Put yourself in the role of a project manager collaborating with MTD, an events company.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, what insights have you gained this week that could offer assistance?
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, what would be the consequences? Similarly, what are the implications of adopting an agile approach? If the company sought your advice, what would you recommend?
Contribute your thoughts and ideas to the discussion.
Implications of iterative approach in a project
1. Flexibility of the process.
2. Improved risk management.
3. It gives room for improved collaboration among team members.
4. It allows for users and stakeholders’ feedback.
5. It ensures the output is of improved quality due to constant collaboration and reviews .
As a project manager working with MTD, I would suggest a combination of linear and iterative approach. The linear approach is crucial as it helps us to prepare in advance for the project. The project may begin with a linear approach while the lifecycle is adapted to incorporate the iterative approach. This is done by having an idea, defining the requirements of the project and then deployment. After deployment, the iterative approach can be introduced.
I believe this method would be beneficial as it:
1. Increases productivity.
2. Improve stakeholders engagement.
3. Helps to test ideas and learn about users requirement.
4. Accelerates delivery of project output.
5. Provides assurance for sponsors and stakeholders.
Being a progect manager I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
Given the obstacles faced by MTD as an event organizing company, it’s crucial to carefully consider the choice between linear, iterative, and hybrid project management approaches based on the specific environmental conditions and project requirements. Each approach carries its own set of advantages and implications, necessitating a thorough assessment to ensure successful project delivery.
Employing a linear approach for event organization can provide clarity, predictability, and progress tracking. However, it may be less adaptable to change and innovation compared to more iterative or agile approaches. Linear project structures are best suited for stable environments with well-defined requirements and minimal uncertainties.
On the other hand, adopting an agile approach could be beneficial for MTD, fostering collaboration, adaptability, and customer-centricity, which are vital in navigating the complexity and ambiguity inherent in many event organizing scenarios. Agile methodologies excel in dynamic and uncertain environments, empowering teams to effectively respond to changes and deliver incremental value.
In my opinion, I would recommend considering a hybrid or mixed approach that integrates elements of linear and iterative methods. The project management profession now acknowledges the value of leveraging both linear and iterative techniques, offering a range of methods and practices to address the diverse challenges and complexities of projects.
A hybrid approach would enable MTD to harness the strengths of both linear and iterative methodologies. The linear components could provide structure and predictability for well-defined aspects of event organization, while the iterative elements would facilitate flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement in areas characterized by higher uncertainty or ambiguity.
Ultimately, the choice should be driven by a comprehensive evaluation of the project’s specific needs, environmental conditions, and the organization’s capabilities and preferences. By embracing a flexible and tailored approach, MTD can effectively navigate the challenges of event organization and deliver successful projects that meet stakeholder expectations.
Considering the difficulties that MTD encounters, I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
Considering the difficulties that MTD encounters, I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will recommend the linear and iterative approaches becaus of efficiency based on the involvement of ‘sprint’ and agile methods
With MTD being a construction company its processes would naturally be drawn to the linear project lifecycle. With the indication numerous challenges, there is need to run a combine approach both iterative and linear. Before this is carried out, phases of the project should be categorized into level of priority as regards the customers, users and sponsors, and also on the basis of stability and instability to understand sections of the project that can accept both the linear and iterative approach. That way the Pm can attempt to avoid a scope creep or failure of the project.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will recommend the linear and iterative approaches becaus of efficiency based on the involvement of ‘sprint’ and agile methods that are being used to check and amend areas where VUCA occur.
CHINONYE DANIEL-UKAEGBU
COHORT 15
TEAM 3.
Osuji Mirian
May 10,2024@3:29 pm
As PM I will suggest the use of linear and iterative approach to be used by MTD, because it provide accurate and enhance quick delivery of the project carried out by the team
Considering the difficulties and problems the MTD encounter in projects, I suggest the combination of linear and iterative approach be adopted in their project, and ensures both approaches are appropriately utilized.
In an event where the business strategy and scope are likely to change and feedback or ideas are needed; iterative approach is best suitable for such event as project. Also, where the environment for the event are stable I advice linear approach be adopted.
My recommendation to the company is before adopting the iterative approach the business environment should be analyzed/studied for stability and instability. If unstable, I recommend Iterative or agile approach and there will be no implications or consequences.
Considering the difficulties and problems the MTD encounter in projects, I suggest the combination of linear and iterative approach be adopted in their project, and ensures both approaches are appropriately utilized.
In an event where the business strategy and scope are likely to change and feedback or ideas are needed; iterative approach is best suitable for such event as project. Also, where the environment for the event are stable I advice linear approach be adopted.
My recommendation to the company is before adopting the iterative approach the business environment should be analyzed/studied for stability and instability. If unstable, I recommend Iterative or agile approach and there will be no implications or consequences.