3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
From Joseph Ikechukwu Onyeocha:
Certainly! The 3 Different people may react in various ways when faced with difficult decisions in a project.
1. The Analytical Thinker: This person prefers to approach decisions with a logical and systematic mindset.
2. The Intuitive Visionary: This individual relies heavily on gut feelings and intuition when making decisions.
3. The Collaborative Consensus-Builder: This type of person values input and consensus from others in the decision-making process. They might:
These reactions illustrate how different personalities can approach difficult decisions in distinct ways, drawing on their unique strengths and preferences.
I don’t think they would have acted differently because they have the interest of the project and would want to do what they feel is the best for the project. There are times you have to terminate and project and restrategize or start all over again this decision is always the hardest to take but necessary.
Also calling all stakeholders to determine the way forward is very vital. One just need to know which approach is best.
Nnadi Stella Chidinma
Team 7
As a PM, when faced with difficult decisions
1. Do not let your ego get in the way of communicating properly.
2. Go back to the goals of the project find out what went wrong and explain it individually to every member of the team and also have a general meeting for brainstorming to look for solutions and resolve the issues.
3. When there is conflict of interest, negotiate between parties and find common ground.
The Project Managers were more concerned about the best way forward. They kept their focus on the goal, why they are there, and considered what necessary adjustment, compromise and collaboration they could make to meet their goal. They maintained a positive mindset in any situation.
In a different context they wouldn’t act differently because of the values they have as Project Managers. For instance, the lady expert spoke about herself not allowing ego to get in the way of her negotiation. That value enabled her meet the clients need and she won the day. They all were purpose driven, not rigid, and solution oriented. The context might be different other times with varying challenges and decisions to make. But In any case, as project managers they have to find a balance that is guided by ethics, values and norms as they did in the situations in the video.
Given all the challenges faced by the project managers, their difficult decisions would not have taken a different route considering the lack of supporting resources. After thorough consideration by the organization, it became clear that language constraints significantly impacted project management. These constraints are a fundamental aspect of the challenges we face, shaping the decisions and strategies employed by the project managers
Reflecting on the decision taken by the experts, I would not have acted differently.
The goal of any project is for it to be completed, irrespective of the challenges be it the language barrier, unforeseen technical issues, low resources et. c. sometimes for a project to be completed, there must be compromise on the side of everyone involved in the project (from the project team to the sponsors and stakeholders) because it will be very painful if a project is to be canceled when time and resources have been invested in to.
The experts found it difficult to take the decisions they were required to take because they considered all resources including time, energy plus all things everyone had pit to ensure the success of the projects.
No, in different projects, given the same challenge they won’t act differently. Basically because they understand their roles as project managers and the demand thereof. They understand the importance of negotiation, which they applied and got results. They were able to adhere to the ethical expectations of the project, hence they considered the impact of the challenges on everyone directly or indirectly. They had to act fast to address the situations.
To me as a project manager, before taking any decisions at all on he or should also communicate with the team members.
And also think of what will be the the out come such decisions.
I would say i wouldn’t have acted any differently from them because one of the necessary characteristics a PM must have is negotiation. That is, they must be able to negotiate in order to get a win-win for the project and team
I would say, I wouldn’t have acted differently as the goal of every project manager is to see that all projects are done and that at the end of the day there is a win-win situation, and that stakeholders are satisfied. All three are centered on clear communication and transparency to the team as this is a core characteristics of a good project manager.
Reflecting on the decisions made by three project management experts in challenging situations and how context influences their actions, I don’t think they would have acted differently seeing that their aim was centered on
— Minimizing risks and ensuring the well-being and productivity of the project stakeholders(Team)
— Balancing Quality and Budget.
— Ensuring they don’t slack on the part of effective and honest communication.