3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
Making decisions as a project manager is crucial as any decision made may favour the project or otherwise not. Therefore a project manager should communicate with team members on issues, listen to others point of view, evaluate all suggestions before making final decision on the project.
Three the PMs used expertise in project review, collaboration and communication to make the tough decision. Provided that the project progress is being reviewed continuously, and there have been communication flow across to all stakeholders, should there be need for such a difficult decision to take, the preparedness, reasons for conviction and juxtaposing the pros and cons through convincing communication could make the decision flies.
I don’t think they would act differently in a different context as much as the merit of the decision supersedes demerits or aligns with the objectives of the organization.
Three experts describe difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now reflect on what was important for them in making the decision. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
These experts described difficult decisions they had to make in their respective projects, and their reflections provided insights into what was important for them in making those decisions.
The key themes across these experts’ reflections include the importance of effective communication, collaboration, transparency, and adaptability in decision-making. While specific challenges may differ in different contexts, the underlying principles of ethical and thoughtful decision-making are likely to guide these experts in various project scenarios.
Expert One
Decision to Terminate a Project Early:
He highlighted the difficulty of deciding to terminate a project prematurely, considering the significant investment of time, effort, and commitment. The decision was prompted by an issue related to water supply conflicting with the venue’s needs during a major event.
The manager emphasized the importance of clearly outlining options for continuing or canceling the project.
A collaborative decision-making process involving relevant stakeholders at the right governance level is crucial.
Expert Two
Resolution of Water Supply Challenge:
The expert faced a challenge related to water supply for a major event and had to bring together various stakeholders, including Scottish Water, local maintenance teams, and organizers, to find a solution. Language barriers added complexity to the situation.
Collaboration and communication played a crucial role in resolving the challenge. The decision involved installing a two-inch connection for the event and building a contingency buffer for the venue. The client funded the contingency, leaving a positive legacy for the venue.
Expert Three
Management of Partnership Project and Stakeholder Relations:
The project manager faced challenges in a social care project with frustrated and angry stakeholders from partner organizations who felt let down by the County Council in the past.
The manager focused on aligning stakeholders by reminding them of the shared project goals. Openness, transparency, and a collaborative approach were crucial in managing the difficult situation. Compromising to meet the needs of stakeholders strengthened relationships and garnered buy-in.
Hello, the three pm took the right decisions. And each project has its own challenges and requires different steps to solving the issues.
A common theme for all three experts was communication. In terminating a project early, being able to carry your stakeholders along and effectively communicate the possibilities and consequences is important. In the case of the 2nd expert, communicating with the stakeholders was key to resolving the issue and finding a lasting solution. How well a PM communicates in a difficult situation will determine how successful such a person will produce a good outcome.
Concerning the other discussion concerning handling contradicting situations in the organization, I believe it can be mitigated by Encouragement, and Motivational words to the team to energize them to carry out the project successfully
Dealing with difficult situations require constant and effective communication. And that has a lot more work to do with the kind of language used in communication, so as to ensure all parties are heard, and we’ll understood.
In a different context, I believe the people in the video should act differently because no two projects can be the same. They can look similar, but not exactly the same, and so flexibility is required to analyse the situation on ground, and then act accordingly with discretion.
Dealing with difficult decisions in projects.
Reflecting on what is important for the three experts in taking their decisions.
In taking the decision to terminate a project early, the experts would likely consider factors such as resource allocation, cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and the potential impact on stakeholders. The decision would be driven by the project’s viability, alignment with organizational goals, and the ability to deliver value.
Regarding communication (language), it’s important for the experts to consider cultural nuances, language barriers, and the diverse backgrounds of project stakeholders. Effective communication strategies, including translation services or cultural sensitivity training, may be essential in such situations.
When dealing with the issue of no water in the project venue, the experts would need to assess the impact on project timelines, health and safety considerations, and alternative solutions. Contingency planning and rapid problem-solving skills would be crucial in addressing this issue.
In a different context, the experts might act differently based on the unique challenges and considerations of each project. Factors such as cultural differences, regulatory environments, and resource availability could significantly influence decision-making. Flexibility and adaptability are essential in responding to diverse project contexts.
I feel what was important for them was communication. And, Yes! I strongly believe they’ll act differently. It depends majorly on the sponsors. Should the outcome from the sponsors change, increased commitment to handle what looked like obstacle then a project manager would consider proceeding with such project.
Again we see stakeholders being carried along/communicated timely in difficult situation for negotiation. Collaboration with sponsors, team members project target cannot be overemphasized.
Decision making though vital in any project cannot or shouldn’t be done in a vacuum hence the laying of all cards on the table while leaving a tiny room for eventualities which in most cases are unavoidable. Every decision taken should get one closer to finish line. On the mind of every project manager is not to terminate before the job is done
Proper analysis of work to be done, who to do what, how to be done , time apportioning and imbibing all rules / ethics are important .
The possibility that the Project Managers will use the same approach is 50/50 as what is most important is ensuring that the job is done . Their personality could inform their decision ..
Finally the tendency to use the same approach in all project is minimal as the projects vary so will any Project Manager factor its uniqueness in .
Handling difficult decision in a project differs with different project managers depending on the nature of the project, the Project Manager needs to involves assessing risks, considering team input, and aligning choices with project goals.
The Project Manager also needs to communicate effectively with the team regarding any decisions to be made and should also seek support to achieve the preferred value and goals regarding the project. The stakeholders as well will be carried along any changes made in order for both parties to be on the same page.