Hello, this module focuses on how to manage projects in a complicated world. The world is changing rapidly and in unpredictable ways. Just consider the changes caused by new technology, worldwide trade and competition, social and political disturbances, and the environmental emergency.
You might think that project management has little to do with these major global matters. However, all kinds of organizations, whether large or small, are impacted by the world they operate in. How a company understands and responds to this complexity influences the projects it chooses to undertake and how it handles them.
This week, we begin by examining frameworks that help us grasp this intricate world. These frameworks guide our actions, responses, and decision-making in the face of complexity.
Next, we delve deeply into various methods and practices for managing projects when faced with uncertainty, instability, and change. These methods include linear approaches and life cycles, often known as the waterfall method, as well as iterative or agile approaches. You will explore the pros and cons of these methods, as well as the ongoing debates about them.
By the end, you’ll grasp how to use and blend these methods effectively to achieve successful project outcomes.
To start off this week, we’re interested in hearing about your experiences. Considering those major global issues like technology, competition, social and political changes, and environmental problems, think about how they impact your organization and the projects you’re involved in.
Feel free to share your experiences with fellow learners in the discussion.
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
As a non-clinical oncology patient navigator with PM, programs coordination, and M&E experience, those global issues shape my projects daily.
Technology: WhatsApp/telehealth now lets survivors in Rivers State access follow-up without traveling to Port Harcourt. But poor network and low digital literacy means you have to budget for phone credit and training, not just clinic visits. Pure “waterfall” planning fails when tech adoption shifts mid-project.
Social/political change and environment: Fuel scarcity and flooding often cancel outreach clinics. We’ve had to cancel screenings due to conflict in the location for the outreach. We’ve also had to delay screenings due to increased cost of transportation, and that pushed me to agile buffers: smaller community events vs one hospital day, and real-time M&E to pivot locations fast.
Funding competition: More NGOs in cancer care means we iterate quarterly with survivors/clinicians to stay relevant, while keeping waterfall structure for donor compliance.
For me, project success is delivering outcomes even when context shifts. Waterfall gives protocols; agile gives flexibility for patient realities
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thinking about complexity in our world of today in delivery of projects
Is all about meeting up with the recent adopted technology and skill used which may be expensive but pretty good
If you are not learning new things in life and not growing professionally you will be out of use or irrelevant getting to know , understand and use new skills and new development in your project field is important but sometimes may be challenging being used to the old ways but new ways of doing things most times make work more perfect and easy
Today Global trends and challenges shape how organizations operate and execute projects. Effective project management requires adaptability, innovation, strategic thinking, and a commitment to sustainability to successfully navigate these changing conditions. however environmental and social responsibility still requires real stakeholder feedback.
so even though we adapt but we will be open to real report for effective and successful projects management.
In this week topic we discussed about how to effectively achieve a project successfully and manage a complexity of the project
This week’s topic hit home because of the XYZ overseas contract case we just discussed. Political/cultural complexity in that country led William to skip proper stakeholder engagement, while competition pressure made the firm want to “clear the way” quickly. At Amajo, our value of “decency” reminds us that technology and competition push us to move fast, but environmental/social responsibility means we still need real stakeholder feedback. That’s why I think blending waterfall for structure with agile for adapting to change is key — the world is too complex for just one approach.