schedule to balance the demand for resources, ensuring a smoother and more consistent utilization of resources over time which can work well with the MDT project
Resource leveling is best suited for a long-term term project for the rescheduling of timeline would not after the project deliverable.
As an upcoming project manager, constant communication with the stakeholders is what I held on to. Meeting the stakeholders individually to show them the evidence of what is on ground and juxtapose if it’s complementing and in line with their needs. Not being scared of bringing ideas to the discussion table is a great one because project manager are ought to endowed with problem solving skills.
Resource smoothing focus on preserving the planned deadline although increasing its project cost. resource levelling on the other hand does not change the current capacity though focuses on rescheduling which have a possible impact on the project deadline.
Every Jobs requires the communication skills, because the way you communicate will determine what the output of your Job will be like. Bad communication ruins Work.
Also continual professional development also matters because the world is advancing and we can’t just stay in a place. We need to advance with it so as to stay relevant
That’s correct! Resource smoothing and resource leveling are two techniques used in project management to manage resources effectively. Resource smoothing focuses on keeping the original project deadlines intact by adjusting the allocation of resources, even if it means increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling aims to maintain the existing resource capacity by rescheduling tasks, which may impact project deadlines. Both techniques have their advantages and can be used depending on the specific needs and constraints of a project.
Making use of resource leveling for an event that is in two days is very risky because it might go over the event day and that will be a failed project and also the client will not be happy. It will be better to make use of resource smoothing instead, though it will add more cost but it will be most beneficial in this scenario.
There are 2 ways to look at this case.
1. Time for event start up is sacrosanct and the so there is no was resources levelling would work without meeting a key deliverable which is the start of the event. This would cause great dissatisfaction to the client.
2. As per the Glasgow event, if the client had put forth the right information about the condition of the water, then the project team would have also built that into their project plant form the onset. With proper information, either resource smoothing or leveling could work as long costs and timelines are aligned with the client from the project onset.
Resource smoothing is preserving planned deadlines while increasing project costs. However, resource levelling does not change current capacity extend and impacts the project deadline, without affecting the overall project timeline.
I don’t believe that resource leveling would be appropriate for MTD project because extending the project date holds no benefit to MTD or its client. This is based largely on the fact that MTD projects have a very fixed timeframe which is determined by the dates that the sporting events take place which have been planned sometimes years in advance.
The only plausible approach is resource smoothing, allocating more resources to project to ensure that the end date is kept.
Time constrained scheduling also know as resource smoothing, is a technique used to make the best or most effective resources to deliver a project without changing the delivery date. This technique might involve the expertise of more hands in other words hiring new people to speed things up, or changing the scope of the project which definitely increases or add to the project cost. While Resource constrained scheduling also known as resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but rather duels on rescheduling, which may delay the project delivery deadlines.
Resource levelling involves splitting or extending a section(s) of the project, without affecting the overall project timeline and may or may not increase project cost. However, resource smoothing will most likely increase project cost and extend the expected project deadline.
resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines while increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change current capacity but focuses on rescheduling but impacts the project deadline
Resource leveling may not be feasible in this scenario since the events cannot be easily rescheduled, and any attempts to do so would incur significant costs. This is primarily because invitations, tickets, and event advertisements have already been created and distributed. Consequently, resource smoothing emerges as a more viable option as it allows for the completion of the task by the anticipated deadline or possibly even earlier.
As the MTD project manager mentioned, it would be better to apply the resource levelling to allocate resources according to their availability and after gathering quality information that would help the production of quality product. Though the resource levelling impacts on the deadlines but all the stakeholders are informed as long as the cost remain unchanged in order to finally provide the quality water distribution system.
Resource leveling will not suit MTDโs project case scenario. Thereโs a fixed date for the event and resource leveling can extend deadlines, this would be catastrophic for the whole event.
I would consider resource leveling for the MDT water cooperation because levelling balances workload and still impacts on project deadlines.
Whatever the nature of a project, both the human, physical, and time continuum impact the planning and decision-making. For example, when a project is of a hybrid nature, like MTD, resource scarcity is unavoidable.
However, a project manager has to reconsider the project scope by either rescheduling the deadline or maintaining the deadline and playing around with the rest of the resources available.
All in all, every project has conditions to fulfill and has constraints related to resources. The solution depends on how a project manager reacts to every situation in the project life cycle.
For MTD resource smoothing is the best option for the company as the project has been planned and has an end date.
Resources leveling suits MTDโs projects in my opinion because resource leveling balances workload and still impacts on project deadlines
I will consider resource levelling as the best option for MTD , as it involve balancing workload on resources although it might be cost but it could be reduced through better scheduling. it will also help reduce the risk of stress.
In my own opinion , For MTD that operates on deadlines, resource smoothing is the way to go. Project price will be impacted but we must note that delivery is a major factor.
Reply
In analyzing MTD’s projects, specifically the water installation events in Glasgow, a critical examination is needed to determine if these initiatives face rapid changes, uncertainties, or resource fluctuations that could justify adopting a resource leveling approach. This evaluation involves aligning the principles of resource leveling with MTD’s operational dynamics, assessing resource constraints or uneven workloads that could benefit from a more balanced allocation. Furthermore, a reflection on project scope revisions, consideration of the core elements of time, cost, and quality, exploration of potential risks and benefits, and comparisons with large infrastructure projects offer insights into whether a resource leveling approach is feasible and practical for MTD’s unique context.
Resource levelling is best for MTD since resource levelling is a resource management technique that can help teams better accommodate resource constraints and predict project timelines. It would also help them avoid poor project planning.
I would consider resource levelling for the MDT water cooperation because it will help to balance the workload and possibly for Glasgow project, but it entails a lot of complexities and the environment is also volatile.
In the Case of MTD a water company who have a lot Clientele relying on them may have to go with idea of Resource Levelling due to the kind of service they provide; it might incur cost. but due to certain factors , the best chance is to stick with resource Levelling.
Resourcce leveling suits MTD’s projects in my opinion becase resource leveling balances workload and still impacts on project deadlines,
Resource leveling aims to address resource constraints without altering the project’s overall duration. This is achieved by adjusting the schedule of activities, often resulting in a smoother resource utilization curve. However, it’s important to consider various factors in the context of MTD’s water installation events:
-Large-scale events, such as those managed by MTD, may involve complex logistics and dependencies. Resource leveling could be challenging if certain tasks are time-sensitive or if there are fixed deadlines for specific aspects of the event.
-Resource leveling may impact these deadlines and could affect client satisfaction. It’s crucial to balance resource constraints with the need to meet client expectations.
-If the project has a degree of flexibility in terms of start and end dates, resource leveling may be more feasible without compromising critical milestones.
-If MTD has successfully implemented similar strategies in the past, it may be an indicator of feasibility.
Overall. we have to look at MTD’s water installations, the constraints that may occur, and the project objective. Resource levelling might be feasible, but we have to look at the unique characteristics of each project, the environmental factor, the industry trend and the clients expectation to be able to utilize resource levelling.
I agree with sunmisola point for MTD waters, resource leveling seem to be the best to be considered with the dynamics of MTD project, environment and stakeholders interest
Resource smoothing suits this project although the project manager should be able to do what works best in meeting up with the deadline and giving his client a satisfactory job.
For me, in the case of MTD, Resource Smoothing is the better option. Especially since they work most of the time with Events which date has already been fixed.
They cannot let the end date slip. They can increase the scheduled resources and let the end date stay.
Reschedule or increase resources, Hold end date.
The end date must stay, so that they don’t disappoint their clients who has a date fixed for their event.
Major difference between resource smoothing and resource leveling are cost and time respectfully. Resource smoothing might cost more by increasing resources but delivers the project on or before deadline. While Resource leveling approach manages the available resource but may not meet up with the deadline.
Both resource smoothing and resource leveling are unpleasant scenario to the project sponsors because they might reevaluate the project scope. This is why is very important to always carry the sponsors along from inception, so they can support when uncertain challenge arise.
It is feasible to implement resource leveling approach on MTD water installation Glasgow event if the clients are willing to adjust project deadline rather than extra cost.
In the context of MTD’s water installation events company and the Glasgow event, I think applying a resource leveling approach is certainly a viable consideration. Resource leveling involves adjusting the project schedule to balance the demand for resources, ensuring a smoother and more consistent utilization of resources over time.
For MTD, which may have varying resource requirements during different phases of event planning and execution, resource leveling could help optimize resource usage and prevent periods of resource overloading or underutilization. This is particularly relevant in the dynamic and often unpredictable environment of event management. The feasibility of applying resource leveling depends on several factors such as the flexibility of task dependencies, the availability of alternative resources, and the overall project constraints.
Task Dependencies- If the tasks in the project have flexible dependencies and can be adjusted without affecting critical paths, resource leveling may be more feasible,
Resource Availability- The availability of alternative resources or the ability to shift resources between tasks can impact the feasibility of resource leveling. Project Constraints- Critical tasks with fixed deadlines or external dependencies may limit the extent to which resource leveling can be applied without affecting overall project timelines.
Flexibility in Scheduling-The nature of event management projects may require a degree of flexibility in scheduling, and resource leveling should be implemented without compromising the timely completion of critical tasks.
Hybrid Approach- A hybrid approach that combines elements of resource smoothing and leveling might be more practical. This allows for optimized resource utilization while maintaining flexibility in meeting project milestones. In some cases, critical tasks with fixed deadlines or dependencies may limit the extent to which resource leveling can be implemented without affecting project timelines.
Considering the complex nature of event management, where certain tasks may be time-sensitive or dependent on external factors, a hybrid approach that combines elements of both resource smoothing and leveling might be most practical. This would allow MTD to balance resource demands while maintaining the necessary flexibility to meet project milestones and deadlines.
I also think that resource levelling application to MTD’s projects should also be assessed based on the specific characteristics and constraints of the events before applying it.
in my opinion i think the resource leveling approach will work efficiently with the MTD water system because the project is not completely a complex one.
I think resource leveling approach will work better with MTD water system because the project is not complex and volatile. But for Gaslow project entails a lot of complexities and the environment is also volatile.
Considering the situation with MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, it might be possible to apply a resource leveling approach. Resource leveling is a technique used in project management to address resource shortfalls or excesses by adjusting the project schedule. Given the context of the company and the event, here are some considerations:
1. Resource Smoothing or Time-Limited Scheduling:
– This approach involves adjusting the project schedule to smooth out resource requirements. It could be useful for MTD if they have fluctuations in resource demand during the Glasgow event preparation. By redistributing the workload more evenly over the project duration, MTD could potentially manage resources more effectively.
2. Reschedule or Increase Resources:
– MTD could consider rescheduling tasks or increasing resources if certain activities are experiencing resource shortfalls. This might involve adjusting the timeline of specific tasks or bringing in additional resources to meet demand.
3. Hold End Date:
– If MTD is facing resource constraints, they might need to consider extending the project timeline to accommodate the limitations. This approach could allow them to complete the work without overloading their resources.
4. Do the Best with What You Have:
– In some cases, MTD might need to make the best of the resources available to them and adjust their plans accordingly. This approach involves optimizing resource usage and finding alternative solutions to work within the given constraints.
5. End Date Slips:
– If resource shortages persist and cannot be easily resolved, MTD may need to consider allowing the project end date to be delayed. This would give them more time to manage resource constraints and complete the project effectively.
6. Resource Leveling or Resource-Limited Scheduling:
– This approach involves examining resource availability and adjusting the project schedule to smooth out resource demand. MTD could use this method to ensure that resources are allocated in a balanced manner throughout the project, helping to manage any shortages or excesses.
Finally, applying a resource leveling approach could potentially help MTD manage resource constraints and ensure efficient utilization of resources during the Glasgow event preparation. However, the specific approach to be used would depend on the nature of the resource constraints and the unique circumstances of the project.
Resource smoothing is the best choice as both ways will still attract additional cost at the end of the day
In MTD ,it wouldnโt be a good idea to use resource levelling , other than that , it canโt work , cause in MTD , THE CRITICAL AND NON CRITICAL EVENTS canโt be delayed or extended cause they required following steps to achieve good distribution of the water and making sure to follow the normal guidelines so as to not have issues with the local authorities and to deliver with the best quality making sure the health of the people who consumes the water is considered . In MTD , i think it would be great to use RESOURCE SMOOTHING to fix the issue of resource overloading
Prominent event firms such as MTD and Glasgow Events prioritize the timely completion of projects. When faced with a choice between meeting project deadlines at a higher expense or entirely rescheduling delivery, management might prefer the former. This is because, despite a slight increase in costs, adhering to project timelines in the events industry has a positive influence on the reputation of events management. Consequently, in this scenario, opting for resource smoothing is potentially a more favorable approach than resource-leveling.
Though both resource leveling and resource smoothing are good, as they create impact on projects cost in their different ways, considering this circumstance, resource smoothing is ideal, reason being that, even while coat increases, there is the assurance of meeting deadlines, with quality projects as a priority.
Resource Smoothing is better of, there’s increase in cost , and workload in other to achieve quality results within the specified time.
MTD and the Glasgow events are high profile events firms that would prefer certain deadlines on projects being met. If the management is faced between delivering projects according to initial deadlines at increased cost and complet reschedule of delivery time, may prefer the former. This may be due to the fact that timely delivery of projects in the events sector has a corresponding positive influence on events management profile irrespective of slight increase in cost. Hence, resource levelling may not be a feasible concept here, rather, resource smoothing may be preferred.
Both Resource smoothing and resource leveling affects project cost in their own ways . So for this case . Resource smoothing is better because it ensures project deadline is met while cost increases . Unless stakeholder of a particular thinks project deadline can be extended without minding, then resource leveling can come into play
I don’t think it will be posible because they will loose the trust of the client
I don’t think it is feasible to implement resource leveling in this case as it would not just attract rescheduled deadline but also increased cost as a result on an extended project timeline.
For me as the project manager, it would be best to activate Resource smoothing which would not only preserve the project goal but maintain Company ethics but an increased cost with the benefit of meeting assigned deadline from the initiation phase.
It is important for MTD to increase cost rather than joepardize future opportunities by extending deadline.
In this scenario
For MTD’s water project deadline, resource smoothing is ideal despite potential cost increases and timely delivery of a high-quality project is the top priority, ensuring sponsor satisfaction.
IN THIS SCENARIO THAT WAS JUST REVIEWED.
Resource levelling has more advantages because it involves smoothing out the allocation of resources to prevent peaks and troughs, ensuring a more consistent workflow.
Factors such as the project timeline, available resources, and potential challenges in resource allocation would need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing a resource-leveling approach in this particular scenario.
The MTD water project is tasked with delivering onsite water facilities by a set event date, making resource smoothing the key solution for timely delivery
OR
If we are thinking about the MTD, Water Installation Company and Glasgow event Company, It would be not just be possible but also ideal going for smoothing strategy in as much as there will be an increase in costs, they will be able to achieve their primary goal which is completing/ delivering a quality project within the stipulated time frame and by so doing, maintain their sponsorsโ satisfaction.
Resource smoothing focus on preserving planned deadline though increasing project cost, while resource levelling does not change the current capacity though focuses on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadline.
I will say resource smoothing is more suitable in order to be able to work with the deadline.
Resource smoothing will be a better option in this scenario. If MTD applies resources leveling, they may be able to maintain cost, but will however, increase their time, which will inevitably affect their cost still. However, if resource smoothing is applied, prices may be hiked up a bit, but their schedule will be maintained.
Resource smoothing suits this project although the project manager should be able to do what works best in meeting up with the deadline and giving his client a satisfactory job.
Thanks.
Resource smoothing is the best option for MTD to meet up with the deadline even though it will cost them more to implement the project but the client will be satisfied with the project delivery.
Since MTD has a deadline to meet, I don’t think it would be possible to apply a resource leveling approach.
Resource leveling seek to balance workload on resources thereby making it feasible to implement in this instance, this help to equate resource usage with available capacity
It will stabilize the workload and reduce stress risks.
Resource levelling will not work in this case because the events cannot be shifted or if done will cost a lot to do due to the fact that invitations, tickets and advertisements about the event would have already been done and sent out. Therefore, resource smoothing will be a better choice because it would help get the job done at the expected date or even earlier.
Resource smoothing maintains maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. While the resource leveling maintain the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines
MTD project, adopting resources leveling, will increase time, which will affect the cost even while trying to maintain their cost. However, if they apply resource smoothing, it might take the prices up a bit, but their schedule will be maintained, especially since the date for the event has already been fixed.
Reply
It would be feasible to implement resource levelling as it focuses on balancing the workload on resources so as to equate resource usage with available capacity
It will stabilize the workload and reduce stress risks.
Because MTD have a tight deadline to meet, the best solution is resources smoothing which will cost them more.
Resource leveling poses significant challenges for MTD due to their stringent timelines, primarily in event setup with fixed commencement dates affecting multiple stakeholders. The nature of their work necessitates allowances for redundancies, ensuring operational continuity and deadline adherence. To mitigate disruptions, MTD strategically incorporates buffers and contingency plans, aligning resources with the dynamic demands of their projects. This approach enables them to navigate unforeseen circumstances and maintain a robust operational structure, vital for meeting time-sensitive project goals amidst the complexities of event management.
No i do not think so due to the deadlines to be met.
Looking ant the magnitude of that project mtd is handling, resource leveling is not possible because they are working on a tight deadline .the best option to adopt . Though it may cost more ,but the goal will be achieved . Therefore , resource smoothing will be the best for them to utilize
Resource levelling is almost impossible for MTD because they work with tight deadlines. They’re setting up for events that have a fixed take off date that impact several other stakeholders. This is why they make room for redundancies and have provision to ensure work is not disrupted and they can meet deadlines given.
For me the MTD water installation, it will be good if they use resource leveling not minding that it will make the project not to be delivered at the appointed time but it will bring in much more good in terms of rescheduling for proper handling of the projectโฆ
It’s very important for the water installation company to stick to deadlines
Cohort 12- Team 2
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines
For the of MTD, applying resources leveling, will definitely increase their time, which will invariable affect the cost even while trying to aintain their cost. However, if they apply resource smoothing, it might take the prices up a bit, but their schedule will be maintained, especially since the date for the event has already been fixed.
I think that resources smoothing will be the best option for the MTD company. This will slightly affect and raise the cost but the project deadline will be maintained.
If MTD applies resources leveling, they will relatively maintain their cost, but will increase their time, which will invariable affect the cost still. However, if they apply resource smoothing, it might take the prices up a bit, but their schedule will be maintained, especially since the date for the event has already been fixed. Resources smoothing will be more ideal in this case.
For me the MTD water installation, I think it will be good if they use resource leveling not minding that it will make the project not to be delivered at the appointed time but it will bring in much more good in terms of rescheduling for proper handling of the projectโฆ
MTD water installation event company and Glasgow event , the key words needed to react to this scenario are deadline, cost, quality, resources and customer’s satisfaction.
In my own opinion, resources smoothing will be preferable. Deadline as set before is achievable only at an additional cost within promised quality and the overall customer satisfaction is achievable. Date of event cannot be shifted here, and therefore I opine that nothing is too much to sacrifice by the MTD company to deliver their promises , meeting deadline even at an extra cost.
Resource leveling is a resource management technique that can help MTD better accommodate resource constraints and predict project timelines. It helps avoid poor project planning that often leads to last-minute delays, overworked team members, and cost overruns.
Resource leveling should be a part of every project managerโs toolkit. By optimizing and balancing resources across time, you can avoid unrealistic expectations and determine the earliest possible date to complete your project.
Yes, employing a resource leveling approach is advisable for MTD in this dynamic scenario. With an increase in event attendees, resource demands may fluctuate, impacting water supply requirements. Resource leveling enables MTD to optimize resources, ensuring a balanced and efficient response to changing demands without exceeding the budget. This adaptive approach helps manage unforeseen challenges, aligning resource allocation with the evolving needs of the expanded event, ensuring water supply remains adequate and cost-effective.
Resource Levelling approach is not a feasible route for this project because it emphasizes on rescheduling with possible impact of altering the project deadlines. As regards to the MTD, the water installation event company and the Glasgow event. I will suggest the resource smoothing because resource smoothing tends to maintain the original deadline but at a higher cost in bringing in experts. The event date has been fixed, sporting game and other live events cannot be moved, altering the time delivery will result to customers dissatisfaction. In order to maintain sponsors satisfaction, MTD’s priority is quality and timely delivery for customers.
MTD can apply a resource-leveling approach to the Glasgow event because resource-leveling is a resource management technique that can help teams better accommodate resource constraints and predict project timelines. It helps avoid poor project planning that can often lead to last-minute delays, overworked team members, and cost overruns.
According to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide, resource leveling is a technique to help you better accommodate resource constraints by adjusting the start and finish dates of the project. In doing so, you can make a realistic project deadline without overworking your team and increasing the total cost of the project.
Resource leveling gives everyone a realistic bird’s eye view of the project and can help teams establish feasible deadlines and assign tasks reasonably.
MTD’s projects like most projects are time specific and bound. Resource leveling requires rescheduling of tasks and activities that may ultimately extend project deadlines. MTD having inadequate resource to meet up project deadliness would not be accepted by the Sporting Event Client to extend the activity plan which is a complex activity. Hence project deadlines would be affected, for MTD resource leveling may not be practical and feasible. For me, I would not recommend resource leveling for MTD’s water supply projects to events.
MTD project is time bound. Resource leveling requires rescheduling of tasks and activities, that will affect MTD Project, it will greatly affect the cost of the project and time.
In the case of the MTD, I strongly believe that resource smoothing should be considered but the sponsor as well as other stakeholders should be communicated appropriately.
I suggest resource smoothing because it doesn’t alter the deadline unlike resource leveling that emphasizes project rescheduling.
For Glasgow event:
Communicating the sponsor at every stage is important. Let them be aware of the situation so it can be resolved. My job here however as a PM is to analyse the situation to them and present the two options of resource smoothing and resource leveling to them. I’ll go with the sponsors resolve.
The MTD Water Project is time-sensitive, imaging the team coming to install the water after the sporting event has started, the purpose of the project would have been defeated, MTDโs priority is quality and timely delivery for customersโ satisfaction. For the Glasgow event, I recommend resource smoothing.
Resource leveling on the MTD project could be appropriate because there was need for maintaining the time frame and enhance collaboration.
Resource leveling could avert over spending or overallocation of resources .
The Resources Levelling strategy is not a feasible route for the MTD for a singular obvious reason which is the event for which they cater which is mostly live.
While resource leveling might peel off their costs it will shift and affect the project timeline. The timeline using MTD and their services as a reference is very strict as a sporting game and other live events cannot be moved due to some shortfalls such as water availability
The strength of this resource management strategy lies in identifying critical and non-critical project activities, and shifting, spreading, or splitting non-critical activities however the subject of drinkable water at sporting events demands a more linear response with the iterative response coming in wherever seems to be a challenge so the management of MTD will have to go the Resource smoothing route though it will affect the project original cost but ensure timely delivery.
Team 3
A comprehensive view on resource overload ( PM Course discussion)
Considering the MTD scenario, it would have still be possible and better to apply Resource Leveling because of the following considerations:
1. Advantage: Leveling aims to minimize resource overallocation and ensures a more even distribution of workload throughout the project duration. It prioritizes resource availability and adherence to the project schedule.
2. Schedule Stability: Leveling focuses on maintaining the project schedule and eliminating resource conflicts by adjusting task dependencies and extending project timelines if necessary.
3. Resource Utilization: Leveling helps in optimizing resource utilization by preventing overloading, ensuring resources are not strained or stretched beyond their capacity.
4. Enhanced Collaboration: By preventing resource conflicts, leveling promotes smoother collaboration among team members, allowing them to work on their tasks without unnecessary delays.
Efficient utilization of resources is a key element towards success of a project and indeed leveling comes in handy.
Considering the critical nature of the Glasgow event and the fact that is time bound, I will recommend resource smoothing for MTD Water Project. MTD’s priority is quality and timely delivery for customers’ satisfaction. For the Glasgow event, cost was not the major thing that was considered but quality and delivery time which was why the went extra mile to create an alternative means to meet the immediate water requirements and ensure clean, uncontaminated water for the event. The project team had to bring in water tankers and buffer bags. This definitely help them to meet deadline but increase cost which mostly are covered by event organizers and sponsors.
I agree with your view. this is my view as well.
Pedro Akhimien, Cohort 12, Team 9
For me, I feel it will be okay to apply the resource leveling approach to the MTD and Glasgow project.
This resource management strategy concentrates on re-scheduling while not altering the resource capacity. This usually does not affect the costs but may affect project timelines/deadlines.
The strength of this resource management strategy lies in identifying critical and non-critical project activities, and shifting, spreading, or splitting non-critical activities along the project lifecycle but within their float.
“‘Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines”.
As regards MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event. I will suggest the resource smoothing as the solution. This is due to the fact that resource smoothing tends to maintain the original deadline for the project but at a higher cost. The event date has been fixed and altering the date will not make sense. Hence the need to add extra “experts” to meet the deadline.
The advantages of resource smoothing include.
-It prevents missed deadlines
-It maximizes resource utilization
-It reduces stress and burnout
Referencing the MTD, Water Installation Company, and Glasgow Event Company. Yes, it is feasible to implement a resource-leveling approach in such a scenario. The resource leveling won’t alter the existing resource capacity but instead underlines rescheduling, which may only affect project deadlines.
And it helps MTD peel off resource scarcity/excess, and maintain budgeted costs to deliver a quality project.
For the MTD water installation, I think it will be good if they use resource leveling not minding that it will make the project not to be delivered at the appointed time but it will bring in much more good in terms of rescheduling for proper handling of the project…
Micah Chijioke Madu
Project Management
Cohort 12
Team 6
I think it to be quite feasible to apply the resource levelling approach to the MTD/Glasgow project.
This resource management strategy concentrates on rescheduling while not altering resource capacity. This usually does not affect cost, but may affect project deadlines.
The strength of this resource management strategy lies in identifying critical and none critical project activities, and shifting, spreading or splitting none critical activities along the project lifecycle but within their float.
This can easily be applied to a project scope like that of the water installation events company MTD, and the Glasgow event. This will aid MTD mitigate resource scarcity/overload, maintain budgeted cost, deliver expected quality, and achieve project deadline.
According to the MTD it would be necessary for them to go for resources smoothing so as to bring in more hands to meet the deadline of project rather than going for resources leveling which will see tje the project noy meeting its deadline.
For MTD in my opinion it will be better to apply resource smoothing, increase project cost , by bring more hands and get the project done by deadline.
Thinking about the MTD, Water Installation Company and Glasgow event Company, It will be not just be possible but also ideal going for smoothing strategy in as much as there will be increase in costs, they will be able to achieve their primary goal which is completing/ delivering a quality project within the stipulated time frame and by so doing, maintain their sponsors’ satisfaction.
Thinking about the MTD, Water Installation Company and Glasgow event Company, It will be not just be possible but also ideal going for smoothing strategy in as much as there will be increase in costs, they will be able to achieve their primary goal which is completing/ delivering a quality project within the stipulated time frame and by so doing, maintainin their sponsors’ satisfaction.
Smoothing resources while keeping the predetermined timeframe intact is, in my judgment, the wisest course of action in this case. Smoothing of resources is recommended in order to meet deadlines.
Although resource leveling does not alter present capacity but instead focuses on rescheduling, which may have an effect on project deadlines, resource smoothing prioritizes maintaining scheduled deadlines at the expense of increased project expenses.
Resource smoothing is advisable in other to meet deadline
Resource smoothing is best recommended for MTD, so that they and their partners (glasgow) can be on the same ground.
Sunday Nathaniel Ngwamah,
Cohort 12, Team 10.
Meeting dates have been a major priority of both MTD and Glasgow as events companies. Many times, they have start and end dates scheduled before the projects begin. With this in mind, they encure higher or more costs many times since their targets are timeliness. They do this to mostly avoid disappointment of sponsors.
As the result, resource smoothing is recommended for them which though will lead to more projects cost, will definitely facilitate finishing in time and therefore meeting dateline. This strategy is best for then so long as quality and timeliness is met.
Sunday Nathaniel Ngwamah,
Cohort 12, Team 10.
Meeting dates have been a major priority of both MTD and Glasgow as events companies. Many times, they have start and end dates scheduled before the projects begin. With this in mind, they encure higher or more costs many times since their targets are timeliness. They do this to mostly avoid disappointment of sponsors.
