3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
They endeavored to do one thing, which is to ensure that the goal of the project is met. They were empathetic, transparent, adaptable, critical thinking and restructuring to meet the time constraint.
In a different context, there would’ve been biases and a lot of personal adjustments would be employed to not deviate completely from the path of the project line especially where the Stakeholders have High Power- High Interest
EKEMINI EBONG
COHORT 17 TEAM 6
I reflect on the experts’ decision-making processes, I realise that they mainly focused on one goal, which is ensuring the successful execution of the projects. After the many problems they faced, the experts were able to navigate the complex project challenges by harnessing the power of:
1. Purposeful Alignment: Ensuring decisions resonated with the project’s core purpose and deliverables.
2. Empathetic Insight: Considering the human impact on stakeholders and adjusting course accordingly.
3. Resilience and Adaptability: Embracing changes, new experiences, and uncertainties with a growth mindset and adapting to new information.
4. Collaborative Synergy: Weaving together diverse perspectives, mapping out decisions with input from team members and experts. to create a myriad of solutions.
5. Values-Driven Integrity: Anchoring decisions in strong personal and professional moral values.
6. Data-Informed Curiosity: Exploring new frontiers with a curious mindset and evidence-based insights.
7. Transparency and Authenticity: Sharing decisions and rationales with vulnerability and trust.
8. Risk Management and Problem-Solving Skills: Analysing problems, identifying solutions, and mitigating risks.
9. Team Support and Empowerment: Foster a positive team culture, encourage ownership, and provide guidance.
10. Emotional Intelligence and Empathy: Understand team members’ perspectives, concerns, and motivations.
11. Realistic Expectations and Prioritization: Manage stakeholder expectations, prioritise tasks, and focus on high-impact activities.
In a different context, these experts might alter their approach due to:
Personal values and biases
Cultural and environmental context
Available information and data
Time constraints and pressure
Stakeholder influence and expectations
Risk tolerance and appetite
Emotional state and intuition
Team dynamics and collaboration
Shifts in organisational culture and policies
Economic and resource constraints
Technological advancements and innovations
Regulatory requirements and compliance
Unforeseen circumstances and surprises
Individual experiences and expertise
Power dynamics and authority
Resource Reallocation.
By recognizing and understanding these factors, project managers can adapt their decision-making approaches to different situations and contexts, leading to more informed decisions and successful project outcomes.
After listening to them all, what I realise is that they all want to achieve the same goal which is, making sure the project turns out successful. After facing all the difficulties, they were all able to find solutions to the problem.
What I observed from the three speakers was one main point: they each wanted their project to go on and to be concluded positively. So they each had a contingency plan, made compromises and collaborated with the people to achieve the desired result. Yes, they would have acted differently in a different context because they would have wanted to prove their points and carried out their own decisions, but as the Project Managers they are, they took good ethical decisions.
In my organisation and community the core values are Service, Fellowship, Diversity, Integrity and Leadership and these help me work effectively with others while executing a project
After listening to them all, what I realise is that they all want to achieve the same goal which is, making sure the project turns out successful. After facing all the difficulties, they were all able to find solutions to the problem.
Listening to the project managers in the video what i understood was that their main aim was to achieve their goals and give in a quality project.
The project manager would act differently on a different context because I believe every individual has a way of handling difficulty or challenges.
Reflecting on the experts’ decisions, we can identify key factors that influenced their choices:
1. *Project goals and objectives*: Aligning decisions with project outcomes and success criteria.
2. *Stakeholder expectations*: Managing stakeholder needs, concerns, and communication.
3. *Risk management*: Assessing and mitigating potential risks and impacts.
4. *Team dynamics and resources*: Considering team members’ skills, workload, and well-being.
5. *Contextual factors*: Taking into account the project’s unique environment, constraints, and opportunities.
6. *Ethical considerations*: Making decisions that respect ethical principles and professional standards.
7. *Long-term implications*: Weighing short-term needs against long-term consequences and benefits.
In a different context, the experts might act differently due to variations in:
1. *Project scope and complexity*
2. *Stakeholder priorities and expectations*
3. *Resource availability and constraints*
4. *Team composition and skills*
5. *Organizational culture and policies*
6. *External factors (market, regulatory, etc.)*
The experts’ ability to adapt and consider multiple factors would remain crucial. They would reassess the situation, weighing the new context’s unique factors and adjusting their decisions accordingly.
Key takeaways:
– Decision-making in project management involves balancing competing factors and prioritizing project goals.
– Context plays a significant role in shaping decisions, and adaptability is essential.
– Ethical considerations and long-term implications should always be taken into account.
this is detailed and helpful.
Thanks Livia for this amazing contribution.
It is detailed and explanatory
What I understood from the three expert discussion is; their sole aim was to achieve a goal and give in a quality project.
The project manager would act differently on a different context because I believe every individual has a way of handling difficulty or challenges.
Victoria
Cohort 17 team 10
A project manager would adapt their approach to achieve a goal in different contexts because each context presents unique challenges, opportunities, and requirements. They must be flexible and responsive to ensure the project aligns with the specific needs, constraints, and priorities of each context. This might involve adjusting their communication style, risk management strategies, resource allocation, or stakeholder engagement approach to optimize project outcomes. By doing so, they can leverage the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses of each context to achieve the project’s objectives.
Ibeh Chiamaka
Cohort 17 team 5