It is now time to review a case study that focuses on ethical behavior.
Access the Open APM’s ethics case study resource provided below to read a scenario concerning ethics in projects.
Can you pinpoint a few instances of professional conduct highlighted in this scenario? Reflect on the skills employed to integrate ethical considerations into the decisions made by the individuals involved. Can you recognize them?
Share your responses in the discussion section below.
After posting your comment, proceed to the next step, where you will find some potential answers provided by APM for these questions.
© The Open University
Downloads
I found, teamwork, research work, innovative skills and communication skills
I found, teamwork, research work, innovative skills and communication skills
JERRY EBRUVWIYOR OSIOBE – COHORT 31 TEAM 5.
Issues of Professional Conduct.
(1). Questionable validity of stakeholder engagement results .
William presented a report from a local opinion research firm that seemed “too perfect,” with no identified risks. This raises concerns about the integrity and reliability of data being used to guide critical project decisions.
“The engagement came back with nothing but green lights across all of the key parameters.”
(2). Pressure to accept flawed findings.
John initially felt compelled to accept the report to keep the project moving, despite doubts. This reflects the ethical tension between delivering results quickly versus ensuring accuracy and honesty in project work.
(3). Fear of speaking up.
Karen hesitated to challenge the report because of her probation period and concern about workplace relationships. This shows the ethical issue of professional courage—balancing personal career risks against the responsibility to uphold standards.
“I’m worried that if I criticise the report, I’ll end up looking like I’m criticising him.”
Skills Used to Bring Ethics into Decisions.
(1). Critical Thinking & Risk Analysis.
John and Karen mapped out scenarios of what could happen if the flawed report was accepted versus challenged. This analytical approach helped them see the bigger ethical and professional risks.
(2). Collaboration & Open Dialogue.
Karen and John spent time discussing concerns honestly, despite initial hesitation. This skill of open communication allowed ethical issues to surface and be addressed.
(3). Courage & Integrity.
Karen overcame her fear of speaking up, showing professional courage. John supported her, demonstrating integrity by prioritizing the firm’s reputation over short-term convenience.
(4). Problem-Solving & Initiative.
Karen researched alternative validation methods and suggested involving a global firm to review the local research. This proactive step ensured the project was based on credible stakeholder engagement.
Williams was not honest and he lacked transparency, he tried to find a quick way to carry out the research.
John was negligent at first and forgot about the ethics of the company he was working for.
Karen was more concerned about her personal interests than the interest of the company.
The three showed teamwork in tackling the research