As the result, resource smoothing is recommended for them which though will lead to more projects cost, will definitely facilitate finishing in time and therefore meeting dateline. This strategy is best for then so long as quality and timeliness is met.
A resource-smoothing approach is recommended for MTD so that the deadlines can be met. Even though more resources are required, it is better to have the sponsors, that is, Glasgow Events Company, satisfied. Resource-levelling may cause delays which may hamper the timely delivery of outputs.
MTD, the water installation company, and Glasgow Events Company often work on events with set start and end dates. It’s recommended to use a resource-smoothing strategy, even if it might lead to higher costs. The main aim is to ensure the project is finished on time. This is crucial to avoid disappointing event sponsors who have invested significantly in organizing the event within a specific timeframe. The priority is delivering a final product or service that meets the required standards and quality.
In this scenario, Resource levelling has more advantages because it involves smoothing out the allocation of resources to prevent peaks and troughs, ensuring a more consistent workflow. Factors such as the project timeline, available resources, and potential challenges in resource allocation would need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing a resource-leveling approach in this particular scenario.
The MTD water project is tasked with delivering onsite water facilities by a set event date, making resource smoothing the key solution for timely delivery
Given the frequent involvement of MTD, the water installation company, and Glasgow Events Company in events with fixed start and end dates, adopting a resource-smoothing strategy is advisable. Despite potential increased costs, the primary goal is to guarantee the on-time completion of the project. This approach is vital to prevent any dissatisfaction among event sponsors who have made substantial investments in organizing the event within the specified timeframe. The focus should be on delivering a final product or service that aligns with the necessary standards and quality.
In my opinion, the best approach to adopt in this instance is resources smoothing where the agreed timeline is retained. Resource smoothing will be advisable so that deadlines will be met.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
It would be best for the water installation event company should adopt the resources smoothing approach which focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing projects cost without changing the current capacity..
Due to the event date, it is not feasible to implement a resource leveling approach within the given deadline for completion.
Resource smoothing will be considered at this point, in order to meet up with the deadline of the project event organized. MTD water project had already a defined date and risk of losing future projects and customers has to be considered by bringing in other strategies to meet the deadline though it affects the project cost
Advisable in this situation is resource smoothing to ensure meeting deadlines. The project phases and plans would remain largely unchanged, with cost implications being the primary consideration. The MTD water project is tasked with delivering onsite water facilities by a set event date, making resource smoothing the key solution for timely delivery
In this scenario, Resource levelling has more advantages because it involves smoothing out the allocation of resources to prevent peaks and troughs, ensuring a more consistent workflow. Factors such as the project timeline, available resources, and potential challenges in resource allocation would need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing a resource-leveling approach in this particular scenario.
In this scenario, resource smoothing will be advisable so that deadlines will be met. The phases and project plans wouldnโt change that much except cost implications. MTD water project has the responsibility to deliver onsite water facilities to meet the need of the users at an already established event date, so the solution that will help with the delivery date would be resource smoothing.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs,
While
Resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling
Hence By considering 3 piles of project management (Time, cost, and quality) Resources smoothing will no be much advisable
Project completion on the specified date is usually paramount and a top consideration by a PM.
In practical terms, opting for resource leveling proves advantageous as it ensures resource capacity remains intact. However, itโs essential to acknowledge that this approach may necessitate rescheduling certain phases of the MTD water project, inevitably influencing the overall deadline. The careful consideration of these trade-offs is crucial for achieving a balanced and successful project outcome.
In navigating project management, the distinction between resource smoothing and resource leveling becomes pivotal. While resource smoothing strives to uphold planned deadlines at the expense of increased project costs, resource leveling maintains current capacity but prioritizes rescheduling, potentially impacting project deadlines.
In practical terms, opting for resource leveling proves advantageous as it ensures resource capacity remains intact. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that this approach may necessitate rescheduling certain phases of the MTD water project, inevitably influencing the overall deadline. The careful consideration of these trade-offs is crucial for achieving a balanced and successful project outcome.
Project completion on the specified date is usually paramount and a top consideration by a PM.
For this reason, the MTD water project should apply Resource Smoothing in order to complete the project within the specified timeframe. This is also to avoid disruption on the start and end dates for the event that is already fixed.
Otherwise, if the event date can be moved, then resource leveling will be used.
For me,I will note the style of communication that best works for each stakeholder.Thank you
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Application of resources leveling is preferable since it wonโt alter the existing resources capacity. However, the implication is reschedule some phases of the MTD water project thereby affecting the deadline.
Resource levelling is more about accomplishing a task that can cause an extension on delivery date but resource smoothing means accomplishing a task putting in more than assigned labour and still delivering at the set out time
Taking MTD event at Glasgow, looking at the timelines to the main event which is fixed already the approach of resource leveling will greatly impact the float whereas the resource smoothing will increase the project cost slightly however the timeline would still be achieved and the programme commences as planned without a hitch. This is more critical, because the idea of shift of event would be costlier than the additional funds needed to ensure the smoothing process is done effectively.
If MTD applies resources leveling, they will relatively maintain their cost, but will increase their time, which will invariable affect the cost still. However, if they apply resource smoothing, it might take the prices up a bit, but their schedule will be maintained, especially since the date for the event has already been fixed. Resources smoothing will be more ideal in this case.
In my opinion, resource smoothing is best due to the fact of accommodating increased project costs while maintaining the deadline.Resource levelling does not allow any increase in project costs, no matter the float.
โขImplementing resource leveling requires strategies with an early, mid or late delays which will cost the project much and time is money afterall. From the iron triangle, time and cost are greatly affected in this approach.
โข A better approach would be resource smoothing, though it will cost the project a little bit the quality, time and client/stakeholder’s satisfaction would be prioritized.
Choice between resource smoothing and resource levelling depends on project priorities and constraints however, resource smoothing focuses on solving resource conflicts without altering project’s critical path, while resource levelling aims to balance usage evenly over time.
MTD in my opinion it will be better to apply resource smoothing, increase project cost , by bring more hands and get the project done effectively
Resource smoothing is the best since it doesn’t change time for deadline it only increase cost. But resource leveling is also good just that the sponsor may not have much time to wait
For MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, it would be possible to apply a resource levelling approach if the non-critical activities can be delayed or extended within the available float. If not, it’s best to employ a resource smoothing approach, most like adding new resources to the project.
Isibhakhomen Angel Alimikhena
On the MTD water project resource smoothing will help in resolving resource over-allocations without affecting the project’s completion date
And it deals with adjusting non-critical path tasks within their float.
While resource smoothing would cause an increase in the project budget, resource leveling will only lead to a change in the project deadline. This wouldn’t be as much of a burden to the PM as having to return to the stakeholders to request an addition to the previous budget {which could end up being a constant if the previous budget is all the organization has got or the PM has been given to work with, this would definitely in turn affect the deadline as well).
Emplying resource smoothing will benefit MTD very well, since they deal with hard deadlines. Resource leveling will be beneficial if extending the deadline will not affect the reason for the project as a whole.
Resource smoothing approach is just the best.
Thanks
MTD should go with resource smoothing, even though it increases cost it doesnโt affect deadlines.
For the MTD project, I think Resource Smoothing is the best approach for this project because of the delivery time.
In this scenario with MTD, the best approach is resources smoothing in the scene that cost does not really matter but the time delivery in meeting the deadline of the project.
For my own perspective with
With regards to the MTD project, while considering timely delivery, resource smoothing could be the best.
I will recommend that MTD should use resource Smoothing because it aims is to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. Resource smoothing may not have impact on the project deadline.
Since meeting deadlines is crucial partner projects, MTD should go with resource smoothing rather that Levelling. Even though it increases cost but doesn’t affect deadlines.
With an already fixed date for the event, resource levelling will not be the best approach because that will mean a new end date for the project and, eventually a new date for the event.
Implementing resource leveling will not be feasible for MTD as it will affect the project deadline which would not be good for the event, so it would be better to go with resource smoothing to meet up with the deadline.
Well definitely yeah, because it aims at maintaining project deadlines while increasing costs
Since resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. MDT would rather embrace resource smoothing which may not have an impact on project deadlines.
MTD cannot afford to delay on their timelines.They will therefore use resource smoothing to ensure their project is timely and also deliver on the quality.
In the context of MTD’s water installation events for the Glasgow event, applying a resource leveling approach might involve redistributing existing resources within the project’s current capacity to ensure a smoother workflow without changing the overall capacity. This could involve adjusting schedules or tasks within the available resource constraints to mitigate any overloading or underutilization of resources.
Resource leveling, in this scenario, could help in optimizing the use of available resources without affecting the overall capacity, potentially helping to balance workloads and avoid bottlenecks in the installation process.
Resource Smoothing is the best option. It is difficult to reschedule events of that nature done by MTD that are time based.
With MTD company resource smoothing will be the best approach because it’s an event water supply company. It is of a fact that events are time bound and as such every event planner must work and deliver between a specified time frame.
As an events based company, MTD needs to prioritise deadlines because it caters to events that are time-based, so the project needs to be done within a fixed schedule.
Resource levelling may not be the right approach as it could end up prolonging the deadlines which will affect the project deliverables.
For MTD, I believe the best course is Resource Smoothing which would ensure that the project stays on course and the water installation is completed before the event, albeit at increased costs which I’m sure the sponsors would prefer rather than failing to deliver the required output.
For the MTD company and Glasgow event , resource smoothing is the way forward as they have a planned time frame to execute the project before them.
Considering that MTD, the water installation company, and Glasgow Events Company frequently deal with events that adhere to fixed timeframes, encompassing both start and end dates, it would be prudent to embrace a resource-smoothing approach. While this may entail higher costs, the paramount objective is to ensure the timely delivery of the project. This approach is crucial in avoiding any disappointment for event sponsors who have invested significantly in organizing the event within the stipulated timeframe. The emphasis should be on delivering a final product or service that meets the requisite standards and quality.
Answer to planning for Quality :
As a project manager focusing on planning for quality, you can take several actions to ensure that the project meets its quality requirements. Here are some suggestions:
Quality Assurance Actions:
Define Clear Quality Objectives:
Clearly define quality objectives at the beginning of the project. Make sure these objectives are measurable, realistic, and aligned with the project’s overall goals.
Establish Quality Standards:
Identify and establish industry or project-specific quality standards. Ensure that all team members are aware of and understand these standards.
Quality Planning:
Develop a comprehensive quality management plan that outlines how quality will be managed throughout the project lifecycle. This plan should include roles and responsibilities, quality control measures, and processes for continuous improvement.
Training and Skill Development:
Provide training to team members to enhance their skills and knowledge related to quality management. This can help in preventing common quality issues due to lack of expertise.
Document Management:
Implement a robust document management system to ensure that all project-related documents, including specifications, requirements, and design documents, are well-documented and easily accessible.
Continuous Monitoring:
Regularly monitor and assess project processes and outputs to ensure they meet quality standards. Implement a system of continuous monitoring and feedback.
Quality Control Action:
Quality Inspections:
Introduce regular inspections and reviews at various stages of the project. This can help identify and address quality issues early in the process, preventing them from escalating.
Testing Protocols:
Implement a thorough testing protocol that includes unit testing, integration testing, and system testing. Automated testing tools can be employed to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Peer Reviews:
Incorporate peer reviews for critical deliverables. Having fresh eyes on the work can often reveal issues that may have been overlooked.
Root Cause Analysis:
Establish a process for conducting root cause analysis when defects or issues are identified. This helps in understanding the underlying causes and implementing corrective actions.
Audit Considerations:
Adherence to Standards:
Ensure that the project processes and deliverables adhere to established quality standards. The audit should verify compliance with both internal and external standards.
Documentation Accuracy:
Verify the accuracy and completeness of project documentation. This includes requirements, design documents, test plans, and any other relevant documentation.
Process Effectiveness:
Evaluate the effectiveness of the quality management processes. Determine if they are being followed correctly and if they contribute to the overall success of the project.
Corrective Action Implementation:
Assess the implementation of corrective actions resulting from previous quality issues. Verify if the actions taken have been effective in preventing similar issues from recurring.
Continuous Improvement:
Evaluate the project’s approach to continuous improvement. Ensure that lessons learned from previous projects are being applied and that the team is actively seeking ways to enhance quality throughout the project.
By implementing these quality assurance and control measures and conducting thorough audits, you can increase the likelihood of delivering a high-quality project that meets or exceeds stakeholder expectations.
Projects like MTD that seem linear in nature better fits into the resource smoothing. Resource levelling doesnโt get handy as timek deadlines are imperative for such projects.
Considering we are dwaling with water and its resources and how it directly involves human lives, i would stand against resource levelling even though i am sure it is often been used just to meet its opening day or commissioning or ribbon cutting day.Resource leveling which involves using available resources could lead to half baked project or a critical part of the project undone or overlooked which definitely would have impact on the lives of those using the water.
For a company like MTD resource smoothing is better to ensure the date if the event is not affected
For MTD that operates on deadlines, resource smoothing is the way to go. Project price will be impacted but delivery is key.
As a result of deadlines and to meet up with time, resource smoothing tends to be the best option.
The best approach is the resources smoothing for MTD Water project implementation as it will preserve planned deadline that cannot be altered.
Olaniyi Onabanjo
Team 8, Cohort 11.
MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event are two reputable companies who will like to focus on preserving planned deadline base on how essential their services are and may not mind the extra cost it may attract. Hence, Resource Smoothing should be their choice.
In this MTD scenario, the resource levelling approach will not be suitable in the sense that it will definitely affect the planning of the scheduled event and when trying to reschedule the project it will affect when the event will hold thereby causing delay. The client will not be happy and satisfied but with the resource smoothing approach which is putting more time (overtime) on the project or adding new resources will definitely make the event hold at the stipulated time but affect cost on the project while at the same time making our client happy and fulfilled.
Given the pre-scheduled event with a fixed deadline, it is clear that the Resource Levelling approach is not suitable for MTD because, the project will not be delivered as agreed and it will bring about disappointet to the client. In this scenario, the most suitable option is Resource Smoothing, albeit with the associated consequence of an incremental increase in project cost. The project will be delivered as planned and event will also hold as proposed
I would not advise using the resource levelling approach as the major issue of the project is a scarcity of resources.
Resource leveling will be a great help when it comes to quality and all technical issue will be handle correctly smoothing might not take project detail into consideration but rather focuses on time.
Resource smoothing appears to be a better option in these cases as the factors (critical and non-critical ) can not be delayed. Time is essential and thus requires allocation of
more resources with the stipulated timelines to be maintained
Resource smoothing will be advisable so that deadlines will be met. The phases and project plans wouldnโt change that much except cost implications. MTD water project has the responsibility to deliver onsite water facilities to meet the need of the users at an already established event date, so the solution that will help with the delivery date would be resource smoothing
For the MTD project, Resource Smoothing is the best approach for the project because of the Time frame to deliver the project.
A Project like MTD requires resource smoothing because it preserves planned deadlines but increases project cost. As long as the deadline is met and the project is delivered, the best approach should be adopted.
Resource smoothing and resource levelling.
About MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event videos so far on this course. Looking at the figure above to apply a resource levelling approach is not a good solution.
The approach that fit is Resource Smoothing because of the event deadline. Resources can be added or using overtime approach will help to meet up with the deadlines
Oladapo Ngozi Elizabeth
Team 8, Cohort 11
Considering MTD and what is does, RESOURCE SMOOTHING is best to handle the project to meet the deadline.
Cohort11 Team5
Meeting deadlines sometimes can be very tasking and stressful, but timely delivery promotes trust and reliability it also meets needs at the appropriate time. I would rather choose resource smoothing for MTD because smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increases project cost.
Resource leveling can be considered only if all options of resource smoothing fail.
Team 5 Cohort 11
I agree to this statement
Resource smoothing is advisable for MTD water event company because they have delivery deadlines that cannot be extended. However, peradventure the resource smoothing fails, they can absorb the resource levelling as an alternative.
Resource Leveling will be fine
Based on the series of videos incorporated into the course, I think MTD can apply resource levelling approach if they, at the outset, were able to secure from the clients, reasonable floats that allow shifting the scheduling of project activities within the secured floats. In the event where the planned deadlines must be preserved, resource smoothing will be more appropriate while taking advantage of its incorporated contingency into the planning process that aligns the client toward bearing directly, the associated costs.
Considering the MTD project , resource smoothing will work better because it involves maintaining deadline with increase in cost. If they don’t meet up with the dead line and reschedule, they disappoint and dis organise the events
I feel the best way for MTD to apply in this situation is Resource smoothing since this strategy focuses on preserving planned deadlines although their project costs will increase.
However the sporting event for which their projects is based is a fixed event with date already fixed. Too many people are involved and participating in the event: athletes and their supporting staff, media, spectators, vendors etc, all probably coming to the event from different locations. So in this case using the strategy of resource levelling would not work as this strategy would require changing the project deadlines and rescheduling, and the project owner would not permit this as MTD is just one of the service provider that has been hired to provide a product (water) for their event.
Considering the MTD water project scenario, I will suggest using resource levelling to meet up with the project deadline. This will help to manage their resources and time to complete the project
If we are to consider the MTD water scheme, which demand is high to ensure water float for consumer usage, Resource levelling will create an uncertain impediment in the project plan.
I will suggest Resource smoothing. Why? It is because the project plan deadline can be effective thus enabling the project manager, teams, clients and stakeholders to move forward into other projects. Although, this choice is costly…the cost effect can be managed than having to reschedule an ongoing project which may lead to failure at the end.
Resource smoothing is advisable for MTD water project.
Concerning the MTD, I’ll suggest resource smoothly since they want to beat up the delay. Though its going to demands for extra cost but that’s the best way to handle the project so that the manager won’t be put under pressure.
For MTD dates, itโs concerning water distribution for consumers as early as possible. So if no enough floats on the schedule then smoothing will be the best option. But if there are enough floats on the schedule then levelling is best so as to maintain duration amd cost. There for a change in cost does not matter so far deadline is met.
Considering the MTD water project scenario, I will suggest using resource levelling to meet up with the project deadline. This will help to manage their resources and time to complete the project.
According to MTD, they deal with an essential commodity for everyday use which cannot to subjected to rescheduling, resource smoothing will be the best approach for MTD.
Considering the MTD water project, I would advise that the MTD project should consider to follow the Resource Smoothing approach because this will help them to meet up with their planned deadlines.
I think resource smoothing is best for MTD water project though it will increase the cost but it will not tamper with the deadline.
EXPERIENCE OF SCHEDULING RESOURCES ASSIGNMENT:
Meredith and Mantel (2012) identified several problems that can affect scheduling resources in project management. Let’s examine how each of these might relate to the banking sector and how they could impact your projects:
Thoughtless Optimism:
This problem refers to being overly optimistic about project timelines without considering potential risks or uncertainties. In the banking sector, this could manifest if project planners underestimate the time required for regulatory approvals, software implementations, or other complex tasks.
Demand Equal to Resource Capacity:
If the demand for resources in a project equals the available capacity, it may lead to resource bottlenecks and delays. In banking, this could occur if there is a high demand for specific expertise or if the team is stretched thin across multiple projects.
The ‘Student Syndrome’:
This refers to procrastination and delaying tasks until the last possible moment. In banking projects, this might occur if certain tasks, such as compliance reviews or data gathering, are postponed until they become urgent, potentially causing delays.
Multitasking to Reduce Idle Time:
While multitasking might seem like a way to improve efficiency, it can lead to decreased productivity and quality of work. In banking projects, multitasking might occur if team members are spread thin across various tasks, impacting the overall project timeline.
Complex Schedules:
Projects with intricate and detailed schedules can be more prone to delays due to the complexity of coordinating various tasks and resources. In banking, this could be relevant in large-scale projects involving system upgrades, mergers, or new product launches.
Motivation:
Lack of motivation among team members can hinder project progress. In the banking sector, motivation might be affected by factors such as unclear project goals, inadequate recognition, or a lack of alignment between individual and project objectives.
Game-Playing:
Game-playing refers to individuals manipulating the system to their advantage, which can disrupt the project schedule. In banking, this might manifest as team members prioritizing tasks that benefit them personally rather than the project as a whole.
Most Likely to Affect Banking Projects:
In the banking sector, the problems most likely to affect projects could include “Demand Equal to Resource Capacity” due to the often high demand for specialized skills, and “Complex Schedules” in the case of intricate projects involving regulatory compliance, technology upgrades, or major organizational changes.
“Motivation” could also be a significant factor, especially if team members are not adequately motivated or engaged in the project, leading to potential delays and reduced productivity.
Additionally, “Thoughtless Optimism” could be relevant, especially if there’s a tendency to underestimate the time required for specific banking tasks, such as regulatory approvals or system implementations.
Understanding and mitigating these challenges can contribute to more effective resource scheduling and successful project outcomes in the banking sector.
Resource leveling is typically applicable in situations where resources are overallocated or unevenly distributed throughout a project schedule. It involves adjusting the timing of activities to balance resource demand with resource availability without changing the project scope.
To determine whether a resource leveling approach is possible for MTD and the Glasgow event, consider the following factors:
Identifying Resource Constraints:
Evaluate whether there are specific resources (e.g., personnel, equipment) that are overallocated or in short supply during certain phases of the project.
Flexibility in Task Timing:
Assess whether there is flexibility in the start and finish dates of certain tasks. Resource leveling requires some degree of maneuverability in the project schedule to be effective.
Project Scope and Dependencies:
Consider the dependencies between tasks and the overall project scope. Resource leveling should not compromise the logical sequence of tasks or violate project constraints.
Project Deadlines:
Understand the criticality of project deadlines. Resource leveling might impact project timelines, and it’s crucial to determine if any adjustments to deadlines are acceptable.
Stakeholder Communication:
Assess the willingness and ability of stakeholders, including the project team and the client, to accommodate potential changes in the project schedule.
Utilization of Project Management Tools:
If available, utilize project management tools to analyze the resource allocation and identify areas where leveling could be applied without compromising project objectives.
Balancing Trade-offs:
Consider the trade-offs between smoothing resource utilization and potential delays in project completion. It’s essential to strike a balance that aligns with project goals and constraints.
Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation:
Implement a system for continuous monitoring of resource allocation and project progress. Be prepared to adapt the resource leveling strategy as the project evolves.
Without specific details about the project schedule, resource allocations, and dependencies, it’s challenging to provide a definitive answer. However, if there are identified resource constraints or uneven resource distribution, and if there is flexibility in task timing, it’s possible that a resource leveling approach could be considered for MTD and the Glasgow event. The key lies in carefully assessing the specific context and needs of the project.
I would advise that the MTD project should consider to follow the Resource Smoothing approach because this will help them to meet up with their planned deadlines,because it is a timely project. It may increasethe project costs but better than going for a Resource Levelling approach which will increase the projectโs costs but will also change the entire project plan causing more delay and the stipulated time would end up failing.
Considering the fact that the MTD water project is already planned and is existing, I would suggest a resource smoothing which is also a time-limited rescheduling should be initiated as the planned time-up for the project will not be extended, the tendency of additional cost is high though but can be managed to the barest minimum.
No, resource leveling won’t be suitable for MTD’s operation.
This is because the events companies must have undergone rigorous work to secure the time frame for their event. Use of resource leveling is most likely going to extend the deadline and won’t be acceptable, as they’d spend more in securing another date or even miss out for the whole of the year than they would in smoothing resources to fit into the available date.
The resource-leveling approach may not be suitable for MTD company as it may cause delays in the processes of their products. I believe the resource-smoothing approach would enable MTD to complete the project on time without any production delays.
Considerating thethe Water Project of MTD does, resource smoothing will be advisable so that deadlines will be met. The phases and project plans wouldnโt change that much except cost implications.
Given that the events been handled by both MTD (the water installation company) and Glasgow events company often times have fixed time frames( both start and end dates), it would be more advisable to adopt resource smoothing approach so as to be able to deliver within the given timeframe, tho it might come at a higher cost but the most important factor would be not to disappoint the sponsors of such events who might have spent much on putting it together within such given timeframes. As long as the end product or service meets up to the required quality and standard.
In my personal opinion, resource leveling can be effectively applied in MTD projects, given that these projects consist of multiple tasks that do not rely solely on one another, especially in the context of utilizing a hybrid or agile project method.
In my opinion, the best approach to adopt in this instance is resources smoothing where the agreed timline is retained. Its better to incure additional cost and satisfy the client by delivering the project ontime. This strengthens the clients trust in your Organisation’s abilities.
Adjust timelines based on resource constraints: Often, the most efficient way to level resources is to adjust the project schedule. This might mean shifting end dates out further to avoid assigning anyone overtime or shortening the project duration by assigning available resources more optimally.
Resources levelling isn’t advisable for MTD cause the project is meant for an event like Olympics whose start date has been fixed. Trying to adopt resources levelling would mean to disappoint the project sponsor. The best approach is to adopt resources smoothing where the planned deadline remain but new resources are being added and the project cost increase. Satisfying and delivering project in the agreed time with clients and stakeholders without disappointment is a value that an organization must have in order to earn the trust of the client.
Additional cost may be involved and variation can be sent later if possible to the project sponsor.
Conclusively, Resources smoothing is the best approach for both MTD and Glasgow
For MTD, resource smoothing is the best bet. For Glasgow, resource levelling could be adopted if the circumstances have been reviewed.
Implementing resources levelling is not feasible for the two companies. It might be risky and can cause rise and fall. The resources smoothing is the best approach to be adopted by MTD (the water installation events company) and the Glasgow event company, They need to incure additional cost and resource over time to avoid disappointing the customers and ensuring a more balanced and efficient workflow.
In the case of MTD company, I will advise them to apply a Resource Smoothing approach since it aim at preserving the planned deadline, which means every clients expect to see their projects been completed on before the planned date.
Resource leveling is the practice of adjusting a project’s start and end dates to accommodate for limited resources. Resource smoothing, meanwhile, entails adjusting the project’s activities to ensure work is completed according to existing timelines.
I’ll vote in the Resource Smoothing approach as it focuses on preserving the planned deadline, it’s okay to only incur an increase in project cost. Resource Leveling approach will increase the project cost, also change or reschedule initial plans on the project, creating a change in project deadline.
Resource smoothing is advisable for MTD Company
Will go for resource smoothing
For a company like MTD my recommendation to this approach will be Resources Smoothing and not Resources Levelling.
Resource smoothing will help them get the job done on time though at a higher cost but levelling will not make them deliver as at when due.
Resources leveling on the MTD project is going to pose a huge risk of lose to the project. In my opinion, resource leveling for such a complex project could be overwhelming and may jeopardise the success of the project, thus the need for resource smoothing.
with my best knowledge so far on this course, I will go for resource smoothing.
I will also go resource smoothing, cos I will rather increase the cost and meet the deadline than rescheduling with possible impact on the deadline.
MTD can increase the work hours and pay overtime for the resources to be for efficient.
For MTD, ultimately the show must go on.
With that in mind, applying resource levelling approach will not work. The event must start regardless with everything in place, therefore I would recommend applying the resource smoothing approach. The end date / deadline is preserved but project cost increases .
From the videos, the MTD seems to plans for contingencies anyway in their project plans so this approach will work best for them.
OJO OLUWANIFEMI
COHIORT 11 TEAM 8
As regards the MTD water installation event company I think resource smoothing will be best this is to give the best services while meeting up with the scheduled time.
Considering the event that happened at Glasglow, I would advice MTD- the water installation events company to follow the Resource Smoothing approach because this gives room to focusing on preserving their planned deadlines in as much as it increases the project costs rather than going for a Resource Leveling approach which will not only increase the project’s costs but will also change and reschedule everything concerning the project, thereby making the project deadline to be changed which would affected the event in Glasglow.
Both could play depending on who and how it’s tackled but smoothing approach would be best suited.
Depending on the constraint i am dealing with, i would level resources as suitable or apply the smoothing approach as suitable to achieve my project objectives
For MTD and their water installation projects, the best approach for them is resource smoothing because client company already has their event day fixed which MTD has to work with. So MTD would rather increase costs in order to preserve planned deadlines.
When we talk about resource levelling, we are talking about rescheduling of project time, delivery date and so on.. This will result in change in the time frame that was agreed on… Giving that MTD Project are time based, it will not be advised to adopt the resource levelling strategy.
On the other hand Resource Smoothing focuses on delivery the project at the agreed deadline and time frame…this may incurr more cost and using overtime. the planned project duration is preserved.
