3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
Yes, they would react differently in a different context.
This is because,
Different problems have dynamic approaches that offers each unique solutions to them for the benefit of the organization while maintaining their codes of conduct.
I think they would have reacted differently in a different situation but still maintain the code of ethics as a project manager.
The goal in all three scenarios was to make sure that everyone was in tune with what the original purpose and goal of the project was. Also to see how to possibly overcome said setbacks so that the project aim is not completely lost and if the plus had to be pulled on the project, it would be done in such that a way that all the positives were not lost in the negative decision of being unable to see the project through to completion.
That said, they would react differently in different situations and here is why: not every project has the same deliverables and wireframe and as such the way a PM approaches different projects depends solely on their research and perception of the key decision markers of the project.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
I think if the situation were different they would react differently
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.