It is now time to review a case study that focuses on ethical behavior.
Access the Open APM’s ethics case study resource provided below to read a scenario concerning ethics in projects.
Can you pinpoint a few instances of professional conduct highlighted in this scenario? Reflect on the skills employed to integrate ethical considerations into the decisions made by the individuals involved. Can you recognize them?
Share your responses in the discussion section below.
After posting your comment, proceed to the next step, where you will find some potential answers provided by APM for these questions.
© The Open University
Downloads
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
I believe that John and Karen did the right by maintaining the value of the organization and also working ethically. It was a very tough decision but their readiness to do what was right gave them chance to think and proffer solution without tempering the organizational value. Project must be done putting into consideration ethical practices,moral principle and value.
INSTANCES OF PROFFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
1. Critical analysis.
The new person, Karen prioritized the integrity of the project over accepting a potential flawed report. She also did mot let the fact that he was on probation deter her from.speaking her mind when the opportunity presented itself.
2. Open communication and mentorship
John fostered an environment where laren could express her concerns honestly which led to them brainstorming and coming up with a solution that would benefit everyone.
3. Upholding the reputation of their company.
They kept in mind that their organization s long term goals and reputation were more important than one project
SKILLS.
1. Influencing Decisions
Instead of making a direct and potentially offensive call, john and Karen used a strategy that allowed them to imcovet flaws and weaknesses without putting blame in anyone.
2. Courage.
Despite her probation Karen chose to speak up because of the importance of the project.
3. Problem Solving.
Instead of ending at identifying the problem they used research and networking to find an uninvolved party to validate the data. This ensures all is aligned with the end goal and all Proffessional relationships are maintained.
Look at the scenario you noticed a flaw of the professional handling the project..
Misconduct and misappropriation of value of the organization.. Noticing that of there resolution to meet the deadline over the delay arose. Data is not utilize effectively. The principle of Ethics and values project the total mission leading board of the organization.
Acting ethically in project management means making decisions based on integrity, transparency, and accountability, especially when handling sensitive data in M&E and public health projects. In my work, ethical behavior ensures that data collected and reported is accurate and not altered to meet expectations.
For example, when monitoring project outcomes, it is important to present real results, even if they show gaps or challenges. This builds trust with stakeholders and supports better decision-making. Transparency in communication and respect for data confidentiality are also critical, particularly when dealing with community health information.
Overall, acting ethically helps ensure that projects create real impact, maintain credibility, and serve the community responsibly.
The professional issues noticed in the scenario include misrepresentation of data and which create lack of team work.
Another noticable issues is conflict of interest, while all characters want to out shine each other which was later corrected.
Working as a team in an organisation should be the main priorities in achieving the organisation goals
It bring ethics back make communication channels flows, also create awareness to prioritize the firm’s integrity over immediate progress.
The professional misconduct issues featured in this scenario include misrepresentation of data, where William provided a sanitized report to avoid delays, and a conflict of interest, as John felt pressured to accept flawed results to secure the firm’s first major overseas contract.
To bring ethics back into the decision-making process, John and Karen utilized risk mapping to visualize the long-term damage to the project’s success and reputational awareness to prioritize the firm’s integrity over immediate progress.
Ultimately, they employed strategic problem-solving by involving a third-party global firm to objectively review the findings, allowing them to correct the ethical breach without a direct, relationship-damaging confrontation with the client.