So Resource Smoothing is the sure bet for both MTD and Glasgow
Resource smoothing is the most appropriate for MTD here due to time constraint. It is recommended in order to meet the deadline.
The best approach for them is resource smoothing because client company already has their event day fixed which is the deadline MTD has to work with. So MTD would have to actively increase costs in order to preserve planned deadlines.
In a bid to meet dateline, i suggest that the best approach or process to use is the resource smoothing.
Constant communication is one of the major roles of project management with stakeholders. The Project manager should consider oral and written communication including online collaboration which has been proven to have several advantages related to how knowledge is codified and creativity is enhanced when online and co-located teams are combined. Constant communication will bring a mutual agreement, understanding and value sought through collaboration.
I would advise MTD to use the Resource smoothing approach as it would enable them meet stipulated deadlines even if its going to cost them more.
Resource smoothing is a better approach for MTD because of the stipulated time assigned to it.
Resource smoothing is the most appropriate for MTD here due to time constraint. It is recommended inorder to meet the deadline.
No. It’s not advisable for MTD to apply resource levelling due to time constraints and the fact that the project is for an event of which they’re only handling a part of (supply of water).
They’ll need to adopt resource smoothing.
I would advise MTD to consider Resource smoothing as it would enable them meet stipulated deadlines. However,They will incur more cost.
Sene Team 4
with regards to the MTD project, resource soothing is better approach since there’s a set date, time constraint, by providing additional resources to keep the project on course
I think the best strategy and approach for MTD is resource Smoothing considering that the project is time based to meet deadlines.
Resource Smoothing is a better approach for a time based project.
I will prepare resource smoothing based on its benefits.
Resource smoothing will be okay
Due to time constraints and being ale to meet up with the Project deliverables, I would recommend that the MTD water events company opt for Resource smoothing.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs
Resource smoothing appears a better option in these cases as the factors (critical and non-critical ) can not be delayed. Time is essential and thus requires allocation of
more resources with the stipulated timelines maintained
MTD main focus was to maintain the project timeline , resource smoothing is the best go to as it focuses on preserving planned deadline. I think its the best strategy at this point even if more cost might be incurred.
Friday Uwhubetine (cohort 10: T 5)
To my mind, the Project Manager at DMT-handling that particular event took the right decision by the deployment of additional resources. Therefore, his choice to use the Smoothie approach, rather than the leveling was well informed.
At the risk of not beating the deadline, incurring more cost (which may be transferred to the sponsors) was well-thought out.
The date for the event had already been scheduled and it was only a couple of days away, so incurring additional costs by way of making arrangements for alternative water supply was on point.
Resource smoothing most definitely appears a better option in these cases. This is especially so as the critical and non-critical factors can not afford to be delayed. Time is of the essence and thus requires more allocation of resources with earlier deadlines maintained.
In MTD ,it wouldn’t be a good idea to use resource levelling , other than that , it can’t work , cause in MTD , THE CRITICAL AND NON CRITICAL EVENTS can’t be delayed or extended cause they required following steps to achieve good distribution of the water and making sure to follow the normal guidlines so as to not have issues with the local authorities and to deliver with the best quality making sure the health of the people who consumes the water is considered . In MTD , i think it would be great to use RESOURCE SMOOTHING to fix the issue of resource overloading
For MTD AND GLASGLOW, Resource smoothing is the best approach to be used in order to be able to meet up with all the deliverables within the timelines for the project.
Considerating Organisation like MTD,i advice that the best approach or process to use is the resource smoothing since it aims at meeting deadlines. Every phases and stage of the project plans would not change or implies more cost implications.
Well, resource smoothing is the best approach to the MTD AND GLASGLOW, after the whole event then there will be a post calculation to prevent the problem form repeating itself
For MTD projects, I think resource smoothing is best approach because it is a time-based project.
Since the major focus for MTD is to maintain the project timeline. Resource smoothing also called time-limited scheduling is the best strategy to deploy.
In the case of MTD projects, I donโt think it will be okay to apply a resource leveling approach to their project as this can affect the deadline date, preferably resource smoothing can be applied to MTD projects.But in situations where there is still some time left before the planned deadline of a particular project, project leveling can be applied.
With respect to the MTD project, the best option is to use both resource leveling and resource smoothing. This will keep both the cost and the date of delivery in check. because MTD can not afford increase in the cost of production as this will affect selling price; and they lose customers.
In the case of MTD projects, I don’t think it will be okay to apply a resource leveling approach to their project as this can affect the deadline date. But in situations where there is still some time left before the planned deadline of a particular project, project leveling can be applied.
Resource smoothing approach is adviced, such project demands serious time frame and the time frame should be strictly adhered to..
While resource smoothing seeks to preserve the date and increase the costs to achieve a successful project, Resource leveling, focuses on maintaining the available resources and increasing the deadline of the project to achieve a successfully project.
Now, applying this to MTD, the water installation company, and the Glasgow events company, to achieve a successful installation of water by the project managers, Resource smoothing is the best approach to implement when handling the water installation project
As PM of MTD you need to analyse the advantage of each resource and the program at hand, this is either levelling or smoothing. Since deadline is of more important to this project resource smoothing will be the right one to use.
For every project, there is a paramount outcome. As a PM on MTD , knowing fully well that deadline most be met. I will subscribe to resource smoothing, as this will be the best approach. Increase in cost might be the price to pay , however, project will be met and delivered to the client before deadline. As long as QUALITY is not compromise in the long run.
However, in a situation where deadline can be adjusted. I will always subscribe to resource leveler, as it helps one to manage resources better, reschedule if need be because I believe above all things, effective management of resources is the core of a PM job
Resource Smoothing focuses on balancing resource utilization while allowing some flexibility in the project schedule to accommodate fluctuations in resource availability.
Resource Leveling aims to achieve a constant and steady resource utilization rate throughout the project, often with less schedule flexibility, by redistributing tasks or activities. The best approach for MTD would be Resource Smoothing. However, Extra cost will be incurred during the project.
Since MTD is an event Planning Organization that has a deadline for the supply of water for Glasgow, I think Resource Smoothing approach will be best for the organization
Considering all the factors in resource levelling and resource smoothing, the best for MTD to use for the project is Resource Smoothing: because it is a time conscious approach which is one of the keys in MTD project seen so far.
Since MTD is an event-planning organization. It should be a combination depending on the context and time contraints.
Given the pre-scheduled event with a fixed deadline, it is apparent that the Resource Levelling approach is not suitable for MTD (the project in question). In this scenario, the most viable option is Resource Smoothing, albeit with the associated consequence of an incremental increase in project costs.
Resource smoothing should be considered by MTD because it’s focus is to preserve the planned project duration and it’s deadlines. So in other for them to meet up with the stipulated timeframe, resource smoothing is best though exra cost will be invited.
For the MTD project, resource leveling is not considered the best approach, but rather resource smoothing as it focuses on preserving planned deadlines rather than rescheduling which would cause an impact on project deadlines
Since there isn’t enough time for the event to accommodate resource leveling for the MTD project, I’ll recommend resource smoothing instead because the cost of the water will not be as detrimental as missing the deadline.
Therefore, even if it has a financial and resource effect, my recommendation for MTD is to remain with resource smoothing since resource leveling will change the project deadline, which could compromise the company’s reputation.
Resource smoothing is important to the successful completion of project.When resources utilization fluctuates wildly_that is, when there are large peaks and valleys in the workflow _it can result in a project going over in terms of budget and timeline.By smoothing out the workflow,the project can be more effectively managed, reducing the budget and timeline.
Furthermore, getting on accurate timeline also helps with resource allocation,as the team can better predict which resource will be needed and when.
In view of these resource smoothing will be more effective in MTD project.
My advise for MTD is to stick to resource smoothing though its has a cost and resource effect๏ผthe deadlines for the project will be met.
On the other hand๏ผusing resource leveling would have serious impact on the project๏ผs deadline and the already communicate dates for the events will be negatively affected. This can result to a serious devastation for Glasgow management. Hence๏ผ resource smoothing is better than
resource leveling because the latter will alter the project deadline which can affect the company integrity.
MTD should consider Resource smoothing to enable them meet stipulated deadlines. Though they will incur more cost.
Resource smoothing is obviously the better option for them
Resources smoothing is the best approach for the company
Resource smoothing is the best option for MTD since deadlines are almost fixed.
At MTD and with the nature to f the project, Resource smoothing which considers deadlines and when it has to do with water, it will involve drinking as well, which price tag cannot be placed on the value of life. So the increase in costs should not be applied.
With the MTD project applying resource leveling is a wrong choice as there is no buffer time for the event to accommodate that, instead I will advise resource smoothing as the water cost will not hurt like not meeting the deadline .
For the MTD project, resource smoothing is a better option especially because meeting a client’s deadline is of utmost importance as well as upholding the company’s integrity while paying for extra cost
With respect to the MTD Glasgow event, resource leveling will be a wrong approach because the project deadline cannot be changed. The entire project objective was to supply drinking water to an event and the date of the event was fixed.
Resource smoothing will be the right approach although it will impact the project cost.
Resource smoothing is a better choice for MTD in my opinion.
Resource levelling wii be a wrong approach because the deadline for the project cannot be extended. Resource smoothing is the better approach although costlier
For a well structured system like MTD, resource smoothening would be best. Their timelines are already programed and would not appreciate the change in schedule that comes with resource levelling.
But then it is important to note the specific details and constraints of the MTD/Glasgow event, the available resources , project requirements and stakeholder expectations would be necessary to make an informed decision.
Most MTD projects are focused towards achieving a goal for an event. This means the timeline must be followed. For a well structured system like MTD, resource smoothening would be a better option. Their timelines have already been programed, a change in schedule that comes with resource levelling will not help the project.
But then it is important to note the specific details and constraints that comes with achieving the MTD Glassglows project so as to better advice
With the need to achieve the required quality, time, cost and the delivery of the project at the stated deadline, I will adopt the resource smoothing strategy as a project manager. Although resource smoothing may increase the projectโs cost for an added but efficient team member etc., It will be in the interest of my client knowing that the work will qualitatively advance and the project realised earlier or in time. wonโt accept any redundancy at all during the project.
On the other hand, given that project deadline rescheduling is the goal of resource levelling, MTD must not adopt this approach because it does not really modify the projectโs present capacity and quality within the stipulated time.
In fact, it will be preferable for me the PM to loose some finances in the new team mate that will be hired and gain trust for better future projects as the qualitative work is executed and handed with the deadline
Using recourse levelling for projects like MTD may alter the deadline by extending the project time, therefore, resource smoothing is better off for this project
For the MTD Glasgow event, using the leveling method might completely alter the chain of events and impact negativity outcome with a new deadline which may not favour the event so the best approach is resource smoothing
For Glasgow events I feel an alterations in their dates or deadlines may have an effect on them. Therefore resource smoothing might work better for them. Better still the sponsor can also look at the scope to see how it can be expanded
For the water project at MTD ,resource levelling will not be the best option because of the fixed date for the project but using the resource smoothing approach will be useful for the project and the stakeholders.
I think resource leveling would not be the best approach here because if the project sponsor wishes to change the capacity of the project, the approach wonโt allow it. So resource smoothing is the best approach to it
Considering the type of project MTD work on which is connected to events and water. Resource levelling approach will most likely not be feasible because events are usually fixed and announced, vendors booked, date sets and even the event center or field readily booked for the date. In this case, Resource smoothing is most feasible. Even though additional cost will be incurred, it can be reduced to ensure it doesn’t strain the stakeholder, parties and company involved and at the end of the day it’s a win win situation, event goes on as slated for deadline, resources is available and project is done.
Resource smoothing may be the best option to achieve the project according to slated timelines and according to float. Resource levelling may extend the timeline for the project.
Resource smoothing may be the best option to achieve the project according to slated timelines and according to float. Resource levelling may extend the timeline for the project.
I think it would be more feasible to implement a resource smoothing approach so as to meet the assigned project deadline rather than restructuring using the resource levelling approach.
Resource smoothing Is the best to me as a project manager in achieving my set goal because my project with be done within the stipulated time, timeline of the project will not be affected.
While in the Case of resource leveling the timeline will be extended thereby incurring most cost to the project.
For the scenario with MTD, resource levelling is possible. A reassessment may have to be done to find overcapacity and then reschedule activities. This could also reduce cost.
The impact of the project cost and the willingness of clients to accept the increase in project cost will largely determine the resource allocation strategies that better suit the project.
Considering the MTD case study where the service provision (Water Supply) is essential and without options, the resource smoothing strategy will be critical to ensure that the project is delivered within the scheduled timeline and within the expected quality not minding the slight increase in cost.
I do not think that applying a resource levelling approach will bode well. This is because MTD projects are very time sensitive and have very little leeway for float periods or reschedulling; the events they set up waterworks for are time sensitive. A resource levelling approach may cause significant impact on project delivery deadline and may render the project a failure.
Resource smoothing is the best approach to be able to deliver quality water on time. This will impact project costs which are usually absorbed by contingency costs that are embedded during initial project planning and costing.
In MTD project, I would lean towards implementing a resource smoothing approach. It focuses on balancing resource demand over time, which can help ensure that resources are allocated efficiently while still meeting the deadline.
Resource smoothing is the best approach for MTD project because it focuses on preserving planned deadlines but, it will increase the costs.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadline though the project cost will increase while Resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadlines.
Looking at the difference between the two strategies, the MTD water project has to been delivered to the users at an estimated time, hence the best strategy to apply is the Resources smoothing while taking into cognizance that the cost will increase.
As a project manager, putting in to consideration MTD the water installation events and the Glasgow event. The best approach is resource smoothing which the original project death lines will be maintained, although there must be increase in cost of project same of the factor to play with are time, cost and quality within the project as manager.
Resource smoothing aims to achieve the original project deadlines although project costs will be increased . while resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but emphasizes on rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadline.Resource smoothing is the best approach for the MTD project, since it is an event which is time bound, Only that the cost for the project might increase. But quality will be obtained and you will be able to deliver on time.
Resources rescheduling due to its impact on deliverables deadline will not work for MTD but rather a time- limited scheduling approach, that is resource smoothening because it preserved planned deadlines though it comes at an additional cost, Hower, the MTD have always included contingency, redundancy
costs etc into their budgets and events organisers were always ready to absorb the extra cost while MTD breaks even.
Resource leveling is the adjustment of project start and ending days to align for short resources while resource smoothing is the adjustment done to ensure that project is completed according to available timeline
Applying resource leveling for the MTD Water Project is feasible but MTD projects are for events and the events are timebound, hence resource smoothing will be the best approach because it focuses on preserving the planned deadlines.
Due to the time frame and the MTD projects that is majorly for events, resources levelling may not be the best approach because it will definitely after the delivery date, hence resources smoothing will be far better since their is contigencies cost already included in the budget .
I bargain for resource smoothing, due to the fact that, MTD caters for events which are time bound, the cost increase could be factor into the continencies and redundancy cost already programmed for.
Resource leveling vs resource smoothing: The basics Resource leveling is the practice of adjusting a project’s start and end dates to accommodate for limited resources. Resource smoothing, meanwhile, entails adjusting the project’s activities to ensure work is completed according to existing timelines.
Resource smoothing is the best approach for the MTD project, since it is an event which is time bound, Only that the cost for the project might increase and there might have to be adjustments. All the same the quality of the project will be same as it was intended in the beginning of the project.
Projects have deadlines and they must be maintained for various benefits. Resource smoothing can be appropriate in this project to meet the completion date.
Resource smoothing is the appropriate strategy to adopt based on the clients MTD works with and the nature of the client’s project because MTD clients always have a defined start date to begin their projects, and such a set date cannot be changed once fixed.
The best approach for the MTD project is resource something because it has a planned deadline even tho it might increase the project cost to be able to meet the deadline on has planned
The best approach for the MTD project is resource smoothing. Though it requires extra cost the deadline must be met.
Resource smoothing can indeed be a beneficial approach for the MTD water project in the given circumstances. It allows for the adjustment of resources, such as adding new ones or using overtime, to ensure that the project stays on schedule and aligns with the required finish date. This method can be effective in managing time constraints and preserving the planned project duration. However, it’s important to carefully balance resource allocation to avoid overloading or causing burnout among the project team members when using overtime. Additionally, monitoring and controlling costs associated with resource adjustments is crucial to ensure the project remains within budget.
The better approach to take for MTD project is Resource Smoothing since it involves a set deadline which is important to meet. Though this approach would require that there is increase in cost, it is a better approach than Research levelling.
I don’t think resource levelling will work in a project like MTD, this project is time-bound as it is for an event { planned date cannot be rescheduled ) so instead of levelling i will go for smoothing.
Considering the MTD water project, resource smoothing is the best approach since the require date has been set and there is a time constraint and it focuses on preserving the planned project duration and its finish date by adding new resources to the project or substituting current resources with a new one with greater capacity and also by using overtime to increase the availability of resources this is to keep the project align with the scheduled.
Thanks
The best approach is the Resource Smoothing since it is a time based project.
Resource smoothing is about preserving planned deadlines but increasing project cost, this should be applicable to the MTD project in Glasgow. The event in question has been scheduled to go life in 3days, so invoking the resource levelling wouldnโt have been feasible and they would have gone past the initial planned deadline. Using the resource smoothing method is the best approach since there is a build in redundancy in the project cost for such occurance in anticipation of any setback.
The most reliable and approach is the Resources smoothing it gives guide to project manager and teams also, so every one keed their eye and mind fixed on the date the project need to be completed more importantly it helps manager to plan and coordinate the project progress in sequence manner. Thanks
Resource smoothing is best used in a certain project to meet up the deadline;though,the cost will be allocated to get the best results while resource leveling it maintain same cost though the deadline will slow and cost will be managed
Since deadline has been fixed,
Resource smoothing will be a good options because it preserves planned deadlines even if it would result in increased cost unlike the resource levelling which will not meet up deadlines
Resource smoothing is all about preserving planned deadlines but increasing project cost, this should be applicable to the MTD project in Glasgow. The event in question has been scheduled to go life in 3days, so invoking the resource levelling wouldn’t have feasible and they would have gone past the initial planned deadline. Using the resource smoothing method is the best approach since there is a build in redundancy in the project cost for such occurance in anticipation of any setback.
Seeing that resource levelling unlike resource smoothing doesn’t change the capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on the project deadline. In the case of MTD, the event (project deadline) had already been fixed, so applying resource levelling wont be feasible as it will have adverse effect on the time already been mapped out for the event. Resource smoothing will be a better option as it preserves planned deadlines even if it would result in increased cost.
The best approach as a Pm is resource smoothing as a change in cost does not matter but meeting dead line does.
Well I think it would be challenging to employ Resource levelling at that event for MTD this is because I believe the project schedule is clear and the main sport event cannot be postponed due to MTD’s inability to meet deadline.
The best course of action for MTD to take in order to reduce serious impact of the project will be to use Resource Smoothing to get the project to completion within the stipulated time even though it will cost the sponsors more money but the main aim which is to support the sport event would have been achieved.
Resource levelling wouldn’t have been a good idea for the MTD company because it would have altered the project deadline. The Glasgow event was already close at hand and rescheduling an international sport event would increase costs with negative impact on all stakeholders.
This was why MTD opted for resourse smoothing as they added new resourses to the project for contingency provision of more water till the end of the sport event.
Resource levelling would have worked for MTD at the Glasgow event, due to the closeness to the project deadline (3 days to the event starting). It would have been easier to reschedule the the project activities (more expensive) but would not affect the project delivery date. In addition, resource smoothing wouldn’t have been the best option it there was neither enough time to increase capacity nor shift the project delivery date.
To ensure the planned event is not impacted, it is advisable that MTD employs Resource Smoothing. This involves prioritizing critical activities and de-prioritizing non-critical ones to optimize available resources and deliver the project as originally planned since the date of the event has already been fixed. Additional resources can be added or a few hours of overtime can be considered, although this may increase costs.
resource smoothing aims at meeting deadline but increasing cost which is the best
Though meeting deadlines sometimes can be very tasking and stressful, but timely delivery promotes trust and reliability it also meet needs at the appropraite time. I will rather chose smoothing for MTD. Resource leveling can be considered only if all options of resource smoothing fails.
Resource smoothing is very balanced because of the deadline
Well I think it would be challenging to employ Resource levelling at that event for MTD this is because I believe the project schedule is clear and the main sport event cannot be postponed due to MTD’s inability to meet deadline.
The best course of action for MTD to take in order to reduce serious impact of the project will be to use Resource Smoothing to get the project to completion within the stipulated time even though it will cost the sponsors more money but the main aim which is to support the sport event would have been achieved.
The best approach is resource smoothing as a change in cost does not matter but meeting dead line
Resource Smoothing is the best approach for this event as the deadline for this event has been fixed, For resource smoothing, I will add more experienced personnel to the project so as to meet the deadline.
Resource Smoothing is the best approach for this event as the deadline for this event has been fixed, For the resource smoothing, I will add more experienced personnel to the project so as to meet the deadline.
Resources smoothing is efficient. The durability of work is visible.
Looking at this scenario in MTD and Glaslow events, resource levelling can not be used in a time based project.
It is necessary to adopt the resource smoothing approach and increase the cost with allocating more personnel and resources and still making sure the schedule for the project remains consistent.
As a project manager, the resource smoothing is the best option. Resource smoothing in other to complete the project before the deadline though this can actually cost them more, yet is far better than resource levelling because end users are waiting at the time scheduled
Leveling of resources assist in balancing of the amount of workdone on the resources and ease capacity.
Resource smoothing is helpful when confronted with limited resources or very costly one. Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadline
As a PM and considering the MTD approach I’ll work with Resource Smoothing since it aims is to maintain the original project deadlines while increasing project costs rather than working with Resource Levelling which will want me to rescheduling my client projects.
Resource smoothing is particularly useful when dealing with resources that are limited or expensive, such as specialized equipment or skilled personnel. The emphasis is on minimizing resource peaks and valleys without significantly impacting project timelines. The best approach is resource smoothing which is best for a time-based project like MTD installation project because of the nature of the event.
leveling of resources is very important in projects because it helpsin balancing of the workloads on the resources which helps in alligning usdeage with the avaliable capacity. resource levelling does not change the current capacity.
resource smoothing helps in preservinga planned deadline but increeases the project cost.
Nnennaya ozuruonye
team 7
In the case of MTD resource smoothing is the best approach
One of the reasons is that itโs a water distributing company that distributes clean water to events
So there is no room for rescheduling as the timeline for the event is fixed
COHORT 9,TEAM 7
OBINWA CHIMAMAKA.
The question says do you think it would it be possible to apply a resource levelling approach?
The aim of resource levelling is to balance workload on resources to align with their available capacity and it does this by shifting the schedule of project activities thus extending deadline.In the case of MTD,the even had already been fixed,so applying resource levelling wont be feasible as it will alter the time already been mapped out for the event.Resource smoothing will be a better option as it preserves planned deadlines.
Resource smoothing rather than levelling is appropriate to meet deadlines.
Keeping a tap on the MTD water project, I will go for the resource smoothing which is optimal for a time based project, though cost will be affected, it is better than resource levelling which has to do with reschedule or not meeting deadline.
Because of the importance of water for the sporting project which has been fixed, resource smoothing is best applicable. This means the entire organisation focuses on preserving the planned project duration and its deadlines by applying more resources to the project.
.
Project completion on the specified date is usually paramount and a top consideration by a PM.
For this reason, the MTD water project should apply Resource Smoothing in order to complete the project within the specified timeframe. This is also to avoid disruption on the start and end dates for the event that is already fixed.
Otherwise, if the event date can be moved, then resource leveling will be used.
Based on the time set for the project, resource smoothing is the preferable option to go for
Resource smoothing focuses on maintaining a consistent level of resource utilization throughout the project duration and is such ideal in this case than resource levelling which focuses on adjusting timing which could lead to delays and affect the overall success of the project
The primary goal is to avoid abrupt fluctuations in resource demand. This technique allows for some flexibility in the start and finish times of activities as long as project deadlines are met.
Resource smoothing is particularly useful when dealing with resources that are limited or expensive, such as specialized equipment or skilled personnel.
The emphasis is on minimizing resource peaks and valleys without significantly impacting project timelines.
In the context of Glasgow sporting events, resource smoothing would involve spreading out the utilization of facilities, equipment, and personnel to prevent sudden surges in demand of available resources without compromising the overall event schedule.
It’s not wise to apply Resource Levelling it will affect the event whose date has been already fixed.
Since the water project of MTD is for a specific schedule event, resource smoothing is best. For the Glasgow project which had definite deadline, resource smoothing is also the best option.
The resource levelling approach may not be applicable in the mtd event water firm, it’ll rather use resource smoothening considering the perennial needs of water in the events and the negativity of rescheduling
Projects have deadlines and they must be maintained for various benefits. Resource smoothing can be appropriate in this project in order to meet the completion date.
The best approach is resource Smoothing which is best for a time-based project like MTD installation project because of the nature of the event.
Resource smoothing will be the best approach to use because the event company has a deadline to meet. When this deadline is missed, it will have a great impact on the purpose of the project
The best approach would be resource smoothing for a project like MTD’s
resource smoothing is the best option in this case because the project has a deadline that cannot be altered.
As a PM, resource levelling is better hence it does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadline.
Taking a look into the MTD Water project, resource smoothing is best advisable to kick against a delay in project delivery while incurring additional cost and training. The Glasglow event has a specified delivery date which the company cannot afford to extend further, therefore resource smoothing is best fit to keep to date.
Fromu understanding Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs whic smooth the running of the project while On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Delaying the deadline might be catastrophic
So, resource smoothing is the best option…unless all the stakeholders are agree to postpone the deadline
From Cohort 9 Team 6,
Based on the type of clients MTD deals with and the nature of the client’s project, Resource Smoothing is the best approach to apply because MTD clients always have a fixed start date to commence their projects and such set date cannot be changed once fixed.
Well, in this senerio resource levelling can be applied at the beginning of the project. When the event has not commenced. MTD water installation events company can ask for additional time which will enable them to arrive the venue some days to the event, so as to check their equipment Incase there is any issue on ground and rectify it on time. But as soon as the event commences there will be no room to ask for additional time to fix any problem, rather more resources will be put in place, which means extra cost. This is where resource smoothing comes into play.
So I would say that it is possible to apply resource levelling approach to the Glasgow event.
I would go for resource smoothing
Since to delay the supply of water will put on hold so many other things dependent on it, then resource smoothing will be the best option for me.
Resource smoothing and resource leveling are two techniques used in Project management to manage and optimize the allocation of resources. While they both aim to achieve a balance between resource availability and Project Requirements.
Resource smoothing aims to adjust resource allocation while keeping the Project schedule intact, focusing on avoiding resource peaks and troughs. Resource leveling involves adjusting the Project schedule to achieve a more even distribution of resources, even if it means extending the Project duration.
As MTD’s Project manager I will work with resource smoothing
For me,
I wouldn’t choose one over the other without understanding the risk in relation to project duration and cost. This is my option on a more board view.
But if am to pick just an approach out of the two options. My first will be to consider resource smoothing.
In as much as applying the resource leveling seems more ideal considering cost I would opt for resource smoothing since project is time-based. But if rushing project (i.e. applying the resource smoothing approach) would result in quality of project been affected, i recommend a meeting with stakeholders to decide on the possible option.
MTD is a water production company and water is very important,infact some organizations or businesses can not be productive without water for instance, food production companies, having said this resource smoothing will be preferred to levelling, even though there is increased cost,yet meeting the deadline is paramount, the end users may definitely procure with increased costs
Cost must be sacrificed in order to meet up with the deadline. Resource Smoothing is preferable
resource smoothing is the best approach
In the case of the MTD water installation company itโs better to go with the resource smoothing than resource levelling which implies rescheduling or not meeting the deadline.
For the MTD water project, I would suggest Resource smoothing approach to meet up with the deadline.
Considering the MTD water project, my best approach would be to go with resource smoothing which is ideal for a deadline and time based project. Even though it’s going to have affect on the cost, it’s better to go with the resource smoothing than resource levelling which implies rescheduling or not meeting the deadline.
With using the resource smoothing approach, the company would be able to meet up with the expected deadline and delivery a quality outcome.
The best approach would be to apply the resource smoothing to meet deadline before event should start.
