3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
Ethical constraints fueled by consumer satisfaction were apparent throughout the stakeholder engagements. The need to achieve the desired outcomes guided the discussions.
Would they have done it differently in a different context? I do not think so.
My reason is predicated on the guiding principles of my earlier statement.
Communication is important and how been applied when matter raise or technical issues like the water shortage to the building is important.
In dealing with a difficult decision, the project manager took into account the short supply of water and technical issues that could hinder the smooth completion of the task.
I think good communication, honesty, transparency and empathy can help a project manager to deal with most of the difficult situations he can be faced with.
The ability to communicate your decision clearly to your team and the why behind it, is a super power every project manager should have.
Effectively doing this with sincerity will always earn better support and outcomes in the long term.
Communication, collaboration with the team is vital in project management and also when any difficulties surface during the execution of the project
In project management, communication is very important, making a difficult decision can be really tough for the project manager.. However, the project manager will need to plan well and communicate effectively with his team member and clients.
Communicating effectively is all you need and care for
Dealing with difficult decisions such as terminating a project early, managing some sorts of contingencies and language challenge are very crucial to Project Management. However, this decisions are very important especially when there are technical reasons why the project is no longer feasible. Having a round table meeting with stakeholders and being able to convince them on why such decision is taken and discussing the way forward is important.
In situations where there is language challenge, hiring employees of diverse languages from different countries could be of great help. This can help in communicating effectively with clients who are unable to speak the universal language.
But would it be different if the reverse is the case? Although project Managers takes the lead in executing a project, but can also take decisions base on the opinion of the stakeholders, if it’s of good interest to the project. The ones with negative interest be discarded.
Facing challenges, particularly the daunting task of terminating a project, presents a formidable obstacle. Yet, amidst this struggle, I find myself drawn to the art of delivering unwelcome news with finesse, despite the inherent frustration it entails. Furthermore, confronting the ire of contractors and stakeholders is a truly immersive journey. It underscores the importance of maintaining composure, addressing issues with impartiality, and adapting to the evolving landscape of project management—even when the ultimate decision necessitates the termination of the project itself. Moreover, grappling with language barriers, particularly in the realm of international collaboration, unveils a fresh perspective that is rapidly becoming the norm. These encounters serve as rich learning experiences, offering valuable insights for navigating future endeavors.