Acting ethically – (PM Course Discussion)

It is now time to review a case study that focuses on ethical behavior.

Access the Open APM’s ethics case study resource provided below to read a scenario concerning ethics in projects.

Can you pinpoint a few instances of professional conduct highlighted in this scenario? Reflect on the skills employed to integrate ethical considerations into the decisions made by the individuals involved. Can you recognize them?

Share your responses in the discussion section below.

After posting your comment, proceed to the next step, where you will find some potential answers provided by APM for these questions.

© The Open University

Downloads

APM_ethics_case_study_1-3

Acting ethically – (PM Course Discussion)

2,609 thoughts on “Acting ethically – (PM Course Discussion)

  1. Karen is a game changer for John, and she was a pro active communicator, honesty and teamwork also played a major role.

  2. I feel like William is a one man army, he’s not much of a team player and that’s not healthy. You don’t just put off someone’s ideas because you feel as though the person would like whatever was given to the person at the long run.
    I saw communication come into play in a manner that was respectful and considerate with Karen. She was new but had good organisational ethics. The way she collaborated with John, brainstorming over ideas together, doing research.
    John too, showed great organisational skills by being open to criticism, knowing that he must not always know it all. Plus the fact that he was willing to work with an outside source (the firm) and see to it that the project ran smoothly makes him a Good Project Manager
    So outlining the skill deployed, we have
    1. Honestly
    2. Critical Thinking
    3. Team Work/Collaboration
    4. Research
    5. Adaptability

  3. Babat

    It’s a worrisome thing trying to manipulate what supposed be a foundation. Proactiveness in deploying ethics of PM saved Karen from falling victim of negligence. Asking questions when necessary.
    When it became obvious that the situation ahead could be devastating John has no option than open up to their shuddy deal about the report.
    Though, Karen realized in good time, not come disappoint their new company in a foreign land. Not ready to compromise Company’s integrity and future decides to think outside the box for solution which inventually payoff.
    Ability to resolve issues quickly is also key for a PM to valuable impact.

  4. professional conduct highlighted from the scenario are
    team work
    communications
    research
    honesty
    integrity
    Williams lacks teamwork
    but Karen and John were able to bring them together through effective communication ,research and pure honesty

  5. Reading through the project, I really can say there was no good team spirit among the three individuals. In a project, all members of the team should be carried out to ensure the success of such project. However, I love how Karen was able to come up with possible solution to solve the issue on ground. It shows Karen is a great thinker and a problem solver. Every team should have someone like Karen.

  6. What I saw here was the absent of team work being carried out by William, and the bridge it brought caused the division between the three most especially with John and Karen. If William had used team work, such disaster would not have happened.

  7. Kareen was quite professional about her review. Even though she was scared it might affect her relationship with John yet she did not stop her from giving an honest review. John was also very professional by accepting Karen’s honest review about the project.

  8. To be a good projectmanager it is important to look at how a project can fail.karen and john were able to map out their options and weigh The chances of

  9. 1) Honesty

    Karen’s willingness to express concerns about the report’s validity.

    2) Transparency

    John and Karen’s decision to investigate the report.

    3) Accountability

    Ensuring accurate findings to inform the project’s next stage.

    4. Objectivity

    Seeking external review from a reputable global firm.

    The skills deployed are as followed
    Critical thinking
    Effective communication
    Collaborative problem-solving
    Ethical awareness
    Professional courage
    Analytical skills
    Research skills

  10. I give Karen a thumbs up. She demonstrated all the ethics of project management.
    She used the communication tool to solve the situation at hand.
    She showed Respect even when she was asked for a honest review and opinion.
    She researched on the possible solution to counter the issue they were facing at that present time.
    She had a great TEAM SPIRIT. She built a working team without hurting the Ego of anyone or making anyone feel incompetent

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top