In the case of MTD, I would suggest Resource Smoothing, though it may require extra cost but because the nature of their projects has a timeframe, They wouldn’t want to risk not being able to deliver at the stipulated time.
In the case of MTD, resource levelling is applicable to avoid additional cost contrary to resource smoothing.
Considering the fact that MTD Water Project is an event project which is based on a time frame for delivery, resource levelling will not work. I suggest they apply resource smoothing.
MTD and glasgow as we have been following throughout this course are companies which events have deadlines and the stakeholders involved may not have the luxury of time to reschedule events hence, a resource smoothing would be advised in order to ensure that the event is preserved
I would recommend resource smoothing for MTDโs water project for their event management program. Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. Resource smoothing aims at delivering in line with such challenge and employing extra hands to enable them deliver within the time bound of the project.
In this context of MTD water project, resource smoothening would work better in the sense that the project has originally been planned to be executed within a specified timeframe and the resources addition can cover up for gap that would otherwise extend the deadline of the project
MTD deals with planned events, these events have deadlines and the stakeholders involved may not have the luxury of time to reschedule events. In this case, resource leveling will not suffice rather a resource smoothing will have to be considered to preserve the event.
Now the problem becomes who bears the cost, MTD or project sponsor. To look at this issue, the PM will have to understand where the problem originated from. Letโs say, the water supplied by the client is not suitable for the event for failing consumption test, the client will have to bear the cost, similarly if it was as a result of poor information from the sponsor the sponsor bears the cost so also if was a result of poor resource allocation by the PM he will also bear the cost.
MTD projects have to do with events which have deadlines such as; date of deployment & execution to meet up with scheduled on a timeline. It could be too demanding on all stakeholders involved to have project execution rescheduled for instance.
Resource smoothing applies here in order to meet up with scheduled timelines. .
Considering MTD, the water installation and the Glasgow event weโve been following so far in this I believe it would it be possible to apply a resource levelling approach, this is possible because shifting the scheduling of project activities within their available floats. That way workload on resources would align with resources available without any increment in costs
COHORT 9 TEAM 8
Using MTD and glasgow event as a case study, I will rather recommend resource smoothing as to meet up with the fixed deadline for deliverable and quality outcome and output is expected while extending time frame by resource leveling approach is not advisable
MTD deals with planned events, these events have deadlines and the stakeholders involved may not have the luxury of time to reschedule events. In this case, resource leveling will not suffice rather a resource smoothing will have to be considered to preserve the event.
Now the problem becomes who bears the cost, MTD or project sponsor. To look at this issue, the PM will have to understand where the problem originated from. Let’s say, the water supplied by the client is not suitable for the event for failing consumption test, the client will have to bear the cost, similarly if it was as a result of poor information from the sponsor the sponsor bears the cost so also if was a result of poor resource allocation by the PM he will also bear the cost.
In my opinion taking MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event as a case study, resource smoothing might possibly be the best option. This is due to the fact that the project has already fixed date and the sponsor is already aware. Using resource leveling can disrupt planned activities for the event day, which invariably will have a negative impact on the image of the company
Using MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event as a case study, I will recommend resource smoothing. This is because the event working towards has already fixed date and the client/sponsor must have sent out invitations. Using resource leveling (deadline rescheduling) can eat up into the event day and this is capable of affecting the companyโs reputation.
For MTD is will be really difficult to apply resources levelling for them because the have a bottled next time line to deliver the process,but resources levelling can only be applied if the project was started much earlier,but this is subject to discussion with stakeholders.
The best method that can work best for the company is resources smoothing,so they can bring in more work force and complete the project within time frame though at an extra cost.
Should the project become very difficult,a visit of the scope of the scope with the stakeholders will be the best option necessary.
COHORT 9, TEAM 3. CYNTHIA ONYINYE OKEKE.
Considering the MTD, water installation company and the event at Glasgow, Resource levelling will only be possible if the issues is discovered at the early phase of the project.
If the issue is discovered during the final phase of executing the project and the deadline is fast approaching, Resource smoothing in the form of additional resource (calling for backup from a similar company) or working overtime by the MTD project team will be the best option at the time because the project deadline is time sensitive, even though it will add to the project cost. That is why the MTD project manager mentioned that the clients are encouraged to budget for unforeseen cost. Though it is expensive, it ensures that the quality of the project deliverables are maintained.
I think resource smoothing is best for MTD, the water installation events company and Glasglow event. Adding new resources to project will help meet project deadline and may also lead to the production of quality output.
What safeguards the projectโs time frame is putting resources in place for project like MTD. THIS IS CRUCIAL in timely delivery.
My take using the MTD water project as a case file, is to go with resource levelling because the industry is a sensitive one and I would rather pay ample attention to quality than cost.
Resource smoothing would give the PM and team time to go over every step, check and recheck quality, proper audit, more professional can be brought in to evaluate the project’s original intended value/ expectation.
However, this would mean rescheduling the deadline by extension. Having a satisfied client with clean and safe water is more beneficial as a PM
Using MTD and Glasgow event’s,
Smoothing will be the best approach to avoid altering customers deadline given that the project has a fixed time. This will increase opex but project will be delivered on time. Leveling will extend deadline hence affecting customers expectations.
Keneth Juma Walumoli Cohort 9-Team 6
Absolutely, applying a resource leveling approach could be highly beneficial for MTD, the water installation events company, particularly when considering the Glasgow event featured in the course videos. Resource leveling involves adjusting project activities to even out resource utilization, thereby preventing overloading and ensuring a more balanced workload for the available resources.
In the context of MTD and the Glasgow event, resource leveling could address various challenges. For instance, if certain tasks require specialized equipment or skilled personnel, resource leveling could help ensure that these resources are efficiently allocated without causing bottlenecks or delays. This approach could also aid in managing the availability of materials, preventing shortages and avoiding last-minute rushes that might compromise the quality of the event setup.
Furthermore, given the unpredictable nature of event planning, resource leveling could provide a structured way to handle unexpected changes or additional tasks that might arise during the event preparation phase. By optimizing resource allocation and maintaining a smoother workflow, MTD can enhance its overall efficiency and deliver a successful event experience.
However, it’s important to note that resource leveling might require adjustments to project timelines and potentially impact the critical path of the project. This could influence event deadlines and dependencies, so careful planning and communication are key. Overall, when implemented thoughtfully, resource leveling can play a crucial role in enhancing MTD’s ability to manage its water installation events and deliver exceptional results for clients.
Team 1 cohort 9
Adeola
Cohort 9, Team 9
I would recommend resource smoothing for MTDโs water project for their event management program. MTD deals with sponsors who work with dead lines and have time bound for each project.
In the short video by the project manager, the major problem was not cost but delivery time. This made him to create an alternative which was the introduction of a sprint. The alteration did not affect the time of delivery and this is the aim os resource smoothing which I will strongly recommend.
I would recommend resource smoothing for MTD’s water project for their event management program. MTD deals with sponsors who work with dead lines and have time bound for each project. From the video by the project manager, cost was not the major problem but delivery time, this is why they went extra mile to create an alternative. There was a sprint application that was a mini project in the main work float, that sprint was created to ensure they met the dead line which was most important at that time for that particular project. The alterations made did not affect the initial delivery time only the work float that wasn’t incorporated initially. As long as the job was delivered within the stipulated time, which was the focus of the company. Resource smoothing aims at delivering in line with such challenge and I would recommend it for this particular event project.
Resource leveling is not feasible, particularly for MTD pure water supplies. The project would result in delays and increased costs, as acknowledged by the project manager in one of the videos. To meet the immediate water requirements and ensure clean, uncontaminated water for the upcoming event just three days away, the project team had to resort to using water tankers and buffer bags. This approach, known as project smoothing, required additional expenses but allowed them to deliver water on time despite the contamination of the initial planned water delivery source or pipe, with the event organizers covering the extra costs.
MTD WATER PROJEC: It is crucial to adopt a resource-leveling strategy to achieve the desired objectives.
Considering the delayed non-critical tasks approach in resource leveling, the project can maintain its progress within the available float period without affecting the critical path. This approach aims to balance the demand for resources while considering their potential and capacity.
This approach is indeed viable as it ensures a stable workload without altering the existing resource capacity. Instead, it focuses on rescheduling, which may impact project deadlines. Whatever the cost required to complete the project, it will be made feasible. If additional workforce is needed to expedite a process, it will be arranged accordingly.
According to the lesson, it is made clear that Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines
It is obvious that Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
I think that resource smoothing helps to maintain deadlines which will be the best approach for MTD project. I suggest in choosing this method they should employ more hands in other to meet up with the time.
I do not think that resource levelling will be the best approach for MTD project. This is because they usually have to work within a tight schedule and beating deadline is critical. There is usually little or no time flexibility, so the float window may not be available to cushion the effect of rescheduling without encroaching into the delivery deadline
Joel Nnamani, team 5, cohort 9.
I would recommend resource smoothing for MTD instead of leveling.
This is because MTD deals with events and events are time bound. Choosing resource leveling may plunge the project into longer time.
And this may lead to penalty charge by the client. MTD should explore the option of resource smoothing but employing extra hands to enable them deliver within the time bound of the project.
use on the MTD water project, as it maintains deadline given and also retains the quality of the project.
Reply
Faith Peters
August 2, 2023 at 3:15 pm
Leveling retains the capacity while MTD manages its limited time and resources, and a new deadline is set.
It is advisable to use resource leveling for projects that have a sufficient amount of non-critical path, which enables time adjustment to stay within the budgeted expenses.
To complete the delivery within the allotted time, MTD in this situation would need to apply resource smoothing. For the MTD water project, resource levelling is therefore not a suitable concept.
we normally use multiple team membership:
it is good to allocate time here and stick to it. It is very exciting and less boring. Although as humans they exhibits conflicts at times
For MTD, Resource leveling will be good to implement because it does not change the project capacity-cost and scope, but the planned timeline will not be met, however, resource smoothing is the best as the MTD project is time-bound and is not flexible on delivery extension.
Which of these are most likely to affect your project(s)?
Thoughtless optimism
Demand equal to resource capacity
The ‘student syndrome’
Multitasking to reduce idle time
Complex schedules
Motivation
Game-playing
All
For MTD, resource smoothing is a great option to meet deadlines with the slim possibility of saving associate costs.
Considering resource smoothing will be the best option for a project like MTD. It safeguards the project’s time frame which is very essential in delivery.
For project like MTD resource levelling will be ok because it help teams better accommodate resource constraints and predict project timelines
Adetoro Olatope
For MTD, Resource levelling will be good to implement because it does not change the project capacity-cost and scope, but the planned timeline will not be met.
The Nature of the projects under the management of MTD is time bound and has relatively fixed deadline which cannot be adjusted (not flexible). In this case project smoothening is best to enable them meet the deadline while maintaining quality outputs! How ever project leveling can also be employed but that’s only if the stakeholders of the events deem it necessary to adjourn the event date which in this regard is the deadline!
Resource smoothing is the best bet as the MTD project is a time bound project and is not flexible on delivery extension.
Resource smoothing will be the better approach for the MTD projects because of the timeframe which is very essential in the project delivery
Amsain Olawale Cohort 9 Team 2:
Because of the nature of the out put of the MTD Projects, which is essential to the community, and also the time bound delivery of project output. I would say that Resource smoothing is the best option, so that the schedule for the project will not be altered and the deadline will be met even though it will come at a price which is an increase in project cost.
The MTD project is a time based project and as such resource smoothing will be advisible to be use because if resource leveling is used it will affect the project deadline or timing
Team 5
Resource smoothing is the best to meet deadlines for MTD project but resource levelling can also work to achieve set quality plan even though it will affect the deadline
Adopting the resource smoothing approach for MTD would be the best option, considering the timeframe for the delivery of the project.
This is because it helps to focus on the set deadline while also adding up the project cost..
Jennifer Aghemwenhio
Cohort 9 team 5
Resource levelling is feasible in the MTD project as it will help to reduce external failures .some aspect of the project can be delayed to enable floating task to take place and still meet with the project quality,time and budget.
Cohort 9 team 1
For project like MTD, resource smoothing is the best option since it preserve the planned project duration and deadline.
Team 6
Resource leveling is a project management technique used to balance the demand for resources with their availability.
Employing a resource leveling approach for MTD, the water installation events company, holds the potential to harmonize resource demand and availability.
By judiciously distributing resources like equipment, personnel, and materials, MTD can achieve a refined equilibrium during their events.
This strategic maneuver would thwart any excessive burden on specific resources, thus optimizing event execution.
Nevertheless, the practicability of this approach hinges on the distinct attributes of MTD’s projects, resource accessibility, and event intricacies.
Engaging in a dialogue with MTD’s project managers would be prudent to assess the viability and distinctive advantages of incorporating a resource leveling strategy.
Problems of Associated with Scheduling Resources.
Thoughtless optimism: Being too hopeful about task times leads to unrealistic scheduling and delays.
Demand equal to resource capacity: Trying to max out resources creates inefficiencies and bottlenecks.
The ‘student syndrome’: Delaying tasks causes unexpected delays and project disruptions.
Multitasking to reduce idle time: Juggling tasks can slow things down due to switching costs.
Complex schedules: Complex plans lead to confusion, errors, and tracking problems.
Motivation: Team apathy leads to slow work and affects timelines.
Game-playing: Selfish schedule changes create conflicts and project delays.
All these problems are most likely to affect my organization especially the multitasking now that we are embarking on a new project while others are still ongoing.
Addressing these problems requires careful planning, realistic expectations, effective communication, and the flexibility to adapt to changes and unexpected events.
For MTD project, resource smoothing strategy is the best, so that the project can be delivered on time. Although, the cost variance can be upsetting for the client in terms of project cost increase.
Based on the situation and criteria I think Resource smoothing is the best option, so that the standard of the project and project end date stay protected and build the reputation of workflow as well for the current and Future project.
As a PM for MTD, Resource smoothing will work effectively with the project, the cost might be high but it will be more effective for the project
Resource leveling can not be an option in such projects executed by MTD from what we have seen, as resource leveling suggest a change and shift in deadline to a later date. Most of these events are time fixed and sensitive and may not accommodate change in deadline. The best option would be resource smoothing eventhough that will incur more cost. So as to deliver the project as at the time agreed or even earliee
The MTD project is a time based project, therefore Resource smoothing approach will be the best because it focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs.
THADDEUS ASOTIE|COHORT9|TEAM 10
Considering the MTD, the water installation events and company, and the Glasgow event that we have been following so far, My thought on this is that resource smoothing is the best and most effective approach to be adopted by the MTD water installations and event company since deadline will and must not be altered.
You absolutely right. There is no need for alteration on the project schedule in resource smoothing.
I would recommend resource levelling. MTD is a time based project and this will keep the team in check in the area of being flexible with time and exercising team work to meet the deadline which is essential.
Considering the fact that the MTD water project is already planned and is existing, I would suggest a resource smoothing which is also a time-limited rescheduling should be initiated as the planned time-up for the project will not be extended, the tendency of additional cost is high though but can be managed to the barest minimum.
Considering the Water Project of MTD, Resource smoothing is adviced as the Project deadlines is not affected, The Glasglow event is on a set date, so its not advisable to delay critical or any activities as the company cannot afford a slip on Time.
However Overtime of the resources available or getting new resource to complete the project will be advised while managing the impact in Project cost and training new hires
Because MTD kinds of projects are events that makes time even much more critical. Hence, the best approach to the resource will be resource smoothing rather than resource-leveling. Because it will allow for maintaining the deadline and quality requirements as well.
I recommend the Resource smoothing Approach as a project is termed a success when all requirements are met.
Chinwendu Daniel Ogwueli
Team3, cohort 9.
I recommend resource smoothing because it allows project manager to add more resources to the project in order to meet up deadline and maintain quality.
Resource smoothing is the best option, so that the standard of the project and project end date is maintained.
Cohort 9; team 1
I recall in one of the videos, the representative from MTD said that they usually make room in their initial project plan for an additional 2 or 3 days before the actual project deadline to accommodate quality issues and that it sometimes impacts cost, but they maintain the deadline. This means their kind of projects fit resource smoothing.
In considering MTD, an ideal approach will be the best to implement resource smoothing, as quality is essential especially in all aspect of the water project.
Introducing more resources to meet deadlines or better still the project sponsor should evaluate and analyze the project scope based on the factor of time, quality and scope.
I encourage MTD to use resource smoothomg
I concur. Resource smoothing will allow for meeting the deadline yet maintaining quality.
I recall in one of the videos, the representative from MTD said that they usually make room in their initial project plan for an additional 2 or 3 days before the actual project deadline to accommodate quality issues and that it sometimes impacts cost, but they maintain the deadline. This means their kind of projects fit resource smoothing.
ADAMU MOHAMMED
COHORT 9,
TEAM 6.
Events often have unique and time-sensitive aspects that cannot be easily rescheduled. Therefore, while resource principles could offer insights, resource Smoothing is a more flexible and adaptive approach necessary to successfully manage the complexities of event projects.
Afterwards, review can be done to forestall any other causes for additional cost in their subsequent projects. Considering the nature of projects and events been Undertaken by MTD, the best approach is resource smoothing due to the fact that they are time-based projects needed to meet deadlines.
An ideal approach will be to implement resource smoothing, as quality is essential especially in all aspect of the water project.
Introducing more resources to meet deadlines or better still the project sponsor should evaluate and analyze the project scope based on the factor of time, quality and scope.
For the water events company, the resources smoothing is the best approach as it would only increase cost but the deadlines will be met, which is the most suitable one as events guest will not lack water usage. Resource levelling will not work in MTD unless, the event date would also be adjusted to the new deadline date.
Considering MTD as a case study resources smoothing us the best approach, because application of resources levelling might affect the usage of water by the beneficiaries during their event which is bound by a timeline.
In the case of MTD Resource Levelling is the best approach in my opinion because they might be on a budget which results in the effective & efficient use of resources available but of course the deadline will be affected too.
For the MTD project, the application of either the resource smoothing or resource leveling depends largely on the Funds available. If there are no available funds to extend the project, the organization may decide to apply the Resource Leveling – that is, making do with what is available.
AKINREMI PATIENCE, COHORT 9, TEAM 1
MTD Event is a water company that supplies quality and safe drinking water to events. When they are given a project to handle. In situations like this, there will be a specific time frame for the execution of the project which I believe will be non-negotiable.
For these reasons, the best approach for executing MTD projects is resource smoothing because it works with a deadline to achieve results irrespective of the high cost.
As such, resource leveling will not be suitable for this kind of MTD event.
For a large water facility installation company like MTD, in most cases it is better for the project manager to have a meeting with the sponsors and tell them the major requirements of the project. The sponsors will always know to beat the set deadline, so it is better to go with resource smoothing and brief them on the benefits.
why is it best option and what it will need to achieve.
Considering the Water Project of MTD, Resource smoothing is adviced as the Project deadlines is not affected, The Glasglow event is on a set date, so its not advisable to delay critical or any activities as the company cannot afford a slip on Time.
However Overtime of the resources available or getting new resource to complete the project will be advised while managing the impact in Project cost and training new hires
Resource smoothing would be the best approach here considering itโs a multitasking project which needs to meet a time deadline increasing the project cost
The best approach here will be resource smoothing due to work ethics of MTD change in cost is acceptable in this case as long as deadline is met.
MTD’s project is time-bound. Rescheduling, in this case, will be highly impossible since most of their projects have to do with sporting events which run on their own calendar. I will recommend resource smoothing as the best approach because it focuses on preserving the planned project duration and deadline.
Cohort 9 (Team 6)
Resources levelling focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact on a projects deadline.
Application of resources levelling would be possible if there was no defined end date for the MTD’s project, However, if the project had a planned end date, implementation of resource levelling will alter project duration with zero cost, only if duration of activities on the non-critical paths was extended within the available float.
Resource leveling aims to balance resource availability and project schedule, ensuring a consistent workload for resources. However, in the case of MTD’s event, where various factors like venue availability, weather conditions, and vendor schedules might impact the project timeline, strict resource leveling might not align with the dynamic nature of event planning. Moreover, events often have unique and time-sensitive aspects that cannot be easily rescheduled. Therefore, while resource leveling principles could offer insights, resource Smoothing is a more flexible and adaptive approach necessary to successfully manage the complexities of event projects.
Considering the time-sensitive nature of the projects undertaken by MTD, I recommend adopting a resource smoothing approach rather than resource leveling. This approach prioritizes meeting the planned project deadline while allowing for increased project costs if necessary.
NIF ENEOJO
*Matter for Discussion* .
Would it be possible to apply a resource levelling approach in the MTD, the water installation events
company and the Glasgow event?
*My Contribution*
Yes, I think it would be possible to apply the resource leveling approach to an extent in the MTD water installation events company and the Glasgow event. They can apply some approach under the resource leveling approach that would not affect the end date or increase cost. Approaches such as:
1. Delay non-critical activities within their available float. They can โfloatโ within a certain time period without affecting the overall duration of the project and project costs will not be affected too.
2. Extend non-critical activity durations within the available float: its duration is extended within the limits of the maximum float available to level the resource load once more and the impact on the project duration and cost is zero.
3. Split an activity into non-sequential pieces: here activities are split into parts to free up an overloaded resource and allows other concurrent activities to be done. The effect is to introduce a delay in the completion of the activity, which could affect the overall project duration and cost if the activity is critical and the project manager should endure the completion of the project doesn’t encroach into the starting of the events of Glasgow event but it can extend outside their end date.
Resource smoothing is the best approach to be used by MTD due to the project deadline and making sure the project quality is not compromised.
For the MTD project, I would recommend a resource smoothing strategies while the Glasgow counterpart work with the resource levelling approach.
Resource smoothing is the best option to be use here because the dead line has been given,thou is going to cost much.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project cost and deliver timeline safely.
KOMOLAFE Daniel Law
I believe the best strategy for MTD to apply in this situation is Resource smoothing since this strategy focuses on preserving planned deadlines although their project costs will increase.
This because the sporting event for which their projects is based is a fixed event with date already fixed. Too many people are involved and participating in the event: athletes and their supporting staff, media, spectators, vendors etc, all probably coming to the event from different locations. So in this case using the strategy of resource levelling would not work as this strategy would require changing the project deadlines and rescheduling, and the project owner would not permit this as MTD is just one of the service provider that has been hired to provide a product (water) for their event
Considering the nature of projects and events been Undertaken by MTD, the best approach is resource smoothing due to the fact that they are time-based projects needed to meet deadlines with additional costs. Afterwards, review can be done to forestall any other causes for additional cost in their subsequent projects.
With the MTD project, resource levelling would not be an option as it is a time constrained project; Resource smoothing is the best approach to enable project is done within the allocated deadline.
For a company like MTD, whose projects are more often than not time limited or constrained. The best approach will be resource smoothing, which delivers within timelines but at additional cost.
It will be unwise to adopt the resource levelling strategy for the MTD project, putting the nature of the project into consideration as an extension would affect the deadline and make the project manager seem unreliable.
I think for a company like MTD and the nature of its projects, resource smoothing will work best for it.
Resource smoothening should work best for MTD. Though it would incure additional cost, but for the benefit of meeting up with the initial deadline as time is very essential in the MTD system’s service delivery.
Prisca Ifediba Alachebe cohort 8 team 9
No. I don’t think MTD should resort to resource leveling. Time is crucial for most of MTD’s operations. They supply water at stadium facilities. Resource leveling needs shifting deadlines, which is at cross purposes with the date of football matches already set .
Resource leveling will make the MTD project manager look unreliable
it is reasonable and wise to utilize the resource smoothing strategy for the MTD water project.
Although, project cost will increase but deadline will be achieved as this is key in every project.
It makes the project manager more reliable and well reassured.
Yes, applying the resources leveling is feasible and allows the project to scale faster since it is time based.
I do not think it wise to adopt the resource levelling strategy for the MTD project, putting the nature of the project into consideration as an extension would affect the deadline and make the project manager seem unreliable.
The availability of resources at the disposal of MTD and the Glasgow event project manager will determine which idea to adopt and why. I would advise the resource smoothing option though since the companyโs not coming cheap, it means there is a large enough buffer for such contingencies and still be in profit, whilst also having a satiated client or sponsor MTD Company, Resource Scheduling might not be the right approach for the nature of their projects.
Scheduling of resources entails a solution that will eventually impact task deadlines and/or the overall scheduled delivery dates of the project. This is because Resource scheduling involves balancing workload with available resources.Application of resources leveling is better since it wonโt alter the existing resources capacity. However, the implication is reschedule some phases of the MTD water project thereby affecting the deadline.
The availability of resources at the disposal of MTD and the Glasgow event project manager will determine which idea to adopt and why. I would advise the resource smoothing option though since the companyโs not coming cheap, it means there is a large enough buffer for such contingencies and still be in profit, whilst also having a satiated client or sponsor.
Resource leveling can come in once the compulsory tasks are achieved if it still aids the ability to meet the set deadline.
Applying the resources leveling is feasible and allows the project to scale faster since it is time based.
Applying resource levelling approach wonโt make it faster rather it slows down the project since it involves lots of rescheduling to be able to make use of available resources
As a PM for MTD, resource leveling wonโt be applicable since supplying water requires prompt delivery in time schedule. Consequently, Resource smoothing will be applicable while ensuring accurate communication from the client and quality feedback to cover up for any cost resources that may spring up after.
Considering the MTD Group, that is, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, it will not be feasible to apply the Resource Rescheduling approach because of the sensitivity of the project. Water source contamination is a very serious issue. It was a good thing that it was discovered a few days to the event, but it will not be ideal to maintain current capacity and reschedule activities because this will not solve the issue of the quality of water and also quality project outcome on the day of event. Resource smoothing will suffice because a new resource (water tank company) will be introduced to solve the problem of water contamination even though more project costs will be incurred. It is actually more guaranteed to have a quality project delivery and to beat deadline going with the Project Smoothing approach. In addition to this is the necessary need for Quality audit where corrective actions are taken and opportunities for improvement, identified.
When dealing with their challenges, MTD company would find the resource leveling method to be a very good approach because with resource leveling, there can be a balance on the use of resources to refrain from excessively allocating or under utilizing it. This inturn can cause them to be more efficient at handling projects and avoid issues that might result from poor schedules.
So, for me, the resource levelling method is really a nice approach to use.
I’d say resources smoothing will be the ideal approach instead of resources levelling, since the organization main concern is to see that the a project is accomplished before the set deadline at any cost.
Adopting the resource smoothing technique for the MTD water project would be acceptable and prudent.
Although project costs will rise, the deadline will be met because every project depends on it.
It increases the project manager’s dependability.
I think the best strategy for MTD to apply in this situation is Resource smoothing since this strategy focuses on preserving planned deadlines although their project costs will increase.
This because the sporting event for which their projects is based is a fixed event with date already fixed. Too many people are involved and participating in the event: athletes and their supporting staff, media, spectators, vendors etc, all probably coming to the event from different locations. So in this case using the strategy of resource levelling would not work as this strategy would require changing the project deadlines and rescheduling, and the project owner would not permit this as MTD is just one of the service provider that has been hired to provide a product (water) for their event.
I don’t think it will be possible to adapt the resource levelling approach for MTD project considering the nature of the project as an extension in deadline can affect the actual event which would have been publicised already. However if resource levelling can be done within the float, then it’s possible.
It would be reasonable and wiser to adopt the resource smoothing strategy for the MTD water project.
Although, project cost will increase but deadline will be meet as this is key in every project.
It makes the project manager more reliable.
It will be feasible to implement project levelling for the MTD Water Project but I would advise that the resource smoothing approach should be utilize because it will help complete the project before the deadline although it will lead to increase in costs, bearing in mind that the organization main concern is to complete the project before the deadline at any cost.
In my opinion, Resource smoothing will be the best strategy as MTD would have to Preserve the deadlines while increasing Project cost.
In context, what i have experience the more in PM is resource levelling as they have to work within the available resources. (Africa reality)
The best approach to be considered here is the resource-smoothing approach instead of resource leveling because we are working with a deadline (for an event that has a targeted time and period its taking place)..However additional project cost will be need but hence will FastTrack the delivery of our project.
On an MTD project ,I would advice the best option to opt for is resource smoothing.
Resource smoothing has a deadline on a project which is paramount, despite it incurring more cost for the project. Hence MTD project deals with delivery of water to a specific people, which is essential to the livelihood of a target people.If this is rescheduled it will affect the aim of the delivery on the project.
