3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
Before making a decision as a PM,I believe this three expert will have think very well about and put some things into consideration especially for the first expert who terminate a project but as for the language barrier from the third expect I think hiring hiring a language translator will have be the best option for that
These three team members exhibited strong work ethics, had a thorough understanding of their environment and project, and consistently delivered the necessary results despite facing challenges. They fully embraced the core principles and values of their project and organization, enabling them to effectively navigate and resolve any difficulties they encountered.
If a project is to be discontinued as painful as it may seem based on effort and input from team and stakeholders. As a PM first a careful reviews of all the reasons for and against and coming up with the right approach and explanations for conciliation is necessary. I have seen projects being delayed for a month for safety reasons were lives with be greatly affected. So yes a project could be council if it will cause more harm to the environment and the eco-system,which in turn will impact on health and cost of the project
In my point of view after watching the video, what is important to them in taking the decision they took was the flair to completing Projects. Considering time, resources, commitment and effort invested on the project.
These three individuals took work ethics into account, understood their surroundings and the project they were working on perfectly, and made sure to deliver the required results despite any obstacles in their way. They were able to fully integrate the principles and values that underpin their project and organization, allowing them to find the best solution for whatever difficulty they find themselves in.
From the video seen, the experiences of three experts who navigated difficult decisions in a project shed light on the critical factors in their decision-making processes. Each expert emphasized the significance of considering diverse viewpoints, gathering pertinent data, and assessing the potential risks and benefits prior to making a decision. These elements enabled them to navigate challenging scenarios and make well-informed choices aligned with their project objectives.
Reflecting on whether these experts would act differently in a different context, it’s crucial to recognize that decision-making is influenced by the unique circumstances of each project. While the fundamental principles of information gathering and considering multiple perspectives remain constant, the specific context, stakeholders involved, and nature of the decision can vary significantly.
In another context, these experts might adjust their decision-making approach based on factors like the urgency of the situation, resource availability, and stakeholder collaboration levels. They could adapt their strategies and processes to address the distinct challenges and opportunities posed by each project environment.
Ultimately, the ability to flexibly apply sound decision-making principles is essential for navigating diverse project scenarios effectively. By learning from past experiences and remaining open to adjusting their approach, these experts can continue making informed decisions that contribute to project success, irrespective of the context.
Communications
Transparency
Consistency in practice
Dealing with difficult decisions requires a thoughtful and structured approach that balances ethical considerations, practical implications, and the interests of stakeholders. First, gather all relevant information and analyze the potential outcomes of each option. Consider the ethical principles involved, such as honesty, fairness, and respect for others’ rights. Engage with stakeholders to understand their perspectives and concerns. Weigh the pros and cons of each choice, taking into account both short-term and long-term consequences. Prioritize options that align with core values and ethical standards, while also considering feasibility and impact. Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly and transparently, explaining the rationale to those affected. Monitor the results of the decision and be open to adjustments if necessary.
1. Before termination of project, one must weigh both the cost of continuing and canceling the project
2. A way must be created to overcome the language barrier even if it requires to hire a translator.
3. When the necessity is not available, the available becomes the necessity which have mostly help out in project management and completion.
4. It’s not easy to bring back the interest of members who have lost interest in an ongoing project but it’s very important to find a way to make them have a rethink towards the completion of the project.
From my observation they all had to seat with all the stakeholders to resolve the issues. The resulting dialog resulted in solutions. In another context they would still have had to dialog to result issues and make the tough decisions.
It was important to all of them that the focus should be on achieving the goal while trying as much as possible to maintain cordiality and effectiveness. Even where the project has to be terminated, it is still critical to keep the goal in mind and constantly align decisions and solutions to problems with the project purpose in mind.
In different situations I think they’d have acted in similar ways but the response would necessarily be tailored to the peculiarity of the situation.