3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
The 3 P.Ms made their decisions inorder to achieve success in the project,to satisfy their customers and to add value to their careers.
I think they would probably make different decisions in different contexts because every decision made stems from the peculiarity of the problem,so yes the problem will determine the decision made eat every point in time.
What I noticed from the 3 Project Managers is that they encountered change while the project was ongoing in which every project manager will definitely be ready for such and when change occurs, definitely tough and precise decisions have to be made to sustain the project. If you noticed for the water project when the water was not going to be enough for the event ,the PM had to call the stakeholders so that they will collaborate, agree on the additional requirement for the ongoing project since it was not in the scope initially. At the end of the day, the change was effected and the client payed for the contingency buffer so that the event can move on as planned.
The lady PM on the other hand had issues with terminating project at an early stage. I like the approach she used in resolving the tough decision she will take which is knowing the negative and positive options of Cancelling or Continuing a project, which one is beneficial. Also after taking the appropriate decision, highlighting the lessons learnt after cancelling or continuing the project and communicating to stakeholders. This is vital because all stakeholders will need have a comprehensive information of what is happening in regards to the project.
The last PM who is talking about how he managed to collaborate with team members despite having a different language set but still managed to achieve his goal as a PM by simply ensuring that he perceives the stakeholders in the project and communicate accordingly.
In conclusion, Project Managers must be ready to adapt to change, make decisions inline with ethics/values/morals of the profession, communicate effective, and goal oriented
Well explained and understood.
You summed it all.
PMs have to be proactive in all aspect and be ready for any outcomes.
The 3 project managers are able to effectively do justice to there decision making when the time arised which is very pivotal for all PMs. PMs must be a problem solver to the extent of fearing to lose a project thinking of the capital invested and some manpower investment. Ability to make decision is a very critical skill to be embodied as a PM. Listen to your team comments and join it with your own opinion to arrived on a decision. And also communication is very essential.
All PMs should be problem solvers….. Should have answers to all questions and solve all problems well envisaged or not.
PMs should be proactive and always think on their feet as this will enable problems to be solved in a more proactive way.
The following were important to them:
1. Finding the way forward
2. Communicating with stakeholders & teams
3. Capturing lessons learnt
4. Making an unconventional but necessary decision
They would have acted in a differently in a different context because every project is unique and so is it’s challenges
Project management requires management of resources to bringing forward a complete project. Hence, with regard to the challenges posed on the 3PMs, I think they were able to successfully manage it while employing sufficient strategy. They were able to achieve this haven taken time to develop themselves in the field. It’s worth learning from.
The capacity to make judicious and pivotal decisions stands as an indispensable attribute within the arsenal of a proficient project manager. It is my firm belief that the three Project Managers (3PMs) admirably demonstrated their competence within the ambit of their respective projects, judiciously taking into account the prevailing circumstances, the information at their disposal, and an unwavering focus on the pre-established project objectives.
These astute 3PMs exemplified a plethora of attributes emblematic of effective project management. Their prowess in communication was nothing short of exemplary, ensuring that the project team and stakeholders remained well-informed and engaged throughout. Moreover, their meticulous attention to detail was apparent, guaranteeing that no facet of the project escaped their scrutinous gaze. What truly set them apart, however, was their remarkable prescience regarding potential risks and a profound understanding of the ripple effect these risks could have on the ultimate project outcome. Despite the adversities they encountered, they adeptly orchestrated a harmonious collaborative atmosphere, resulting in a mutually beneficial denouement for all parties involved.
It is conceivable that, had the situational landscape been disparate, the 3PMs might have adopted a different course of action. Nevertheless, their ability to navigate the circumstances at hand, adapting with sagacity, was noteworthy. In essence, their ability to make apt decisions in light of the prevailing conditions underscores their proficiency in the realm of project management.
Being able to make a good decision as a Project Manager is very important. And from my look the 3 Project Manager’s take the best decision at that point. For instance, being able to bring people from different parts of the country and being able to convince them, that was I good one. Secondly, Communication and also being able to deliver the project on time was also a good.
Decision-making is not always an easy one in project management. the 3 P.M made effective decisions which was beneficial to their team and the project goal. Communication is key, carrying your team along about the status and state of the project and inconvenience is greatly important too which the 3 P.M did
Ability to take critical decision is a very vital quality of a project manager. I believe the 3PMs acted well on their respective projects given the situation on the ground, the information available to them and an eye on the already set goals of the project.
The 3PMs displayed sound qualities of effective communication, attention to detail, keen foresight on potential risks and their corresponding effect on the final outcome of the project. Despite the inconvenience they were able to carry everyone along, so at the end it’s a win-win situation for all parties involved.
Perhaps if the conditions on ground were different, they might have acted differently but nevertheless they handled it appropriately with what was on ground.
In my own View, after listening to the three Project managers speak,
Decisions were made based on the circumstances surrounding the decisions to be made.
The most striking is effective communication in a clear and simple language to stakeholders
which is a vital key in Project Management.
Project Managers must be able to prioritize task, have a foresight and prepare for challenges
anytime they present themselves.