As a PM for MTD, resource leveling won’t be applicable since supplying water requires prompt delivery in time schedule. Consequently, Resource smoothing will be applicable while ensuring accurate communication from the client and quality feedback to cover up for any cost resources that may spring up after.
For MTD water project, itโs crucial to factor in the project timeline. I will recommend employing the result-smoothing or time-limited schedule method in executing the project. In addition to this, seeking more expertise and adjusting the budget may be necessary to ensure the water supply is delivered effectively. While increasing the final cost might be a concern, it will help accommodate the necessary budget adjustments.
Analyzing the projectโs timeline allows us to assess potential challenges and opportunities for optimization. By utilizing the result-smoothing or time-limited schedule method, we can mitigate risks and ensure timely completion. Engaging additional expertise ensures a comprehensive approach, improving project outcomes. While budget adjustments may seem daunting, they are essential for project success and maintaining high-quality water supply for the community.
Resource levelling will be possible if during the planning phase allowance was made while scheduling .
The project should not just be planned to end on the same day as the opening. That way resource levelling can borrow some of the days that was originally meant for testing.
As a PM, relating to MTDโs water project, I will go for Resource smoothing approach reason being that it is helps in maintaining deadline but ofcourse operational cost will increase.
I believe resources smoothing will be best approach rather resources levelling, since the organization main concern is to see that the a project is accomplished before the deadline at any cost
My own contribution is that MTD project will require Resource smoothing for them to ensure the project completion time is preserved even though that it will affect the Project cost,it may be necessary to do a re-evaluation of the Project Scope
i think that for the MTD Company, Resource Scheduling might not be the right approach for the nature of their projects.
Scheduling of resources entails a solution that will eventually impact task deadlines and/or the overall scheduled delivery dates of the project. This is because Resource scheduling involves balancing workload with available resources.
MTD has to deliver onsite water facilities to meet the need of the users at an already established event date, so any solution that might impact the delivery date would not be the best, but rather; resource smoothing, on the other hand, might be preferable as this will enable the delivery of the project within the specified time at the expense of a cost increment.
Resource Smoothing is the act of working on the scheduled deadline of a project despite the changes in price or cost of the project while in Resource Leveling, the cost of the project remains the same but there’s rescheduling on any slight change on project deadline.
For a project like MTD the Float is very essential as such I will advice them to use the resource smoothing approach
With MTD, It is very possible to apply resource levelling approach on preserving planned deadlines and if it will not affect the event
Reply
For MTD water project the most accurate approah to use will be resource smoothing.
For a company such as MTD, Resource smoothing rather than resource leveling would be beneficial for them as the first aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs whereas the latter does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines and usually events on which MTD manages their projects comes with fixed dates and they have no control in moving the dates forward or backwards.
To join this discussion, I will say that first of all, the MTD is kind of intricate one, but I will say that It will
be possible to apply resource levelling approach on preserving planned deadlines.
That’s my take
I am of the opinion that MTD project will require Resource smoothing in order to ensure the project completion time is is preserved even though that may affect the Project cost otherwise it may be necessary to do a re-evaluation of the Project Scope
Taking into consideration the timeliness of the MTD projects which are scheduled to meet a specific need and a target audience; the best approach to adopt would be resource smoothing although much cost would be incurred but the urgency of the project would be attended to.
I do not think it is possible to apply resource levelling for it tends to impact on the project deadline. Take for instance a sporting event that has been scheduled to end within a specified time; it is not possible to end the deadline. So MTD will apply resource smoothing though this will add to the project cost but the timely delivery to meet the project deadline is paramount. Cost can be reviewed by sponsor and possible apply for variance to the client.
With MTD, It is very possible to apply resource levelling approach on preserving planned deadlines.
When analysing MTD event company and Glasglow event, the to the smoothing pattern would be preffered rather than the levelling one
Considering the timeliness of the MTD projects which are scheduled to meet a specific need and a target audience; the best approach to adopt would be resource smoothing although much cost would be incurred but the urgency of the project would be attended to.
As a PM for MTD, resource smoothing is better, firstly because the product entailed is essential therefore rescheduling would stir lots of noise from stakeholders or clients.
The adoption of resources would preserve deadlines would although with more cost incurred
I think it would be best to apply the resource smoothing approach to handle resource shortfall in the MTD Project. This is considering the fact that the nature of MTD’s projects always require urgency in its delivery and although this approach of resource smoothing may incur some extra cost, it will ensure quality delivery and holding up the deadline. The levelling approach would ultimately cost more where deadlines are not met as it could result in the client recalling the entire project or terminating the contract.
I would go for resource smoothing for the kind of time-based projects handled by MTD. Though project cost is affected upwards, but project would be delivered according to schedule. That, however, would require project cost review by the sponsor.
Resource smoothing is the best approach as it ensures the timely completion of the project with the agreed end date.
for the case of MTD event company and Glasglow event, i will subscribe to the resource smoothing rather than resource levelling because the project deadline can still be met and also the quality of the project will still be okay.
In the case of the Glasgow project of MTD, Resource smoothing will be the only option at that time because the event is already upon them so it will be better to upscale the project cost, keep quality assured and maintain the deadline. Resource Levelling wouldn’t be feasible in such a time.
Resource leveling is an important tool to manage resources during the execution of this project, it may not be sufficient for this MTD and Glasgow project, as delivery date would be delayed.
Resource smoothing is the best approach for this since the start date is already close by.
Itโs a complex project, that means, it requires a broader reflection and reevaluation of the overall project scope with the project sponsors to address the challenges effectively and make informed decisions about potential revisions, such as having additional resources into the project in order to meet project deadline using resource smoothing.
Rescheduling the MTD, the water installation events firm, and the Glasgow event is not recommended since it will have a significant impact on project timelines, affecting stakeholders and project management deliverables.
However, I propose that we implement resource smoothing, which seeks to keep original project timelines while increasing project costs. Increasing project costs may be uncomfortable at first, but in the long run, hiring more hands on the project will keep the project deadline while generating effective outcomes.
Considering the Glasgow Event, as Project Manager of MTD, I’d rather opt for Resource Smoothing which aims at maintaining original project deadlines, since the Event cannot be rescheduled even though it would have an upward impact on Project Costs.
Resource Leveling cannot be considered at all, as it would mean rescheduling which is impossible, even though the existing resource capacity remains unaltered, but Project deadlines wouldn’t be met.
As a project Manager for MTD and bearing in mind how timely event management project planning is, it is absolutely impossible to use resource levelling strategy. It would be advisable that Resource smoothing be used as the deadline cannot be moved from initial project planning.
Understanding both concepts will help us make a better decision, Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
i would go for resource leveling, although the project deadline may change by a day or two, its better than incurring unnecessary cost.
Ekwuribe Uzochukwu C.
Cohort 8 Team 4
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines. Therefore, it is advisable to go for Resource Smoothing to ensure the deadline is met.
As the PM, considering resource smoothing for the project which will be in line with the deadline and quality than resource levelling which may have an impact on project deadlines.
As a project manager for MTD, I will advise that we stick with Resource smoothing because it aligns with the objective of the company ( to deliver water timely and when needed)
I don’t think it would be a good idea to compromise the deadline. instead of resource levelling, I would go resource smoothing, since it sticks to the deadline which in this case is cardinal.
The MTD Project aimed to provide quality water at a specific time or period and hence, I do not think it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario. This is because the levelling approach focused on rescheduling with an impact on the project deadline. This impact on the deadline might not warrant the MTD deliver their product as at when due.
With MTD, It is very possible to apply resource levelling approach on preserving planned deadlines.
For the MTD water project I believe resource smoothing will be the best approach to maintain quality and still keep to time.
As a Pm I sure will consider using a resource smoothing strategy.
Considering the importance of meeting deadlines for event planning, resource smoothing may not be the ideal option as it could lead to increased project costs. Since MTD is likely working on a budget, managing resource overload through leveling would be a more cost-effective approach.
As the PM, I will consider resource smoothing because the project will still be in line with the deadline and still retain quality. Though there will be cost increase will will be discussed with project sponsors and stakeholders before reaching an agreement.
Thank you
Joanna
For the MTD project , resource smoothing will be advisable,
Resource smoothing refers to a technique where resources are adjusted
to meet project demands without changing the project schedule.
In resource smoothing, resources are allocated in such a way that
their utilization is balanced and peaks and valleys in resource demand are minimized.
The goal is to distribute the workload evenly over time, keeping resource utilization
as steady as possible. This technique is particularly useful when limited resources
are available and project schedule flexibility is less important, with this approach project delivery will still be in specified frame window
Resource smoothing would be the best approach. It will minimize resource fluctuations and maintain a balanced workload throughout the project, ensuring efficient resource allocation and successful event execution within the available timeline and resources. By carefully managing resource utilization, MTD can avoid overloading team members and reduce the risk of resource shortages.
Resources smoothing will be the best option for MTD project in order to complete the project at the deadline date, although it will increase the cost, but time management is very important and quality assurance
As a PM in MTD, I would opt for resource levelling, the project can be rescheduled, with costs Managed properly
Adopting the resource smoothing technique for the MTD water project would be acceptable and prudent.
Although project costs will rise, the deadline will be met because every project depends on it.
It increases the project manager’s dependability.
I will consider resource smoothing for MTD Water project implementation as it will preserve planned deadline.
Resource Smoothing is perfect for this project as it preservs the planned deadlines which of course should focus on meeting it’s deadline
Implementation of Resource Smoothing is a better option to use on the MTD water project, as it maintains deadline given and also retains the quality of the project.
For MTD, resource smoothing would be the most suitable approach. Though it will incur extra cost, but there will be no reason to reschedule the deadline.
For MTD, resource smoothing would be the most suitable approach. Though it will incur extra cost, but at the end the deadline is met.
For MTD resource Smoothing should be implemented ,this is to meet up with the project deadline.
Implementation of Resource Smoothing is a better option to use on the MTD water project, as it maintains deadline given and also retains the quality of the project.
Leveling retains the capacity while MTD manages its limited time and resources, and a new deadline is set.
It is advisable to use resource leveling for projects that have a sufficient amount of non-critical path, which enables time adjustment to stay within the budgeted expenses.
To complete the delivery within the allotted time, MTD in this situation would need to apply resource smoothing. For the MTD water project, resource levelling is therefore not a suitable concept.
Resource Smoothing is good because the resources are available and the resources
helps to enhance the work flow to meet deadlines. And increase project costs.
ANENE AMARACHI SARAH
COHORT 8,TEAM 2.
project smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing the project but resource leveling does not change the current capacity hence, focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact on projects deadline. sometimes, s revision of project scope by project sponsors is what is needed.
Considering that the MTD (the water installation events company), I think i will rather implement resource smoothing because this will still maintain the deadline to deliver and maintain the quality of the project but with increase in cost.
Resource Smoothing should be implemented for MTD, this is to meet up with the project deadline as their services might be irrelevant after the end-date.
In MTDs case resource smoothing is the best option. It allows for excellent quality and a set deadline attained.
Concerning MTD water project, I think smoothing is the best to apply since the project has a time frame which must be met and no room to extend.
From what I understand so far about MTD projects, most times there are uncertainties in their projects and that impacts deadlines. As in the Glasgow event, I will implement resource smoothing so as to keep to the deadline. Nevertheless, if I discuss the changes with the client and stakeholders and we agree, then resource levelling can also be implemented and a new end date will have to be taken.
The best option is the resources smoothing,
The kind of service that MTD offers isn’t one that Resource levelling is suited for, being that projects handled by MTD are usually critical.
In the case of the Glasgow project, the best thing to do would be resource smoothing. It would bring about an increase in the overall project cost, but they’ll get to maintain the required quality and finish up within the allocated time.
Looking at a company such as MTD, Resource smoothing rather than resource leveling would be beneficial for them as the first aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs whereas the latter does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines and usually events on which MTD manages their projects comes with fixed dates and they have no control in moving the dates forward or backwards.
Resource levelling focuses on rescheduling with a possible record to deliver before deadline.
Resources smoothing approach is the best option to use on the MTD water project, they maintain the deadline given and maintain the quality of the project, the only change that occurs is the increase in cost while using this approach.
Considering MTD water project, time is of essence to them truly. But applying resource levelling approach is possible because;-
Resource levelling will balance the workload on their resource in order to align with their available capacity by applying either the
Delay non- critical activities strategy of resource levelling, which will not affect the project as long as it is completed within the period of available float. Or
Extend non-critical activity durations within the available float.
I would advise that MTD take on a resource smoothing approach instead of a resource levelling approach. This will ensure that the planned deadline for the project is attained although the project costs may increase.
As a PM, Iโll stick with resource smoothing so that the deadline of the event doesnโt change.
The Deadline will be reschedule why cost implementation we be increased due to factor involved
The MTD Glasgow project had a quality problem, three days before the venue of the event went life it was discovered that the water quality was bad due to a contaminated main source.
I think that a resource levelling approach although might not impact on the project cost or resource capacity, however a resource smoothing smoothing option would preserved the planned deadline, however increasing the project cost.
In my best opinion about the MTDโs water project, Resource smoothing approach is appropriate because the deadline is maintained but operational cost will increase. Also, the quality of the project is sustained and project is delivered at the expected time.
For the MTD Project, I will recommend the Resource smoothing so as to meet up with the deadline and the quality will be attained but at a higher cost.
With the MTD water project the resource smoothing would be the best, even though it might cost the project sponsor more money. However, the budgeted deadline would still remain the same and quality maintained.
With the nature of projects that MTD take on which are time sensitive, I would advise they take on a resource smoothing approach instead of a resource levelling approach. This will ensure that the planned deadline for the project is attained although the project costs may increase.
Resource leveling is a project management technique that balances resource demand with availability, aiming to avoid overloads and underutilization. For MTD and their projects, this approach holds potential benefits. Firstly, it can help reduce failure costs by accurately identifying resource requirements and preventing unexpected expenses. Secondly, it ensures accurate information and capacity calculation for water installations, aligning available resources with projected demand. Thirdly, it enables event flexibility by reallocating resources to adapt to changing requirements, maintaining project progress. Lastly, resource leveling contributes to customer satisfaction by meeting deadlines, delivering high-quality installations, and preventing resource-related disruptions. However, the success of this technique depends on factors such as resource availability, project complexity, and specific constraints. MTD would need to carefully analyze their resources and project requirements to implement resource leveling effectively. Overall, resource leveling has the potential to optimize resource utilization and enhance efficiency in MTD’s water installation events, including the upcoming Glasgow event.
When discussing the MTD water project, it’s crucial to factor in the project timeline. I recommend employing the result-smoothing or time-limited schedule method. Additionally, seeking more expertise and adjusting the budget may be necessary to ensure the water supply is delivered effectively. While increasing the final cost might be a concern, it will help accommodate the necessary budget adjustments.
Analyzing the project’s timeline allows us to assess potential challenges and opportunities for optimization. By utilizing the result-smoothing or time-limited schedule method, we can mitigate risks and ensure timely completion. Engaging additional expertise ensures a comprehensive approach, improving project outcomes. While budget adjustments may seem daunting, they are essential for project success and maintaining high-quality water supply for the community.
MTD has limited time and resources levelling holds the capacity and reschedule the planned deadline.
Resource Levelling is better with project that have enough non-critical path which allows for time adjustment in order to stay within the planned costs.
MTD in this case, would need to use resource smoothing in order to deliver within the limited time. Therefore resource Levelling is not a good idea for MTD water project.
resource levelling approach is not a good idea in the MTD operation because the work deadline cannot be shifted or reschedule, it has to be delivered on point or in earnest,so increasing resources to accomodate delivery on time will be the best solution.
Resources smoothing will be a better option for MTD, so that they will not loose a further and also be able to meet project the deadline
From the lessons on resources smoothing ร nd level which clearly explains the both a
So sorry about this,my phone mistakenly sent what I was still working on.
From our lesson,we were meant to understand what resources smoothing and and resources levelling which states;
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
MTD will be better of with resources smoothing since it’s for the immediate but if peradventure the event can postponed,then using resources levelling is better
Based on my own perspective, the best option to adopt MTD water is resources smoothing which aims at maintaining the original project schedule & workbook, maintaining the initial deadlines set in achieving the project which is in agreement with different stakeholders at inception; while the project costs slightly increases. The cost implications here might be a sacrifice to give in order to get more referrals and businesses once they believe you render the best to them. The approach here (resources smoothing) place priority on timing and meeting up with deadline or timeline without compromising quality standard.
As for me i will prefer the resource smoothing for the MTD water project, due to my goal in delivering the project at all cost.
Resource levelling approach would only work if the games was postponed to a further date, thereby giving more room for MTD to do the needful but if the games were to hold without any postponement, Resource smoothing is the best approach to meet up but at a cost for both the sponsor or client and the project manager…..
Thank u
MTD is a contractor not a client, hence speedy completion of the project at any cost would be their goal. Thus resources smoothing would be ideal for them to meet deadline and get the project delivered.
Resource smoothing will an ideal approach to be employed on the MTD water project especially as it requires deadline. This is due to the fact that all available resources that could aid the timely completion of the project will be employed though it can’t be said to be cost effective as overallocation could be experienced on like the resources leveling that requires rescheduling of need be though without altering the original deadline but minimum cost and pressure
Considering the MTD water project, I is important to take into consideration the timeline of the project. I will suggest that the result-smoothing or time limited schedule method should be used. Engagement of more expertise might be considered, while the budget is adjusted and the final cost of the water supply can be increased in order to accommodate the budget.
Considering that MTD operates in the events and events management space, resource smoothing is the best option for them. This is because, the events they cater for are already scheduled with defined timelines. On the other hand, they may be able to adopt resource levelling if they work-out ample buffers before the commencement of the events, especially if they are privy to the schedules.
Okwulu Paul
Cohort 8 Team 3
Considering the MTD Project, I will recommend the Resource smoothing because there will be no impact on the deadline and the quality will be attained but at a higher cost.
Looking at MTD as an organization with limited time to deliver a quality project or job, resource smoothing will be more advisable since deadline is a key factor.The cost of the project can be increased in order to meet up with the stipulated time.
The MTD projects are time sensitive and so, it’d be more advisable to go for a resource smoothing approach instead of a resource levelling approach. This will ensure that the planned time for the project is retained while project costs might increase… The pros definitely seem to outweigh the cons.
Resource smoothing may be appropriate for the MTD project considering the nature of the project and the availability of resources.
In the case of MTD project, smoothing would be the best approach to carry out the task because they would be able to deliver at stipulated time, but the cost will increase which they need to carry people that are involved in financing the project along.
Thanks
Resource Smoothing will be a more acceptable option for MTD Project so as to be able to meet the deadline. The cost can be increased if there is need for that just to ensure that quality is maintained.
On MTD water project, Resource smoothing will be a better approach to use since the project will be delivered at a given deadline even though it will impact on the cost.
Resource Smoothing is advisable because the resources are readily available and it would enhance the work flow to meet the project deadlines.
Smoothing is not advisable as resources are not readily available. Implementing resource leveling would be the ideal solution for MTD water company.
About the MTD water project, resource smoothing is the best option. It is because it will make them meet up with the deadline since time is huge considerable factor.
Resource smoothing is the best approach to used because the project will be delivered at the stated deadlines though, it will increase in cost .
For MTD water project, Resource smoothing is the best option because it will help them meet up their deadline though they will have to use more resources or make the team work overtime.
To achieve the set project target since time is a priority, Resource smoothing is the idea approach.
This will speed the work process and ensures the overall efficiency and productivity of the team is well optimized, this implies that project scope will not be affected and quality achieved without compromising on the deadlines.
The MTD water company that had to fix an issue at Glasglow could not have applied the strategies for resource levelling as this could alter the deliverables as to make the project an effective one they will rely on the strategies for resource smoothing for an effective output.
MTD dates, concern delivering valve water distribution for consumers as early as possible. So smoothing will be the best option if there are not enough floats on the schedule. But if there are enough floats on the schedule then leveling is best so as to maintain duration and cost.
For MTD dates, itโs concerning delivering valves (water distribution for consumers) as early as possible. So if no enough floats on the schedule then smoothing will be the best option. But if there are enough floats on the schedule then levelling is best so as to maintain duration amd cost.
I would love to submit that resource smoothinh is a good tool for on time project delivery most especially when the selection of teams to run the various project sectors was well sought of. Though it might someone compromise the quality due to a lot of pressure in fear of the hardship of mobilising new resources to continue the project
For the sake of quality results I would rather work with resource leveling which will somewhat take time but come up with quality results.
The major differences between smoothing and levelling of resources is cost implications on using smoothing. For MTD dates, it’s concerning delivering valves (water distribution for consumers) as early as possible. So if no enough floats on the schedule then smoothing will be the best option. But if there are enough floats on the schedule then levelling is best so as to maintain duration amd cost.
For MTD they may not be able to apply resource levelling on their projects because these events have somehow fixed dates.
Resource smoothing will be more applicable for MTD on their projects.
Bolaji Atoloye
A project manager in this case should consider first the scope of the project before making any decisions. How would the change affect the scope and what is critical to the project launch? If the scope of the project prioritises the deadline, then resource smoothing might be the best approach to take.
A project manager in this case should consider first the scope of the project before making any decisions. How would the change affect the scope and what is critical to the project launch? If the scope of the project prioritises the deadline, then resource levelling might be the best approach to take.
Resource smoothing is the best approach for this since the start date is already close by.
It’s a complex project, that means, it requires a broader reevaluation of the overall project scope with the project sponsors to address the challenges effectively and make informed decisions, such as having additional resources into the project in order to meet the project deadline.
Merry Okara
Cohort 8
Team 2
While resource leveling can be a useful tool to manage resources during the execution of this project, it may not be sufficient for this MTD and Glasgow project, as this would cause delay in delivery date.
Resource smoothing is the best approach for this since the start date is already close by.
It’s a complex project, that means, it requires a broader reflection and reevaluation of the overall project scope with the project sponsors to address the challenges effectively and make informed decisions about potential revisions, such as having additional resources into the project in order to meet project deadline using resource smoothing
Among the factors listed above, the following three are often considered the highest factors that may significantly affect projects in general:
Complexity of schedules: Projects with complex schedules can present challenges in terms of planning, coordination, and execution. As projects become more intricate and involve multiple interdependent tasks, the risk of delays, conflicts, and resource constraints increases.
Motivation of the project team: The motivation level of the project team members can have a substantial impact on project success. Highly motivated team members are more likely to be proactive, productive, and collaborative, leading to better project outcomes.
Thoughtless optimism: Underestimating the complexity or risks of a project due to thoughtless optimism can lead to inadequate planning and preparation. Unrealistic expectations may result in missed deadlines, cost overruns, and compromised project quality.
While other factors, such as multitasking, demand equal to resource capacity, the ‘student syndrome,’ and game-playing, can also affect projects, they might not have as pervasive and widespread impact as the three factors mentioned above. It’s important to remember that each project is unique, and the significance of these factors may vary depending on the project’s size, nature, and complexity. Effective project management involves identifying and addressing these potential challenges to mitigate their adverse effects on the project’s success.
Considering the information provided about MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, it is indeed possible to discuss the application of a resource leveling approach to the project.
Resource leveling is a project management technique used to balance the demand for resources (e.g., manpower, equipment, materials) with the available capacity. The goal is to avoid resource overloading and ensure a smoother project flow. However, it’s important to note that resource leveling primarily deals with managing resources and does not directly address potential revisions to project scope that might be required in the face of challenges.
In the case of the Glasgow event undertaken by MTD, it’s evident that the project involves a large-scale water installation project. Such projects are inherently complex, and unforeseen challenges are not uncommon. If during the project execution, MTD encounters increased costs, unexpected obstacles, or other issues that might affect the project’s overall feasibility, a simple resource leveling approach may not be sufficient to address the situation.
Resource leveling could help to some extent in managing resource allocation to balance workloads and prevent resource overloads, especially in the context of time, but it may not directly address the broader impact of potential revisions to the project scope. A thorough reevaluation of the project’s overall goals, cost, timeline, and quality might be necessary.
In a situation where revisions to the project scope are needed, MTD and the project sponsor would have to undertake a comprehensive review of the project and consider how time, cost, and quality factors combine. This review might involve revising the project’s objectives, identifying alternatives to address increased costs, considering alternative technologies or materials, and assessing the impact on stakeholders.
The consequences of such revisions could be significant for both MTD and the stakeholders involved in the project. Stakeholders may have to adapt to changes in the project’s deliverables, timeline, or budget, which might affect their expectations and interests. In some cases, revisions to the project scope might lead to the loss of further follow-on work if stakeholders are dissatisfied with the changes.
In summary, while resource leveling can be a useful tool to manage resources during the execution of a project, it may not be sufficient to address the higher-level impacts that come with revising the project scope. For complex projects like large infrastructure endeavors, a broader reflection and reevaluation of the overall project become necessary to address challenges effectively and make informed decisions about potential revisions.
With respect to the MTD project, the best option is to use resource smoothing. Although it will increase the cost of actualizing the project, the fact that it will enable prompt delivery of the project makes it a good alternative. After All the clients will be satisfied with the outcome.
Given that the Glasgow event has a set schedule, resource leveling will not be possible, hence as a project manager, I would only take resource smoothing into consideration. This is when the proposed contingency plans from the project planning stage would be useful. Even if spreading out resources costs more, it is more crucial to match the client’s expectations for quality.
Resource smoothing is suitable for MTD water project because the project activities is schedule with the available floats to enable them deal with resource overload.
It is advisable to apply the leveling approach. Smoothing is not advisable as resources are not readily available.
Resource levelling won’t work for both MTD water and Gasglow
Resource levelling won’t work for both MTD water and Glasgow project now
I will suggest resource smoothing
I would Advice resource smoothing as it permits the meatimg of deadline and brings in more hands to ensure they meat deadline according to stakeholder requirement. Seeing that levelling will inconvenience stakeholders.
As the PM, I would go for Resource smoothing since the project is time limited. Increasing the cost will help us maintain the overall quality and we get to finish within the estimated timeline.
For MTD, Resource Smoothing will be the best approach because their projects are always time bound. Most times, Project owners/sponsors do not shift dates because their projects are event driven
In these two case studies, I will implement resource smoothing. This will preserve planned deadline, even though it will attract additional costs. This is because the date for the event(s) has already been fixed, and can not be altered.
As a project manager for MTD, I will adopt the resource smoothing approach even if it more expensive, quality will be maintain and target will be meet.
This method brings about customer satisfaction and more referrals.
I understand that resource levelling can be cost effective, however it might have an impact on the project deadline. Resource smoothing has an increasing effect on the cost of the project and not the deadline.
In accordance to our case study that is MTD company and the Glasgow event resource smoothing would be recommended, because the deadline cannot be moved due to the fact that an event has been fixed which cannot be postponed.
Event smoothing would be our best bet
In regards to the MTD water and the Glasgow projects,it was very important to maintain the resource smoothing approach so as to be able to meet up with the deadline, since itโs tied to a program with a defined definite date. This no doubt has its own disadvantage, in this situation a higher cost for the project, than what was originally proposed. Whatever approach the PM wants to take my be suited to the availability of the project as proposed, which maybe be fraught with challenges. The best option therefore is proper planning, putting into consideration circumstances that may arise which was not planned for.
Smoothing means additional cost but the quality of project set at the transition level will still be attained with the right set of team members and also project deadline will be accomplish at the set date.But I have few reservation,it might not be proper to increase a cost that might affect the cost of production, just to to mighty up with the deadline.But could be the best option if the additional cost will not push the out put up,resulting to hike in the price of the out put as against the current market.
Resource levelling however cause some delay ,there should be consideration of factors e.g inflation etc
Considering the MTD Project, I will recommend the Resource smoothing because there will be no impact on the deadline and the quality will be attained but at a higher cost.
Although resource smoothing means additional cost but i will go for it because it means that the quality of project set at the transition level will still be attained with the right set of team members and also project deadline will be accomplish at the set date.
If I decide to adopt resource levelling it will be because there is an obvious situation that is pointing to the fact that quality of the project will not be attain due to the inadequacy of some team members or unforeseen situation that might happen to some task owners. This will
however cause some delay in project time.
Resource leveling might be feasible in the scenario of MTD’s water installation events company in Glasgow if the following conditions are met:
Limited Resources: If the company is dealing with limited resources (e.g., specialized equipment, skilled personnel, or specific materials) that are critical for multiple tasks, resource leveling can help prevent resource bottlenecks and avoid overloading certain resources while leaving others idle.
