3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
I noticed 3 important things about the 3 experts, the decision was the success of the project. They were focused on the project goals. They had their different approaches in solving difficult issues.
In difficult situations where there’s no straightforward answer or decision, the project manager has to ensure that the guiding factor behind his/her choice/decision is the success of the project. In different circumstances, different choices would need to be made while still ensuring the success of the project.
What was important for 3 experts in taking the decision was the success of the project. They were focused on the project goals. They had their different approaches in solving difficult issues. They were able to make the decision because of their transparency and clear communication with their teammates and stakeholders.
If they were found in a different situation, they will act differently because not all problems are the same, so approach cannot be the same.
I’ve learned from the three experienced Project Managers that a difficult decision often arises when there isn’t a straightforward, clear path forward. In such situations, there are multiple options available, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, as a Project Manager, it’s crucial to recognize that there’s always an alternative. Our primary objective is to deliver value within the designated timeframe or schedule, and navigating through these alternatives is a fundamental aspect of achieving that goal.
As a project manager, circumstances towards a project could differ but identifying the right strategy to approach them is relevant.
Basically, the ultimate goal of a project manager is to meet a success at the end, so each situation could probably have their own different way of sorting, and the PM’s ability to think like the teammates and the stakeholders could go a long way
One of the things that was important for the Project managers was the positive outcome of what ever decision they had to take, either aborting a project they just started or finding an extra solution to an already existing one or having to come to terms in communication with the stakeholders despite the disparity in languages.
The three experts all had different approaches to solving the difficult issues. And I think one of the general factors of the three is the ability to communicate with both their team mates and the stakeholders. As a project manager, we should be able to tackle difficult situations in a very calm way. Ability to compromise and be patient with team members is also essential. A project manager should also be honest, ensure you relay the reason for any change to both team members and stakeholders in clear term.
The experts’ decisions were influenced by the specific project context, including constraints, objectives, and external factors. Depending on different contexts, such as available resources, deadlines, budget, and market conditions, their decision-making may vary to align with the unique circumstances at hand. Flexibility and adaptability are key traits in decision-making, allowing experts to navigate various contexts effectively
Project managers have a unique approach in terms of decision-making. this depends on the current matter at hand. the three experts each had to make a difficult decision to continue or discontinue their projects. project manager should be open and communicate effectively to ensure the feedback collected can be of help in the next project.