3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
Stopping a project half way may be discouraging to both the PM and the team members, in all Communication at that crucial time is essential.
The Project Manager needs to meet the project deadline in other to succeed, he or she needs to ensure that the project is a success by coming together with the team to work it out.
Their decisions differed because each had unique goals and project scopes. By clearly understanding these goals and carefully weighing the pros and cons, they could make more informed and cohesive decisions, ultimately enhancing teamwork and project outcomes.
Different problem comes with different solution on solving them. Communication and language is the 80% of resolving issues. Focus centre help you to know the right solution for a given problem.
What they did was weigh the pros and cons. Find alternatives to the problems. Avoid conflicts from both sides. Table compromises.
Depending on the situation they may take different decisions but their first response was to find a solution to the problem. Always the first thing they do. And in every compromise made someone has to take the responsibility for it.
In the experts’ examples, their decisions centered around three key factors: stakeholder needs, project goals, and ethical considerations. Each expert had to weigh these elements carefully to reach the best outcome.
For instance, one expert prioritized stakeholder needs when facing a budget cut, focusing on keeping communication open and managing expectations. In a different context, like a project with less stakeholder involvement, they might approach the decision differently, perhaps prioritizing cost-saving measures over extensive updates.
Another expert emphasized project goals, making a tough call to reallocate resources to critical areas. In a less time-sensitive project, they might have considered alternative solutions rather than reallocation, to avoid disrupting the original plan.
Finally, ethics played a crucial role for the third expert, who had to consider the impact of a decision on both the team and client. If the ethical stakes were lower, their approach might have shifted to a more pragmatic solution.
Omolara Idowu
The project managers had to make those difficult decisions to meet the project deadline and ensure the project’s success.
From the video, they would have acted differently in different scenarios because every project is unique and requires a unique approach. Every decision taken has its side of effect on the company and the PMs personality
Terminating a project before completion may result in sunk costs where the money, time, and resources already invested cannot be recovered. The project manager’s reputation may be affected depending on the reason for termination. If the project is terminated for valid reasons (e.g., misalignment with business objectives), the project manager may be seen as decisive and pragmatic. However, if poor planning or execution led to early termination, it could harm their professional standing.
On the other hand, Early termination may free up resources (budget, personnel, etc.) that can be redirected to more strategic or higher-priority initiatives. This can be a positive if the project no longer aligns with the organization’s goals.
To mitigate the adverse implications of terminating a project early, the project manager and organization need to adopt proactive and strategic measures such as clear communication with stakeholders on the reasons behind the termination, Offer support, and keep the team engaged and motivated for future success, etc.
A project manager should up his decision-making skills and ensure that it aligns with organizations goals and values.
As a project manager, it’s essential to stay calm and think clearly amidst a crisis. This helps you effectively rally your team and steer everyone toward a successful event outcome.
Their primary focus is delivering the project successfully. Despite any obstacles that arise, they remain committed to making informed decisions that ensure the project’s timely completion.