Put yourself in the role of a project manager collaborating with MTD, an events company.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, what insights have you gained this week that could offer assistance?
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, what would be the consequences? Similarly, what are the implications of adopting an agile approach? If the company sought your advice, what would you recommend?
Contribute your thoughts and ideas to the discussion.
As a Project Manager, taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a Project Manager will accommodate consistent adjustments due to feedback which will enhance flexibility and feedback.
An agile approach brings collaboration, team work and quick solution to problems.
I would advise MTD to execute the project using both iterative and linear approach in order to be ready for any situation or occurrences as it arrives.
As a project Manager, I will understand the project in different angles and actually seek the project is heading to from the view of the MD and apply the VUCA frameworks to help the project scale to the next level.
Building awareness and analyzing MTD’s situations will help the organization to develop appropriate responses to the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects. The VUCA framework would be an effective tool for this.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, the risks would be mitigated on time at a low cost. Also, there would be effective communication and transparency among the project team and stakeholders.
I would recommend the use of Hybrid approach, incorporating the strong points of both the linear and iterative approaches.
As a project manager for MTD my approach will be to identify the problem and challenges faced by the organization, then apply the VUCA framework tools in order to develop a suitable response to the problems as identified. Also, I will apply the iterative and agile approach to tackle problems and challenges encountered along the line of implementation, while putting the budget into full consideration.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a Project Manager will accommodate consistent adjustments due to feedback which will enhance flexibility and feedback.
An agile approach brings collaboration, team work and quick solution to problems.
I would advise MTD to execute the project using both iterative and linear approach in order to be ready for any situation or occurrences as it arrives.
For MTD, considering the nature of event management, a blend of both approaches could be beneficial, I would employ the iterative method to carry out my company’s prerogatives and weigh all challenges using the VUCA method.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project allows for incremental progress and adjustments based on feedback. It can enhance adaptability to changing requirements and improve overall event quality. However, it may extend the timeline and potentially increase costs as changes are implemented.
An agile approach, on the other hand, emphasizes collaboration, flexibility, and quick response to changes. It could lead to a more efficient event setup but might require continuous communication and regular reassessment of priorities.
If advising MTD, I would suggest a hybrid approach, incorporating elements of both iterative and agile methodologies. This would provide flexibility while maintaining a structured framework, allowing for adjustments without compromising project timelines excessively. Clear communication and stakeholder involvement throughout the process would be crucial for success.
Be in a position of the Project Manager of MTD water distribution company; linear approach should be adopted while at the initial installation of the water infrastructure because the cost of the project will be determined during conceptual state which iteration approach should be apply for the distribution of the water; for timely and feedback from the stakeholders.
Given MTD’s role as a water supply company, it’s evident that they encounter specific challenges with stakeholders, particularly due to public scrutiny over water quality. Therefore, as an advisor to MTD, I recommend focusing on enhancing their people management skills, particularly through further training in communication.
Regarding project management, a linear approach seems appropriate initially, given the close relationship between water supply installations and construction. However, in complex projects, introducing an agile approach—a combination of linear and iterative methods—can effectively address challenges. It’s crucial for MTD teams to evaluate project nature and stakeholder involvement before determining whether to adopt iterative or linear solutions, as an iterative approach may not always be suitable and could lead to wastage of time and resources.
Based on my learning, i would deploy iterative technique to address the various challenges. Implications of iterative lifecycle would be that the outcomes would be in sprint, feedback would be faster, stakeholders would get project progress report in record time and solution would be in quick succession.
If I was approached to give a suggestion on the approach to engage, I would suggest a hybrid of approach, combining both linear and iterative so as to get the best possible outcome.