Flexible Task Scheduling: The tasks in the project should have some degree of flexibility in their start and end dates. If tasks have rigid deadlines or dependencies that cannot be adjusted, resource leveling might not be feasible.
Non-Critical Tasks: The project should have non-critical tasks that can be rescheduled or delayed without significantly impacting the project’s overall timeline or objectives. These tasks can be rearranged to better manage resources.
Tolerance for Schedule Adjustments: Stakeholders, including clients or project sponsors, should be open to schedule adjustments to accommodate resource leveling. Sometimes, reorganizing tasks can result in changes to the original project timeline.
Project Constraints: Consideration of other constraints such as budget limitations, client preferences, and external factors that might influence the project.
Resource leveling is a powerful tool to optimize resource allocation and create a smoother workflow. However, its feasibility depends on the specific characteristics and constraints of the project.
As a PM for MTD, I will adopt the resource smoothing approach even if the cost will increase but quality will be maintained and we will meet with the proposed deadline.
This method brings about customer satisfaction and more referrals.
As a PM for MTD, I will adopt the Resource smoothing even if the cost will increase but quality will be maintained and we will meet with the proposed deadline.
For MTD water project, as a Project Manager, I will go for resource smoothing and not resource levelling, in as much as resource smoothing will attract more cost, but it would help achieve quality even before deadline. The impact of resource levelling on the project would affect meeting up deadline which is not entirely good for the MTD project.
Project timelines may slip if activities are rearranged without the resource capacity being changed if MTD is facing resource limitations and is unable to allocate new resources to the project. This could be a concern if there are set deadlines or commitments to stakeholders.
A more effective MTD method in this case would be resource smoothing. The basic objective of resource smoothing is to keep to deadlines while taking into account rising project costs. It involves controlling job duration and timing within set parameters in order to avoid resource overloads. By adjusting the resource requirements, MTD might make sure that the burden is distributed more equally over time without exceeding the capability of the resources.
For the MTD water project, I won’t recommend resource levelling because it will affect the project deadlines. Therefore, I recommend a resource smoothing which will focus on preserving the planned deadlines but will need a rescheduling or increase of resources.
For me, I will go with resource leveling because I want a stable workload which will activate the morales of my project team and reduces risk of stress. We all know the project team is the engine room, and once the engine is down it is a failed project besides resource smoothing will always increase project cost, which is a No-No situation for me. Thanks.
In the case of MTD water project, resources levelling is not recommended because using resources levelling means they have to work within the available resources in other to achieve best result which may in turn extend the period of deliverable
On the other hand, i recommend resources smoothing because it enables them to incure additional cost to fast-track the progress of the project which enable them to deliver the best results at the expected timeline
Because I have to consider quality, time, and cost in order to fulfill the project’s deadline, I will advocate the resource smoothing strategy as a project manager. Although resource smoothing may increase the project’s cost, my clients will feel better at ease knowing that I won’t accept any redundancy at all during the project. When I know the correct kind of quality for the project, as the MTD projects require, resource smoothing will allow me to maintain deadlines.
Although project deadline rescheduling is the goal of resource levelling, MTD cannot perform it because it does not modify the project’s present capacity.
Rearranging activities without altering the resource capacity may cause project deadlines to slip if MTD is experiencing resource constraints and is unable to devote more resources to the project. If there are definite deadline or commitments to stakeholders, this could be a problem.
Resource smoothing may be a better MTD strategy in this situation. Maintaining scheduled deadlines while accounting for increased project expenses is the main goal of resource smoothing. To prevent resource overloads, it entails regulating the timing and length of tasks within predefined bounds. MTD could ensure that the workload is dispersed more evenly over time without going over the available resource capacity by smoothing out the resource requirements.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
it is possible to apply a resource leveling approach to ensure efficient allocation of resources, prevent bottlenecks, and optimize project timelines. By carefully managing the availability of resources and adjusting the project schedule as needed, the company can enhance its project execution process and improve overall project outcomes.
If MTD is facing resource constraints and is unable to allocate additional resources to the project, rescheduling tasks without changing the resource capacity may lead to delays in project deadlines. This could be problematic, especially if there are fixed event dates or commitments to stakeholders.
In such a scenario, resource smoothing might be a more suitable approach for MTD. Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines while allowing for increased project costs. It involves adjusting the timing and duration of tasks within certain limits to avoid resource overloads. By smoothing out the resource requirements, MTD could ensure that the workload is distributed more evenly over time without exceeding the existing resource capacity.
Precisely
Resource levelling is not the best for MTD because it involves balancing the workloads on resources, they do this by shifting the scheduling of project activities within their available floats, that is how flexible a deadline is and to what extent an activity can be rescheduled.
I will recommend resource smoothing because it has an alternative way of dealing with resource overload. it focuses on preserving the planned project duration and its deadlines by applying strategies like adding new resources to the project and using overtime
I don’t think it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario.
In the context of the MTD water project, as Project manager resource smoothing will play a significant role in maintaining perfect project delivery with great quality. Resource smoothing can help us as a team to ensure successful project delivery with high quality in the following ways:
1. Efficient Resource Allocation: Resource smoothing ensures that the project team’s workload is evenly distributed over time, preventing situations where some team members are overburdened while others have little to do. This efficient allocation of resources allows team members to focus on their tasks and deliver quality work without feeling overwhelmed.
2. Minimize Bottlenecks: By smoothing resources, the project manager can identify potential bottlenecks early on and take proactive measures to address them. Bottlenecks can lead to delays and compromised quality, but with resource smoothing, resources can be reallocated to alleviate bottlenecks and keep the project on track.
3. Enhanced Team Morale: Maintaining a balanced workload improves team morale and reduces stress levels. When team members are not under excessive pressure due to uneven workloads, they are more likely to stay motivated and perform at their best, contributing to the overall quality of the project.
4. Effective Risk Management: Resource smoothing can help mitigate risks associated with resource constraints. By leveling the workload, the project manager can identify potential risks related to resource availability in advance and take proactive steps to manage them, thereby reducing the impact on project delivery and quality.
5. Focus on Quality Assurance: With a more predictable and balanced project schedule, there is greater scope for the project team to focus on quality assurance activities. This includes conducting thorough reviews, testing, and other quality checks to ensure that the deliverables meet the required standards.
6. Improved Stakeholder Communication: Resource smoothing allows the project manager to provide stakeholders with more accurate and reliable project timelines. This promotes better communication and expectation management, which are essential for maintaining stakeholder satisfaction and support throughout the project.
7. Flexibility for Unforeseen Changes: Projects often encounter unexpected events that require adjustments to the schedule. Smoothing resources provides flexibility to accommodate these changes without causing major disruptions to the project timeline or compromising quality.
Unarguably, resource smoothing can help us maintain perfect project delivery with great quality by ensuring efficient resource allocation, minimizing bottlenecks, enhancing team morale, supporting effective risk management, enabling a focus on quality assurance, improving stakeholder communication, and providing flexibility for unforeseen changes. It optimizes resource utilization and promotes a balanced and well-managed project environment conducive to successful project outcomes.
So for MTD, Resource leveling will not work. There is already a planned target time for the events to hold. So only resource smoothing that will work. For example, when there is water contamination from the source, they will need to make plans for alternative water supply, which will be additional cost. The goal is to ensure deadline is met.
Looking at the MTD water project and the Glasgow event. I will recommend using the Resource Smoothing approach which will maintain the date line of the project and increasing the cost so as to deliver the project on time.
Resource leveling will really not be good as it will cause delay in the project.
In regards to the MTD water and the Glasgow projects,it was very imperative to maintain the resource smoothing approach so as to be able to meet up with the deadline, since it’s tied to a program with a defined definite date. This no doubt has its own disadvantage, in this case a higher cost for the project, than what was originally proposed. Whatever approach the PM wants to take my be suited to the availability of the project as proposed, which maybe be fraught with challenges. The best option therefore is proper planning, putting into consideration unforseen circumstances
As regards the Glasgow event, I will recommend Resource smoothing. Such an event deadline cannot be shifted unless there is a predictable natural disaster like an earthquake. With all things being equal, postponing the deadline with affect MTD’s reputation and also, and the sponsor may insure a lot of loss due to litigation etc. As a project manager, it’s best to add more manpower to meet the deadline and discuss the additional cost with the project sponsor than to shift the deadline and maintain the work schedule. Therefore, the most appropriate option here is Resource Smoothing.
I will recommend and adopt resource smoothing as the best option to use in the case study shared (MTD water project).
Efficiently managing multiple projects necessitates implementing various strategies, such as effective time management, precise task organization, clear communication, proper delegation, and adaptability. This approach offers several advantages, including heightened productivity, the cultivation of diverse skill sets, optimal utilization of resources, improved collaborative efforts, and elevated rates of project success.
Potential factors that may affect the project:
The ‘student syndrome’: Procrastination and last-minute work can lead to delays and rushed outcomes.
Multitasking to reduce idle time: Juggling multiple tasks simultaneously may cause inefficiencies and delays due to divided attention.
Complex schedules: Numerous interdependencies and dependencies in the project plan can increase the risk of longer project durations and potential delays.
MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event may consider adopting a resource leveling approach to address resource overload. This could involve rescheduling tasks and making potential adjustments to timelines, enabling them to effectively manage resources without compromising the project outcomes.
Resource levelling is a technique used to adjust project schedules to deal with limited resources. Based on the figure above, it seems that resource levelling could be applied to the MTD project to ensure that available resources are used most efficiently. By identifying the critical path and shifting non-critical tasks, the company may be able to avoid overloading certain resources and ensure that they are maximized throughout the project. However, as each project is different, it is necessary to have detailed information about the project plan and resource availability to determine the feasibility of applying resource levelling effectively.
For the MTD water installation company and the glass glow company, resources levelling will be feasible.
The scope of a project does not only revolve around time,but cost and quality..
Resource levelling is feasible because it works with float. Some of the strategies may affect duration and cost,but not as the smoothing, as it is concerned with rescheduling and not deviation from plan and requirements of stakeholders and customers.
Resources smoothing is more demanding as it involves additional resources or substitution of resource that may require training, review,time, re-evaluation,stress and overtime.
As a potential project manager,I think both resource smoothing and resource levelling can fit in depending on the agreement of the stakeholders involved.Although integrity is very important but quality of projects delivered supercedes deadlines.
As a project manager resource smoothing is the best option for the project, because deadline will be meet the only change here is the cost which will increase and maintain the quality of the project.
I believe the resource smoothing is the best technique as a project manager as in the case of MTD
In the case of MTD, Resource Smoothing will be the best technique to use.
As a project manager the resource smoothing is the best option.Resource smoothing in other to complete the project before the deadline though this may cost them more yet is far better than resource levelling because end users are waiting at the time scheduled
Hi, from Comfort k. Hussaini
Resource leveling is a project management technique used to adjust the schedule of activities to balance resource demand with resource availability. In the context of event planning, it aims to avoid overloading resources and prevent bottlenecks.
To determine if a resource leveling approach is possible for MTD’s events in Glasgow, several factors need to be considered:
Resource Availability: Assess the availability of resources like labor, equipment, and materials. If resources are limited and cannot be easily adjusted, resource leveling might be challenging.
Event Requirements: Analyze the specific requirements of each event. Some events might require more resources than others, making leveling difficult.
Flexibility: Evaluate the degree of flexibility in the event schedule. If certain activities can be rescheduled without affecting the overall event outcome, resource leveling becomes more feasible.
Cost and Time Constraints: Consider the budget and time constraints this may limit the ability to level resources without increasing costs significantly or extending the project timeline.
Prioritization: Determine if certain events take precedence over others. It might be necessary to prioritize critical events and allocate resources accordingly.
In conclusion, applying a resource leveling approach to MTD’s water installation events company in Glasgow is possible if there is sufficient flexibility in the schedule, resources can be adjusted, and the events can be rescheduled without compromising their success. However, a detailed analysis of the specific circumstances would be needed to make a definitive assessment.
Resource smoothing remains the best option for me as a PM. There is a high tendency that resource leveling will negatively impact the project considering the urgency of the work.
It minimizes fluctuation in resource demand including peak demands. It lets you amend the project schedule without changing the critical path. It ensures the timely completion of a project. It protects resources against spontaneous changes during project implementation.
While in RL.
it addresses inefficient resource allocation, optimizing the utilization of available resources. By leveling the workload, it ensures a balanced distribution of tasks, preventing overloading or underutilization of resources. Secondly, resource leveling improves project visibility and control by highlighting resource constraints and their impact on the project schedule. This enables better decision-making and resource management throughout the project. Lastly, resource leveling minimizes conflicts and bottlenecks, fostering collaboration and smoother project execution. Overall, resource leveling enhances project efficiency, productivity, and the likelihood of successful project completion.
Thanks.
A resource smoothing will be better because adjustment made will be better to achieve an even more better result.
As a project manager, ensuring timely project completion requires adapting resources and implementing smoothing techniques. Resource leveling balances and optimizes resource utilization, preventing overallocation or underutilization.
The optimal strategy depends on the project deadline and resource availability, ensuring cost control and a more even workload distribution.
Thank you.
As a project manager, I will recommend the resource smoothing approach because I have to put quality, time and cost into consideration so as to meet up with the deadline of the project. Though resource smoothing will require more cost but informing my clients that
I won’t admit any amount of redundancy in the course of the project will offer them peace of mind. Resource smoothing will enable me maintain deadlines when I know the right kind of quality for the project which is what the MTD projects needs.
Resource levelling does not change current capacity of the project but focuses on project deadlines rescheduling which is not feasible for MTD to implement.
As a P.M, my main objective is to ensure the timely completion of the project and in order to achieve this goal, I believe adapting resources and implementing the Smoothing techniques is the most effective and practical approach. While this strategy may result in an anticipated increase in cost and require careful time management, it can ultimately prove to be advantageous for the project as a whole.
It is crucial to keep in mind that striving to excellence should always be the guiding principle in P.M. By making informed decisions and prioritizing the overall quality of the project, we can ensure its successful completion while maintaining the highest standard
For a project that has a timeline attached to it, especially one that is an event, resource levelling may not be the best option as it will affect its deadline to deliver the outcome.
As a Project Manager whose aim is to complete the project timely, adapting the resources smoothing is the best and most viable option. However, the anticipated increase in cost and time management might end up being an added advantage. It is always good to bear in mind that excellence is the key word for every project.
Resource management technique that can help teams better accommodate resource constraints and predict project timelines, whereas resource leveling is a technique used to optimize resources to deliver a project without changing the delivery date.
As a project manager, I will recommend resource smoothing to maintain deadline which is what the MTD projects needs.
Resource levelling does not change current capacity of the project but focuses on project deadlines rescheduling which is something MTD cannot afford as time is a critical resource , so the use of resource smoothing is the best approach for MTD
Resource smoothing is the greatest choice for the MTD project because there is a deadline, but it will cost more. but will work well and complete the project in time for the community to utilise it.
The only thing that has altered is the pricing, which will still be maintained along with the deadline and quality of the project. They will also meet the delivery date.
Resource leveling is an approach used to balance and optimize resource utilization throughout a project’s duration. It aims to smooth out resource demand to prevent overallocation or underutilization of resources. This approach involves adjusting task schedules, durations, or resource assignments to achieve a more even distribution of workload.
To determine if resource leveling is possible for MTD’s water installation event in Glasgow, several factors need to be considered:
1. Resource Availability: Assess the availability and capacity of the resources required for the project. If the necessary resources, such as equipment, skilled personnel, and materials, are limited or in high demand, resource leveling may be challenging.
2. Task Dependencies: Examine the dependencies among project tasks. If there are strict dependencies or critical path activities that require specific resources, it may limit the flexibility for resource leveling. Adjusting the schedule or duration of such tasks could impact the overall project timeline.
3. Project Constraints: Consider any constraints or limitations that may affect resource leveling. These can include contractual obligations, fixed deadlines, budgetary constraints, or external factors beyond the project manager’s control. These constraints may influence the ability to adjust resource allocation or task scheduling.
4. Project Objectives: Evaluate the project objectives and priorities. Resource leveling aims to balance resource usage, but it should not compromise the project’s quality, scope, or desired outcomes. It’s important to ensure that resource leveling efforts align with the project’s overall goals.
Based on these considerations, the feasibility of applying a resource leveling approach to the MTD water installation event in Glasgow can be determined. It would require a detailed analysis of the specific project requirements, resource availability, dependencies, and constraints.
It’s worth noting that resource leveling may not always be feasible or practical in every project. In some cases, resource overallocation or uneven resource usage may be necessary due to project requirements or external factors. The project manager needs to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of resource leveling and make informed decisions based on the unique circumstances of the project.
As a project manager, I will recommend resource smoothing to maintain deadline and project quality although it will incur more cost
Given the tight timeframe for the MTD project, resource smoothing is the greatest choice, though it is also the most expensive. However, will be efficient and complete the project in time for the community to access it.
The only thing that has changed is the cost, which will be increased, but they will still meet the date for completing the project and keep the project’s quality.
No. Instead, resource smoothing can be opted for.
smoothing is the best option on the MTD project Resource they will maintain their deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, which increase in cost is the only thing that changed and they will meet up with the time to deliver the project.
Y
In order to complete the project timely, adapting the resources smoothing is the best and most viable option for the MTD project. However, the anticipated increase in cost and time management might end up being an added advantage. It is always good to bear in mind that that excellence is the key word for every project.
smoothing is the best option on the MTD project Resource they will maintain their deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, which increase in cost is the only thing that changed and they will meet up with the time to deliver the project.
Resource smoothing is the best option for MTD project since deadlines need to be preserved. Though cost will increase. Time limited resource levelling may also be an option where it involves non critical activities
On the MTD project Resource smoothing is the best option since there is a deadline, although this will incure more cost. But will be effective and get the project ready in time for the community to have access.
they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, which increase in cost is the only thing that changed and they will meet up with the time to deliver the project.
In my opinion i think resource Smoothing will be the best
It would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in this scenario standard in other for them to maintain their standard
The core values of MTD is timely delivery and that has really made them standout overtime. For them to have compromised this standard will cost them lot considering the organizational enigma, adopting resources smoothing will be best as it would enable them to reserve and preserves their corporate standard.
For MTD water project,
Resources smoothing would be the best option as they have to maintain their current deadline, although it will add operational costs to the company.
On the MTD project
Resource smoothing is the best option since there is a deadline, although this will incure more cost. But will be effective and get the project ready in time for the community to have access.
Resource levelling depends on matters of time and capacity of resources, also significantly in the client. Whatever approach you use depends on the client. With MTD it depends on the client to know which approach to use. Which one should be sacrificed time or cost.
Absolutely.
Even though resource smoothing would incur more cost, it is the best option for MTD as the projects they’re are working are already preplanned even before the project was allocated to them, so they must have to meet the deadlines which would not be possible with resource levelling.
Since the MTD has a deadline to complete the project, I think resource smoothening will be a better option because it aims to maintain the original deadline of the project.
To me, I consider the MTD water project and the fact that the company was contracted for an already planned event with time frame, so opting for resource levelling will affect the time given for the project i.e the deadline because the activities of the project/resources need to be rescheduled or extended. Remember, the event can not be rescheduled because the project wasnโt delivered due to arising issues but if more resources and funds can be employed, the deadline can be met.
Resource smoothing, therefore, is the best option in this case (since a deadline has to be met and an event done).
For the project to be complete on time, resources smoothing it usually the best option for the MTD project. The increase in cost and time management is can end up to be an added advantage to it. Remember, excellence is required in every project.
MTD water needs to maintain deadlines so therefore Resource smoothing is best however it increases cost and that might be a problem for the client
Resource leveling is best if the project is e.g. a water installation for the community. This may affect the deadline however it will allow the project to become successful and impactful in the long run.
Resource smoothing becomes relevant if the project is one like an event that is time-bound. Adding more time to the initial project would gravely affect the set-date event and hence adjusting a budget upwards becomes unavoidable and necessary.
In my own the best option for MTD water is resources smoothing as it aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs, other than resource leveling which does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling and this might have an impact on project deadlines.
On the MTD water project, resource smoothing will be the best approach to getting and maintaining the required quality while at the same time meeting the deadline but requiring an increase in cost.
Resource smoothing will be the best to apply as it focuses on maintaining the deadlines but increasing the cost.
Resource levelling can be applied in MTD water installation project because of the nature and event while resource smoothing can be applied in Glasgow project because of the fixed date that cant be adjusted.
Resource Smoothing focuses on maintaining project deadline while resource levelling focuses on preserving limited resources. The best approach for MTD is Resource Smoothing because it supplies water(nature of its business) so as to meet up with deadlines. Water is life!
No only smoothing can be applied
From the definition we can understand that the resource smoothing looks at preserving planned deadlines but increase the project cost while the resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadlines. While resource smoothing maybe considered best but we need to look at the increase in the cost of the project which actually impacts on project delivery. The resource levelling does actually reschedule but it has its advantages such as a stable workload which enhances and reduces the risk of stress; the cost advantage related to a steady distribution of resources cost overtime.
Also we need to understand that for flexibility of deadlines the scheduling of projects activities is within the available floats. For me I will apply the resource levelling approach so as to give the best quality in that project.
As a project manager the best option for MTD is Resource smoothing is the best option for the project because, they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, in other to complete the project before the deadline though this may cost them more yet is far better than resource levelling because end users are waiting at the time scheduled.
From my own perspective the best option for MTD water is resources smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs, other than resource leveling which does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphazises rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Reply
Of course, its going to be feasible as project levelling does not alter the initial plan but build on it by reschedulling some activities withing its framework without altering the deadline.
As a project manager the best option for MTD is Resource smoothing in other to complete the project before the deadline though this may cost them more yet is far better than resource levelling because end users are waiting at the time scheduled
The best option on the said project is Resource Smoothing.
This would bring about additional overhead cost but the project would be achieved by the initial completion date
As a project manager the resource smoothing is the best option even though it will cost more but the project will still maintain its deadline.
Resources smoothing is aim to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
While resource levelling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasises rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Reply
When examining the provided figure, MTD, should use the Resource smoothing. Though the company will incur additional cost but will still meet up with project deadline without altering the project quality.
Resources Leveling is sure option for the MTD water company rather than resource smoothing as you may run out of what you have.
Resource leveling gives more time to ensure a perfect project.
Resource levelling focuses on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadlines which is a batter option for MTD
Resources smoothing is aim to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
While resource levelling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasises rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Resources smoothing is aim to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
For the MTD, resources smoothing is a good choice regarding the nature of the company’s service.
Resource smoothing is a better option for the MTD scenario. This will help fo balance the workload and still focus on delivering time of project
In summary Resource Levelling has to do with optimizing limited resources
While Resource Soothing has to do with Meeting up with project schedule
In this scenerio with MTD project Resource Smoothing is the Best.
the resource smoothing is more prefferable in the MTD scenario. although methods can be apply.
All of the options below are most likely going to affect your project deadline
1. Thoughtless optimism
2. Demand equal to resource capacity
3. The ‘student syndrome’
4. Multitasking to reduce idle time
5. Complex schedules
6. Motivation
7. Game-playing
The appropriate approach may vary based on the specific circumstances of the case. However, in the majority of instances concerning projects similar to those managed by MTD, the resource smoothing approach tends to be more relevant and applicable.
Hence the deadline is close, Resource smoothing is ideal. We earlier discussed quality in the context of managing projects. So in this case, inorder not to delay delivery to the event, a feasible adjustment wouldn’t be a much lapse compared to extending time of execution which will affect quality of job and the end users might not exhibit such patience.
Adanna Ekenna Mbah.
Cohort 7, Team 1.
Availability of resources at the disposal of MTD and the Glasgow event project manager will determine which idea to adopt and why. I would advice the resource smoothing option though, since the company’s not coming cheap, it means there is a large enough buffer for such contingencies and still be in profit, whilst also having a satiated client or sponsor.
Resource levelling can come in once the compulsory tasks are achieved, if it still aids the ability to meet set deadline.
Oke Omotayo Babatola
Cohort 7, Team 7
Looking at the scenario mentioned about late discovery about the project by MTD, resource smoothing is the best approach owing to the fact that the event being prepared for has already gotten a start date the project ought to have been delivered days before the event.
Now that this discoveries have been made, returning to the drawing board with project sponsor to release more fund so more experts could be recruited into the project in order to meet project deadline is but the best way to go since project leveling approach is inconsiderable.
Looking at the scenario mentioned about late discovery about the project by MTD, resource smoothing is the best approach owing to the fact that the event being prepared for has already gotten a start date the project ought to have been delivered days before the event.
Now that this discoveries have been made, returning to the drawing board with project sponsor to release more fund so more experts could be recruited into the project in order to meet project deadline is but the best way to go since project leveling approach is inconsiderable.
Resource leveling โ This is used when scheduling the production of available resources is limited and needs to be used optimally.
Resource smoothing โ This is used when time constraints are the biggest factor blocking production. The idea is to finish a project on time while avoiding peaks and dips in.
For the MTD project for Glasgow event, resource smoothing is the best
Considering the type of project being executed by MTD, resource smoothing is the best option because its gives the company the advantage of meeting up with their deadline which is very important as opposed to resource to resource leveling which won’t maintain the deadline but save resources.
Considering the scenario of MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, it’s essential to evaluate the specific circumstances to determine if a resource leveling approach would be feasible. However, based on the information provided, it seems that resource smoothing would be more applicable in this case.
Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines while increasing project costs. In the context of the Glasgow event, if MTD is faced with a limited resource capacity or availability constraints, resource smoothing could be used to adjust the project schedule by reallocating resources in a way that minimizes fluctuations in resource utilization. This approach aims to smooth out peaks and valleys in resource demand, ensuring that resources are utilized as evenly as possible while still meeting project deadlines.
Resource leveling, on the other hand, involves rescheduling tasks to accommodate resource constraints without changing the overall resource capacity. In the case of MTD, if there are no significant limitations on resource capacity, and the main concern is the scheduling of tasks to avoid overloading resources, resource leveling might not be necessary.
It’s important to note that the applicability of resource leveling or resource smoothing depends on the specific constraints, goals, and priorities of the project. In the case of MTD and the Glasgow event, a detailed analysis of resource availability, project deadlines, and the impact of resource adjustments would be needed to determine the most suitable approach.
Looking at the scenario of MTD and Glasgow project, while looking at resource leveling which does not change the current capacity but it focuses instead on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadline. Which is not good for the project both companies are doing because it will wonโt change the current capacity even if they need to change it.
Resource smoothing on the other might be good for it because it preserve planning deadlines but it can increase cost which might bring a delay in the delivery deadline.
Resource levelling involves rescheduling tasks within the existing resource capacity, which means that the number of resources available remains the same. It aims to balance the resource workload and avoid resource overloads. In the case of MTD and the Glasgow event, if they are already working at full capacity and have allocated all available resources to various tasks, applying a resource levelling approach may not be feasible.
If MTD is facing resource constraints and is unable to allocate additional resources to the project, rescheduling tasks without changing the resource capacity may lead to delays in project deadlines. This could be problematic, especially if there are fixed event dates or commitments to stakeholders.
In such a scenario, resource smoothing might be a more suitable approach for MTD. Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines while allowing for increased project costs. It involves adjusting the timing and duration of tasks within certain limits to avoid resource overloads. By smoothing out the resource requirements, MTD could ensure that the workload is distributed more evenly over time without exceeding the existing resource capacity.
However, it’s important to note that the specific details and constraints of the Glasgow event, as well as the available resources and project requirements, would ultimately determine the feasibility and effectiveness of applying either resource levelling or resource smoothing techniques. A detailed analysis of the project’s schedule, resource availability, and stakeholder expectations would be necessary to make an informed decision.
Looking at Meredith and Mantel on Scheduling Resources, a thoughtless optimism is what is likely to affect my project(s).
As the PM of MTD, I will implement Resource Smoothing because of the nature of the Project deliverables. This is a project that will affect the comfort of the users. Hence, adopting Resource Smoothing keeps the project timeline in focus while incurring little cost due to an increase in funding for more resources. Applying Resource levelling will not only discomfort the users but will incur higher costs of resources due to rescheduling.
