3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)

Different projects requires different strategy and approach. Each project has it’s uniqueness and desicion to be taken when the need arises
Every decision that a project manager takes is tailored to the uniqueness of their project and I find that is still true when they have to make difficult decisions. Ultimately, they must consider all angles to try to sort the issue affecting the project by harnessing all of their communications and problem solving skills. If all else fails and the difficult decision is taken to end the project early, they must show that they have covered all angles and must then try to justify that early project closure is beneficial at some level for all stakeholders and that these benefits outweigh the disbenefits.
Ultimately, I drew from the video, the inference of having to develop a solution-oriented adaptation aptitude in the face of fragile and tough decision making as a project manager, when it seems situations or circumstances won’t give you what’s normally expected or ideally desired to play out.
In the face of critical plan-altering constraints that may threaten the accomplishment of projects with respect to quality delivery, time and client’s satisfaction, the onus lies on a PM to find creative or extra-usual way no matter how stretching, if necessary, reaching for a necessary acceptable and non-unethical compromise alongside with other project managers , stakeholders and team members to ensure that set goals are met and objectives achieved.
Ultimately, I drew from the video, the inference of having to develop a solution-oriented adaptation aptitude in the face of fragile and tough decision making as a project manager, when it seems you situations or circumstances won’t give you what’s normally expected or ideally desired to play out.
In the face of critical plan-altering constraints that may threaten the accomplishment of projects with respect to quality delivery, time and client’s satisfaction, the onus lies on a PM to find creative or extra-usual way no matter how stretching, if necessary, reaching for a necessary acceptable and non-unethical compromise alongside with other project managers , stakeholders and team members to ensure that set goals are met and objectives achieved.
What I noticed was important to each of them was the Desire to meet the need of their Clients and Also reach the goals of the Stakeholders.Diversity is an Important part of Project management since different projects requires different strategies their Decision would be Different in a Different situation.
Dealing with difficult situations require constant and effective communication. And that has a lot more work to do with the kind of language used in communication, so as to ensure all parties are heard, and we’ll understood.
In a different context, I believe the people in the video should act differently because no two projects can be the same. They can look similar, but not exactly the same, and so flexibility is required to analyse the situation on ground, and then act accordingly with discretion.
These experts described difficult decisions they had to make in their different projects, and their reflections revealed what was crucial to them when making those decisions.
The significance of effective communication, teamwork, transparency, and adaptation in decision-making are significant topics in these experts’ thoughts. While the precise problems may vary depending on the situation, the basic concepts of ethical and intelligent decision-making are likely to guide these specialists in a variety of project circumstances.
During decision making, would I act differently in a different context? I need to ask myself these questions and get honest answers.
While they were faced with a situation where decision making is important, they confidently aligned it with organizational objectives, emphasizing conviction and merit.
Their decision-making strength lies in preparedness and effectively articulating rationale, pros, and cons. Through persuasive communication, they ensured stakeholders understood the decision’s merit, whether it outweighed drawbacks or aligned with organizational goals. This consistent approach reflects a commitment to excellence, demonstrating that their decision-making prowess transcends specific contexts, consistently prioritizing organizational objectives.
I think for me, what makes you a good PM is the quality of your decision while being in a difficult situation as you are caught between the stakeholders and your team. make them see the difficult situation that the project is facing and It essential to always find the balance between making an informed and rational decision as well as keeping your team motivated for a subsequent project.