Considering the MTD water project and the fact that the company was contracted for an already planned event with time frame, opting for resource levelling will affect the time given for the project i.e the deadline because the activities of the project/resources need to be rescheduled or extended. Remember, the event can not be rescheduled because the project wasn’t delivered due to arising issues but if more resources and funds can be employed, the deadline can be met.
Resource smoothing, therefore, is the best option in this case (since a deadline has to be met and an event done).
Since the MTD has a deadline to complete the project,I think resource smoothening will be a better option because it aims to maintain the original deadline of the project.
Resource levelling might not be the ideal method here as the deadline is already close. Hence, resource smoothing is ideal so that the deadline can still be achieved.
In my recall, MTD allocates a certain amount of cost for redundancies and unexpected change of events, therefore resource smoothening will be most suitable.
Since they already have a fixed deadline(first to be at the event and last to leave) resource levelling will cause a lot of setbacks and might even result in project failure they don’t have float time.
Utilizing resource leveling on the Glasgow Project might not be a good way to handle the pitfalls of the project. This is because the above method affects the deadline of the project which was already at hand.
For the MTD project, resource levelling isn’t such a great idea, because it involves not meeting up with deadlines. But in a situation where this can’t be avoided, I believe a proper discussion/meeting be held with stakeholders to explain reasons why deadlines have to change so as to carry everyone along
The MTD project has a particular time given to them to deliver ,so for them to accomplish it- resource levelling cannot be the best option because they are working with specific time.They have to put more resources to maintain company integrity by delivery at a given time or schedule time .I believe adapting smoothing will be far better in this case
Resources Leveling is sure option for the MTD water company rather than resource smoothing as you may run out of what you have.
Resource leveling gives more time to ensure a perfect project.
For the MTDs water supply company I think resource smoothing will be much effective tho costly but it will ensure the delivery of the project on time without having to reschedule due to lack of resources
Yes, a resource leveling approach can be applied to balance the workload of resources across the project. Resource leveling is a technique that adjusts the project schedule to balance the demand for resources with their availability.
For quality to be achieved in the MTD project, resource smoothing is the best option.
Resource smoothing will work effectively with the MTD project, the cost might be high but it will be more effective
Resource smoothing is the best option for MTD project because the deadline will be maintained unlike Resource leveling which won’t be feasible in MTD project because the Glagslow event is time based, the start date for the event has been fixed and cannot be rescheduled.
For the MTD Water Installation project, resource leveling should be used, while for the Glasgow event resource smoothing is the best option as there was a hitch and additional resources was added to meet up a deadline for the event which cannot be rescheduled.
Resource Leveling by moving or delaying non- critical activities will work
And also resource smoothing because the deadline for the event is not flexible.
Onyinyechi Ofulozor
Resource leveling won’t be a good idea for such projects because the date and deadlines have been fixed and can not be rescheduled defense Resource Smoothing.
It might for ideal for MTD but for Glasgow, it’s not advisable because rescheduling will affect the initial plan/deadline which is not too good for stakeholders and plan deliverables.
Resources leveling won’t be best for such project because the date and deadline is fixed and cannot be rescheduled. Therefore project smoothing is the best approach because it maintains the deadline.
Resource smooth would be ideal the project
Resource leveling won’t be feasible but rather resource smoothing will be needed because the original deadline will be met but there will be an increase in the cost of production
Resource leveling might not be feasible in MTD project because the Glagslow event is time based, the start date for the event has been fixed and cannot be compromised. The deadline is not flexible and hence the activity cannnot be rescheduled.
I believe things will work out well at MTD Water Project if it picks up Resource Levelling at this critical moment of a scarcity of needed resources for the project.
Resource levelling won’t be ideal for such projects but rather Resource Smoothing.
Resource smoothing is ideal for such projects
For the MTD project, resource levelling isnโt such a great idea, because it involves not meeting up with deadlines. But in a situation where this canโt be avoided, I believe a proper discussion/meeting be held with stakeholders to explain reasons why deadlines have to change so as to carry everyone along
I think the best strategy for MTD to apply in this situation is Resource smoothing since this strategy focuses on preserving planned deadlines although their project costs will increase.
This because the sporting event for which their projects is based is a fixed event with date already fixed. Too many people are involved and participating in the event: athletes and their supporting staff, media, spectators, vendors etc, all probably coming to the event from different locations. So in this case using the strategy of resource levelling would not work as this strategy would require changing the project deadlines and rescheduling, and the project owner would not permit this as MTD is just one of the service provider that has been hired to provide a product (water) for their event.
approach to the Glasgow event
for MTD may adopt the Resource levelling approach though its has it implication which the shifting of deadlines and operating within the operation budget except if the sponsors are head bent on meeting deadlines and are willing to foot the prevention cost in agreement with the project team
Looking at the MTDโs project, project smoothing is the best approach because it will sustain the deadline there may be increase in the cost of the project due to extension but the quality of the project will still be maintained and the project will be delivered at the expected time.
Based on the MTD’s project, project smoothing is the best approach because it will sustain the deadline although it may increase the cost of the project due to extension but the quality of the project will still be maintained and the project will be delivered at the expected time.
Implementing resource leveling would be the ideal solution for MTD water company. This approach ensures that all tasks are performed efficiently and within designated timeframes. Moreover. It is important to note that resource leveling does not impact the overall capacity of the project. Whether there is an assigned resource or additional resources are added.
Resource leveling wonโt be feasible but rather resource smoothing will be needed because the original deadline will be met but there will be an increase in the cost of production
Resources Leveling will be the best option for the MTD water company in the sense that all works are done effectively and does not pertain to the planned deadlines and resource leveling does not change capacity even if there is an assigned resource or addition of resources to the project.
To achieve quality in the MTD project, resource smoothing would be the best option.
On the MTD water project, resource leveling would be the best option for the project as it will ensure a stable workload and ensure that resource are evenly allocated throughout the project which will enhance morale, reduce the risks of stress and cost increments.
But in a situation where the clients need this infrastructures available at a
Particular Deadline then resource smoothing would be the right approach to take as it will preserve the planned project duration and deadlines but with the risk of increased costs and possible burnouts.
By OkunroboJ
Yes, it would be possible to apply a resource levelling approach to the Glasgow event
for MTD. Resource levelling is a project management technique that helps to smooth
out resource demand over time. This can be done by delaying start times, extending
the project’s planned duration, removing tasks with the least value, allocating additional
resources, splitting tasks up between resources, or assigning alternative resources.
In the case of the Glasgow event, there are a few areas where resource levelling could
be applied. For example, the task of “Dig trenches” has a high resource demand in the
first week of the project. This could be leveled out by delaying the start of this task by a
few days or by allocating additional resources to it. The task of “Install pipes” also has a
high resource demand in the second week of the project. This could be leveled out by
extending the planned duration of this task by a few days or by splitting it up between
two resources.
Resource levelling can be a helpful way to ensure that a project’s resources are used
efficiently and effectively. It can also help to avoid over-committing resources and to
prevent project delays.
Here are some specific examples of how resource levelling could be applied to the
Glasgow event:
โ Delay the start of the “Dig trenches” task by a few days.
โ Allocate additional resources to the “Dig trenches” task.
โ Extend the planned duration of the “Install pipes” task by a few days.
โ Split the “Install pipes” task up between two resources.
โ Remove the “Lay concrete” task, as it is not essential to the project.
โ Assign alternative resources to the “Test pipes” task.
By applying these resource levelling techniques, MTD could ensure that the Glasgow
event is completed on time and within budget.
The MTD project has a fixed time frame.. A specific period within which to deliver the service promised. In the instance of a glitch or unforseen issues, resource levelling will not be the best approach as it means the water company will not be able to deliver at the agreed time. It’s best to put in more resources yet maintain the company’s integrity by delivering at the agreed time. So resource smoothing will be the best bet in this scenario.
The difference between resource leveling vs smoothing can be broken down to this:
Resource leveling โ This is used when scheduling the production of available resources is limited and needs to be used optimally.
Resource smoothing โ This is used when time constraints are the biggest factor blocking production. The idea is to finish a project on time while avoiding peaks and dips in.
From the above, On the MTD water project, resource smoothing is the best option for the project because, they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, which increase in cost is the only thing that changed and they will meet up with the time to deliver the project.
Resource leveling is usually performed before resource smoothing when trying to compress your schedule. Thatโs why weโre going to look more into resource leveling, starting with the two key elements of this planning tactic.
Katana logo
See all articles Accounting Business tips E-commerce Inventory management Manufacturing software People at Katana Top 10
Resource leveling vs resource smoothing
If youโre experiencing scheduling issues, youโre going to need to use resource leveling or smoothing to fix the problem. But, how do you use them?
Katana software for resource management.
Last updated: 26.05.2023 6 mins read
Share
Youโre a project manager, and you stand before your production schedule. You realize, with the operations you have scheduled, you canโt finish production within your current chosen timeframe. When problems like this arise, there are two solutions you can adopt to fix the scheduling issues: resource leveling vs smoothing.
Project management techniques thatโll help you compress your schedule, so you can finish your orders without over-burdening your resources.
Before we get started, what are these project management techniques?
Getting more control over your production planning. Even with the perfect resource level plan in place, anything can happen to disrupt those plans. Thatโs why itโs important to find a tool with production planning with real-time functionalities. Try it for free with the 14-day trial.
What is resource leveling?
Resource leveling overlooks allocating resources and resolving any issues from over or under-allocation of resources for new projects.
What is resource smoothing?
Resource smoothing is a project management tool for optimizing your resources, and adjusting your schedule activities, so resources donโt exceed the pre-defined limits during planning.
Resource smoothing is the tactic of decreasing over-burdened resources to complete production on time.
The difference between resource leveling vs smoothing
The difference between resource leveling vs smoothing can be broken down to this:
Resource leveling โ This is used when scheduling the production of available resources is limited and needs to be used optimally.
Resource smoothing โ This is used when time constraints are the biggest factor blocking production. The idea is to finish a project on time while avoiding peaks and dips in resource demand.
You can identify the differences by their traits and decide where you should hedge your bets when it comes to resource leveling vs resource smoothing:
Table illustrating the difference between resource leveling and resource smoothing.
Resource leveling is usually performed before resource smoothing when trying to compress your schedule. Thatโs why weโre going to look more into resource leveling, starting with the two key elements of this planning tactic.
The two key elements of resource leveling
The main objective of leveling is to allocate resources efficiently, so youโre able to finish production within a given period.
When you start your resource leveling, there are two main elements youโll need to be focusing on.
These two elements of resource leveling are figuring out which projects:
Can be completed by using up all available resources
Can be completed with limited resources.
Resource levelling will not be a good approach to the MTD project. This is due to fixed deadline to commission project
My thoughts is that, it would be feasible to implement a resource leveling approach in the given scenario – considering MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event that I have been following in the course videos so far. Note that the MTD project is a service provider. Resource leveling is a method of managing resources that considers various factors. It can assist MTD and the water installation events company, distribute resources optimally across different phases and activities in the case of the Glasgow event. Resource smoothing is the best option for the MTD water project because, they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project. Resource leveling considers the project schedule to determine high-demand periods and adjust activities accordingly. It equally helps identify potential bottlenecks and allocates resources appropriately to prevent shortages or overloads. Additionally, resource leveling mitigates resource-related risks, optimizes resource utilization and enhances project efficiency.
The MTD project is to provide a service for a planned event, that should not have be affected by the inability of MTD to deliver. They company will need to apply resource smoothing to meet the deadline, however increasing the cost but making sure that planned even is not impacted by any resource related issues.
Resource leveling is a method of managing resources that considers various factors, including the nature of the event, resource constraints, project schedule, cost efficiency, and project constraints. In the case of the Glasgow event, resource leveling can help MTD, the water installation events company, distribute resources optimally across different phases and activities. By doing so, it ensures that resources are neither overused nor underused. Additionally, resource leveling helps identify potential bottlenecks and allocates resources appropriately to prevent shortages or overloads. It also considers the project schedule to determine high-demand periods and adjust activities accordingly. Cost efficiency is improved by minimizing idle time and overstaffing. Furthermore, resource leveling ensures that necessary resources are available to meet deadlines, client requirements, and regulatory obligations, reducing the risk of delays or compromised quality. However, resource leveling may face challenges due to external factors, unexpected events, or uncertainties in resource availability, requiring careful analysis, monitoring, and flexibility. Overall, applying resource leveling optimizes resource utilization, enhances project efficiency, and mitigates resource-related risks.
Applying a resource leveling approach to the Glasgow event by MTD, the water installation events company, may not be feasible due to the potential need for a revision of project scope. In such cases, where projects undergo significant changes and rescaling, the allocation of resources may require a broader reflection on the overall project’s time, cost, and quality combination.
Resource smoothing is more ideal for the MTD project. Resource smoothing would allow them to reschedule the project when need arises.
Resource smoothing is more ideal to be used by the railway MTD, than resource levelling
The Glasgow event, the water installation events company, and the environment of MTD all need to be taken into account when applying a resource leveling method to resource management. Resource leveling seeks to strike a balance between workload and resource utilization to provide a seamless and effective project execution. Let’s talk about how it applies to this situation:
1. The nature of the event: The Glasgow event is anticipated to include a number of phases and activities, including as the construction, maintenance, and deconstruction of temporary water infrastructure. It’s possible that the resources and effort levels needed for each step vary. Resource leveling can be used by MTD to guarantee that resources are distributed optimally among various stages, avoiding overuse or underuse.
2. Resource Constraints: MTD might only have a limited amount of resources, such as qualified employees, equipment, and and materials. Resource leveling helps identify potential bottlenecks and ensures that resources are allocated appropriately, preventing resource shortages or overloads during critical project phases.
3. Project Schedule: By analyzing the project schedule, MTD can identify periods where resource demand is high and plan resource leveling accordingly. This can involve adjusting the duration of certain activities, redistributing tasks among available resources, or even considering temporary resource reinforcements if required.
4. Cost Efficiency: Resource leveling can contribute to cost efficiency by optimizing resource utilization. It helps minimize idle time or overstaffing, reducing unnecessary expenses associated with resource allocation and management.
5. Project Constraints: MTD may need to consider project constraints such as deadlines, client requirements, and regulatory obligations. Applying resource leveling helps ensure that the necessary resources are available when needed, reducing the risk of project delays or compromised quality.
However, it’s important to note that resource leveling may have limitations or challenges in practice. These can include constraints imposed by external factors, unexpected events, or uncertainties in resource availability. It requires careful analysis, monitoring, and flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.
Overall, by applying a resource leveling approach, MTD can optimize resource utilization, enhance project efficiency, and mitigate potential resource-related risks during the Glasgow event or similar projects.
Cohort 7
With MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event its possible to apply resource levelling approach considering Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines
Based on the MTD scenario’s smoothing is the best approach cos it will sustain the deadlin may
increase cost that may be incurred during the project but the quality of project still maintained but will deliver project at the expected time with good Quality Output.
Joy Onyenakuchi
Resource smoothing is a better option for the MTD water Project because its timing will be affected, and quality will also not be affected. The only problem is that costs will increase. This cost factor can be managed compared to a poor water quality .
Considering the already planned event with a static deadline, Resource Levelling approach would not work for MTD. The best option available is Resource Smoothing, despite its attendant increase in project cost.
Looking at the MTD water project, the resource levelling will extend the project duration, which is not feasible as the event has a fixed date already.
The resource smoothing would be the best, though it might cost the client more money. However, the budgeted deadline would still remain the same and quality, too.
Looking at the MTD water project, resource levelling will extend the project duration, which is not feasible as the event has a fixed date already for the event,
Resource smoothing will be the best option for the project because they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project.
Since the project as a time frame, I think Resource Smoothing is the best to be applied
Resource smoothing focuses on maintaining original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
While resource leveling does not change the existing resource capacity instead it emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Resource Smoothing may be a better choice for MTD as they have to meet up with the clientโs needs or expectation.
If the date of the event can be moved, resource leveling can be adopted.
Looking at the MTD water project, resource levelling will extend the project duration, which is not feasible as the event has a fixed date already
Therefore, resource smoothing would be the best, though it might cost the client more money. However, the budgeted deadline would still remain the same and quality, too, will he ensure.
As regards MTD, resource levelling won’t be the best choice for them. This is because, the event already has a specific time to run, and in the event the water supplier is running out the best option would be to get a tanker as a substitute(resource smoothing), even though it might cost more but the end date of the event won’t need to be postponed.
Think about a conflict you have either been aware of or involved in. Can you identify its sources according to the categories in the table? Share your thoughts in the discussion section.
A conflict between the project manager and the project architect.
Project architect insist on a change of design to a particular area of the building, after considering the time and cost, project manager objected to it.
The conflict was resolved by the client during a technical meting
Looking at MTD water project, resource smoothing would be the best though it might cost the client more money but the budgeted deadline would still remain the same and quality too will he ensured.
for MTD water installation event company, resource smoothing is a better option than resource levels since it focuses on maintaining original project deadlines , although an increase in budget cost is expected but customer satisfaction is paramount.
On an MTD project, the project duration cannot be extended, so Resource Smoothing is more effective in that scenario.
Iwu Ozichi Uzoamaka
Cohort 7, team 5
Resource smoothing is the best for the project because it will maintain the original project deadline, and only increase the cost.
On the MTD project scope, resource smoothing is the best option for me since it aims on maintaining the delivery date and quality.
However, there will be slight increase in budget provided the customers expectation are satisfied
On this MTD project resource smoothing will be the best option compare to resource levelling
Resource leveling โ This is used when scheduling the production of available resources is limited and needs to be used optimally.
Resource smoothing โ This is used when time constraints are the biggest factor blocking production. The idea is to finish a project on time while avoiding peaks and dips in resource demand.
Therefore both methods are important to be used when the need arises
For the MTD water project, in my own opinion resource smothing is the best approach to use because delivering the project on time is paramount to the client, in order to avoid it is better to increase the cost and maintain the quality rather than shifting deadlines(resources levelling).
My view, MTD water project. I will say resources smoothing is the best option to go with as it will and maintaining deadline of project delivery and also maintain the project quality.
Considering MTD and Glasglow as a case study, Yes, it will be possible to apply Resource Levelling approach regardless of any form of uncertainty or complexity.
A resource levelling approach can benefit MTD and Glasglow activities by balancing the workload on resources in order to align resource usage with their available capacity. This can be done by shifting schedules of projects within their available floats, which helps in stable workloads, enhance morale, reduce risk of stress and allows steady distribution of resource cost over time.
Resource levelling aims at balancing resourse usage by avoiding Over Allocation or Under Utilization of resources available, which can help to reduce project delay and cost, promotes efficiency in the project as well as mitigate scheduling conflicts.
The resource leveling approach requires identifying the resource requirements, analyzing resource availability and strategically Delaying and Extending Non-critical activities within available floats and Critical activities as well. All of which aims at adjusting the project schedule to balance the workload on resources.
Considering MTD and Glasglow as a case study, Yes, it will be possible to apply Resource Levelling approach regardless of any form of uncertainty or complexity.
A resource levelling approach can benefit MTD and Glasglow activities by balancing the workload on resources in order to align resource usage with their available capacity. This can be done by shifting schedules of projects within their available floats, which helps in stable workloads, enhance morale, reduce risk of stress and allows steady distribution of resource cost over time.
Resource levelling aims at balancing resourse usage by avoiding Over Allocation or Under Utilization of resources available, which can help to reduce project dey and cost, promotes efficiency in the project and mitigate scheduling conflicts.
The resource leveling approach requires identifying the resource requirements, analyzing resource availability and strategically Delaying and Extending Non-critical activities within available floats and Critical activities as well. All of which aims at adjusting the project schedule to balance the workload on resources.
In the case of MTD water project, I will not recommend resource leveling because using resource leveling means they have to work within the available resources in other to achieve best result which may in turn extend the period of deliverable.
However, I recommend resource smoothing because it enables them to in-cure additional cost to fast-track the progress of the project which enable them to deliver the best results at the expected timeline
MTD project is based on time sensitivity and deliverables, which involves all the quality they’d deliver for water outflow so here, Resource Smoothing is best for them
Resource smoothing is used when the time constraint takes priority. The objective is for the work to be completed by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand while resource levelling is used when limits on the availability of resources are paramount in that case for MTD project hitch in Glasgow, resource smoothing seems to be the best approach since leveling will affect the project duration and cost. Another reason being the fact that quality water supply and meeting deadline is key to MTD company, resource smoothing would work best for the company as it would not affect the deadline though it affects the cost.
Abiayi Mercy
Cohort 7
Team 6
Looking at the MTD water project, I will say that resource smoothing is the best option to go with as it will aid maintaining deadline of project delivery and also maintain the project quality.
Uchechukwu Okochua
Cohort7
Team 10
Having in mind that meeting up with the targeted deadline is aim, then resource smoothing will be right approach in order to deliver, however, the cost will definitely go higher but the quality will be maintained.
The Case study of MTD and Glasgow Event company, Resource smoothing strategy is the best strategy that sooths both. To enable both companies deliver tasks and KPI’s of target market and stakeholders and must all be done without exceeding the timeline,
Considering the scope of the project involved by MTD, resource smoothing will be the better option. The objective is to ensure job completion at the set date while peaks and troughs of resource demand are avoided.
Considering MTDโs work scope, resource leveling will not work due to stakeholders expectations and concerns , however, resource smoothing will be a perfect fit.
It is not feasible to apply resource levelling to the MTD water installation project for the Glasgow event, since resource levelling may lead to an extension to the water installation project which may have a direct causal effect on the Glasgow event.
MTD should consider resource smoothing and as such:
i. Use overtime
ii. Add new resources
iii. Combine both I and ii stated above.
On the contrary, Glasgow may choose to revisit the project scope.
Michael O. Nwenne
Cohort 7
Group 6.
Looking at MTD project scope, resource smoothing will be the option.
Yes, a resource leveling approach can be applied to balance the workload of resources across the project. Resource leveling is a technique that adjusts the project schedule to balance the demand for resources with their availability. By using resource leveling, we can ensure that resources are not over-allocated or under-utilized, which can help to reduce project delays and costs. The resource leveling approach involves identifying resource requirements, analyzing resource availability, and adjusting the project schedule to balance the workload of resources. This approach can be applied to the MTD Project regardless of its size or complexity.
Looking at MTD project scope, resource smoothing will be the option. Their objective is to complete the work by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand.
Yes, applying a resource leveling approach could be beneficial for MTD company in managing their resources and addressing the challenges they face. Resource leveling aims to balance resource usage to avoid over-allocation or under-utilization, which can help improve project efficiency and mitigate scheduling conflicts.
It’s important to note that while resource leveling can help optimize resource usage, it may impact project deadlines. The trade-off between resource utilization and project timeline needs to be carefully managed and communicated to stakeholders. By adopting a systematic resource leveling approach, MTD Event Company can better manage their resources, reduce the likelihood of conflicts, and improve overall project performance.
For MTD, resource smoothing is a better option because a lot of things can come up which may be totally out of control or new in the climate and a need to adjust is necessary.
For MTD, Resource smoothing would be the best option as this will involve increasing the resources but maintaining project delivery deadline, thereby making the event to start on the specified date without any disruption.
Attempting resource levelling will not be a good option as this will mean maintaining the current situation and altering the project delivery date (not meeting the customers’ project delivery deadline). This will greatly impact negatively on the proposed event as the start date will have to changed or start without MTD required services.
Name:Nnabuife Chiamaka Rosemary
Cohort 7
Team2
Following, the project,of MTD , I will like to indicate the importance of project manager in a project, “flexibility, transparency, and the ability to solve every challenge presented to him or her.
Now, looking, at this present project, we understand that any slightest change can change everything including time, cost etc, but as a project manager,you have to deliver.
Using the resource leveling approach, it means,the deadline will change,it will affect their time management and increase cost.
Inclusion,as a project manager, using the resource leveling approach will affect the project, but, at the end, it will enable you to adjust and deliver positive result.
Considering MTDโs work scope, resource leveling will not work due to stakeholders expectations and concerns , however, resource smoothing will be a perfect fit.
The peculiar nature of processes of production of water at MTD and the constant flow that the system demand because of consumer needs the resource leveling will not be a suiting approach rather resource smoothing is appropriate becaused it focuses more on meeting and maintaining project deadlines even as the project cost is likely to increase. The scope of project and the time frame needed to satisfy clients and stakeholders favour resource smoothing.
MTD is a water installation project in which any delay or prolong of any of its activities will affect its completion. Using resource levelling will definitely affect the completion time of the water installation because resource levelling is a technique in which the start and finishing dates are adjusted based on resource constrained with a goal of balancing the demand for the resources with available supply.
I will recommend resource smoothing because it has an alternative way of dealing with resource overload by moving some of the resources from non- critical path activities so that the project gets completed on time.
Resource smoothing… according to the diagram shown I observed that in this sheduling it has a planned end….in whatever you’re doing using this project method,consideration of time should be our major factor .
And secondly can even implement such in the project of water installation event company and the Glasgow event just to make sure as a project manager you deliver before the deadline and as well maintain quality of the project.
No because it will affect the deadline for project completion and water is an essential commodity to any community.
So I’ll recommend smoothing ahead of levelling in this scenario.
Applying resource leveling is okay here since it only affects time and not cost.
Resource leveling can not be implemented in this scenario, since the water installation event company and the Glasgow event have a fixed deadline. Therefore, Implementing the resource leveling will alter it entirely
Paul-Okonko Chiamaka
Cohort 7, Team 9
The MTD, the water installation event company and the Glasgow event are all into projects with specific deadline that cannot be adjusted or rescheduled.
So in this case it wonโt be ideal using the resource levelling approach since the resource levelling will change the project deadline thereby making the events not to hold on the specified date initially fixed.
MTD should adopt the Resource Smoothing because the project is time sensitive with strict deadline. Its a live event. Though this option may push their overhead cost a little deadline will be met and customer will be satisfied
Applying resources leveling is okay here since it only affects time no cost
Applying resources leveling is okay here since it only affects time not cost
Resource leveling can be apply in the MTD water installation project. This involves balancing the workload on individual resources in order to access resource performance with their capability. While resource smoothing should be applicable to the Glasgow project because it is towards an event which already has a fixed date and can not be moved.
Resource leveling will not be the best choice, in my estimation, basedย offย the modus operandi ofย MTD Events Water Supply company , even though cost of resourcesย will have increase.
The projects MTD providesย water for areย events ,typicallyย they are usually sporting events thatย have set completion deadlines/datesย with little to no flexibility, . The reputation of MTD as well as the clients and other stakeholders could suffer if the resource leveling strategy were used in this situation, because itย would prolong the timing.
Because resource smoothing emphasizes time-limited scheduling while maintaining the end date, I think it is the best choice.
Resource leveling would not be the ideal way to deal in these two projects unless an extended deadline will still provide that same quality and will not affect the clients and their consumers I.e if the said deadline is not the exact deadline for the project
Resource levelling is not the best for MTD because it involves balancing the workloads on resources, they do this by shifting the scheduling of project activities within their available floats, that is how flexible a deadline is and to what extent an activity can be rescheduled.
As a PM I will recommend resource smoothing because it has an alternative way of dealing with resource overload. it focuses on preserving the planned project duration and its deadlines by applying strategies like adding new resources to the project and using overtime
CATHERINE OKEH
COHORT 7, TEAM 2.
Resources smoothing will be the best option for the MTD project to complete the project at the deadline date, although it will increase the cost, time management is very important and quality assurance.
Since the goal of resource levelling is to achieve a more realistic and manageable schedule that optimizes resource utilization while maintaining project objectives, adopting this approach will be feasible.
Using the MTD water project as case study, it is my opinion that resource levelling will not be the right option.
The projects MTD handle usually have specific end dates with little or no room for rescheduling. Using the resource levelling approach in this case could be disastrous for not just the clients and other stakeholders but also for MTD’s reputation.
I believe resource smoothing is the best option because of its focus on time limited scheduling while holding the end date.
Considering the MTD water company, with the view that the Working nature of this project is not always really certain, in This case it would not be advisable to implement resource smoothing, reason been that it will add more costs to it, as the project already have much costs so it would not be advisable or proper to add more costs, therefore as a project manager I will advise the MTD company to implement Resource levelling which can only extend the deadline but work with available or agreed resources, communicate with the stakeholders, the team n the client/customer to create awareness regarding the change in deadline “extension” for the company to be able to deliver and maintain the quality of the project with the available resource.
Considering MTD and Glasgow project management I think a total revision of the project scope by the stakeholders is very important so as to determine a more efficient approach based on cost and other variables because resource smoothing will increase cost of the project which may have already been expensive while resource levelling will not increase cost but will extend the project time frame which may also be catastrophic.
Resource smoothing would have been best with clients complete agreement because extra costs are going to be inccured
Resource levelling changes the project deadline, postponing an event because of contractor failure to deliver is unacceptable, unless there some float between event day and project deadline
At MTD, the water installation is not certain and applying the resource smoothing strategy might be helpful due to the scope of project and the time frame needed to satisfy clients and stakeholders. Applying the Resource levelling approach may not be the best choice applicable in tune with the scope of the project and also the costs implication.
Lanssina TO
Cohort 7, Team 6, Group 3
Resources smoothing will be the best option to go through the project until ending.
Resources levelling will affect entirely the project deadline.
Considering the MTD company, the working nature of this project is not always that certain which means that at some point in time other approach might be considered to present a result. Project levelling might play a vital role in this scenario considering that the original cost of the project might be too expensive to add more cost – project smoothing to deliver the job with specified deadline. Therefore in other not to add more cost, I think it best the project nature be discussed with the clients and all the stakeholders of the project by presenting how the levelling process will be used according to deliver a quality project although at different deadline
As a Project Manager for MTD I’ll rather apply resource leveling.
Resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Resource levelling is not the best for MTD water project since it is used when there are resource constraints or conflicts within a project. However, MTD water project is much more about time management which requires the completion of the project within a specific period of time. Hence, adopting resource levelling or resource smoothing depends on the project’s particular circumstances.
Using the MTD Water project as an example;
Resource Smoothing is the best option base on the fact that it focuses on preserving planned deadlines though it increases project cost when a new resource is added to the team without affecting the deadline of the project.
If resource levelling is applied, there would be loads of consequences for the team and even the clients such as not meeting up with the deadline and rescheduling of projects due to delays.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original product deadline while increasing cost of project.
Resource levelling does not change the alternative capability but can emphasize rescheduling. MTD may adopt both base on the scope of the awarded project.
In order to execute a project for MTD Resources smoothing should be considered as the best technique to use, it increases the cost and time management and it is very essential and quality assurance.the project can be completed before or on the deadline.
Resource levelling can be applied in MTD water installation project because of its nature and it’s kind of event but resource smoothing could be applied in Glasgow project because it’s faced with an event that has a fixed date and this can’t be moved. Which suggest the cost going up but have to maintain scheduled date
Resource levelling for the MTD, the water installation events firm, and the Glasgow event is not advised due to the fact that rescheduling will significantly affect the project deadlines, which will harm the stakeholders and project management deliverables.
I’ll propose that we use resource smoothing, a technique that seeks to keep project expenditures on track with initial deadlines while also extending project duration.
Resource levelling for the MTD would not suffice as that would significantly affect the date of delivery to the client.I’d say resource smoothing would do better except if theres a way to go round both resource levelling and smoothing
For the MTD project, making do with what you have might hinder the quality of delivery. Resources leveling is not the most advisable method for MTD to take.
Being a PM of a water installation project, levelling or smoothing approach will depend on the context, a such project would consist of a sequence of activities that one leads to another (linear approach). As far as this project is concerned, booth approaches would be used interchangeably if there arise a circumstance where an unexpected expertise is riquired, smoothing approch will ne visited but in normal situation, levelling approach will be the most used to prevent extra cost and acheive the goals in throat of allotted time.
Resources smoothing it usually the best option for MTD project in order to complete the project at the deadline, however it increases the cost and time management is very essential and quality assurance
MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event are time-conscious companies, as a Program Manager I will introduce the Resource smoothing approach which focuses more on meeting and maintaining project deadlines even as the project cost is likely to increase. on the other hand resource leveling approach balances resources with available capacity which may impact project deadlines.
Resource Leveling for the MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event would not be advisable because rescheduling will have a major impact on the project deadlines which will affect the stakeholders and project manager deliverables.
I will suggest we implement Resource smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
Based on the provided figure, it seems that implementing a resource leveling approach in the MTD Glasgow event scenario would be feasible. Resource leveling involves rescheduling activities to avoid resource overallocation, which is a common issue in project management. In the case of MTD, it appears that there are several instances of resource overallocation, particularly in the lead-up to the event. By rescheduling activities, MTD could avoid overloading their resources and ensure that the project is completed on time and within budget. However, it’s important to note that resource leveling may require trade-offs between time, cost, and quality, and MTD would need to carefully consider these factors when making scheduling decisions.
Resource levelling will only be advisable for the MTD project under review if the adjustments can fit well into the floating window of the task to be handled.
In the event that this can not be accommodated in the floating window the recommended approach will be resource smoothing to ensure project deadlines are met though this might impact project cost.
Resource levelling can be applied in the MTD water installation project because resource levelling involves balancing the workload on resources in order to align resource usage with their available capacity. but resource smoothing should be applied to the Glasgow project because it is towards an event which already has a fixed date and can not be moved.
Resource levelling can be applied in the MTD water installation project but resource smoothing should be applied to the Glasgow project because it is towards an event which already has a fixed date and can not be moved.
Considering the MTD events and deadline, I will apply the rescues smoothing approach though it will increase the cost of the project but it will help achieve the original plan and ensure the project is delivered in record time with the quality required.
Regarding the resource management for the MTD, the water installation events company, and the Glasgow event, it has been determined that resource leveling would not be advisable. Rescheduling these events would have a significant impact on project deadlines, which would ultimately affect the stakeholders and the deliverables of the project manager.
However, we recommend implementing resource smoothing instead. This approach aims to maintain the original project deadlines while acknowledging that it may result in increased project costs. While the idea of increased costs may initially be uncomfortable, we believe that hiring additional personnel for the project will help maintain the project deadline and ultimately lead to more effective results.
Based on the provided figure, it seems that implementing a resource leveling approach in the MTD Glasgow event scenario would be feasible. Resource leveling involves rescheduling activities to avoid resource overallocation, which is a common issue in project management. In the case of MTD, it appears that there are several instances of resource overallocation, particularly in the lead-up to the event. By rescheduling activities, MTD could avoid overloading their resources and ensure that the project is completed on time and within budget. However, itโs important to note that resource leveling may require trade-offs between time, cost, and quality, and MTD would need to carefully consider these factors when making scheduling decisions.
Implementation of resources leveling approach and resources smoothing.
As a PM, I would apply my approach based on the project I am handling.
I could use part of resources leveling approach and part of resources smoothing for better results.
With the MTD water project, and the issue of deadline, I don’t thing resource levelling is the best approach, due to the fact that, the event has a fixed date to start and all necessary arrangements has been put in place, it just for MTD to complete there own expect of the project, I feel resource smoothing is a more suitable approach to implement. When resource smoothing is apply it shows the level of understanding the project manager and the sponsor has, and it shows how important timing and deadline is to MTD.
It’s gives the organization more credibility and earn the organization more trust from the stakeholders.
With all the delays in activities and extension of deadline, resource levelling will not be the best approach to implement. If resource levelling is implemented MTD will encounter a lot of issues with the sponsor, the stakeholders and the public in general.
I know quality is very important in project delivery, if the cost can be increased (more resources are made available), and also the right personnel with a right amount of experience are engaged, the quality of project delivery will still be intact, the deadline is mat. So I feel resource smoothing is the best approach to implement.
Resource smoothing is used when the time constraint takes priority. The objective is to complete the work by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand. Resource levelling is used when limits on the availability of resources are paramount.
Here are some reasons why your team can benefit from resource leveling approach
-To optimize your resources
-To minimize deficits.
-To prevent task overloading.
-To ensure the quality of a project output
-Critical Path Method (CPM)
-Fast tracking.
-Crashing.
-Critical chain method
Resource leveling is important because it: Eliminates over-allocation: by balancing the demands of project tasks with resource capacity, resource leveling removes the risks of over-allocating resources. Enhances productivity and reduces burnout: by removing over-allocation, the risk of resource burnout is reduced.
Looking at the MTD project the application of resource smoothing will be a better choice than resource leveling it will increase cost but it will maintain project original timing
Implementing resource leveling approach will be relevant to this scenario because the resource that will be used will be the same and there will be possibility of rescheduling the time.
Using MTD Water as a cited example, Resource Smoothing is the better option. As we all know, Water is a necessity at every point in time and at every event. If resource levelling is going to be considered, there would be loads of consequences for the team and even the clients.
Resource Leveling for the MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event would not be advisable because rescheduling will have a major impact on the project deadlines which will affect the stakeholders and project manager deliverables.
But I will suggest we implement Resource smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. At first, Increasing project costs might not be comfortable but at the long run, hiring more hands on the project will maintain the project deadline while producing effective results.
Okafor Innocent
Group 5
For an Organization like MTD and Glasgow it is not advisable to consider resource leveling rather I would advise resource smoothing because resource leveling would serious impact of the already communicate date for the event and create serious devastation for Glasgow management, athletes, spectators and the media.
Resource leveling would require a change in the already schedule date for the event which could cause catastrophe for the project.
For a company like MTD resource leveling will not be the best. Instead the resource smoothing should be adopted.
Executing resource levelling is not feasible, particularly for MTD pure water supplies. The project would result in delays and increased costs, as acknowledged by the project manager in one of the videos. To meet the immediate water requirements and ensure clean, uncontaminated water for the upcoming event just three days away, the project team had to resort to using water tankers and buffer bags. This approach, known as project smoothing, required additional expenses but allowed them to deliver water on time despite the contamination of the initial planned water delivery source or pipe, with the event organizers covering the extra costs.
MTD WATER PROJEC: It is crucial to adopt a resource leveling strategy to achieve the desired objectives.
Considering the delay non-critical tasks approach in resource levelling, the project can maintain its progress within the available float period without affecting the critical path. This approach aims to balance the demand on resources while considering their potential and capacity.
This approach is indeed viable as it ensures a stable workload without altering the existing resource capacity. Instead, it focuses on rescheduling, which may impact project deadlines. Whatever the cost required to complete the project, it will be made feasible. If additional workforce is needed to expedite a process, it will be arranged accordingly.
Resource smoothing focus on maintaining project deadline even as the project cost increases. While resource leveling in the other hand,does not destroy or bring down the capacity of the existing resource but rather reschedule which may have infact on the project deadline.
Either resource smoothing or levelling can be applied to the MDT project depending on whether or not the change requiring resources allocation is on the critical path of the project plan or not.
It’s best to use the Resource smoothing rather than the rwsouce levlling because it available MTD stick by the planned deadlines so the clients don’t run out of water at any point but just increasing the cost.
I don’t think implementing levelling approach is advisable because rescheduling is required water company and it is difficult if not impossible to achieve with this approach.
I would suggest the use of resource smoothing which makes gives room for original project deadlines
I don’t believe that the resource leveling technique will be a good choice for this project because it will have an impact on the project schedule and incur more costs. Since time is of the essence for the MTD project, resource smoothing will instead be an effective approach.
Due to the status of the project at hand, I would go with resource smoothing, although it would have an impact on the cost but it would help stay on track, finish the project at the expected date and also help maintain quality.
Resource Leveling for the MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event would not be advisable because rescheduling will have a major impact on the project deadlines which will affect the stakeholders and project manager deliverables.
But I will suggest we implement Resource smoothing which aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. At first, Increasing project costs might not be comfortable but at the long run, hiring more hands on the project will maintain the project deadline while producing effective results.
I don’t think resource levelling is ideal in this scenerio. For example the MTD project which had to do with human lives and safety, being economical with the resources will impact negatively on the people. Also, people’s lives are on the line, hence, the project deadline must be respected.
So I think resource smoothing would be the perfect fit for the project as resources will be increased for a better output while the timeline is still respected .
Problems that affect scheduling resources based on my experience are:
* Thoughtless optimism of the project manager, most times adequate resources are not properly scoped to enable effective campaign delivery process especially at the ward level where some of the personnel will have to use their personal funds to execute their daily task.
* The students syndrome, on several occasions the personnel delay in work at the initial stage of the project until when is getting close to mop up days where campaign is gradually coming to an end.
* Complex schedules: due to the nature of campaign with several dependent bodies, campaign most times is been delayed because approval needs to be sought before proceeding with the next activities.
I believe resource smoothing will be a better option for a company that provides services for events like MTD. Since this method preserves deadline and schedules and MTD does not have a say or influence over fixing the event date, they would need a method that will help them deliver by the set date since they can’t change the vent schedule.
Resource smoothing involves preserving the planned project duration and it’s deadlines while applying some strategies.
So, I thing for the project of the MTG to be achieved, resource smoothing should be applied.
With the definition of resource smoothing and what it entails in mind, it means that whatever extra it would cost to deliver a project may have already been taken care of.
For MTD water company, resource leveling is not really a good idea because the stakeholders especially the end users which includes the athletes would have already be in the city in the agreed date to commence the competition, hence waiting for the project to be delivered.
Delaying the deadline will mean shifting the competition and all that which will not be good to the project sponsor hence rather than use resource leveling, it is best to use resource smoothing wherein additional cost may apply but the project be delivered on the agreed deadline
For MTD water, it is best they use resource smoothing, because the end user’s would already been on ground than using resource levelling which will mean delaying the project, of which it will not be good for the project sponsor, so therefore resource levelling is a no no.
Since MTD, only have few days to go, using resource levelling is no no for them, because it will chanwge the date of the project delivering. So i will suggest resource smoothing. Is the best optikn in irder to complete the projecr before the deadline daye. It is bettee to accumulate more costs than to fail on delivering at the plan date of the project. Time management is the key for quality assurance and trust from the clients.
Resource leveling is a project management technique used to balance and optimize the allocation of resources in order to minimize fluctuations in resource demand and avoid overloading or underutilization of resources.
Since the goal of resource leveling is to achieve a more realistic and manageable schedule that optimizes resource utilization while maintaining project objectives, adopting this approach will be feasible.
Let’s say you have a project that requires two developers working on the back end of a website. But you have only one developer to do the job. You can complete the project successfully without overworking your team members using resource leveling. For example, you can split tasks so that your team members have enough time to complete their activities, or you can extend the planned duration of the activity.
Resource leveling is a technique where project constraints are managed by balancing available resources and the project schedule.
Resource leveling involves adjusting activities’ start and end dates within a specific project. The changes can occur immediately after the project schedule is created or even during the project itself to account for shortages.
For MTD project hitch in Glasgow, resource smoothing is the best strategy to adopt because leveling will affect duration and cost as well.
The MTD projects usually has fixed deadlines to commission its project. therefore, resource leveling isn’t a good approach to be use. And on the other hand resource smoothing allows rescheduling of projects when there is an extension on it hence making it flexible for the MTD
Considering that quality water supply and meeting deadline is key to MTD company, resource smoothing would work best for the company since it would not alter the deadline though it involves more resources and costs.
This would enable the company to supply guality water while meeting the deadline
The implementation of resource leveling, especially for MTD pure water supplies, is impractical. The project manager acknowledged in one of the videos that it would lead to delays and increased costs. To address the immediate water requirements and guarantee clean, uncontaminated water for an upcoming event just three days away, the project team had to resort to alternative measures such as using water tankers and buffer bags. This approach, known as project smoothing, incurred additional expenses but ensured timely water delivery despite the contamination of the original water source or pipe. The event organizers covered the extra costs.
To achieve the desired objectives of the MTD water project, it is crucial to adopt a resource leveling strategy.
By employing the approach of delaying non-critical tasks in resource leveling, the project can maintain its progress within the available float period without affecting the critical path. The objective is to balance the demand on resources while considering their potential and capacity.
Furthermore, any extension of non-critical activity durations should be limited to the allowed float duration.
This approach is indeed feasible as it ensures a consistent workload without altering the existing resource capacity. Instead, it focuses on rescheduling, which may impact project deadlines. Whatever the cost required to complete the project, it will be made feasible. If additional workforce is necessary to expedite a process, appropriate arrangements will be made.
With reference to MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event, I think applying a resource levelling approach will not be the best for them, because it will change the delivery date of the project and already the client / customers / end users of the facility are already waiting for them to deliver, been a running process that undertake expansion project from time to time to increase their capacity. They have to plan well, deploy the right resources on schedule to meet the project delivery time line, to avoid delays, cost overruns, lengthening project duration.
No, resource levelling will not work. The project is time bound. I suggest they apply resource smoothing
Putting into consideration MTD water project, time is of essence . Applying resource levelling approach is possible because :
Resource levelling will balance the workload on their resource in order to align with their available capacity by applying either the
Delay non- critical activities strategy of resource levelling, which will not affect the project as long as it is completed within the period of available float. Or
Extend non-critical activity durations within the available float.
Group 1
Resources smoothing will be the best option for MTD project in order to complete the project at the deadline date, although it will increase the cost, but time management is very important and quality assurance
NNAMDI MICHAEL
group 10
Cohort 7
If the MTD is compelled to maintain the original project deadline it is proper to apply the resource smoothing approach, which will result to an increase in project cost. But if the deadline or time schedule can be shifted it will be more profitable for the MTD company to apply the resource levelling approach because by so doing the existing resource capacity will not be altered but it will definitely have an impact on the project deadline as it will be shifted.
So the approach to use depends on the flexibility of the project guidelines
Projects like MTD that seem linear in nature better fits into the resource smoothing. Resource levelling doesn’t get handy as timek deadlines are imperative for such projects.
I think it would be possible to apply resource levelling approach to tackle the issue of resource shortfall arising from issue of venue at the MTD water event, so as to avoid resource overallocation or over capacity. This is because it entails resource limited scheduling (within the available resources) which has different strategies associated with it, one of the strategies is the delay of non-critical activities within the available float, especially when considering the issue with the venue. this will incur no additional project cost, however possibility of shift planned end date.
Resource smoothing is targeted at maintaining the original project deadlines with an increase in project costs. while resource leveling tends not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes on rescheduling, which may have an impact or a shift on project deadlines.
Resource leveling is preferred considering the cost involved in executing the project.
Hello everyone;
Using the challenges faced by MTD as a case study; they had to rely on resource smoothing – and solely beat the higher cost; as deadline initially planned must be met.
Revision of project scope is never an option; as time management is paramount, neither does Resource levelling come in at all.
Thank you
Clare Marie Ukaegbu
I will prefer resource leveling to ensure that because it will help me to predict the time line correctly and conflicts arising out of time, scope, or insufficient resources can be tackled early on without it snowballing into a huge problem, forcing my employees to work overtime. In applying leveling resources, informations are vital and enhancing productivity and reducing burnout by eliminating over-allocation and minimizing the risk of resource burnout.
Thanks.
MTD has limited time and resources levelling holds the capacity and reschedule the planned deadline.
Resource Levelling is better with project that have enough non-critical path which allows for time adjustment in order to stay within the planned costs.
MTD in this case, would need to use resource smoothing in order to deliver within the limited time. Therefore resource Levelling is not a good idea for MTD water project.
Yes resources smoothing can be apply to the MTD water project,because it will help to maintain a form of balance in the project duration
As resource leveling provides room for rescheduling, it is possible. Most times, when a particular period has been earmarked for a project, some unforeseen circumstances can come into play which can alter the predicted time for the completion of the project.The MTD can be faced with the challenge of not meeting up with the completion of the installation, if all that will be needed are not provided.
Resource smoothing is used when the time constraint takes priority. The objective is to complete the work by the required date while avoiding peaks and troughs of resource demand. whereas Resource levelling is used when limits on the availability of resources are paramount.
Yes it is possible if they implement resources levelling approach to balance workload and productivity.
Applying the resources levelling is possible and okay as it does not alter the resources capacity, rather it create room for time rescheduling, which affects the project delivery deadline. Importantly, it does not increase in cost.
Applying the resources levelling is feasible and okay in this project since it will not alter the resources capacity, it will only create room for rescheduling of time frame which may affect the deadline to deliver the project but no increase in cost may also be avoided via resources levelling
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original product deadline while increasing cost of project.
Resource levelling does not change the alternative capability but can emphasize rescheduling.
The both can be judiciously applied to the MTD project if maybe the charge requires resource allocation which can be critical to the success of the project.
Funmilayo Adelabi Osabinu
Team 9
Cohort 7
Implementing resource leveling is not feasible, particularly for MTD pure water supplies. The project would result in delays and increased costs, as acknowledged by the project manager in one of the videos. To meet the immediate water requirements and ensure clean, uncontaminated water for the upcoming event just three days away, the project team had to resort to using water tankers and buffer bags. This approach, known as project smoothing, required additional expenses but allowed them to deliver water on time despite the contamination of the initial planned water delivery source or pipe, with the event organizers covering the extra costs.
When it comes to the MTD water project, it is crucial to adopt a resource leveling strategy to achieve the desired objectives.
By employing the delay non-critical tasks approach in resource leveling, the project can maintain its progress within the available float period without affecting the critical path. This approach aims to balance the demand on resources while considering their potential and capacity.
Additionally, any extension of non-critical activity times should remain within the allowed float duration.
This approach is indeed viable as it ensures a stable workload without altering the existing resource capacity. Instead, it focuses on rescheduling, which may impact project deadlines. Whatever the cost required to complete the project, it will be made feasible. If additional workforce is needed to expedite a process, it will be arranged accordingly.
Applying resource leveling is okay here since it only affects time not cost
Resource smoothing is ideal for MTD, water is very critical and crucial to our existence and to not have it when required will be disappointing and may create unnecessary panic. While glass glow i can apply resource leveling to prevent extra cost which the investors may not be will be sponsor.
It will be possible to apply the resource levelling approach, if the scheduling does not affect critical events.
Resource levelling would not work, especially for MTD pure water supplies, the project would deliver outside schedule and with more costs,as mentioned by the project manager in one of the videos, they they had to use water tankers and bufferbag to deliver required water to places that are needed and at the same time make provisions of clean unconterminated water for the event which was just three days away using project smoothing.
This was necessitated because the initial planned water delivery source or pipe was conterminated, and they delivered within schedule though at an extra cost that was paid for by the event organizers.
Thank you.
It is imperative when it comes to the MTD water project, adopting the resource leveling strategy is vital for such purpose.
Application of delay non-critical tasks approach of resources levelling, which wonโt have an impact on the project as long as it is finished within the period of available float, will balance the demand on their resource in order to line with their available potential and capacity.
Also alternately extend non-critical activity times should be within the float required time.
Yes it’s very possible as the approach will make the workload stable and resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
whatever it would cost to deliver that project it would be made possible. If it needs more workforce to fast track a process, it would be perfected.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original product deadline while increaseing project cost,,
while resource leveling does not alter alternative capability but can emphasis rescheduleing.
The both can be applied to the MTD project if maybe the charge requires resource allocation which can be critical on the project .
NNEOMA
Group 3
a more significant level of impact, certain projects undergo more than just rescheduling or resource allocation adjustments. They may undergo a reevaluation of their project scope by the project sponsor. This involves a broader analysis of the entire project and requires reconsideration of how time, cost, and quality interact within the project.
Abiye Ngeribara
Task: In what ways do these values and norms impact on the ethical and environmental considerations of running Projects for the company?
The MTD core values being
passion for what we do , drive of our employee, support of everyone and quality of infrastructure have positive impart on the entire scope of ethics and if there is a gap or break of these MTD core values and the scope of ethics then the possible effect will be
1. Violation of rules and regulation and as well as rules of conduct can affect the nature of the project therefore it calls for environmental disaster
2. Moral principles,ethical practices and values will give birth to quality infrastructure and along side with passion and drive when the project is finally executed else it becomes environmental problem because poor quality of infrastructure may be achieved due to lack of the above scope of ethics mentioned
In mtd recource soothing or leveling can be applied to it depending on if the scheduling or timming doest affect things or events and it’s been implemented efficiently
Time is really important to them when it comes to the MTD water project. However, it is viable to adopt the resource leveling strategy because:
Applying either the Delay non-critical activities approach of resource levelling, which won’t have an impact on the project as long as it is finished within the period of available float, will balance the demand on their resource in order to line with their available capacity. Alternately, extend non-critical activity times within the float that is at hand.
Either resource smoothing or levelling can be applied to the MDT project depending on whether or not the change requiring resources allocation is on the critical path of the project plan or not.
for MTD in a scenario where water required increased unexpectedly, or a member of the team is unavoidable unavailable, resource smoothing could be applied.
Yes it is possible if they implement resources levelling approach to balance workload and productivity.
For the MTD water installation company and the glass glow company,the implementation of resource levelling can be feasible….
The scope of every project does not only resolve around time,but cost and quality put together..
Resources levelling will help as it works with float,some strategies may affect cost and duration but not as much as resources smoothing that involves bringing in or adding a new resource,that may require training,review,re- evaluation of project, stress and low quality and burn out.
Yes. it is possible to apply the resource levelling approach to the water installation event of MTD if the scheduling does not affect critical events.
It’s possible,as resource leveling provides room for rescheduling.Most times, when a particular period has been earmarked for a project,some unforeseen circumstances can come into play which can alter the predicted time for the completion of the project.Tge MTD can be faced with the challenge of not meeting up with the completion of the installation,if all that will be needed are not provided.
With MTD, the water installation events company and the Glasgow event its possible to apply resource levelling approach considering Resource smoothing focuses on preserving planned deadlines but increasing project costs; resource levelling does not change the current capacity but focuses instead on rescheduling, with a possible impact on project deadlines.
Considering MTD water project, time is of essence to them truly. But applying resource levelling approach is possible because;-
Resource levelling will balance the workload on their resource in order to align with their available capacity by applying either the
Delay non- critical activities strategy of resource levelling, which will not affect the project as long as it is completed within the period of available float. Or
Extend non-critical activity durations within the available float.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
Injoh Linda epse Zama
Resource levelling does not change current capacity but focuses on project deadlines rescheduling which is something MTD cannot afford as time is a critical resource ,if the work load is levelled or split into pieces it will lead to a delay in the completion of the activity and there fore impacting the overall project . resource smoothing will be a better approach for MTD though it will be costly and this cost can be incurred by some major stakeholders.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
Events are scheduled and extensions or durations are not mostly feasible, so smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines as what is likely what MTD project may effect
Their PM said earlier that their department is not cheap to hire. This is mostly because they don’t have the luxury of time. Every event has a definite start time and whatever preparation MTD is hired to do must fit into the available time frame. With this in mind, whatever extra it would cost to deliver that project will be brought. If it needs more hands or more money to fast track a process, it would be done.
Ezeojiewuru Francisca Ozioma
Considering if the MTD company can apply resources levelling approach, I think the company is constantly constrained by time seeing they have to meet up with a scheduled events.
Looking at resource levelling approach where the current capacity does not change but focuses instead on rescheduling with a possible impact on project deadlines, I think the MTD company will best function with the resource smoothing approach.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs.
While resource levelling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasises rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
The MTD supplies water for events in this case. Resource Smoothing may be their better choice as they have to meet up with the client’s expectation except the date of the event can be moved, in which case, resource Levelling may work.
i think that for the MTD Company, Resource Scheduling might not be the right approach for the nature of their projects.
Scheduling of resources entails a solution that will eventually impact task deadlines and/or the overall scheduled delivery dates of the project. This is because Resource scheduling involves balancing workload with available resources.
MTD has to deliver onsite water facilities to meet the need of the users at an already established event date, so any solution that might impact the delivery date would not be the best, but rather; resource smoothing, on the other hand, might be preferable as this will enable the delivery of the project within the specified time at the expense of a cost increment.
Resource smoothing aims to maintain original project deadlines while increasing project costs. On the other hand, resource leveling does not alter the existing resource capacity but instead emphasizes rescheduling, which may have an impact on project deadlines.
Application of resources leveling is better since it won’t alter the existing resources capacity. However, the implication is reschedule some phases of the MTD water project thereby affecting the deadline.
Implementing resources levelling approach in this scenario will balance workload that is there will be a stable workload and it will still align with use of available resources to get to the expected end of the project though there will be the possibility of rescheduled time frame for the project
On the MTD water project, resource smoothing is the best option for the project because, they will still maintain the deadline to deliver the project and still maintain the quality of the project, which increase in cost is the only thing that changed and they will meet up with the time to deliver the project.
Considerating thethe Water Project of MTD does, resource smoothing will be advisable so that deadlines will be met. The phases and project plans wouldn’t change that much except cost implications.
The best approach is resource Smoothing which is best for a time-based project like MTD. A change in cost does not matter so far deadline is met.
Zumukalice Team 3